Comments by "Ggoddkkiller" (@ggoddkkiller1342) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1. If somebody wants to talk about false narratives they should first stop this "Central Asia" generalization themselves! Tajikistan is an ethnically Iranian country and has nothing to do with Turkic central Asian countries, in fact relations are quite bad and there were border conflicts have been happening including an incident only few months ago. This bad relations with neighbours, destabilized country conditions and having a long border with Afghanistan put Tajikistan as an ideal place for terrorist activities. As a Turkish person i already knew there was some isis activity in Tajikistan before this attack so attackers being from there didn't surprise me at all especially condering the country's poor conditions. About terrorists not looking like jihadists since their defeat in most of middle east isis terrorists went undercover so to speak. They are still hiring people and engaging in some illegal activities but they are heavily hunted in everywhere. Also we are talking about really poor people here, in Tajikistan minimum wage is 50 dollars, if you offer these people 2,000 dollar a month you can make them do almost anything and slowly brainwash them. Anybody in their right mind wouldn't join isis anyway so it is not that hard to manipulate inviduals willing to join isis for payment.. About why they would do this and if it is a false flag attack, i'm not sure. Usually there would be a clear reason behind such attacks, for example they targeted Turkish tourism spesifically back in the day and caused at least 10 billion dollars damage to Turkish economy. Here i can't see any reason honestly, perhaps they are trying to destabilize Russian fedaration and trying to infiltrate into Russia's large Muslim minority but it is far fetched. When false flag claimed everybody somehow thinks it has to be Ukraine but it isn't at all! They can use a false flag attack like this to blame Russia's Muslim population and use it to suppress them freely, in fact this Muslim minority is also the most anti-war and even pro-independence population in Russia. So they have reasons to suppress them and it wouldn't be first time Russia using similar tactics. It was again their propaganda machine declaring FSA (Ordinary Syrians who only tried to topple Assad) as terrorists and sadly it worked. Even western countries ditched supporting FSA while mostly Turkey still supporting them today.. So it could be a false flag as well, i guess we will learn it in few weeks. If it slowly disappears from Russian media then a real attack while if it shifts towards Ukraine or Muslim minority heavily then it was a false flag.
    3
  2. 2
  3. Your numbers are way off i must say, first of all there are around 8 million ethnically russian population in Ukraine. And secondly 50% population is either under 18 or over 40 years old, while also there are around 5 million under russian occupied region! Lets reduce 8 million from 41 million which would include russian occupied region as well as it is impossible to know how many ethnically russian minority want to join the army and how many Ukrainians are under russian occupied region, 33 million left. At least 16 million of them are not fit for duty which would leave 17 million, around 9 million women and 8 million men. Not everybody can be drafted as workforce is still needed and not fit because of illness etc so lets say it is 50% even if it is quite high. It would leave Ukraine 4 million men and 4.5 million women who can be drafted. Even if Ukrainian army has some female soldiers drafting millions of women is not logical nor can be achieved politically so at best Ukraine can draft 4 million men and 1 million women total 5 million. This isn't conversative at all rather the MAXIMUM Ukraine can draft without facing severe political and economical backlash so realistically they can never achieve this number. While wounded and killed soldiers do not exactly show total manpower lose neither as you can not keep soldiers fighting for a decade in front lines, rather they must return after a year or two at maximum unless they volunteer themselves. So it is safe to say Ukraine used around 25% of it's manpower already, still far away from facing any issues but they can not continue many years for sure..
    2