Comments by "Solo Renegade" (@SoloRenegade) on "PBS Terra" channel.

@XERXESDOE you don't smoke hemp. and hemp has been relegalized for growing in some states.
1
@XERXESDOE wrong, hemp was historically a very widely used and relied upon crop in the US. it is not smokable, or rather, has no value for that purpose. They are two different plants. It was only banned due to its similar appearance and difficulty with enforcement if it was allowed to be grown. never should have been banned at all. Most people I know who call for it's reuse don't use drugs at all. they want it for it's practical applications, utility.
1
@XERXESDOE you're the one conflating hemp with pot smokers. I'm pro freedom. why regulate things that need not be regulated? I was agreeing with you and you got all butt hurt. Maybe do some self reflection.
1
@XERXESDOE oh, now you're resorting to insults (ad hominems). yes, aren't you so smart and mature....not. you're behaivng like a child. "Like I said, you’d be surprised with the things some people don’t know… you proved my point. " No, I'm not surprised one bit. how do you figure I proved your point? Hemp and cannabis a are of the same species, but different plants.
1
@XERXESDOE i saw no evidence from you that proved anything. Ihave no clue? about what?
1
@XERXESDOE Ad hominems can be called personal attakcs, I think "insult" is more the thing here. It has nothing to do wityh crying , it's about making an invalid argument. by resorting to insults, you are no longer making a valid argument. you're so emotional about this. people only behave like you when they're losing. you're so emotionally triggered by my responses, you had to respond 2x to my last comment. Two different plants, of the same species, are two completely different plants, yes.
1
@XERXESDOE no, I replied to one comment, before seeing you commented again. so I ended up replying separately. And yet you think that's some sort of a diss... "I’ve cited multiple paragraphs, you literally cannot put a link on YouTube comments anymore either. " you can use links. and yes, you've typed stuff. but refuse to list the titles and specifics of where you got that info from. Do they not teach citations anymore? did you fail school and never learn how to type a citation? Title, author, date, etc.? "Sorry you’re just wrong. Literally use google. Stop trying to argue something Google can disprove in under a minute." that's an invalid argument, you cannot simply assert something as true without supporting evidence. "if me telling you it’s shocking people don’t know stuff, the internet isn’t for you." you really can't read, can you? comprehension, it's a skill you lack. It means I already knew, hence not shocked. You might want to call up your elementary school teachers and as for a refresher in reading. "what makes the argument invalid? " Lack of facts supported by evidence. Lack of citation of sources for independent verifications of your claims. I have over 300 books on WW2 aviation history, and another 100+ books n aerospace engineering in my living room library. I've never come across the claim the FW190D9 was superior to the P-51 in any of my decades of research. So if you share your source, I can look it up and verify your claims. Feelings and emotions have no place in a debate about facts. Keep yours and your childish whining to yourself. "I just get the feeling you’re a very bored troll. No way you’re on the internet spouting stuff you can disprove with a single search." no, I stop people like you from spreading lies. If it's so easy to verify, then why can't you cite a Single Source to verify your claims?
1
I'd go inside until it passes. just like i do for a blizzard and thunderstorms (yes I've lived in many deserts around the world and been in many dust storms).
1
hot drought? maybe. worst in 1200yrs? no. The Dust bowl was much hotter and drier than today.
1
unscientific fear mongering.
1