Comments by "Solo Renegade" (@SoloRenegade) on "Jordan B Peterson" channel.

  1. 35
  2. 24
  3. 14
  4. 11
  5. 5
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. quantum mechanics is nothing more than probability and statistics being used to GUESS what is going on when we are unable to physically measure things. To measure a subatomic particle (position, velocity, etc.), we use other subatomic particles, typically photons. Imagine trying to measure the position or velocity of one marble, by shooting another marble at it. the thing you are trying to measure has now changed. The marble you are trying to measure does not remain stationary, nor continue on it's previous trajectory, after having been impacted by the marble you are using to measure its position or velocity in that Moment in time. By measuring the particle in that moment, you have also changed its position and trajectory. This doesn't occur at larger scales simply because the thing being used to measure another is so much smaller that the forces imparted on what you are measuring becomes inconsequential. Things like "two states at once" is quantum mechanics using math and statistics to LIE to you. such states don't exist in reality, only a result of the math used to solve it. It is in a Single state, we just don't know which one yet is all, until we actually measure it. But it was always in a single state, we just are using probability to say we don't know right Now which state it is in because we haven't measured it yet. The wave function is a statistical equation, NOTHING MORE. Statistics is Not reality, it is merely a tool for analyzing what we both can and cannot see/know. when you measure the state, now you know for sure what state it is in, we no longer need statistical probability wave functions to Guess, we know now.
    1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21.  @NinjaRunningWild  "Many people reason emotionally & cutting through their beliefs is impossible on a logical level. " you defat those people by making them think it was THEIR idea. You have to be super sly and slowly and tactfully shift teh argument in a nonaggressive way, using their own arguments to slowly turn them, and then make them feel like they came up with it. But when dealing with College, science, math, physics, engineering, you beat them to death with logic until they submit. they CANNOT refute science an keep their jobs. There are rules to scientific debate, scientific method, etc. And you just have to constantly call out their logical fallacies, call out their errors in data collection and processing, cite your sources, show your work, do the math, etc. they can't refute cold chard facts. But you have to defeat them publicly. Others have to witness it. Others have to see in no uncertain terms that person is objectively wrong. "People might reluctantly agree in the moment because you’ve succeeded in making them so uncomfortable (INTPs are pros at this) that they just want the interrogation to end, then they’ll go right back thinking what they thought, feeling what they feel, previously, rendering all your intellectual heavy lifting moot. " Doesn't matter, when they give in, I've won. Doesn't matter what they feel nor believe afterwards. "People see what they want to see." 100% true, but if they are going to come after me, they are going to get a fight. And they re never prepared to fight someone like me.
    1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1