Comments by "Multiple Miggs" (@MiggsMultiple) on "10 Suspected Conspiracy Theories That Oddly Turned out to Be True" video.

  1. This video could have been 9 mins long if you spoke at normal human speed....Anyone would think you are under the impression we have been subject to mind control and are too dumb to follow ;) But how come the Rich and powerful drunkards who dance around the big owl statue in weird costumes don't have the clout to silence the investigators of CIA corruption?
    1
  2. x Whales And what fine quality that Pentagon footage that was released was.....4 shitty, grainy, blurry still frames that miraculously hid whatever it was supposed to be catching. 86 or so cameras in operation on arguably one of he most 'secure' buildings in the World that is concerned with defense, had nothing more to offer than images that were on level with the quality of the first cell phone camera.
    1
  3. John McDonough Yeah, but I also realise that it is the Pentagon....not Walmart. I also realise that it is a building with 5 sides yet the place is reported to have had 86 cameras operating on the day....1 per side from that far away? Really? Don't underestimate the fact there were no wing marks on the impact of the building either...not even slight dents. They just evaporated I guess,the minute the nose touched the building.... or miraculously fell off before impact which only means complete wings should have been on the lawn... And still frames? 14 years ago is no excuse....My shitty Nokia cell was capable of continuous recording at the time. I would expect a building as significant as the Pentagon would outdo me technologically.
    1
  4. John McDonough Yeah I saw an engine, a few bits and pieces of debris but the whole plane seem to just disintegrate. I wouldn't even say I am convinced it wasn't a plane but the footage, you have to admit is highly questionable. I agree cameras were also for intruders but I would still expect a bit more outdoor surveillance.....even if to catch intruders before they made it inside. The wing marks I would expect to see something more than a scratch...Most people can make a dent with a crow bar when they whack a concrete wall....which leads to the next point. When the Aircraft made impact with the 2 towers, they both left a complete slice in the structure of the Plane shape, including the wings....as clear as day. I have to argue that the steel on the towers was more robust than some concrete. We demolish and penetrate concrete with steel tools and equipment....not the other way around.
    1
  5. John McDonough The pictures shown had no Aircraft inside the building. Even more so, it was surprising how shallow the hole was if anything....it didn't really go that deep at all for a plane impact.... The wings would have left some form of noticeable impact regardless....No way they just fell off beforehand.... If a Plane is going to fall apart so easily they should be banned as a mode of transport altogether. Like I said, I am not saying it wasn't a plane....it just seems the damage seemed rather minor compared to something that size making impact.
    1
  6. John McDonough So the wings sliced straight through the solid steel structure of the twin towers like a hot knife through butter even leaving the wing shape yet couldn't make it through a tree or some street signs? 
    1