Comments by "Drew Malesky" (@drewmalesky9869) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. * Russia was the only country with direct access to the dam * The dam was constructed by the USSR specifically to withstand a nuclear strike. * The dam had specific compartments for explosives to be placed, just in case it needs to be destroyed at some point *The dam was destroyed by an internal explosion. * Satellite footage shows the floodgates had been closed for weeks prior to intentionally raise the water level to unprecedented levels. Presumably to inflict maximum damage. Add all this together and there is only one real answer as to who did this. Russia. Edit: the Zbots are in full force to disinform and dissuade the public of the obvious. Mute them if you can.
    34
  2. MIC: Would you like to buy..... Poland: Yes. MIC: I havent said what im s.... Poland: Take my money! MIC: ok, but... Poland: More!
    28
  3. They wouldn't. The Zbot army are in full force to disinform this incident.
    24
  4. ​​​ @odinsrensen7460  No. Artillery couldn't have blown a hole of that magnitude in hundreds of meters of hardened concrete. A bunker buster (which Ukraine doesn't have) requires a dedicated bomber, which Ukraine has 2 of, and wouldn't risk that close to the front without protection. And you still can't explain away the floodgates.
    12
  5. Poland has GDP Per Capita 3/2 more than Russia. Poland has dedicated 4% of national GDP to military expenditure. Poland has endorsed NATO bases to be built within Polish borders to be used as an article 5 tripwire. Poland has technology sharing treaties with South Korea, Japan, US. It would be suicide for Russia to attack Poland.
    9
  6. * because of Russia.
    4
  7.  @missk1697  they won't. They just like to threaten it every Tuesday.
    3
  8.  @shaftoe195  Ukraine took a 1000km in Kursk in 3 days. It took Russia 4 months to take the equivalent amount of territory in Pokrovsk. Russians have been downplaying the Kursk offensive since it happened. But it's hard to deny.
    3
  9.  @conflictclips  "undefended" Really? Why was that? Did Russia believe they could throw stones, without stones being thrown back?
    3
  10.  @conflictclips  Russians seem to "not have expected" a lot this "special military operation." Let's hope they keep "not expecting."
    3
  11.  @conflictclips  my point is Russia has made blunder after blunder and you are still spouting the latest Kremlin talking points loudly and often. How many times do you need to be wrong in a row before you start rethinking the paradigm.
    3
  12. why do I feel they'll be outdated by the time they come out. Modern Warfare has not been friendly to current tank tactics.
    2
  13. ​ @stefanschleps8758 I know you're being facetious. But there are rivers of dirty money flowing through Lichtenstein. If Lichtenstein gets hit all the world's politicians and cartels would be raging.
    2
  14. ​ @limbus_patrum 😂😂😂😂
    2
  15. Poland knows what it's like to be invaded and occupied....never again. No wonder so much of their GDP goes to military.
    2
  16.  @Gravitatis  and everyone else gets to respond in kind.
    2
  17. Liar liar pants on fire
    2
  18. Is Zayne short for Zbot?
    1
  19. Russia rigged it to blow months ago. And due to their incompetence, blew it early.
    1
  20.  @missk1697  awww thanks
    1
  21.  @Gravitatis  ... as far as you are aware.
    1
  22.  @Gravitatis  or Maybe NATO has strategically placed Nukes in Poland, and all the Baltics. Who knows? Certainly not Russia. And Certainly not you.
    1