Comments by "Шум Шумов" (@YaShoom) on "DW News" channel.

  1. FAL, you are trying to evoke emotions, not an objective analysis of the situation. But if they start to analyze, they will have to choose sides, which they do not want.
    4
  2. "Estonia being part of the EU gave me many amazing opportunities to study, live and work abroad" - 😂
    3
  3. He meant the Ukrainian Plain, which poses a danger to Russia, he does everything logically - if you cannot remove NATO, then you need to move the border.
    2
  4.  @margotgorske6986  That's right, the Russian people did not choose it, but they were not given the right to vote))
    1
  5. Is genetic mixing bad?
    1
  6.  @emilpersidski  I don't understand, why did you write this?
    1
  7.  @emilpersidski  And what about the ants?
    1
  8.  @SUSPICIOUSCABBAGE  Under this video, they denigrate the Russians, their history and actions - it is they who incite hatred, and I intercede and point out contradictions, mistakes and relativity. And why are you slandering me that I incite hatred?
    1
  9. But they also support Russia's policy of expanding Russia... So you are not logical. Yes, everything that does not fit into your opinion is insulting - it must be banned.
    1
  10.  @Irina-vy8qq  Why did your parents run away? Did someone stalker them? Kicked out?
    1
  11. The earth is neither round nor flat)))
    1
  12.  @protorhinocerator142  Situation: One country commits genocide. The second does not want to. Question: What should the other party do?
    1
  13. The sure way to deprivation of sovereignty is to become an enemy of Russia.
    1
  14. @kızgın tosbağa Hope. After all, Russia does not want to burden itself with joining - it's hard, but such people who scare the CIS countries with Russian aggression, on the contrary, provoke what they are supposedly fighting against. This is absurd... I admit that Russia wants to return Belarus and Ukraine (possibly Kazakhstan), but the rest of the countries are worrier about it purely for security purposes, and not for accession. These countries are too small to be interesting to join, but too dangerous if NATO sits there and provides weapons, exploiting the fears of the nationalist elites of these countries.
    1
  15. @kızgın tosbağa Yes, they seem to have not crossed, but simply do not want a conflict that will lead to the loss of sovereignty (which the first commentator wants). Russia does not need a conflict in which it will have to seize countries that it does not need. These countries do not want conflict and do not provoke it (so that they would not have to be senselessly captured). I’m just thinking and I can’t imagine why Russia might need Armenia, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Estonia, Latvia ... In general, all countries have no value for their capture, EXCEPT to expel NATO and the threat. As soon as a country tries to involve NATO, it immediately provokes Russia into active actions for protection. If a country does not introduce NATO troops into its territory, then Russia does not see any interest in this land (except that it simply trades and that's it - everyone is happy). But no, NATO, Turkey, Arabs need to constantly stir up conflicts in these countries, which have subsided for decades (Karabakh, South Ossetia, Chechnya). Naturally, Russia is afraid of all this at its borders.
    1
  16. This is not the case - the arguments can be found on two sides, and this argument is mirror-like: "Every country is fighting for the safety of its people." It’s just that Russia has more resources and was lucky, and Ukraine acted stupidly, knowing that Russia is such a strong adversary, starting to flirt with NATO and threaten it (and also bombing the Donbass for 8 years, instead of peacefully listening to the demands of the people who did not recognize the current junta of Ukraine ).
    1