Comments by "Elazar de Lusignan M." (@Elazar40) on "Is Organic Food Worth the Cost? | 5 Minute Video" video.

  1. This "analysis" is flawed. In addition to avoiding the detrimental effects upon health of glyphosate by a consumption of organic produce, the nutritional value of produce, grown in/upon minerally dense, microbially living soil, is often, but not always, greater than produce grown upon/in conventionally managed soils, which often have become minerally depleted. NPK, in terms of providing a nutritionally dense food is inadequate. The true measure of overall nutritional value, may be ascertained by its BRIX Reading, which measures sugar content and thus an overall mineral profile of each produce. Each item of produce has it's own Optimum BRIX reading. So nutritional value then, is a separate consideration from toxic pesticides and chemically limited fertilizers. If It's not in the soil, it won't be in the produce. Further, as a rule, healthy, unstressed plants will not attract nature's recyclers (insects). Accessible, absorpable dietary plant minerals are the building blocks of all organic and biological material, including the human body. The two pillars of nutrition are, enzymes and minerals, both of which are most often absent in a cooked and processed conventional food supply. Effectively, nutrition was sacrificed for shelf life and portability.
    1
  2. The current factory dairy system, stems originally from "brewery," or confinement dairies. Whereas modern pasteurized/homogenized dairy products, are detrimental to health, traditional, certified raw milk is, contrary to propaganda, both healthful and nutritious. See, The Untold Story of Milk by Ron Schmid.
    1