Youtube comments of Shafqat Ishan (@shafqatishan437).
-
297
-
293
-
248
-
127
-
126
-
114
-
109
-
95
-
73
-
70
-
60
-
59
-
55
-
54
-
53
-
51
-
50
-
48
-
47
-
45
-
45
-
42
-
42
-
40
-
35
-
35
-
33
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
27
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
@genekalutsky8813 they killed 1.6 million of the 2 million that existed in the city at that time. They killed non combatants, women and children, carpenters, book writers, street beggars, ill patients in hospitals, even killed domestic animals. Tigris river was red with human blood for 3 days. The grand library of Baghdad was entirely burned, centuries of book and manuscript collections of greek, Egyptian, Persian and Arabian scholars of all fields of knowledge including math, science, history, philosophy, literature etc has been lost forever.
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
@mdi786 No, Alauddin came much later, he only faught weaker Chaghtai Khanate. Chenghis Khan didn't attack delhi mainly because of 3 reasons- 1st, the Shah of Delhi didn't give refuge to Jalaluddin Khwarijmi who was at war against mongols, so it was a respectful gesture, second it was hot and humid weather that was uncomfortable for Mongols, and 3rd reason, as great and rich as Delhi was back then, it was still nothing compared to Baghdad, Bukhara, Samarkhand, Aleppo etc which were their main targets which they achieved.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@bigrez005 no pal, everything you stated is false. I did my studies very well. 1st of all by faster I meant agility not running speed. Tigers paw swipes are slightly faster than lions and they strike with greater speed. 2ndly there's no such thing as 2nd fastest bigcat, cougars and Siberian tigers have also been claimed to reach 50mph on short bursts, lionesses do match that speed but male lions' running speed is quite slower, however according to most big cat experts tigers, lions, leopards and cougars all have similar top speed about 40mph, greater than that is mere overestimation. Running speed of an animal is useless in combat anyway, still male tigers are faster than male lions and it is an obvious fact. Now when it comes to aggression, it is a well known fact that tigers are the most aggressive of all bigcats, ask any wildlife biologists or animal experts, you'll get the same opinion. The claims you're putting here based on some captive animals doesn't have any credibility at all, I can also tell you incidents about captive tigers dominating and chasing off lions which happens on regular basis but it's pointless because wild animals acts differently than captives. As for Mufasa, he's a strong powerful lion and a true king, there's no doubt about that, but Shere Khan is just way out of his league, maybe against a regular tiger he can put up a good fight.
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@Souljaboy68-m8e not a chance. Servals are nowhere near the built of a cougar. They're long legged, thin necked and built for stealth in the bush. It is very narrowly built. Cheetahs are also very thin, similar to serval, but they are stronger with bigger bite force compared to most other cats at their size. Servals take insects, shrews, rats, snakes, bird etc. They're not built to fight equal size animal. Never seen or heard of a serval killing anything bigger than them, and trust me I've been watching and researching about animals for years now. Cheetahs kill gazelles, impala, topi, hartebeest, wildebeest, nyala, kudu, oryx, ostrich etc.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@bigrez005 lion paw strikes are stronger compared to tigers of equal weight but generally Bengal and Siberian tigers are much larger and have a stronger swipe. The numbers are close anyway and either can deliver killing blows to the other just as easily. Tigers don't run away always, lions also run away most often then not. Other than territorial fights between males of same species, all bigcats run from other predators, and tigers are larger so if lions don't have numbers they will run from tigers. Tigers and lions have been pitted against each other throughout the history, in Roman Colosseum, also by Indian kings and by many more, tigers and lions have also faught and killed each other many times in circuses, zoos, captive breeding facilities and more, and the statistic is pretty clear and is now a universally known fact, and that is Tigers win against lions 99% of the time in 1 on 1 fights. At equal weight it's 50-50 but generally tigers are larger and more powerful. Just Google bro.
As for Shere Khan, he faught off almost the entire forest of animals specially Baloo, Baghira and the wolfpack to get to Mowgli who himself is no slouch. Khan is larger and stronger than all tigers, he's a vengeful man-eater who has wiped out many human villages and travellers, his smartness even outmatches many village intellects and hunters, he has out-foxed everyone and even known to disappear in bushes and shadows, he couldn't kill Mowgli because the boy had the spirit of the jungle and true humanity, and was destined to end the terror of Khan. Mufasa on the other hand was the greatest king of the pridelands, but was a flawed hero, it was easy for scar to manipulate and entrap him using simba, Shere khan is a far deadlier and smarter villain than scar but as a tiger naturally he's stronger than any lion, he is even more powerful than all tigers and has unnatural feats. Now do your math. Don't let your favoritism cloud your judgment. This is no competition. Fanboyism has no place in reality.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Surah Adh-Dhariyat
Al-Qur'an - Chapter 51 - سورةالذاريات - The Winnowing Winds (Verses: 1 - 23)
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
In the name of Allah, the Merciful, the Compassionate.
وَٱلذَّٰرِيَـٰتِ ذَرْوًۭا ١
(I swear) By the winds that scatter (dust) (far and wide),
فَٱلْحَـٰمِلَـٰتِ وِقْرًۭا ٢
Then those (clouds) bearing load (loaded with rain),
فَٱلْجَـٰرِيَـٰتِ يُسْرًۭا ٣
Then those (ships) sailing with ease,
فَٱلْمُقَسِّمَـٰتِ أَمْرًا ٤
Then those (angels) distribute (blessings) by Our command!
إِنَّمَا تُوعَدُونَ لَصَادِقٌۭ ٥
(Indeed) What you are promised (threatened with) is (most surely) true,
وَإِنَّ ٱلدِّينَ لَوَٰقِعٌۭ ٦
And the Judgment will certainly come about,
وَٱلسَّمَآءِ ذَاتِ ٱلْحُبُكِ ٧
And by the heavens with their (numerous) pathways,
إِنَّكُمْ لَفِى قَوْلٍۢ مُّخْتَلِفٍۢ ٨
Surely you are (lost) in conflicting views (with each other),
يُؤْفَكُ عَنْهُ مَنْ أُفِكَ ٩
Only those who turn away from it (the Qur'an) are (truly) deceived.
قُتِلَ ٱلْخَرَّٰصُونَ ١٠
Cursed are the liars—
ٱلَّذِينَ هُمْ فِى غَمْرَةٍۢ سَاهُونَ ١١
Those who are in a flood (of ignorance), totally heedless.
يَسْـَٔلُونَ أَيَّانَ يَوْمُ ٱلدِّينِ ١٢
They ask, “When is this Day of Judgment?”
يَوْمَ هُمْ عَلَى ٱلنَّارِ يُفْتَنُونَ ١٣
The day (on which) they shall be tried at the fire.
ذُوقُوا۟ فِتْنَتَكُمْ هَـٰذَا ٱلَّذِى كُنتُم بِهِۦ تَسْتَعْجِلُونَ ١٤
“Taste your torment! This is what you were seeking to hasten.”
إِنَّ ٱلْمُتَّقِينَ فِى جَنَّـٰتٍۢ وَعُيُونٍ ١٥
Indeed, the righteous will be amidst Gardens and springs,
ءَاخِذِينَ مَآ ءَاتَىٰهُمْ رَبُّهُمْ ۚ إِنَّهُمْ كَانُوا۟ قَبْلَ ذَٰلِكَ مُحْسِنِينَ ١٦
(Joyously) Receiving what their Lord will grant them. Before this they were (truly) good-doers
كَانُوا۟ قَلِيلًۭا مِّنَ ٱلَّيْلِ مَا يَهْجَعُونَ ١٧
They used to sleep only a little in the night,
وَبِٱلْأَسْحَارِ هُمْ يَسْتَغْفِرُونَ ١٨
and pray for forgiveness before dawn.
وَفِىٓ أَمْوَٰلِهِمْ حَقٌّۭ لِّلسَّآئِلِ وَٱلْمَحْرُومِ ١٩
And in their wealth was a rightful share for the beggar and the deprived.
وَفِى ٱلْأَرْضِ ءَايَـٰتٌۭ لِّلْمُوقِنِينَ ٢٠
And on earth are signs for those with sure faith,
وَفِىٓ أَنفُسِكُمْ ۚ أَفَلَا تُبْصِرُونَ ٢١
And within yourselves (too); then will you not see?
وَفِى ٱلسَّمَآءِ رِزْقُكُمْ وَمَا تُوعَدُونَ ٢٢
And in the heaven is your provision and whatever you are promised.
فَوَرَبِّ ٱلسَّمَآءِ وَٱلْأَرْضِ إِنَّهُۥ لَحَقٌّۭ مِّثْلَ مَآ أَنَّكُمْ تَنطِقُونَ ٢٣
Then by the Lord of the heavens and the earth! Indeed this is surely truth (just as sure) as you (can) speak!
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@Luke-md7up history is based on limited interpretation of limited findings of limited people, so talking history here really isn't a good point. There are also many historians who has suggested that Mecca was initially a place of worship where there was no idols and no pagan people existed. In Islam the Kaba was the first place of worship build by either Adam(A) or by the Angels at the order of Alllah(SWT) of course, later it was lost in time. Later it was rebuilt by Ibrahim(A) and his son Ismail(A), the descendants of Ismail(A) was monotheist(muslims) but later they lost the guardianship of the Kaba and it was taken over by other Arab tribes among whom pagan practices began, which reached extreme level during the arrival of the final prophet. Muhammad(S) retook it's control and restored it as the grand mosque of worship to the one and only God- Alllah(SWT). Quran is proven correct by both history, science and every ground of study that ever existed many times over, you just need to do more research. Some historical study and scientific theory can sometimes go against some interpretation of Quran but not the actual text itself because it is written in such a way which unless you know the context of the verse you're interpreting you can misunderstand or mislead people. Besides historical studies and science keep changing all the time so trying to judge a devine book with the ground of limited human studies is nothing but foolishness. I suggest you read these books- "Bible, Quran And Science" by Maurice Bucaille, "The Devine Reality" by Hamza Tzortzis, and "Lost Islamic History" by Firas Alkhateeb, and Of course read the Quran Itself, there's this translation called- "The Clear Quran" which is one of the best and you can collect it for free from any islamic dawah people.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Chris-xt8em there is no evidence from history to point out clearly at what age mother Aisha (RA) was married to our prophet (pbuh). Still argument sake I suppose that the age was 6. The reason; It was prophecied by angel Gabriel (AW) in God's to command, to our prophet (SAW) that Aisha (RA) would be our prophet's wife in Earth life and in Paradise and would be the brightest of them all. She indeed was very intelligent and had very sharp wit and memory. She described 2nd most numbers of hadith (teachings of our prophet) which to this day is valuable for true muslims who read and follow them. If the age was indeed 6 then the marriage was finalized when she was 9. Do some medical research, the minimal age at which a woman can mature is the age of 9, though it doesn't happen for all women, God definitely knew whom He chose for our prophet. Most Arab women till this day do mature faster, though with today's so called modern age and social system it is rarer. And guess what, she didn't bear any children, in fact none of our prophet's later wives did. When Muhammad (SAW) started preaching islam the disbelivers offered to bribe him with countless things including large amount of money women, they even swore to give him the most beautiful woman from Arabia but he refused. Years before at the age of 25 he married a woman namely Khadija (RA) 15 years older than him who was married before more than once and had children, and he didn't marry anyone else at the time he was married to her, and had a happily married life for 25 years until her death. All of his later 10 (no more than that number is true) marriages were for either political or ethical decisions and was ordered by God himself, and happend after he was past his 50. I understand for unbelievers of islam like you how this will look to you at first glance, but if you try to see from a believer's perspective you'll understand it. Instead of focusing on how many marriages he had or how many wars he had to go to, focus on why those happened and what was his teachings for humanity throughout his life. If you still don't like our prophet then fine, keep it to yourself, don't go around spreading hate or attacking us his followers who love him more than our own lives. Would you like it if I call your parents or loved ones anything or questioning about stuff without knowing the inside story about it? We love Alllah (SWT) and our prophet more than even our family and loved ones. If you want to know more about Aisha (RA) then just watch the other video of Leslie Hazelton herself about her.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This video is so biased and retarded! You assumed Britain abd France would go independent anyway but no rise of Islam, to a point you totally even say our prophet wouldn't have been born either?! Showing an artwork of our prophet as well, which if anyone know anything about our faith, it's hugely disrespectful! According to our belief, no matter what alternate timeline, prophet Muhammad(S) was meant to be born and to be the final messenger of Alllah. Even if you don't agree with the last part because of your own belief at least you should acknowledge his existence and influence which's rise of Islam. But no, you chose to indirectly call us liars with this video. There's no doubt you're an islamophobe and jealous of the success of Muslim dynasties. Another lie you told in this video was that North Africa was prosperous during Roman era, where's in reality those were mostly barren lands with some military outposts, some farming villages and isolated towns with limited goods, and only Egypt under Rome was some what prosperous that too because of being an important trade center which Rome had no hand in building. Under islamic rules the entire North Africa become prosperous and meaningful, until the British and French colonizers destroyed mostly everything. Get your facts straight and learn history with two eyes instead of one. Every Muslim should dislike this video, unsubscribe and leave. Let the haters have their fun...
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Such biased list! If it was based on territory then why mix it up with those which had much smaller territory? This guy is obviously an islamophobe, otherwise no historian would deny that Arab Caliphate was number one not just in Asian history but also the whole world. No one else ruled nearly as justly and prosperously over such a vast territory as them. Their social, political, cultural, scientific influence is unmatched in history. Mongols did conquer larger territory but they could only hold on to them for only a couple of centuries and they had very little social or cultural influence in history. Using the excuse that they have more descendants today is the lamest excuse, it has no logic whatsoever. As for the Ottomans, they had little to do with Asia. Their capital was in Europe, most of their territories were in Europe, and their most political affairs were of Europe as well. Also not listing the Sassanids exposed the ignorance of the admin. Even they would rank higher than mongols if it was considered based on social, political, cultural influence over the world in long term.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Souljaboy68-m8e Tallest cheetahs are 90 to 94 cm, tallest cougars 85 to 90 cm, leopards 74 to 80 cm, jaguars 70 to 85 cm, servals 45 to 66 cm tall at the shoulder. African male leopards from Savannah regions average 60kg, males from forest regions 65 kg, from cape coast 32 kg only, male Arabian leopards 30 kg. The extinct North African Barbary leopards were huge, they used to have almost similar length to Atlas lions, so imagine their weight. There's not a single record of a 110kg leopard from any other region. Leopards max weight is indeed no more than 80 kg, 90 kg is extremely rare individuals, 100 kg+ is only 1 or 2 historic accounts which can never happen anymore bcz of significant population and habitat decrease. Persian and Anatolian leopards are not bigger, they're only 56kg avg and 76kg max. They're more robustly built than africans but not larger at all, In fact they're the most robustly built subspecies of leopards, but on average they're smaller than many wild leopards of india (50kg avg but 78kg max) and Sri Lanka (55kg avg, 77kg max. As for cougars, their avg weight is greater than leopards, their max weight is 90 kg, rare extreme individual males from Northern ranges can be 100-120kg but still unlikely nowadays. only the largest male ever recored was a 125kg male, it was historic and it can not be counted. Similarly you cannot count lions over 250kg or tigers over 300kg to be the normality anymore. Bigcats in the wild has shrunk in size bcz of lack of habitat and resources.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Surah Adh-Dhariyat
Al-Qur'an - Chapter 51 - سورةالذاريات - The Winnowing Winds (Verses: 1 - 23)
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
In the name of Allah, the Merciful, the Compassionate.
وَٱلذَّٰرِيَـٰتِ ذَرْوًۭا ١
(I swear) By the winds that scatter (dust) (far and wide),
فَٱلْحَـٰمِلَـٰتِ وِقْرًۭا ٢
Then those (clouds) bearing load (loaded with rain),
فَٱلْجَـٰرِيَـٰتِ يُسْرًۭا ٣
Then those (ships) sailing with ease,
فَٱلْمُقَسِّمَـٰتِ أَمْرًا ٤
Then those (angels) distribute (blessings) by Our command!
إِنَّمَا تُوعَدُونَ لَصَادِقٌۭ ٥
(Indeed) What you are promised (threatened with) is (most surely) true,
وَإِنَّ ٱلدِّينَ لَوَٰقِعٌۭ ٦
And the Judgment will certainly come about,
وَٱلسَّمَآءِ ذَاتِ ٱلْحُبُكِ ٧
And by the heavens with their (numerous) pathways,
إِنَّكُمْ لَفِى قَوْلٍۢ مُّخْتَلِفٍۢ ٨
Surely you are (lost) in conflicting views (with each other),
يُؤْفَكُ عَنْهُ مَنْ أُفِكَ ٩
Only those who turn away from it (the Qur'an) are (truly) deceived.
قُتِلَ ٱلْخَرَّٰصُونَ ١٠
Cursed are the liars—
ٱلَّذِينَ هُمْ فِى غَمْرَةٍۢ سَاهُونَ ١١
Those who are in a flood (of ignorance), totally heedless.
يَسْـَٔلُونَ أَيَّانَ يَوْمُ ٱلدِّينِ ١٢
They ask, “When is this Day of Judgment?”
يَوْمَ هُمْ عَلَى ٱلنَّارِ يُفْتَنُونَ ١٣
The day (on which) they shall be tried at the fire.
ذُوقُوا۟ فِتْنَتَكُمْ هَـٰذَا ٱلَّذِى كُنتُم بِهِۦ تَسْتَعْجِلُونَ ١٤
“Taste your torment! This is what you were seeking to hasten.”
إِنَّ ٱلْمُتَّقِينَ فِى جَنَّـٰتٍۢ وَعُيُونٍ ١٥
Indeed, the righteous will be amidst Gardens and springs,
ءَاخِذِينَ مَآ ءَاتَىٰهُمْ رَبُّهُمْ ۚ إِنَّهُمْ كَانُوا۟ قَبْلَ ذَٰلِكَ مُحْسِنِينَ ١٦
(Joyously) Receiving what their Lord will grant them. Before this they were (truly) good-doers
كَانُوا۟ قَلِيلًۭا مِّنَ ٱلَّيْلِ مَا يَهْجَعُونَ ١٧
They used to sleep only a little in the night,
وَبِٱلْأَسْحَارِ هُمْ يَسْتَغْفِرُونَ ١٨
and pray for forgiveness before dawn.
وَفِىٓ أَمْوَٰلِهِمْ حَقٌّۭ لِّلسَّآئِلِ وَٱلْمَحْرُومِ ١٩
And in their wealth was a rightful share for the beggar and the deprived.
وَفِى ٱلْأَرْضِ ءَايَـٰتٌۭ لِّلْمُوقِنِينَ ٢٠
And on earth are signs for those with sure faith,
وَفِىٓ أَنفُسِكُمْ ۚ أَفَلَا تُبْصِرُونَ ٢١
And within yourselves (too); then will you not see?
وَفِى ٱلسَّمَآءِ رِزْقُكُمْ وَمَا تُوعَدُونَ ٢٢
And in the heaven is your provision and whatever you are promised.
فَوَرَبِّ ٱلسَّمَآءِ وَٱلْأَرْضِ إِنَّهُۥ لَحَقٌّۭ مِّثْلَ مَآ أَنَّكُمْ تَنطِقُونَ ٢٣
Then by the Lord of the heavens and the earth! Indeed this is surely truth (just as sure) as you (can) speak!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@vishnuvenu5045 same can be asked for tigers, but being apex predator has nothing to do with eating other predators. Tigers kill and eat bears, crocodlies, leopards, lynxes, dholes and wolves. Jaguars do the same to anacondas, caimans, giant otters, turtles, boas, spectacled bears, pumas, ocelots, margays etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@UsefulCharts Such biased list! If it was based on territory then why mix it up with those which had much smaller territory? You're obviously an islamophobe, otherwise no historian would deny that Arab Caliphate was number one not just in Asian history but also the whole world. No one else ruled nearly as justly and prosperously over such a vast territory as them. Their social, political, cultural, scientific influence is unmatched in history. Mongols did conquer larger territory but they could only hold on to them for only a couple of centuries and they had very little social or cultural influence in history. Using the excuse that they have more descendants today is the lamest excuse, it has no logic whatsoever. As for the Ottomans, they had little to do with Asia. Their capital was in Europe, most of their territories were in Europe, and their most political affairs were of Europe as well. Also not listing the Sassanids exposed the ignorance of the admin. Even they would rank higher than mongols if it was considered based on social, political, cultural influence over the world in long term.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@soulboygabicci5681 there's no such thing as different Quran. There's only one and only one Quran and it's unchanged. If you don't believe then you can read from all the groups of Muslim divisions you mentioned, all has the same Quran no difference. It's still a shame that there's so many division among Muslim people since it's been forbidden by our prophet himself not to get divided, alas most Muslims nowadays don't follow, they're too busy fighting between themselves and with others. All the divisions you mentioned are made because of political propaganda between Muslims in different ages, but slight change of belief cannot overrule the original source that's unchanged and will always be that way. As for christians they also have divisions such as catholic, Protestants, orthodox etc, but aint they all Christians? And there's no successor of prophet Muhammad (SAW), He's the last of the messengers of Alllah, if anyone say otherwise then s/he isn't a Muslim. Adam, Seth, Noah, Abraham, Lot, Isaac, Ishmail, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, Aron, Jonah, David, Solomon, Eliah, Zachary, John, Jesus etc all were also prophets and messengers of Alllah according to our beliefs. If you don't want to believe what we believe then that's fine. Be a Christian, be a jew, be hindu or a buddhist or be an atheist, all fine with us. but please do not disrespect eachothers belief just because of some bad people who exist in all the religious and nonreligious groups. If you wanna do logical debate that's fine too but again there's a line nobody should cross. Disrespecting other people's beliefs is not what good and educated people do. Darwin himself respected other people's belief, so did all the famous scientists, historians and all the great personalities of the history. So please for the sake of humanity don't provoke religious groups just because their belief seem absurd to you, because quite normally your own beliefs are looked at the same way by them. If you wanna prove them wrong, try nicely with logic and knowledge.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I love Biology, I love wildlife, I love paleontology, I love Astronomy, I love history, I love archeology, I love mythology, I love sports, I love movies, I adventure and traveling, still I love and follow my religion.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1