Comments by "Ggoddkkiller" (@ggoddkkiller1342) on "MasterofRoflness" channel.

It becomes even worse as it was also the french who executed Turkish garrisons and Muslims even if Sigismund promised them safe passage! This was also the reason crusaders were executed after the battle so egotistical kid also attacked teachers after getting an F lol
25
@saintyork You are assuming things without actually knowing Ottoman army at all. As Turks were nomads vast majority of Ottoman army was cavalry, for example in 1492 Ottoman had 6,000 Janissaries and 40,000 Sipahis. In Nicopolis infantry/cavalry ratio was similar if Ottoman didn't have way more cavalry. So it was natural for them to use feigned retreats often to break enemy formations then charge with their cavalry. It wasn't sacrifcing infantry for tiring them at all, that's just a false assumption. Even if the french waited for Sigismund to arrive there was no way on Earth they could destroy Ottoman army, at best they were going to force Ottoman army to retreat but they were going to regroup and attack them again next day. Their cavalry heavy armies were the real reason why Ottoman dominated pitched battles for several centuries and only lost against Timur who had more cavalry than them as another nomadic nation. And it was also the reason why Ottoman struggled a lot while capturing castles and cities as their cavalry was useless in sieges. So Ottoman infantry Janissaries always had great importance even if their numbers were much smaller as they were the ones capturing cities. Janissaries weren't Ottoman standing army at all, standing army was called Kapıkulu army and it had Kapıkulu heavy cavalry who were also guards of Sultans, Topçu ocağı (Artillery division), Janissaries (Infantry division), Cebeci ocağı (Supply division) and lağımcılar (Drillers) who were weakening walls etc had their own division. So those infantry in front lines weren't expandable soldiers or anything rather they were also Janissaries so Ottoman couldn't sacrifice them so easily if they wanted to capture anything..
11
Crusader army slaughtered almost all Muslims and even some Orthodoxs on their path to Nicopolis so it isn't exactly surprising Serbians fought against them. This was also the reason why Sultan Beyazid Khan ordered their execution..
10
One part was skipped crusaders executed small Turkish garrison of Oryahovo castle and other Muslims they captured. When Sultan Beyazid Khan learned about it he was furious ordering execution of entire crusader army which was a first in Ottoman history. Only some nobles for ransom and ''underage'' prisoners could survive the slaughter, they placed a spike to ground and anybody higher than that lost their heads. Turkish version of an eye of an eye could be a little unbalanced, Europeans also realized it and tried to not provoke Turks at least while they were powerful...
8
1- Chinese claimed we are half human half wolf not us! It was 2000 years ago while they were high smoking opium even if it a stupid story still being half wolf is kinda cool.. 2- Turkic nations actually very rarely fight against each others as long as there is only one Khan! Khan title is so little known by most people, they think it is same as King or Emperor title. But nope it couldn't be more different, Khan basicly means the leader of people which includes everybody really. So there can't be two leaders of people rather only one and if there were two Khans you can bet they fought against each others same as Timur Khan and Beyazid Khan. Ottoman kept using Khan title for it's entire 600 years long history which basicly meant they were overlord of all Turkic people and always accepted Turkic migration to the west regardless which tribe it is actually from.
4
I was going to add it was the french who executed them as well but you added it yourself in the edit. They singlehandedly destroyed the crusade lol
4
They were way too heavy, it might work in local small battles in France but not against a real army in a pitched battle. Especially not against a mostly cavalry army like Ottoman had in Nicopolis..
4
As Turks were nomads Ottoman armies were vast majority cavalry in early Ottoman history. For example in 1492 Ottoman had 6,000 Janissaries and 40,000 Sipahis which was the real reason why they were so powerful in pitched battles but you know who had more cavalry than Ottoman..
4
It was also the french who executed small Turkish garrison of Oryahovo castle and other Muslims they captured despite Sigismund promising them safe passage! When Sultan Beyazid Khan learned about it he was furious ordering execution of entire crusader army which was a first in Ottoman history. Only some nobles for ransom and ''underage'' prisoners could survive the slaughter, they placed a spike to ground and anybody higher than that lost their heads. Turkish version of an eye of an eye could be a little unbalanced, Europeans also realized it and tried to not provoke Turks at least while they were powerful..
4
@夜行者-s2x What an ignorance! But don't worry i will help you reduce your ignorance. First of all you need to learn ''Early Turkic peoples are primarily associated with ancient northeast Asians'' is just a CLAIM. There are ancient Chinese records claiming this but there are also ancient Hebrew records which claim Turks were actually from the west and descendance of one of Noah's sons. No scientific study could prove any of those claims as first they weren't large enough studies and secondly all Turkic nations are quite mixed, in fact there are countless caucasoid graves all over central Asia that some of them are over 3,000 years old despite ''Turks having east Asian origin''.. Secondly you need to learn how to check study pools while reading any studies as it shows how reliable they are crystal clear. If you did that you were going to see those genetic studies only had few hundred subjects from Turkey while even few dozen subjects from central Asian countries! But they somehow generalized their really poor study to over 200 million people and this is the reason no scientific person takes those studies seriously expect you ignorant people. Until there is a study with millions of subjects we can never know what is true percentage of east Asian ancestry. Then comes the actual facts which confute ''Turks have east Asian origin'' claim like the fact Mongols are not mixed, Chinese are not mixed. But even if Turks were east Asian same as them there isn't a single Turkic nation on Earth who are east Asian same as them! Even in East Turkestan there are caucasoid Uyghurs today despite they were dealing with Mongols and Chinese in last almost 1000 years and had no connection with the west at all. Some scientists try to explain this by claiming Uyghurs could take migration from the west. But there is a huge question mark why anybody in their right mind would migrate to mountains and deserts of East Turkestan from fertile west?! But if we accept Turks were mixed people even 1000 years ago it perfectly explains how there are caucasoid Uyghurs even today especially if we consider Uyghurs were actually western Turks.. I bet you don't even know Uyghurs were actually western Turks same as Oghuzs, Karluks and Tatars, in fact their Turkic is very close to theirs as well. As nomadic nations Turkic people kept migrating to different regions for thousands of years, for example Kazakhs and Kyrgyzs have way more east Asian ancestry despite being a neighbour of both Uzbeks (Karluks) and Turkmens (Oghuzs) simply because in the past they weren't living there! They were living inside of today Russia, Mongolia and China as far as Pasific ocean and after many wars they migrated to their current location. On the other hand Uyghurs were the first Turkic people who adopted sedentary life so they remained where they were and became eastern edge of Turkic world. So in short everything in your message is completely false that nobody knows how much east Asian ancestry any Turkic people actually have as studies were too small, nobody knows the origin of Turks so having east Asian ancestry doesn't mean they are more Turkic it could actually mean being less Turkic! Even you are admitting western Turks like Oghuzs were already mixed before they invaded the west so care to explain what makes you so sure they have east Asian origin?? And the part you tried to teach how most Turkish people see Turkey and Ottoman to a TURKISH PERSON was just moronic!! Vast majority of Turkey's population love Turkey and you can see that in the respect we show for our flag that we even kill people rather than allow them to touch it. But there were always political problems in Turkey's entire history between islamist and republican population that either side has been working against other and trying to turn Turkey to what they like. You shouldn't confuse that with hate of country wrongly, we might argue with each others but if there is a foreign threat you can bet we would unite in a heartbeat as we did many times in the past. Even during Turkish war of independence there were actually islamist and republican blocks fighting together against Entente forces..
2
@夜行者-s2x If understanding English is hard you can use translation because i literally explained in my message those studies which showed 5-10% east Asian ancestry are done with only few hundred subjects not even thousands! So they are not reliable or perhaps it is ''logical'' for you that few hundreds of subject can show ancestry of 84 million people.. It might be the reason you don't understand because of your morontiy because some of your examples are just stupid! Even the source you tried to use for ''proving Turkic people should have east Asian ancestry'' admitting some Turkic people instead have very high west Eurasian ancestry: ''However, they also noted that central-steppe Türks and early medieval Türks exhibit a high (but variable) degree of West Eurasian ancestry, which indicates that there was genetic sub-structure within the Türkic empire.'' I guess you moron didn't read it entirely or couldn't understand it entirely while copy-pasting it, LMAO!! Göktürk empire was a massive empire with hundreds of Turkic tribes, a single one of them having high east Asian ancestry doesn't prove anything at all especially while there are way more Turkic people with west Eurasian ancestry, capish?? You moron also seemed to care about genes too much in a childish fashion. Genes don't mean anything, there isn't a single nation on Earth which is not mixed at all. Rather CULTURE brings people together and form nations for thousands of years. I guess when somebody is a chinese inbred like you it is hard to understand this nation concept))
2
This was mandatory practice in early Ottoman armies. At least one Şehzade usually most favourable one would command one wing, while usually there were several Şehzades commanding smaller units. So even if Sultan dies in battle Şehzade commanding the wing would assume control of entire army like nothing happened. It actually happened in 1389 and Ottoman army wasn't affected at all, Şehzade was called from the wing into center under Sultan banner, that was it..
1