Comments by "Solo Renegade" (@SoloRenegade) on "GriffinMind" channel.

  1. 23
  2. 7
  3. 7
  4. 4
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8.  @BrideOfTheDawn  " women are the heart and soul of the home and the hearth. We are the home-makers and the pillars that support our spouses." Women Were, in the past. not anymore. Few women know how to be that person anymore. Few women these days know how they bring value to a home. If such women existed more often, society would be better off. But as you can see by the state of things, that is not where we are. " I am a college student with a perfect GPA. Straight A grades. " means nothing. I got straight A's and perfect grades too. Never been turned down by a college in my life. Even had a chance to got to Harvard on a full-ride back when only 30% of students even got degrees at best. But I can teach anyone how to get straight A-s today, not hard at all. But being book smart is one thing, practical useful smarts is another. I hold 4 degrees and attended 6 colleges. I taught at one of the colleges, and was offered jobs as a professor at others. I tutored and mentored students for nearly 20yrs in math, engineering, physics, history, etc. Most men can't keep up with me, less so women. But you don't need a degree to be smart, and a degree is NOT proof of intelligence either. Most college students these days are the dumbest people I know. the truly brilliant people are the ones who know how to think for themselves, and are able to debate deeply any issue, and understand all sides, not just their own viewpoint. But again, women can't be career women and homemakers at the same time. And men don't want career women. "But intellect is one of the few areas that we share equally." Scientifically false. Men are objectively more likely to be geniuses than women, but also more likely to be retards. Women lack the kind of drive and commitment men bring to scientific endeavors. Nothing wrong with that. If women brought the same drive, they couldn't be homemakers. A rare few women are very smart, but they are very rare, and not homemakers either. Hypatia is one I'm very familiar with, actually impressed you knew that one, almost no women I've ever met have even heard of her. "Emilie du Chatelet: a French natural philosopher and mathematician." ok, but I've never heard of before. I notice you failed to mention any significant contribution she gave the world to be worthy of mention. "And let's not forget how many women existed within the literature community. " i didn't ask about that. There are plenty of artistic women. But women can be artistic and homemakers. "But nevertheless, it does not change the fact that women do, in fact, gain more value the older they get. All human beings do." how so? I just fail to see what age brings for a woman who is not already married. Not all humans are valuable, or get wiser as they age. Some humans deserve death for their actions, others are lazy, some can never get any smarter no matter how hard they try. That's life. "Yes, the man may pay for the groceries, but he does not cook the meals." not exactly true, men have cooked for many generations. Most of the men in my family are better cooks than the women. " You cannot claim that women are ALL stupid." I never did. if you pay close attention you'll notice I never make such claims, other than to generalize for the sake of making a point/argument. That is just you projecting your feelings onto what I actually said. "And a home will thrive or crumble depending on the woman in charge." yes, if the woman is in charge, the home will crumble. " Furthermore, in today's society, it is no longer the case that only men provide for their families. ", yes, but do you know WHY that is the case? what changed to bring this about? "If a woman's value, to you, is in her womb, then you must surely see how the woman who has raised your children to be responsible, respectable, and contributing adults with thriving careers is far more valuable than the youth of a woman who may be young and pretty, but has yet to achieve motherhood. " there you go projecting on me again. trying to assume what I value. missing the mark and making no sense doing it. A career woman is of NO VALUE to men. Why can't women comprehend this fact. To men, young and beautiful is of value because of what it represents biologically and from an evolutionary selection point of view. And yes, studies that asked women how they ranked or valued men tended to pick older men (not OLD, but older as in 30s and 40s). "What do you, as a man, care more about? A pretty bimbo on your arm? Or a successful legacy? " wow, finally get nearly to the end and only now have you finally asked what a man values, after already proclaiming what you think he values. Don't you think it would have made Far more sense to lead off with this, rather than stand on your soapbox? The key to a good debate is establishing common ground and understanding, but you fail to do that and respond emotionally first. but, then you follow that up with the following, "Probably none. Because you don't seem like the kind of person that wants what a good woman can offer. You are so determined to see women as lesser than you. I do not know who hurt you, but it does not justify closing your eyes to the reality of the world." once again proclaiming to know what I think, what I value, and then resorting straight away to the tried and true feminist insult. this is the lowest form of debate their is. this is a true sign you have no actual argument hear, that you feel the need to resort to insults and projection. Whenever a feminist is losing an argument, or has no argument, the cookie cutter response is, "who hurt you?". it's childish and just proves my point about how intellectually incompetent most women are that they continually lean on logical fallacies to try to avoid losing, and to avoid hearing someone else's point of view, especially when it disagrees with their mantra. Men don't want feminists in their lives. "Good women, even of the modern variety, do exist. And for those of us who are decent human beings, many of your statements are cold, calloused, cruel, and downright untrue." Good women DO exist, and I know some of them, but they are not the norm, and they are rare, not enough of them to go around. But modern women are not good women. Yes, the cold hard truth can hurt, but hiding from it doesn't change reality. Some people just refuse to face facts. And these ideas are Not "untrue", they are scientifically backed. I thought you said women were equal to men intellectually, yet you're not helping your case by denying scientific and statistical reality. "If you treat every woman you meet like this, you might consider that to be a solid part of the reason you have a hard time finding a good woman." no, of course I don't treat very woman like this, just the ones who are cruel, selfish, narcissistic, feminists, woke women, and women who refuse to accept reality for what it is. Fortunately not all women are like that. But too many these days are. If women want to be Equal to men, then they better buck up and learn how to take it like a man. Because men don't get to deny reality and get away with it like women. Men get rude awakenings all the time, whether they like it or not. So women need to learn how to take it if they want to be "equals". But I'd prefer that not be the case. I'd prefer men and women accepted their differences, and that women stopped trying (and failing) to be men. I'd prefer it if women understood their value, and capitalized on that. but the modern woman doesn't know what that is or how to do it. What do I value in a woman? I could tell you if you were able to get off your soapbox of unscientific feminist lies long enough to hear an opposing point of view.
    2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15.  @stevennguyen4993  "These are not considered hobbies in a sense that you won't have much use for engineering knowledge and skills when you're working full time as an attorney for a pharmaceutical giant" not true. Engineering has been a hobby of mine for years, before becoming an engineer, and i still do it as a hobby on the side. I also dabble in law and political theory too. I've had multiple lawyers try to get me to go into law, one offered me a job too because he was so impressed. Understanding law can be extremely useful in business and such. I've put my legal knowledge to use more than once in more than one field of work (and again, offered a job as a result of those efforts, but turned it down). Aerodynamics and theoretical physics are additional hobbies of mine. As are history, with an emphasis on military history. I am also a skilled and proven tactician with combat experience in which I put my ideas to the test personally, with unmatched success. I am also an Airplane and Helicopter CFII. I was an Adjunct Instructor at a college for a bit. I was asked by three of my professors to become a professor of engineering, but I turned them all down. I have also been asked to be a history professor and a Math professor more than once each. I've made a passion/hobby of trying to teach math better to more students at all levels. I spent over 10 years teaching math to college students to test and refine my methods. Even college professors mistake me for being a professor when they see me teaching. Students think I'm a professor, and I've even had various other college staff mistakenly think I was employed by the college as a professor. I love teaching, but I have great success by doing it MY way, not theirs. Law, math, history, engineering knowledge, etc, all make me more adept at understanding business issues, and being able to better read the market, trends, evaluate risks, and understand cost/benefit, etc. Physics, math, and engineering all overlap. Engineers make good soldiers. Soldiers make disciplined workers and good leaders. I have many hobbies, from flying, to engineering, to history, to Math, to physics, to philosophy, to political/economic theory, to racing, to firearms, to military strategy/tactics/logistics, and much more. These are great skills. But so are leadership (military, business, teaching...), handwriting, communication (military, aviation, HAM radio, teaching, speaking...), negotiating, empathy, etc. if you can't see how such skills and hobbies have value, you are not fit to be giving others advice.
    1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1