Comments by "Ggoddkkiller" (@ggoddkkiller1342) on "Could New Borders Bring Peace to the Middle East? | History of the Middle East 1918-1922 - 14/21" video.

This was mostly unbiased expect some parts were so ridiculously wrong especially about Armenia. In 1920 it was Armenia which attacked Turkey not the other way around, Hovhannes Kajaznuni who was PM of Armenia during that wrote it was them who attacked Turks crystal clear. He even adds in his manifesto that Turks wanted to confer instead of the war but they refused believing they were going to win! Even if it is so unquestionably proven that Armenia was the aggressor, somehow it is told otherwise by simply using Turks won the war like it was their plan all along. Once again it was also Russian empire and their Armenian proxies which invaded Anatolia in 1914 and remaining Armenians rebelled against the empire believing it was about to collapse. But ofc if Armenians were aggressors how exactly somebody can claim they were genocided so Armenian rebellion is completely ignored by so called "neutral" western historians. Just pathetic to be honest, Turkey will never ever recognize this rewriting of history even if thousands of years pass. It was Armenians who tried to "liberate their historial lands" they weren't even majority anymore, in that order they became a proxy of Russian empire and committed atrocities. On the other hand Georgians never became a proxy, never claimed an inch of land they weren't majority and at the end they could establish twice larger country than Armenia with half of population. Everybody reaps what they sow, Armenians wanted war and got it..
4