Comments by "Ggoddkkiller" (@ggoddkkiller1342) on "What Will Sweden Bring to NATO: A Warographics Analysis" video.

There were 12 wars between Russians and Turks and hundreds of battles with millions of casualties at both sides, their rivalty considered as one of the longest and bloodiest in history!! So if you could think Turkey suddenly became a russian ally now it only means how clueless you are, in fact Turkey is the only NATO country which directly engaged against russian forces in decades in both Libya and Syria like that shooting down russian warplane, you people quickly forgot about somehow... If we check what Sweden really offers to NATO, weapons that a handful of them could be produced or there are far better alternatives in NATO already doesn't prove at all Sweden would be useful for NATO!! But unlike this nonsense the real answer is very simple: Can Sweden protect itself against Russia? No.. Can US protect itself? Yes.. Can France protect itself? Yes.. Can Turkey protect itself? Yes.. Can UK, Italy or Spain protect itself? Maybe.. Yep, all other nations in NATO are already relying on NATO for protection and Sweden would be just an excess baggage! US wants Sweden to join so they can place their missiles to there. EU wants Sweden to join so first time in history pretty much entire Europe would be united militarily. But why Turkey would care any of those especially while Sweden still doesn't want to drop it's non-aligned policies and show very little intention to protect it's future NATO allies!! Even if Finland is in similar situation both their army isn't as bad as Sweden and they also dropped their non-aligned policies entirely, they are really committed to protect all NATO members. Unless Sweden does the same im not supporting their membership, they can sign a defensive pact with US alone if they want protection alone not becoming allies..
3
Such a nonsense i must say, using weapons that a handful of them could be produced or there are far better alternatives in NATO already to prove ''Sweden is strong''!! But unlike this nonsense the real answer is very simple: Can Sweden protect itself against Russia? No.. Can US protect itself? Yes.. Can France protect itself? Yes.. Can Turkey protect itself? Yes.. Can UK, Italy or Spain protect itself? Maybe.. Yep, all other nations in NATO are already relying on NATO for protection and Sweden would be just an excess baggage! US wants Sweden to join so they can place their missiles to there. EU wants Sweden to join so first time in history pretty much entire Europe would be united militarily. But why Turkey would care any of those especially while Sweden still doesn't want to drop it's non-aligned policies and show very little intention to protect it's future NATO allies!! Even if Finland is in similar situation both their army isn't as bad as Sweden and they also dropped their non-aligned policies entirely and really committed to protect all NATO members. Unless Sweden does the same im not supporting their membership, they can sign a defensive pact with US alone if they want protection alone not becoming allies...
2
Such a nonsense i must say, using weapons that a handful of them could be produced or there are far better alternatives in NATO already to prove ''Sweden is strong''!! But unlike this nonsense the real answer is very simple: Can Sweden protect itself against Russia? No.. Can US protect itself? Yes.. Can France protect itself? Yes.. Can Turkey protect itself? Yes.. Can UK, Italy or Spain protect itself? Maybe.. Yep, all other nations in NATO are already relying on NATO for protection and Sweden would be just an excess baggage! US wants Sweden to join so they can place their missiles to there. EU wants Sweden to join so first time in history pretty much entire Europe would be united militarily. But why Turkey would care any of those especially while Sweden still doesn't want to drop it's non-aligned policies and show very little intention to protect it's future NATO allies!! Even if Finland is in similar situation both their army isn't as bad as Sweden and they also dropped their non-aligned policies entirely and really committed to protect all NATO members. Unless Sweden does the same im not supporting their membership, they can sign a defensive pact with US alone if they want protection alone not becoming allies..
2
Such a nonsense i must say, using weapons that a handful of them could be produced or there are far better alternatives in NATO already to prove ''Sweden is strong''!! But unlike this nonsense the real answer is very simple: Can Sweden protect itself against Russia? No.. Can US protect itself? Yes.. Can France protect itself? Yes.. Can Turkey protect itself? Yes.. Can UK, Italy or Spain protect itself? Maybe.. Yep, all other nations in NATO are already relying on NATO for protection and Sweden would be just an excess baggage! US wants Sweden to join so they can place their missiles to there. EU wants Sweden to join so first time in history pretty much entire Europe would be united militarily. But why Turkey would care any of those especially while Sweden still doesn't want to drop it's non-aligned policies and show very little intention to protect it's future NATO allies!! Even if Finland is in similar situation both their army isn't as bad as Sweden and they also dropped their non-aligned policies entirely and really committed to protect all NATO members. Unless Sweden does the same im not supporting their membership, they can sign a defensive pact with US alone if they want protection alone not becoming allies...
1
Such a nonsense i must say, using weapons that a handful of them could be produced or there are far better alternatives in NATO already to prove ''Sweden is strong''!! But unlike this nonsense the real answer is very simple: Can Sweden protect itself against Russia? No.. Can US protect itself? Yes.. Can France protect itself? Yes.. Can Turkey protect itself? Yes.. Can UK, Italy or Spain protect itself? Maybe.. Yep, all other nations in NATO are already relying on NATO for protection and Sweden would be just an excess baggage! US wants Sweden to join so they can place their missiles to there. EU wants Sweden to join so first time in history pretty much entire Europe would be united militarily. But why Turkey would care any of those especially while Sweden still doesn't want to drop it's non-aligned policies and show very little intention to protect it's future NATO allies!! Even if Finland is in similar situation both their army isn't as bad as Sweden and they also dropped their non-aligned policies entirely and really committed to protect all NATO members. Unless Sweden does the same im not supporting their membership, they can sign a defensive pact with US alone if they want protection alone not becoming allies...
1
Such a nonsense i must say, using weapons that a handful of them could be produced or there are far better alternatives in NATO already to prove ''Sweden is strong''!! But unlike this nonsense the real answer is very simple: Can Sweden protect itself against Russia? No.. Can US protect itself? Yes.. Can France protect itself? Yes.. Can Turkey protect itself? Yes.. Can UK, Italy or Spain protect itself? Maybe.. Yep, all other nations in NATO are already relying on NATO for protection and Sweden would be just an excess baggage! US wants Sweden to join so they can place their missiles to there. EU wants Sweden to join so first time in history pretty much entire Europe would be united militarily. But why Turkey would care any of those especially while Sweden still doesn't want to drop it's non-aligned policies and show very little intention to protect it's future NATO allies!! Even if Finland is in similar situation both their army isn't as bad as Sweden and they also dropped their non-aligned policies entirely and really committed to protect all NATO members. Unless Sweden does the same im not supporting their membership, they can sign a defensive pact with US alone if they want protection alone not becoming allies...
1
@jemakrol You understand all NATO members must protect each others and it is not ''lets protect only white christians'' organization, right?? Then care to explain please why would Turkey approve a country's NATO application which has no intention at all protecting Turkey??? You people are such ridiculous jokes acting like NATO belongs to only US, UK, Germany etc while in reality Turkey is an equal member and has every right to veto a new member which doesn't act like an ally...
1
Such a nonsense i must say, using weapons that a handful of them could be produced or there are far better alternatives in NATO already to prove ''Sweden is strong''!! But unlike this nonsense the real answer is very simple: Can Sweden protect itself against Russia? No.. Can US protect itself? Yes.. Can France protect itself? Yes.. Can Turkey protect itself? Yes.. Can UK, Italy or Spain protect itself? Maybe.. Yep, all other nations in NATO are already relying on NATO for protection and Sweden would be just an excess baggage! US wants Sweden to join so they can place their missiles to there. EU wants Sweden to join so first time in history pretty much entire Europe would be united militarily. But why Turkey would care any of those especially while Sweden still doesn't want to drop it's non-aligned policies and show very little intention to protect it's future NATO allies!! Even if Finland is in similar situation both their army isn't as bad as Sweden and they also dropped their non-aligned policies entirely and really committed to protect all NATO members. Unless Sweden does the same im not supporting their membership, they can sign a defensive pact with US alone if they want protection alone not becoming allies...
1
Such a nonsense i must say, using weapons that a handful of them could be produced or there are far better alternatives in NATO already to prove ''Sweden is strong''!! But unlike this nonsense the real answer is very simple: Can Sweden protect itself against Russia? No.. Can US protect itself? Yes.. Can France protect itself? Yes.. Can Turkey protect itself? Yes.. Can UK, Italy or Spain protect itself? Maybe.. Yep, all other nations in NATO are already relying on NATO for protection and Sweden would be just an excess baggage! US wants Sweden to join so they can place their missiles to there. EU wants Sweden to join so first time in history pretty much entire Europe would be united militarily. But why Turkey would care any of those especially while Sweden still doesn't want to drop it's non-aligned policies and show very little intention to protect it's future NATO allies!! Even if Finland is in similar situation both their army isn't as bad as Sweden and they also dropped their non-aligned policies entirely and really committed to protect all NATO members. Unless Sweden does the same im not supporting their membership, they can sign a defensive pact with US alone if they want protection alone not becoming allies...
1
Such a nonsense i must say, using weapons that a handful of them could be produced or there are far better alternatives in NATO already to prove ''Sweden is strong''!! But unlike this nonsense the real answer is very simple: Can Sweden protect itself against Russia? No.. Can US protect itself? Yes.. Can France protect itself? Yes.. Can Turkey protect itself? Yes.. Can UK, Italy or Spain protect itself? Maybe.. Yep, all other nations in NATO are already relying on NATO for protection and Sweden would be just an excess baggage! US wants Sweden to join so they can place their missiles to there. EU wants Sweden to join so first time in history pretty much entire Europe would be united militarily. But why Turkey would care any of those especially while Sweden still doesn't want to drop it's non-aligned policies and show very little intention to protect it's future NATO allies!! Even if Finland is in similar situation both their army isn't as bad as Sweden and they also dropped their non-aligned policies entirely and really committed to protect all NATO members. Unless Sweden does the same im not supporting their membership, they can sign a defensive pact with US alone if they want protection alone not becoming allies...
1
@Saba-lz2qg What are you smoking really? You are that upset because Sweden can not prove they would act like an ally and protect Turkey too not expect protection for only themselves?? You people are just pitiful, crying and yelling instead of actually acting like an ally!! If Sweden want to become a NATO member they MUST drop their non-aligned policies and start acting like allies, it is just that simple. And Turkey has nukes right now and Sweden is within range of Turkish weapons, not that it makes any difference as Turkey doesn't see Sweden as a threat but not an ally neither thanks to moronic Swedish policies while trying to become an ally...
1
@EaizePeazy First of all because you completely changed the topic from Sweden's value to Turkey i guess you also agree my statement! Secondly it was quite amusing to read a nation with extremely brutal and bloody history lecturing us, Vikings killed and enslaved more people in 100 years than entire Turkish history and established your countries upon those atrocities!! But i guess you forgot who you are and could act like you are cradle of humanism somehow. Our biggest disagreement with so called ''humanist'' Europeans that you are murderers who became rich by killing, enslaving and stealing. And you Viking descendance aren't even among the worst nations in Europe despite raiding entire Europe for hundreds of years as British, Spanish, Portugese, German, Belgian, French, Russian committed far worse crimes.. What was the last one? Ohh yeah Russians who committed genocides from Circassia to Crimea, from Kazakhstan to Siberia and they are committing a new one in Ukraine today and that's the entire reason you want NATO protection. But even then you could dare to claim they were the ones who ''protected'' Armenians and ''condemned crimes against humanity'' first time in 1915. As i said in my first message you are CLUELESS about history, first of all Russian civil war didn't begin in 1915, there were no white Russians in 1915 rather Russian civil war began in 1917 so what you claimed can't be true at all!! Here let me teach more history since we already began. Armenians revolted against Ottoman in 1914 as a Russian proxy, believing Ottoman was about to collapse. They were armed and supplied by Russian empire which also invaded entire eastern Turkey at the end of 1914 which included ALL Armenian majority territories so Ottoman didn't even control vast majority of Armenians when they were ''genocided''. But nope it wasn't enough rather Armenians needed to have their ''historical lands'' which were Muslim majority for centuries. So they began targeting not only Ottoman forces also Turkish civilians in order to displace them elsewhere. According to ENTENTE sources at least 300,000 Turkish civilians were killed during the time. But unlike their belief Ottoman was no where near collapsing and stopped their rebellion by displacing Armenian population to Lebanon and Syria so Russian empire couldn't continue arming and supplying them. Some of them resettled into those countries while majority of Armenians migrated into Russian empire over Caucasus mountains where a lot of them died because of winter conditions and lack of supplies. It is really a sad incident for sure but this doesn't make it a genocide simply because Ottoman targeted them because of their rebellion not their etnicity nor religion that genocide definition demands to be the reason!! You can read the manifesto of Hovhannes Katchaznouni first PM of Armenia where he openly admits they revolted as a Russian proxy and even dares to say if they didn't revolt Ottoman wasn't going to target them. To be fair he also claims they didn't want to claim such a massive Armenia that most of it was Turkish majority anymore but first Russian empire then US forced them to do so in order to accept them as their mandate. Even if it is true it doesn't change anything, you don't make your neighbours your enemies while believing some foreign powers would protect you. It is an eye opening manifesto you ''humanist'' should read it and learn some true history. About Kurds, im not a nationalist nor islamist we did a lot mistakes about our Kurdish minority especially about Kurdish language like it was forbidden to use other languages than Turkish for publishing books or operating radio and TV channels which discriminated against them. But we didn't collect their children to assimilate like Canada or Australia did to it's minorities! We didn't have anti-Kurdish laws which made them second class citizens such as anti-Black laws in USA or South Africa!! Every single Kurd is full and equal citizen of Turkey since 1923 and govenrment doesn't even know who is Kurdish or Turkish simply because there is no ethnic recording in Turkey. So it is very bold and ignorant of you to claim ''Kurds are genocided'', in fact Turkish army is actually 20% Kurdish force as every male citizen of Turkey has to do their mandatory military service. Then according to your claim those Kurds in Turkish army are genociding themselves, huh? Let me teach you another fact and reduce your ignorance a little bit, nobody in the region calls that Syrian group we are targeting just ''Kurds'', they are called YPG a Syrian branch of PKK which waged war against Turkey for decades. In this war do you know who has second highest casualty after terrorists themselves?? Ofc you don't know otherwise you wouldn't support terrorists at first place. It is KURDISH VILLAGE GUARDS, there are thousands of villages in eastern Turkey alone and the army couldn't protect them all constantly in 80 and 90s. So the government armed Kurdish villagers therefore they could protect themselves until the army arrived. Im sure you would expect Kurdish villagers and ''Kurdish'' PKK didn't fight against each others but you couldn't be more wrong. It is called terrorist PKK who was seizing their assets and even forcefully recruiting children so they pretty much always fought against PKK even if they were greatly outnumbered! While PKK simply declared them as ''traitors'' and mercilessly killed thousands of them!! Here is your ''freedom fighters'' and ''Kurdish genocide'', this is also reason why millions of Turkish Kurds in Turkish army are mercilessly attacking them as well because unlike you they know those are really terrorists who killed thousands of innocent Kurdish people... I hope you learned something and reduced your insane ignorance a little bit, not that it doesn't matter much. We Turks are one side while you Europeans are another side we will be never ever same. But we honour our agrements unlike those cheeky russky bastards, stop supporting terrorists then Turkey would defend Sweden while no pressure can ever change it.
1
Such a nonsense i must say, using weapons that a handful of them could be produced or there are far better alternatives in NATO already to prove ''Sweden is strong''!! But unlike this nonsense the real answer is very simple: Can Sweden protect itself against Russia? No.. Can US protect itself? Yes.. Can France protect itself? Yes.. Can Turkey protect itself? Yes.. Can UK, Italy or Spain protect itself? Maybe.. Yep, all other nations in NATO are already relying on NATO for protection and Sweden would be just an excess baggage! US wants Sweden to join so they can place their missiles to there. EU wants Sweden to join so first time in history pretty much entire Europe would be united militarily. But why Turkey would care any of those especially while Sweden still doesn't want to drop it's non-aligned policies and show very little intention to protect it's future NATO allies!! Even if Finland is in similar situation both their army isn't as bad as Sweden and they also dropped their non-aligned policies entirely and really committed to protect all NATO members. Unless Sweden does the same im not supporting their membership, they can sign a defensive pact with US alone if they want protection alone not becoming allies..
1
Such a nonsense i must say, using weapons that a handful of them could be produced or there are far better alternatives in NATO already to prove ''Sweden is strong''!! But unlike this nonsense the real answer is very simple: Can Sweden protect itself against Russia? No.. Can US protect itself? Yes.. Can France protect itself? Yes.. Can Turkey protect itself? Yes.. Can UK, Italy or Spain protect itself? Maybe.. Yep, all other nations in NATO are already relying on NATO for protection and Sweden would be just an excess baggage! US wants Sweden to join so they can place their missiles to there. EU wants Sweden to join so first time in history pretty much entire Europe would be united militarily. But why Turkey would care any of those especially while Sweden still doesn't want to drop it's non-aligned policies and show very little intention to protect it's future NATO allies!! Even if Finland is in similar situation both their army isn't as bad as Sweden and they also dropped their non-aligned policies entirely and really committed to protect all NATO members. Unless Sweden does the same im not supporting their membership, they can sign a defensive pact with US alone if they want protection alone not becoming allies...
1