Comments by "Solo Renegade" (@SoloRenegade) on "driving 4 answers" channel.

correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't a wankel have 3 combustion per rotation?
2
look at sleeve valve engines
2
sleeve valve engines are similar
1
chosing your level of personal safety is a core tenant of freedom
1
who cares what the displacement is and how it's counted? What matters is HP, weight, fuel efficiency, and nothing else. If it's lighter than equivalent engines, produces same HP, at lower fuel consumption, then it is a better engine. Nobody cares about how its displacement is classified. But only counting combustion cylinders seems fair to me, as other engines don't count their turbos either, and the extra cylinder is doing the same thing as the turbos (using waste gas to boost performance). More complex? how? 3 pistons and a simple turbo is no more complex than existing engines. Billet engine block has no impact on performance within the cylinders. it just holds things together. No big deal to make a cast version. What Mfg method you use for prototyping is often different from production due to cost and qty ordered. But they are functionally equivalent. you're nit picking and trying very hard (and very poorly I might add) at discrediting the engine. You take an otherwise good video, and finish it with BS nonsense.
1
11:27 because gov, in collusion with car corporations, have criminalized small simple cars. they don't actually care about emissions at all.
1
@youtubasoarus steam engines work completely differently, they are not trying to contain an explosion. Nor are they trying to compress a gas. They are merely using controlled expansion of gasses. Totally different operating principles. the best examples of sleeve valve engines is in WW2 airplanes.
1