Comments by "Ggoddkkiller" (@ggoddkkiller1342) on "Ryan McBeth" channel.

Ryan still no explanation about why Ukraine keeps their bayraktar fleet as reserve? You once claimed they were shot down but apparently not Ukraine still operates them around Odessa but not other regions. Perhaps they are planning to use them in Crimea once russky air defenses are down?
5
There were two small mistakes Turkic people were living in and around Crimea a thousand years before Mongol invasion. And Ottoman wasn't trying to capture Crimea rather trying to DEFEND Crimea! As a Turkic empire Ottoman always considered Crimean Tatars as allies and heavily supported them for centuries, in fact this was the reason of famous Russo-Turkish rivalry and 12 wars in total...
5
@Newbobdole As an engineer i must say he is kinda right, a cloth hat can not damage a jet engine it would be just shredded. Same for small birds under such pressure and forces there is very little difference between air and bird meat and tiny bones they would be just shredded with minimal damage. However if there is any metal on the hat even if it is small as a coin it would do massive damage to engine and might easily destroy it..
5
Stop trying to justify wickedness! US army committed HUNDREDS of war crimes in every single war it joined from WW2 to invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan!! Nazis, saddam, Japanese etc being worse than US doesn't magically disappear war crimes into thin air.....
2
King Stallion can carry over 30,000 lb with center hook so i really wonder what is so "dangerous" about this?! It is just propaganda you can see it is carrying M1280 etc while empty F-35 especially without engine weights less than that..
2
''Such ineffective and time taking solutions i must say! If there is a mine field send cheap vehicles and soldiers one after another until a path is cleared'' Vladimir Facistirovich Putin
2
The answer is very simple, if tanks are useless or ''death traps'' why exactly both russia and Ukraine deploying more and more of them to front lines? Why Ukraine is asking tanks from every country on Earth?? It is because tanks might get destroyed but it is EXACTLY their job taking heavy fire away from softer targets like APCs, trucks etc! And there are thousands of light vehicles in Ukraine fighting in front lines if any side didn't have tanks they would loose MANY TIMES more soldiers. Tank's job is resisting heavy fire as much as possible without risking too many soldiers and deliver a heavy damage in any opportunity not winning wars. It was a brief moment during WW2 that tanks could deliver battle winning punch but never again, it has been just a delusion for decades but people still couldn't update themselves somehow. To be honest it is also effected by propaganda of governments as national MBTs are always showcased like wonder weapons while they aren't at all, even US lost DOZENS of Abrams against weakly armed militants but when western media didn't share their footage a lot for obvious reasons it is somewhat lost knowledge. Just check how many Abrams were damaged or destroyed in Iraq alone you would loose your mind...
2
A sloppy russky will throw a cigarette into the barrel long before it wears off😂😂
2
It is really called IOF, even ICJ confirmed there are warcrimes committed, to a degree it could be even considered as a genocide! If ICJ ruled against a Muslim country you westerners would race each others to condemn that Muslim country and consider ICJ's ruling as fair and unbiased. But now you will ignore it only because Israel is accused?? Grow a backbone please..
2
So? Turkey killed several hundred wagner thugs in Syria and Libya but somehow WW3 didn't begin and we all didn't die in a nuclear war!! There are so many crybabies in the west who scream as ''it is over, we are doomed'' in every dang opportunity...
2
@piotrd.4850 Care to share which drone is effective in kineticly contested airspace, huh?? Also Bayraktars operated against air-defenses in not one not two rather many countries including Azerbaijan, Armenia, Syria, Libya, Ukraine but in all those countries enemy air defenses weren't in combat mode, LMAO!! Your kind of ''experts'' were also claiming all Bayraktars were shot down while in reality even after a year later Ukraine still operates Bayraktars...
1
People are really underestimate the difference between military and commercial grades, as an electronics engineer i must say pretty much everything is different! Military grade has every electronic component, frame, glass etc more robust to withstand wide range of temperatures and conditions. For example most military laptops are designed to withstand from -20 to 60 C while most commercial laptops are only designed to withstand 10-30 C! And this is the reason why electronic devices fail way more in tropical countries like Indonesia as they aren't designed to withstand those hot humid environments at first place...
1
Bayraktars are still flying around Odessa and over Black sea, in fact recently released Su-27 vs Bayraktar footage was from there. Ukraine basicly uses them as maritime patrol aircraft anymore which could be because Russians figured out their radar cross section and it became too dangerous operating them over enemy lines. It is possible but not likely as Turkey operated Bayraktars against russian forces years ago in Syria and Libya! They couldn't figure it out for years and failed to stop them then suddenly managed to shoot down every single one of them? It doesn't make sense and because they are mostly fiberglass their radar cross section is quite small not that easy to detect them. So most probably Ukraine uses them in the south on purpose not because they have to. They can hit targets on ground with Himars, artilery, smaller drones, their air force but when they need to patrol sea what they will use? They don't have anything at all expect Bayraktars alone, Ukrainian air force still can't fly over Black sea as they don't have any air defence system over the sea to cover them..
1
US dropped two nuclear bombs on hundreds of thouands medical personel and civilians, only God knows what exactly we are arguing here???
1
Turkish army is actually 20% Kurdish force and they also fight against those so called ''Kurds'' in Syria simply because nobody in the region calls them just Kurds here. It is called YPG a Syrian branch of PKK which has been around since 80s as a marxist organization first which wanted to establish a communist Kurdish country. After soviet union collapsed and accordingly their funding ran dry they became freelancers. They fought during Kurdish civil war between 1994 and 1997 as a PUK (Second largest party/tribe in KRG) and IRANIAN ally against KDP which is the largest party/tribe in KRG. And they were actually winning the civil war until Turkish army invaded KRG in 1997 with 50,000 soldiers and ended the civil war in favour of KDP, that's exactly how KDP and Turkey have been allies since then and there are 13 Turkish bases in KRG. After Turkish invasion they ran into Qandil mountains in KRG where regional government control is pretty much non-existing even today and stayed there until American invasion of Iraq. So after a bumpy ride they finally found the perfect master which is rich and could babysit them with it's lies and influence. Since then they have been a US proxy in both KRG and later Syria, cooperation in Iraq is often overlooked as on paper US army has been cooperating with PUK Peshmerga not PKK terrorists. But in reality PUK Peshmerga is not an army and they have all kind of smaller groups in their armed force as allies. And since Kurdish civil war PUK and PKK were allies for 2 decades, in fact it was PUK Peshmerga and PKK terrorists who captured and controlled Kirkuk for several years. However after Iraqi army could push them out of Kirkuk easily their relations went sour as both sides kept blaming each others for weak defence of the city. And later PUK completely banned PKK activities in their territories which ended their alliance in 2021. So right now they have no allies left in Iraq and being hunted down anytime they leave their caves, this is why more and more PKK members are running into Syria and becoming ''democratic Kurds'' aka YPG terrorists, in fact even so called commander of YPG is actually a PKK terrorists! But according to our ''lovely'' NATO allies Mazloum Kobani is a FORMER PKK terrorists who ''retired'' and became ''an angel of democracy'' now!! Yeah right, PKK/YPG didn't hold A SINGLE ELECTION in their entire history anywhere on Earth and same people are controlling the group for decades but they are somehow democratic that only God knows how exactly.. Here comes the excuses ''they didn't hold any election because turkish oppression didn't let them, they are freedom fighters that's why they are democratic'' etc let me ask you a question, who do you think has second highest casualties in this war after terrorists themselves? Turkish soldiers?? Civilians?? No, the second highest casualty in this war is KURDISH VILLAGE GUARDS! There are thousands of villages in south-eastern Turkey alone and the army couldn't defend all of them constantly therefore government decided to arm Kurdish villagers so they could defend themselves until the army arrives. I bet you would expect ''Kurdish freedomfighters'' PKK and Kurdish villagers didn't fight against each others, right? But in reality it is terrorist PKK which was seizing assests of villagers as ''tax'' and even forcefully recruiting their children so Kurdish village guards pretty much always fought against them even if they were greatly outnumbered! While PKK simply declared them as ''traitors'' and mercilessly killed thousands of them, that's how they have second highest casualties in this war!! Such example of freedom fighters i must say and it doesn't even end here, hundreds of bomb attacks against public markets, squares, stadiums, government buildings. Executions of Kurdish civilians who were against them, plating mines into rural roads against Turkish army which pretty much always killed innocent civilians passing, suicide attacks with trucks loaded with explosives which happened as late as 2016 when they attacked a police station and leveled down an entire block into ground killing dozens. Few months later another truck exploded while they were still loading it and leveled down several buildings killing all terrorists and many civilians. That's your ''freedom fighters'' if you can believe such an extreme moronity and this is the reason why dozens of countries consider PKK as a terrorist organization as they are truly. But ofc it was in the past, today PKK is a lovely, reliable and democratic US partner anymore even if US also considers PKK as a terrorist organization!! You westerners love to talk from your high horses about humanism, democracy, rule of law etc but at the end all you care is your own benefits and could even support terrorists for it, such a pity...
1
US dropped two nuclear bombs on hundreds of thouands medical personel and civilians, only God knows what exactly we are arguing here???
1
Such a white sheep you are Ryan! Slavery was so important to those states simply because their economy entirely relied on slave labour while the north was heavily industrialized and wouldn't be affected at all! So southern states had two options abolish slavery and face complete collapse of their economies which would make them lesser states compared the north. Or take up arms and decide their own future!! It is entirely possible even if CSA won slavery was still going to be abolished like 20-30 years later, meanwhile they were going to move huge wealth from north to south and industrialize their states. It was all about MONEY not humanity, not freedom, not American dream, it is just you sheeps who believe such a moronity...
1
Exactly, if tanks are useless or ''death traps'' why exactly both russia and Ukraine deploying more and more of them to front lines? Why Ukraine is asking tanks from every country on Earth?? It is because tanks might get destroyed but it is EXACTLY their job taking heavy fire away from softer targets like APCs, trucks etc! And there are thousands of light vehicles in Ukraine fighting in front lines if any side didn't have tanks they would loose MANY TIMES more soldiers. Tank's job is resisting heavy fire as much as possible without risking too many soldiers and deliver a heavy damage in any opportunity not winning wars. It was a brief moment during WW2 that tanks could deliver battle winning punch but never again, it has been just a delusion for decades but people still couldn't update themselves somehow. To be honest it is also effected by propaganda of governments as national MBTs are always showcased like wonder weapons while they aren't at all, even US lost DOZENS of Abrams against weakly armed militants but when western media didn't share their footage a lot for obvious reasons it is somewhat lost knowledge. Just check how many Abrams were damaged or destroyed in Iraq alone you would loose your mind...
1
Im speechless really, that vehicle could be used only for target practice! It can't be a propaganda attempt neither as it is literally a WW2 era weapon. Perhaps it is wagner who did it, there is some kind of beef ongoing between government and wagner because wagner doesn't receive a lot of modern weapons. So it is possible they built it to exaggerate their situation like ''we are fighting with ww2 weapons''...
1
Empty F-35C doesn't weight that much + it has no engine. This isn't a dangerous operation at all that's why Navy ordered them to refuel..
1
@richarddoig1865 You are the one who is clearly out of his mind, driving is FAR more dangerous than flying! You can easily die while walking and crossing a road!! There are many times more land accidents in the army than helicopter crashes so we should act like they all in danger constantly?? This is just a moronic comment that you wrote without thinking..
1
Bayraktars are still flying around Odessa and over Black sea, in fact recently released Su-27 vs Bayraktar footage was from there. Ukraine basicly uses them as maritime patrol aircraft anymore which could be because Russians figured out their radar cross section and it became too dangerous operating them over enemy lines. It is possible but not likely as Turkey operated Bayraktars against russian forces years ago in Syria and Libya! They couldn't figure it out for years and failed to stop them then suddenly managed to shoot down every single one of them? It doesn't make sense and because they are mostly fiberglass their radar cross section is quite small not that easy to detect them. So most probably Ukraine uses them in the south on purpose not because they have to. They can hit targets on ground with Himars, artilery, smaller drones, their air force but when they need to patrol sea what they will use? They don't have anything at all expect Bayraktars alone, Ukrainian air force still can't fly over Black sea as they don't have any air defence system over the sea to cover them..
1
Like US war against terrorism has been any different? Create millions of refugees and terrible poverty which would push people join shady organizations. Began targetting those shady organizations, kill a bunch of civilians every time by ''accident'' and create more extremists every fucking day! I would admit wagner does it in whole another level by their brutal tactics but essentially US was also harmful in every country from Somalia to Afghanistan...
1
@mcnultyssobercompanion6372 It is really sad to see after 40,000 civilian deaths, even ICJ considering it as a genocide and countless footage showing the deaths and destruction there are still spineless people like you who could still defend the war! Perhaps you have no idea there are more children lost their lives in Gaza than any other war in 21st century which includes decades long wars as well, this alone proves without any question there are warcrimes committed everyday..
1
Turkish army is actually 20% Kurdish force and they also fight against those so called ''Kurds'' in Syria simply because nobody in the region calls them just Kurds here. It is called YPG a Syrian branch of PKK which has been around since 80s as a marxist organization first which wanted to establish a communist Kurdish country. After soviet union collapsed and accordingly their funding ran dry they became freelancers. They fought during Kurdish civil war between 1994 and 1997 as a PUK (Second largest party/tribe in KRG) and IRANIAN ally against KDP which is the largest party/tribe in KRG. And they were actually winning the civil war until Turkish army invaded KRG in 1997 with 50,000 soldiers and ended the civil war in favour of KDP, that's exactly how KDP and Turkey have been allies since then and there are 13 Turkish bases in KRG. After Turkish invasion they ran into Qandil mountains in KRG where regional government control is pretty much non-existing even today and stayed there until American invasion of Iraq. So after a bumpy ride they finally found the perfect master which is rich and could babysit them with it's lies and influence. Since then they have been a US proxy in both KRG and later Syria, cooperation in Iraq is often overlooked as on paper US army has been cooperating with PUK Peshmerga not PKK terrorists. But in reality PUK Peshmerga is not an army and they have all kind of smaller groups in their armed force as allies. And since Kurdish civil war PUK and PKK were allies for 2 decades, in fact it was PUK Peshmerga and PKK terrorists who captured and controlled Kirkuk for several years. However after Iraqi army could push them out of Kirkuk easily their relations went sour as both sides kept blaming each others for weak defence of the city. And later PUK completely banned PKK activities in their territories which ended their alliance in 2021. So right now they have no allies left in Iraq and being hunted down anytime they leave their caves, this is why more and more PKK members are running into Syria and becoming ''democratic Kurds'' aka YPG terrorists, in fact even so called commander of YPG is actually a PKK terrorists! But according to our ''lovely'' NATO allies Mazloum Kobani is a FORMER PKK terrorists who ''retired'' and became ''an angel of democracy'' now!! Yeah right, PKK/YPG didn't hold A SINGLE ELECTION in their entire history anywhere on Earth and same people are controlling the group for decades but they are somehow democratic that only God knows how exactly.. Here comes the excuses ''they didn't hold any election because turkish oppression didn't let them, they are freedom fighters that's why they are democratic'' etc let me ask you a question, who do you think has second highest casualties in this war after terrorists themselves? Turkish soldiers?? Civilians?? No, the second highest casualty in this war is KURDISH VILLAGE GUARDS! There are thousands of villages in south-eastern Turkey alone and the army couldn't defend all of them constantly therefore government decided to arm Kurdish villagers so they could defend themselves until the army arrives. I bet you would expect ''Kurdish freedomfighters'' PKK and Kurdish villagers didn't fight against each others, right? But in reality it is terrorist PKK which was seizing assests of villagers as ''tax'' and even forcefully recruiting their children so Kurdish village guards pretty much always fought against them even if they were greatly outnumbered! While PKK simply declared them as ''traitors'' and mercilessly killed thousands of them, that's how they have second highest casualties in this war!! Such example of freedom fighters i must say and it doesn't even end here, hundreds of bomb attacks against public markets, squares, stadiums, government buildings. Executions of Kurdish civilians who were against them, plating mines into rural roads against Turkish army which pretty much always killed innocent civilians passing, suicide attacks with trucks loaded with explosives which happened as late as 2016 when they attacked a police station and leveled down an entire block into ground killing dozens. Few months later another truck exploded while they were still loading it and leveled down several buildings killing all terrorists and many civilians. That's your ''freedom fighters'' if you can believe such an extreme moronity and this is the reason why dozens of countries consider PKK as a terrorist organization as they are truly. But ofc it was in the past, today PKK is a lovely, reliable and democratic US partner anymore even if US also considers PKK as a terrorist organization!! You westerners love to talk from your high horses about humanism, democracy, rule of law etc but at the end all you care is your own benefits and could even support terrorists for it, such a pity...
1