Comments by "bobby hans" (@user-oc7ll9sv5r) on "Jake Broe"
channel.
-
52
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
There is a reason why the Soviet Union, nor any nuclear power, never launched a first strike (nuclear attack) since Word War 2, despite all of the Cold War fears that the Soviets would. And it’s because you can't launch a first strike without being annihilated in the second strike. We need to understand that that some ppl. probably do not realizing the Russians like the Soviets can be trusted to act in the best self-interests...which mutually assured destruction is clearly against... and that the Soviets knew this since the 60s, if not the 50s. -- How is it any different today?
Even if Putin had the launch codes (he doesn't), or the ability to order a first strike by himself (he doesn't), even he would know the response is not going to be 'more sanctions'. -- The only way I could fathom Russia using a nuclear weapon in Ukraine, or against any enemy country, is the FSB had a foolproof plan to blame am ISIS terror cell, or rogue Chechen element, or claim the Ukrainians did it in a false-flag conspiracy to frame the Russians. -- But that would require a convincing story on how such an element got the nuclear weapon 'elsewhere', and eliminating everyone involved in the planning and execution. Whatever the case, Russia would need absolute plausible deniability. -- Here's my two cents, if there was really a way to use a nuclear weapon against an enemy without equal repercussions, Russia and China (and the US) would have figured it out a long time ago and did it already.
All NATO must do is take out Moscow and 5 -6 other city's to take out all of Russia.... But Russia must take out city's all over the planet from USA , CANADA ,FRANCE UK. ALL OF EUROPE and as far away as , AUSTRALIA and so on and so on ...
United Kingdom 225 warheads (submarine delivery systems new and up to date systems )
France 300 warheads
(submarine delivery systems new and up to date systems )
United States 7,315 warheads
(Mixed delivery systems new and up to date systems )
Russia 8,000 warheads
(Mixed delivery systems old mostly from the soviet union times NOT up to date systems )
RUSSIA IS AT DISADVANTAGE !!! and they know it Putin's regime knows its and that is why they will not use nukes they will hint and shout about nukes but that's it !!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Look at some facts about Russia and Russians !!
Ukraine only 17,3% ethnic Russian
Latvia only 26% ethnic Russian
Lithuania only 2,5% ethnic Russian
Estonia only 25,2 % ethnic Russian
Moldova only 5.8% ethnic Russian
Georgia only 1,5 % ethnic Russian
The % is not big in most of the nation's above but when it comes to how much this Russian scum demand of influence and how much they are screaming if you did not know the facts you will think they are almost the majority of the populations.
Take Lithuania as an good exs. in that country ethnic RuSSians are ONLY 2,5% that represents ONLY 50,460 people that are ethnic Russians and Russians are NOT the biggest ethnic group in-fact after Lithuanians it is Jews that take 2nd place as the biggest ethnic group in Lithuania with 7,6% of the population that represents 153,743 that is 3 times bigger than Russians and we don’t see the jews shouting out that their language (Hebrew) must have a special status in education, schools and that gov. documents must be written in Hebrew and TV and Radio must also be in Hebrew, street signs must be written Hebrew and that Hebrew must have special protected statues rights within Lithuania like
Russians are shouting about that they demand and want in Lithuania for their Russian language now do we …??
NO WE DONT !! becouse the Jewish population in Lithuania understand and respect that Lithuanians are the rightful owners and ppl. of Lithuania and they respect that fact..
SO THE QUESTION must be: Why is there always a problem with ethnic Russians all the time and why do they think they can demand special status for themselves and special status for Russian language who do they think they are ???
2
-
2
-
Putin will NOT use Nuclear weapons if he or when he invades Ukraine !!!
AND HERE IS WHY !!
1. If he did use Nuclear weapons then he will be not just nuking Ukraine but the fallout will hit Europe and the Baltic ’s the blast and fallout will also hit East Ukraine, Crimea, Poland Belorussia, and parts of Russia as well ect..
2. If he bombed Ukraine Putin will get the orthodox church against him for taking out Pecerska Lavra and make the Lavra into a nuclear wasteland for 1000 years the center of orthodox faith in the world and the far right orthodox is Putin's power base at home losing the orthodox church will be political suicide for Putin,,
3. How will it look like if he bombed Ukraine and the fallout of the blast will rain down onto Russians in Europe and in Ukraine millions of Russians live in the EU and Ukraine now and all of the Russian elite children in schools in western Europe, even Putin's own daughter and ex-wife live in Holland..
It is not like back in the day of the USSR when almost no Russian was living in Europe, and in the Baltic’s 20% are ethnic Russians in Ukraine, 17,6 % are ethnic Russians.. How can he claim to be defending Russians abroad if he is nuking them ??
4.If he did this than any friends he has in the international community will run for cover and distance themselves from him and RuSSia in every way they can, they will admit openly that Putin is a mad man, that needs to be taken out asap..even his good old buddy in Syria Assad and his good buddy in Minsk Mr Lukanhesko will not return his phone calls and run for cover.
5. Russia will become an international outcast and pariah state and diplomatic relations with the rest of the world will be over even including China, Venezuela, North Korea, Iran, and every other nut job country will cut off diplomatic relations with Russia !!..
6.USA and NATO and its allies and even most likely even Japan (and probably even China) will respond with an all-out attack on Russia and Putin and Moscow will only be left in history books just like the soviet union is now ...
7.Putin like Hitler and Stalin is a very smart calculated psychopath he is not crazy or insane and does not have a political death wish or any other type of death wish for that matter, he pushes as far as he feels he can and then backs down if he feels he gets pushed back, and if he doesn't get pushed back he continues until he does.
2
-
2
-
Let’s look at Ukraine’s disgraced former President, (Putins boy) Mr . Victor Yanukovych . After he fled to Putin with billions of stolen money the Kremlin-backed politician and his cronies (made away with $40 billion in state Ukrainian assets disappear ) the idea that he remained the legitimate head of the Ukrainian state, and therefore the manner in which he was replaced was automatically illegitimate, was commonplace. This line of thinking was heavily promulgated by his new host country for reasons that are self-evident. But was it right, or even logical, to claim this?
The legitimacy of the Yanukovych regime indeed began with a somewhat fair election, albeit an election in which the Ukrainian people had no good other choices at the time
(NOTE : Yanukovych was backed up by Moscow controlled media and corrupted elites that have dealings with the Kremlin and media inside Ukraine) .
But could that legitimacy go on unquestioned despite the blatant grand scale theft of state resources? No. Of course it could not.
Common hooligans and thugs were brought to Kyiv by the Yanukovych authorities to beat down on the students protesting Yanukovych authorities corruption (first recorded on Nov. 29, 2013when the protested was just a few days old) Yanukovych thugs mission was to terrorize the residents of the capital and beat down the students protesting Yanukovych . This act was completely in contradiction to Article 3 of the constitution that Yanukovych was elected to uphold. It was more than right to question Yanukovych’s legitimacy after this and the Ukrainian people did just that after seeing young students getting beat up by Yanukovych imported thugs in the streets of Kyiv, this act of state terrors, enraged the people even more and other joined the students protesting Yanukovych , now demanding his removal of office.
Lets take a closer look into legitimacy of Yanukovych Presidency..
Can the legitimacy of a ruling authority survive past the blatantly illegal adoption of laws designed to end democracy and create a dictatorship? No. Of course it cannot. Yet, this is what the Yanukovych controlled Party of Regions attempted to do on Jan. 16, 2014. Later analysis of images taken in parliament that while 235 MPs were declared to have voted for these “dictatorship” laws, only about half of this number of MPs were actually in the session hall when the vote was taken (by a show of hands – also illegal.)
After such clearly anti-democratic and dishonest actions, can anyone consider that authority to be legitimate? The actions were a breach of Article 5 of Ukraine’s constitution – something that Yanukovych was under oath to protect and uphold. But he failed to keep his word.
There were more violations of the constitution by Yanukovych, its supposed protector.
Article 27 of Ukraine’s constitution says that “Every person shall have the inalienable right to life. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of life.” Yet Yuri Verbitsky, a 42 year old geologist from Lviv, was kidnapped, tortured, and murdered by forces belonging to the Yanukovych regime between Jan. 22 and Jan. 25 of 2014.
That Yanukovych had already lost any legitimacy by this point should be beyond question. Later, of course, came the deaths of many more people on Jan. 18 and then Jan. 20, after which Yanukovych fled to Russia, insisting his authority and position were still legitimate. Define legitimate.
The idea that legitimacy carries on from appointment without further question is a complete fallacy. It is something that we should refuse to accept. An elected leader most certainly can lose their legitimacy through illegal and/or unconstitutional, actions. The most recent public attempt at increasing the fog blurring the distinction between legitimately elected and legitimate comes from Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev. Bottom line, they are not the same, although it is easy to see why Russia’s ruling clan would seek to pretend that they are.
2
-
2
-
1.Ukraine should NOT give up territory, appeasement never works good eks. Neville Chamberlain and Hitler with the Munich Agreement land for peace , an absolute disgrace)
2. disarmed Russia disarm them to the level of some south Pacific island and give Ukriane all of Russians weapons and nukes
3. When they have lost NO restructuration should be done let them rot and its ppl suffer in their beloved Russik Mir they made their own bed let them sleep in it !!)
4. Russian should be forced to understand that all of their history is fake based own a myth connecting them to Kyiv Russ; and their historical connection to Ukriane capital Kyiv is a massive falsification of history made up by Catherine the grate (she was german not Russian by the way ) !! Russian are not even slavic they are descendants of Finnic nomadic tribes that assimilated with Mongolians back in the day Mongolians build Moscow as a trading post in 1200s and that is the origins of Moskovia )
6. We should NOT let them be able to re build there socially structors or military to western or even North Korea standards they should be frozen isolated and blacked from taking part in any intr, cooperation civilian, economical, political , educational , financial, trade , transport , and travel .. Should be locked down uncompromised isolated, harder than North Korea locked down its on ppl . totally frozen so it never ever raise up and can threaten anyone ever again----)
2
-
1
-
I SAY … Putin is just a symptom of the diseased psychotic nation that is Russia..
It is not Putin who made modern Russia or Russians, it is Russia and Russians who made Putin !!!.
After all the Russians do know the truth about Putin by now, they know who he is, what he does , what he will do, and what he has done, it should come as no surprise to any Russian, what they are voting for after soon 20 years with Putin in power THEY KNOW ALL ABOUT HIM !!
Even when Putin himself was NOT able to run for President back in 2008, and the Russians, had a chance to vote for another direction, what did they do?? They voted in Putin's boy Dmitry Medvedev for president, the Russians had the changes to vote for Boris Nemtsov and therefor freedom, rule of law and democracy but NO THEY VOTE for Putins boy Dmitry Medvedev for president, because that was the next best thing to voting for Putin !!
1
-
Just look at the population of Russians LIVING in that nations in East Europe it does not need to be that big to get problems .
Look at some facts
Ukraine only 17,3% ethnic Russian
Latvia only 26% ethnic Russian
Lithuania only 2,5% ethnic Russian
Estonia only 25,2 % ethnic Russian
Moldova only 5.8% ethnic Russian
Georgia only 1,5 % ethnic Russian
The % is not big in most of the nation's above but when it comes to how much this Russian scum demand of influence and how much they are screaming if you did not know the facts you will think they are almost the majority of the populations.
Take Lithuania as an good exs. in that country ethnic RuSSians are ONLY 2,5% that represents ONLY 50,460 people that are ethnic Russians and Russians are NOT the biggest ethnic group in-fact after Lithuanians it is Jews that take 2nd place as the biggest ethnic group in Lithuania with 7,6% of the population that represents 153,743 that is 3 times bigger than Russians and we don’t see the jews shouting out that their language (Hebrew) must have a special status in education, schools and that gov. documents must be written in Hebrew and TV and Radio must also be in Hebrew, street signs must be written Hebrew and that Hebrew must have special protected statues rights within Lithuania like
Russians are shouting about that they demand and want in Lithuania for their Russian language now do we …??
NO WE DONT !! becouse the Jewish population in Lithuania understand and respect that Lithuanians are the rightful owners and ppl. of Lithuania and they respect that fact..
SO THE QUESTION must be: Why is there always a problem with ethnic Russians all the time and why do they think they can demand special status for themselves and special status for Russian language who do they think they are ???
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
THE MYTH … The USSR defeated-nazigermany without the help of allies. The Russian forces could have won the war without the help of other nationalities of the Soviet Union
THE TRUTH Soviet textbooks described the role of Soviet allies in the war in a rather superficial manner. While they are blamed for allowing the occupation of the Czech republic and waited till the last moment to open up the Second front, little is said about US help as part of the lend-lease program.
During the Cold War, this myth was particularly important, as it elevated the contribution of the Soviet Union and diminished the contributions of its allies who were now on the other side of the Iron Wall. Today, in line with the growing isolation of Russia from the West, this myth is once again accentuated, one recent example being the book of now-Minister of Culture of Russia Volodymyr Medynsky “War. Myths of the USSR. 1939-1945.”
In reality, the lend-lease was one of the decisive factors in the victory of the Allied forces against the Axis. The USSR, and Russia as its successor, still has not repaid its debt for the lend-lease to the USA.
According to different estimates, western equipment added up to:
* 12-16% of the equipment of the Soviet armored troops;
* 10-15% of USSR’s aviation
* 32.4% of its Navy.
Up to 70% of the transport of the Soviet army came from the USA, meaning that the Soviet army drove around mainly on US cars. While the USSR released only 600 trucks for mounting “Katyusha” mortars, the USA contributed 20,000 American Studebaker trucks, making it the main vehicle for Soviet artillery. Apart from that, the lend-lease program gave USSR 56% of its railroad tracks and 43% of tires; 42% of it sugar, 108% of meat preserves, 18% of aviation fuel.
The amount of locomotives that the West provided exceeded the USSR’s production by 2.4 times and the amount of train cars – by 10.2 times. The amount of food that the USSR received as part of the lend-lease would have been enough to feed a 10-million army over 1688 days, i.e. the whole course of the war.
THE MYTH…. For the USSR, World War II started on 22 June 1941. The proper name of the war is the “Great Patriotic War,” because the USSR was defending itself against the-nazzi-invasion
THE TRUTH .. In reality , the USSR started the war on 17 September 1939, when the Red Army crossed the border with Poland, occupying it in accordance to the union between the Third Reich and Soviet Union, outlined by the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact. “German and Soviet troops walked hand in hand. This was called a ‘military brotherhood’ in the USSR, before the war broke out,” noted Oleksandr Zinchenko from the Institute of National Memory. After Hitler started the war in Europe, the USSR provided economic assistance to-nazigermany-The USSR attempted to conceal these facts of collaboration with Hitler with the concept of the “Great Patriotic War,” which started out as a mere ideological cliché pronounced by Joseph Stalin during a radio broadcast on 3 July 1941, after-nazigermany-invaded Soviet Ukraine.
Today, the concept of “Great Patriotic War” is being used by the Russian Federation as an alternative to World War II in attempts to maintain its influence on Ukraine and post-Soviet republics.
THE MYTH.. The USSR is an innocent victim of German aggression and was always an enemy of the-nazzis-and did not work with them
THE TRUTH..: The USSR signed a non-aggression pact with-nazigermany-the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, that not only defined broad economic cooperation with the Third Reich and agreement on mutual non-aggression, but also contained a secret protocol by which the USSR and Germany agreed to divide up Europe.
During Soviet times, and in Russia today, the existence of the-nazi–Soviet-pact was explained as a necessity that came only after fruitless negotiations with Britain and France, and that the invasions of Poland were unconnected to the pact. In fact, Stalin willingly ruined attempts to establish an anti-Hitler coalition. During 12-21 August 1939, negotiations with Britain and France about collaborating to meet growing security challenges associated with the Third Reich took place in Moscow, but did not amount to an agreement because the Soviet leadership demanded the right to occupy Poland’s regions Halychyna and Vilenska Oblast (today, western regions of Ukraine and Belarus), which the other side could not condone.
Both Stalin and Hitler were unsatisfied with the world order that came about after World War I, which made their collaboration natural. On 19 August 1939, Stalin spoke about the necessity to urge Europe into a great war, which would be an overture to a “world revolution;” on 23 August 1939, the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was signed, outlining broad economic cooperation between the USSR and the Third Reich, and violating the sovereignty and territorial integrity of a range of independent countries.
In addition to the stated clauses of the Molotov-Ribbentrop non-aggression pact, a secret protocol was adopted, dividing territories of Romania, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Finland into German and Soviet “spheres of influence”, anticipating potential “territorial and political rearrangements” of these countries. The Kremlin denied the existence of the secret protocol to the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact up to 1992.
The Soviet-nazi-military collaboration is undeniably clear in photographs from the German–Soviet military parade in Brest-Litovsk on 22 September 1939 during the invasion of Poland.
The pact had the most tragic consequences for European nations and the world; it is this agreement that became the mechanism opening the doors for a new world war. What followed was the invasion of Poland by-nazigermany-and the USSR, followed by the further carving up of Europe.
1
-
1
-
IT WAS NOT ETHNIC RUSSIAN THAT DIED FIGHTING THE NAZIS it was Ukraine, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Armenia and the other nations that was forced into the USSR and put in the front lines as cannon fodder the ethnic Russians was the NKVD cowards shooting everyone else in the backs the ethnic Russians was in the NKVD and was officers and in supply units behind the lines not getting used a cannon fodder !!
Also let us not forget the fact the it was the Stalin and RuSSia that made it possible for Hitler to build up his nazi army by giving him iron-ore and other need goods from 1939-1941 the soviet union was the strongest and most important partner of nazi Germany ..
It was only after June 1941 when Hitler turned on his good buddy Stalin and attacked the USSR that Stalin came running to the west for help and the west said yes ok we will let you fight with us they did this well knowing that Stalin helped Hitler build his army and also because the west was thinking in terms like my enemy's enemy is my friend policy and tactic
Russians living in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. I really think that the Russians aren’t the ones to lecture ANYONE about fascism, or anything else for that matter, especially since RuSSians was the ones that signed the pact with the-devil [nazigermany] and started World War II… and even today RuSSia are still glorifying Stalin... Hitlers good buddy in 1937-1941 Hitler and Stalin started ww2 together when they invaded Poland together.
The RuZZians were the cowards who shot their own troops in the backs to press other forward infront like a human shields and canon-fodder.
YES they did shoot their own troops in the backs But they did NOT shoot ethnic Russians in the backs as most of that scum was officers and in logistics and the NKVD doing the shooting...
The ethnic Russian was the pathetic cowards that was shooting other Soviets in the back.....
And why did this happen you ask !
Answer : Becouse Stalin did not trust Ukrainians (and other none ethnic Russians )(remember he had only 8 years before Stalin had killed 10 mill Ukrainians in a genocide called the holodomor )
So what did Stalin do before ww2 he made a purge and killed all officers of non ethnic Russians decent in the Army and replaced them with ethnic Russians and made all others that was not ethnic Russians in low level positions in other worlds as cannon fodder for the german artillery and targets for german bullets... this was the Ukrainians, Belorussians , Uzbeks , Moldovan’s ect ect ect .. this is who was fighting and geting killed this is who was fighting the-nazi-not ethnic Russians they was in the safe jobs like NKVD ect ect ect ... back in the reserve army and as administrators ect ect..
Why do you think the Kremlin always say Russians died and not soviets died ?????
They do this to cover up this facts I have stated above and for Russia to take the honor from the people who really did the fighting..Russians and Russia have no shame !!
1
-
Nobody wants to be a "buffer country". NO nation wants to have a little bit of freedom and self-determination, like some sort of 2nd class country
The whole concept is demeaning to an independent nation. NO nation wants to have a little bit of freedom and self-determination, like some sort of 2nd class country; That is not right, and Russia has no right to demand or bully Ukrainians or Ukraine to accept to be some sort of lap dog on a leash 2nd class country to serve kremlins geopolitical agenda and so Kremlin, Putin and RuZZans can feel better about themselves ...
Eastern European countries (ex soviet countries like Poland the baltic states ect ect ..) joined NATO because they are scared of Russia and want to be and stay independent. Nobody forced them to join NATO they was the ones running and knocking and begging to be able to join NATO and the EU ,,, .
When Russia invaded Ukriane Russia then just showed why it was a good idea for those countries to join NATO, because if they didn't they might just have got invaded as well just like Ukraine and Georgia did .
During Soviet times those Eastern European countries where nothing less than Russia puppet states. If they didn't join NATO after the fall of the USSR then they for sure couldn't guarantee their own independence from Russia.
Nato did nothing wrong, the only mistake was Ukraine not joining NATO to ensure Ukraines independence; Remember former satellite states like Poland, Romania, Czech Republic and The Baltic states, Slovakia ect ect all came running by their own accord, knocking, kicking, screaming and banging at the front door of EU and NATO begging to come in, no one forced them into it .
If Russia was not such a asshole country and stoped constantly bulling neighboring countries maybe other neighboring countries will not need to join NATO and by more open and welcoming to Russia ..
1
-
Bandera was not personally part of the genocide the evidence clearly shows that Bandera had nothing to do with it ... BANDERA WAS a prisoner (POW) of war when the massacre in Volhynia happened..so how is Bandera responsible ????
The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists under the leadership of Stepan Bandera decided to fight against the Hitler after they was arrested in 1941.
Now that is NOT much collaboration now is it.... AND THAT IS WHY Stepan Bandera was arrested by the GERMANS and sent to Sachsenhausen concentration camp because Bandera was not collaborating with the nazis it is a
Myth and propaganda used by Moscow and some times the anti Ukraine elements inside Poland to direct Ukrainian independence..
The German high command in Ukraine sent a memo saying that all functionaries of the Bandera Movement must be arrested at once and, after thorough interrogation, are to be liquidated...".
On July 5, Bandera was arrested and transferred to Berlin.
On July 12, the president of the newly formed Ukrainian state, Yaroslav Stetsko, was also arrested and taken to Berlin. In January 1942,
Bandera was transferred to Sachsenhausen concentration camp's special barrack for high-profile political prisoners Zellenbau
Bandera was in a German KZ camp Sachsenhausen concentration camp from 1941-1944
NOW if you are sent to a KZ camp YOU ARE NOT a friend of Hitler are you AND IF YOU ARE inn a concentration camp from 1941 to the end of 1944 YOU can not be held responsible for the Volhynia massacre that happened in 1943 !!!!
AND LETS US ALSO NOT FORGET THAT MORE AND MORE new evidence is coming to light saying that it was NKVD dressed up as UPA /OUN that did the massacre in Volhynia in 1943.. But this is still not 100% proven yet,,,,
1
-
1. There is NO WAY Ukraine should give up territory, and there is no point in negotiating with Russia .
(YES !! for sure appeasement never works good eks. Neville Chamberlain and Hitler with the Munich Agreement land for peace , an absolute disgrace)
2. Russia needs to be disarmed.
(YES!! disarm them to the level of some south Pacific island and give Ukriane all of Russians weapons and nukes )
3. Restructured.
(NO!! let them root and its ppl suffer in their beloved Russik Mir they made their own bed let them sleep in it !!)
4. Re-educated
(YES!! they need to understand that all of their history is fake based own a myth connecting them to Kyiv Russia and is a massive falsification of history made up by Catherine the grate (she was german not Russian by the way ) !! Russian are not even slavic they are
descendants of Finnic nomadic tribes that assimilated with Mongolians back in the day Mongolians build Moscow as a trading post in 1200s and that is the origins of Moskovia )
6. Brought into the 21st century.
(NO !! they should be frozen isolated and blacked from taking part in any intr, cooperation civilian, economical, political , educational , financial, trade , transport , and travel .. Should be locked down uncompromised isolated, harder than North Korea locked down its on ppl . totally frozen so it never ever raise up and can threaten anyone ever again----)
1
-
1. There is NO WAY Ukraine should give up territory, and there is no point in negotiating with Russia .
(YES !! for sure appeasement never works good eks. Neville Chamberlain and Hitler with the Munich Agreement land for peace , an absolute disgrace)
2. Russia needs to be disarmed.
(YES!! disarm them to the level of some south Pacific island and give Ukriane all of Russians weapons and nukes )
3. Restructured.
(NO!! let them root and its ppl suffer in their beloved Russik Mir they made their own bed let them sleep in it !!)
4. Re-educated
(YES!! they need to understand that all of their history is fake based own a myth connecting them to Kyiv Russia and is a massive falsification of history made up by Catherine the grate (she was german not Russian by the way ) !! Russian are not even slavic they are
descendants of Finnic nomadic tribes that assimilated with Mongolians back in the day Mongolians build Moscow as a trading post in 1200s and that is the origins of Moskovia )
6. Brought into the 21st century.
(NO !! they should be frozen isolated and blacked from taking part in any intr, cooperation civilian, economical, political , educational , financial, trade , transport , and travel .. Should be locked down uncompromised isolated, harder than North Korea locked down its on ppl . totally frozen so it never ever raise up and can threaten anyone ever again----)
1
-
Look at some facts
Ukraine only 17,3% ethnic Russian
Latvia only 26% ethnic Russian
Lithuania only 2,5% ethnic Russian
Estonia only 25,2 % ethnic Russian
Moldova only 5.8% ethnic Russian
Georgia only 1,5 % ethnic Russian
The % is not big in most of the nation's above but when it comes to how much this Russian scum demand of influence and how much they are screaming if you did not know the facts you will think they are almost the majority of the populations.
Take Lithuania as an good exs. in that country ethnic RuSSians are ONLY 2,5% that represents ONLY 50,460 people that are ethnic Russians and Russians are NOT the biggest ethnic group in-fact after Lithuanians it is Jews that take 2nd place as the biggest ethnic group in Lithuania with 7,6% of the population that represents 153,743 that is 3 times bigger than Russians and we don’t see the jews shouting out that their language (Hebrew) must have a special status in education, schools and that gov. documents must be written in Hebrew and TV and Radio must also be in Hebrew, street signs must be written Hebrew and that Hebrew must have special protected statues rights within Lithuania like
Russians are shouting about that they demand and want in Lithuania for their Russian language now do we …??
NO WE DONT !! becouse the Jewish population in Lithuania understand and respect that Lithuanians are the rightful owners and ppl. of Lithuania and they respect that fact..
SO THE QUESTION must be: Why is there always a problem with ethnic Russians all the time and why do they think they can demand special status for themselves and special status for Russian language who do they think they are ???
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
DO NOT GIVE THE SCUM CITIZENSHIP PAY THEN OFF OK BUT UKRIANE MUST NOT INPORT THIS SCUM THATS THE PROBLEM IN THE FIRST PLACE THOSE RUSSIANS WILL NEVER CHANGE THEY WILL END UP PROMOTING RUSSIA-FACTION OF UKRIANE IN THE FUTURE QQ
Just look at the population of Russians LIVING in that nations in East Europe it does not need to be that big to get problems .
Look at some facts
Ukraine only 17,3% ethnic Russian
Latvia only 26% ethnic Russian
Lithuania only 2,5% ethnic Russian
Estonia only 25,2 % ethnic Russian
Moldova only 5.8% ethnic Russian
Georgia only 1,5 % ethnic Russian
The % is not big in most of the nation's above but when it comes to how much this Russian scum demand of influence and how much they are screaming if you did not know the facts you will think they are almost the majority of the populations.
Take Lithuania as an good exs. in that country ethnic RuSSians are ONLY 2,5% that represents ONLY 50,460 people that are ethnic Russians and Russians are NOT the biggest ethnic group in-fact after Lithuanians it is Jews that take 2nd place as the biggest ethnic group in Lithuania with 7,6% of the population that represents 153,743 that is 3 times bigger than Russians and we don’t see the jews shouting out that their language (Hebrew) must have a special status in education, schools and that gov. documents must be written in Hebrew and TV and Radio must also be in Hebrew, street signs must be written Hebrew and that Hebrew must have special protected statues rights within Lithuania like
Russians are shouting about that they demand and want in Lithuania for their Russian language now do we …??
NO WE DONT !! becouse the Jewish population in Lithuania understand and respect that Lithuanians are the rightful owners and ppl. of Lithuania and they respect that fact..
SO THE QUESTION must be: Why is there always a problem with ethnic Russians all the time and why do they think they can demand special status for themselves and special status for Russian language who do they think they are ???
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Appeasement & Armageddon: Giving in to Vladimir Putin’s nuclear blackmail will spark an unprecedented nuclear arms race and make a future nuclear war far more likely!!
There is a reason why the Soviet Union, nor any nuclear power, never launched a first strike (nuclear attack) since Word War 2, despite all of the Cold War fears that the Soviets would. And its because you can't launch a first strike without being annihilated in the second strike. I remember in the 80s when The Day After aired, and everyone hoped the Soviets would see the movie and learn the lesson. Probably not realizing the Soviets can be trusted to act in the best self-interests...which mutually assured destruction is clearly against... and that the Soviets knew this since the 60s, if not the 50s. -- How is it any different today?
Even if Putin had the launch codes (he doesn't), or the ability to order a first strike by himself (he doesn't), even he would know the response is not going to be 'more sanctions'. -- The only way I could fathom Russia using a nuclear weapon in Ukraine, or against any enemy country, is the FSB had a foolproof plan to blame am ISIS terror cell, or rogue Chechen element, or claim the Ukrainians did it in a false-flag conspiracy to frame the Russians. -- But that would require a convincing story on how such an element got the nuclear weapon 'elsewhere', and eliminating everyone involved in the planning and execution. Whatever the case, Russia would need absolute plausible deniability. -- Here's my two cents, if there was really a way to use a nuclear weapon against an enemy without equal repercussions, Russia and China (and the US) would have figured it out a long time ago and did it already.
All NATO must do is take out Moscow and 5 -6 other city's to take out all of Russia.... But Russia must take out city's all over the planet from USA , CANADA ,FRANCE UK. ALL OF EUROPE and as far away as , AUSTRALIA and so on and so on ...
United Kingdom 225 warheads (submarine delivery systems new and up to date systems )
France 300 warheads
(submarine delivery systems new and up to date systems )
United States 7,315 warheads
(Mixed delivery systems new and up to date systems )
Russia 8,000 warheads
(Mixed delivery systems old mostly from the soviet union times NOT up to date systems )
RUSSIA IS AT DISADVANTAGE !!! and they know it Putin's regime knows its and that is why they will not use nukes they will hint and shout about nukes but that's it !!
1
-
1
-
Giving in to Vladimir Putin’s nuclear blackmail will spark an unprecedented nuclear arms race and make a future nuclear war far more likely!! There is a reason why the Soviet Union, nor any nuclear power, never launched a first strike (nuclear attack) since World War 2, despite all of the Cold War fears that the Soviets would.
And it’s because you can't launch a first strike without being annihilated in the second strike. I remember in the 80s when The Day After aired, and everyone hoped the Soviets would see the movie and learn the lesson. Probably not realizing the Soviets can be trusted to act in the best self-interests...which mutually assured destruction is clearly against... and that the Soviets knew this since the 60s, if not the 50s. -- How is it any different today?
Even if Putin had the launch codes (he doesn't), or the ability to order a first strike by himself (he doesn't), even he would know the response is not going to be 'more sanctions'. -- The only way I could fathom Russia using a nuclear weapon in Ukraine, or against any enemy country, is the FSB had a foolproof plan to blame am ISIS terror cell, or rogue Chechen element, or claim the Ukrainians did it in a false-flag conspiracy to frame the Russians. -- But that would require a convincing story on how such an element got the nuclear weapon 'elsewhere', and eliminating everyone involved in the planning and execution. Whatever the case, Russia would need absolute plausible deniability. --
Here's my two cents, if there was really a way to use a nuclear weapon against an enemy without equal repercussions, Russia and China (and the US) would have figured it out a long time ago and did it already.
All NATO must do is take out Moscow and 5 -6 other cities to take out all of Russia.... But Russia must take out city's all over the planet from
USA , CANADA ,FRANCE UK. ALL OF EUROPE and as far away as , AUSTRALIA and so on and so on ...
United Kingdom 225 warheads (submarine delivery systems new and up to date systems )
France 300 warheads
(submarine delivery systems new and up to date systems )
United States 7,315 warheads
(Mixed delivery systems new and up to date systems )
Russia 8,000 warheads
(Mixed delivery systems old mostly from the soviet union times NOT up to date systems )
RUSSIA IS AT DISADVANTAGE !!! and they know it Putin's regime knows its and that is why they will not use nukes they will hint and shout about nukes but that's it !!
1