General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
bruzote
CNBC Television
comments
Comments by "bruzote" (@bruzote) on "FDA member on why she voted against Pfizer vaccine" video.
Then don't take it. However, healthy humans who get COVID can become UNHEALTHY humans who spread it. We can't stop that without getting closer to herd immunity via infections and vaccinations.
32
@darnelltobar9726 - So, we should all be isolated for five years while you happily wait for the data?
6
Why do you say that? The title is pretty simple and clear and factual. "FDA member on why she voted against Pfizer vaccine." The person being interviewed IS a member of the panel that voted. She DID vote against the vaccine. She explains why. Those facts are easy to understand.
4
@chuckkennedy5656 - But you will eat food prepared by people carrying who-knows-what disease using ingredients carrying who-knows-what pathogens. You see, EVERYTHING is a threat if you look at with cynicism.
3
@chrisweidner4768 - Oh, but viruses are not like poison? Would you like some polio with your snark? How about HPV and HIV? You would like those, too, no doubt.
3
@lynettesideris1983 - You've obviously not seen what COVID can do.
2
@avmail7097 - So they shouldn't eat?
2
What most people fail to understand is not just the data but degree of specificity they need to pull from it. They need to know the efficacy, not just the side effects.
2
@steelyman08 - This was an emergency authorization, not a slow roll discussion.
2
LOL, we should listen to the troll who has trouble w/simple sentences.
1
Her comment was about vaccines IN GENERAL.
1
@punknhead23 - Your comment is proven to be wrong by the next one. This had to be slow or idiots would claim it was rushed under conspiratorial reasons.
1
I can imagine if opinions like yours prevailed during the first polio vaccine release.
1
If such tech existed, you would not even have internet access.
1
@CYBERUS212 - And most fundamentally empathic with their own citizens.
1
@Chi_Loutman - Not just because they are greedy, but because they typically overestimate their abilities. They think they are "stable geniuses" when nothing could be farther from the truth.
1
You don't "win" a Nobel Prize. It is not some race. PCR test is old news. So what if the prime driver of its existence just died? That has no bearing on this vaccine.
1
You're making perfection the enemy of the good. I trust them enough, and I am a bitterly cynical Pharma worker. This process is currently HEAVILY scrutenized. Between the trials and the first wave of vaccinations, I will have enough info to take a risk. I almost lost my brother-in-law. He doesn't know if he could endure getting COVID again. I myself almost died from the flu when I was 38. I have no intention of getting taken down by some miserable nanopathogens. I look forward to the virus.
1
@Drivewaybuilt - NAILED IT!
1
@Sympss It is not even approved for your use, so you need not worry.
1
WTF is with you people and the title? She voted against the vaccine approval. The title is not supposed to be 172 words long.
1
Is that the ONLY reason the meeting was delayed. I have trouble believing that.
1
Well, at least take your meds. You clearly missed your last dose.
1
Past performance of existing vaccines does not guarantee performance of a new vaccine. In this case, they WERE unexpected and the UK has responded to this news. The national regulator changed its guidance on the vaccine to say “any person with a history of immediate-onset anaphylaxis to a vaccine, medicine or food should not receive the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.”
1
Better a prudent response than short blather from an impatient fool. Doctors who vote on approval MUST be very circumspect in what they say, including being very clear and explicative. Even if they speak prudently, 1/3 of the people here will claim she is out to get them, and the other 1/3 will say they are out to get her, all because of what she supposedly said.
1
The FDA did not. However, some DOCTORS voted against approving the suggested administration protocol, particularly giving it to kids (most of whom won't get it anyway, since they are low priority).
1
@rwhunt99 - Let the country's 16-year-old boys refill the supply in what, two days? :-D
1
@archerblacksmen3320 - The virus is not an existential threat, so not really.
1
This is the opposite of clickbait. I heard the vote take place and heard Ms Chatterjee vote against the approval. I wanted to know. This video DID interview her and she clarified WHY she voted against approval. There is nothing "bait"-like in the title. What link did you use to come here? Maybe the particular link you saw was clickbait, but the title here matches the content very well.
1
More people died today from COVID than due to the 9/11 attacks. My bro-in-law almost died. His cousin died. My sister caught this. Plenty of people are gone. Just because you're too scared of seeing the truth doesn't mean it is not happening.
1
First of all, the doc is referring to vaccines IN GENERAL. This vaccine, during testing, also showed a fairly safe profile. Two cases on one day does not a disaster make. Plus, those cases are apparently not severe. (See punkinhead's response.)
1
Who do you think is laughing? Are you maybe experiencing auditory hallucinations? Or misinterpreting normal human speech?
1
The panel voted Yes. Now the FDA has some bureaucratic steps to plod through. Then it will be approved. However, this is THE key step as far as most experts believe. Everything from here on out is typically not going to stop the vaccine rollout.
1
What a deluded drama queen!
1
You're the fear monger, telling people the media is fear mongering when all they did was VERY CALMLY interview someone in an informative interview. Grow up.
1
That is ALWAYS how it goes. Big Pharma actually does not usually make much money on vaccines. That's why so few companies make vaccines. Thus, the government indemnifies them so they are not dissuaded from making vaccines.
1