Comments by "Elazar de Lusignan M." (@Elazar40) on "Liberty vs. Licentiousness | Short Clips" video.

On the other hand, freedom is only suitable for an ethical and morally conscious people. To all others, freedom is forfeit, and supplanted by a false "liberty," or a "liberation" into, rather than out of bondage. Too often, in a materialistic world, the people come to prefer the counterfeit over the true.
14
@kevinss1969 To a large extent, what is "moral," is determined, and informed by design, function and process in duality. Whereas duality in nature is a function of natural law and an expression of Singularity as THE informing Source, man is also dual in the sense of spirit embodied. So insofar as man becomes an expression of the Singularity within time/space, he is morally "normal." When man adopts conventions in violation of the complementarity embedded within natural law, to the degree he does, he becomes discordant with nature as well as morally abnormal (immoral). So, our moral sense then, is grounded in natural law, or, the 7 laws of Noah. As for time? Time, can be either egoic/psychological, or an expression of, and an alignment with function and process. What is referred to as "bondage," from a psyco-spiritual perspective, is little more than a fixed, or limited condition within illusion. What is time? Time is the gift we are given to transform our minds
4
@iamchillydogg As a "last resort," the "sword of just defence," remains a moral option. Those who show compassion to the wicked, will persecute the compassionate. Too often, self-pity (egoic) is mistaken for authentic compassion.
2
@kevinss1969 Indeed, "argument" does suggest an egoic quality. In truth and knowledge, no "argument" is required. Truth, as well as authority grounded in Truth, is self-evident, and irrefutable. The Spirit always knows, and never slumbers. To be in discord with Spirit, is to also be in discord with Self. Namaste
1