Comments by "Ralph Bernhard" (@ralphbernhard1757) on "TLDR News EU"
channel.
-
9
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
@C05597641 I'm not expressing a "belief". Look up the definition of "belief".
I've already stated the reasoning behind my standpoint.
As a business owner, one receives a license to perform a specific task/duty within that community. A community is common property. It belongs to everyone who lives here.
By voluntarily taking on such a task, one also takes the responsibility of serving the community.
As a business person, one serves the community that issues the license. The license says something like "sells gas", or "bakery".
As an owner of such a business, one therefore has an obligation to do for the community, as the license says.
It works all ways.
As the owner of a petrol station, one can't refuse to fill up a car with gas, because the car has a Trump sticker on the bumper.
That would not be in the interests of the community.
Or a mechanic, who is an atheist, refuses to fix your car because of your religion, and you consequently have to drive 50 miles to the next town.
Allow me to expand further.
Nobody will forbid any religious group to buy some land, put a fence around themselves, put a sign on the front saying "by appointment only", and then only baking cakes for the people they consider "good people". That is private property (like a house).
Same, with anything else.
If a Muslim opens a cafe, is given a license to operate a cafe by the community, he can't deny service to women "because his belief forbids it". It is not "free choice".
If you start allowing this kind of bigotry to prevail, everybody is going to jump on the bandwagon, with their version of bigotry.
Especially in small towns.
Dude, you want towns with 500 inhabitants to have 10 of each shop, catering to each particular brand of bigotry?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Very simply answered:
Keep the tension high.
An age-old political strategy.
Today everybody is afraid of the big bad wolf...
Of course the afraid little sheep will flock to the shephard (alpha).
The alpha has no interest in achieving lasting peace.
The alpha adores the dependency of the afraid sheep who flock around him...
And re. "strategies" and how "the truth is revealed on scraps of paper" (Roehl)
The USA has practically admitted that it misuses all small nations as "lightning rods" and "tools" to advance own global domination.
Adam Schiff, in 2020, two years before the war:
"Most critically, the military aid we provide Ukraine helps to protect and advance American national security interests in the region and beyond. America has an abiding interest in stemming Russian expansionism, and resisting any nation’s efforts to remake the map of Europe by dint of military force, even as we have tens of thousands of troops stationed there. Moreover, as one witness put it during our impeachment inquiry: “The United States aids Ukraine and her people so that they can fight Russia over there, and we don’t have to fight Russia here.”
From a short ebook "Adam Schiff Impeachment an Opening Argument".
Note the use of "Russian expansionism", when it is actually the USA/NATO which has been acting as an icebreaker these last 30 years to create PNAC/EU markets in the traditional Moscow sphere if influence, the Black Sea region.
In other words, a typical attempt of "flipping the script".
Note also that this US policy regarding "tools to fight for US interests" was incidently revealed as a by-product of the probe into the alledged attempt by Trump to blackmail the Ukraine to dig up "smear material" on the Biden family for dirty domestic political games.
Don't be a sheep.
1
-
Re. "strategies" and how "the truth is revealed on scraps of paper" (Roehl/Historian)
Today, the USA has practically admitted that it misuses smaller nations as "lightning rods" and "tools" to advance own global domination.
Adam Schiff, in 2020, two years before the current war in the Ukraine:
"Most critically, the military aid we provide Ukraine helps to protect and advance American national security interests in the region and beyond. America has an abiding interest in stemming Russian expansionism, and resisting any nation’s efforts to remake the map of Europe by dint of military force, even as we have tens of thousands of troops stationed there. Moreover, as one witness put it during our impeachment inquiry: “The United States aids Ukraine and her people so that they can fight Russia over there, and we don’t have to fight Russia here.” Taken from a short ebook "Adam Schiff Impeachment an Opening Argument".
Note the use of "Russian expansionism", when it is actually the USA/NATO which has been acting as an icebreaker these last 30 years to create PNAC/EU markets in the traditional Moscow sphere if influence, the Black Sea region. In other words, a typical attempt of "flipping the script". Note also that this US policy regarding "tools to fight for US interests" or "using little nations" was incidently revealed as a by-product of the probe into the alledged attempt by Trump to blackmail the Ukraine to dig up "smear material" on the Biden family for dirty domestic political games.
Some things never change...
"The policy which Britain has been pursuing for the last two centuries has brought her prosperity and greatness. After each victory, Britain seems, on the surface to have gained for herself no advantage whatever; all she did, she claimed to be an act of international chivalry and justice but a deeper analysis of British statesmen's claims reveals that they never speak the truth. Britain's key policy is to attack the strongest country with the help of weaker countries and then to join the weakened enemy in checking the growth of other countries and so on, and so on. British foreign policy has remained basically unchanged for two centuries. When Britain befriends or colonizes another country, the purpose is not to maintain a cordial friendship for the sake of friendship but to utilize that country as a tool to fight all threats to her supremacy. Therefore Britain always remains in a commanding position by making other countries fight her wars while she herself reaps the fruits of victory." Taken from The Vital Problem of China by Sun Yat-Sen, 1917
Should we eternally defend these long-dead historical "lords" who sacrificed pawns so their own crumbling "Empire" could survive a few more years?
Whilst these "fine gentlemen" in suites and bowler hats, scrambled to invent tax havens to safeguard the riches they had looted and raked in for a few hundred years, they used emotional arguments to cause outrage in times of crises, or sent the lower classes scrambling for the muddy trenches in times of war...
These tax havens they created spared their own obscene wealth, while the middle-classes and poor "masses" bore the burden of "Empire".
These fine elites sacrificed pawns following a "priority list": first to go were the "pawns" abroad, then followed by such in the own country, while skimming the cream off the top for themselves.
After WW1, they already knew "Empire" was on the way out, but preferred playing the game (strategies) with human lives just a little longer.
(Evidence: Search for The Spider's Web documentary on the Timeline Channel, here on YT).
Though it isn't possible to say when the American Century will go down in the same way as the British Empire once did, I will predict what will happen.
Maybe it will last another dozen years.
Maybe two-dozen.
Maybe even another fifty years...
Who knows?
Whatever.
The first "hedge fund manager"-types are already betting against the US dollar as the world reserve currency.
Such "hewoes" and "patwiots", lol
They will take their accrued "assets", and and the obscene wealth and profits raked in over the past American Century, to tax havens WHEN America's "century" implodes: leaving millions of middle-class and poor Americans to rub their eyes while wondering wtf happened...
History will repeat itself, unless the hegemon changes its deceitful ways (Google: "What does the Bible say about deceitful friends", to discover how history repeats itself in endless cycles).
The Founding Fathers once described London as “rich, proud, hectoring, swearing, squibbing, carnivorous” (Jefferson), therefore the perfect type of character flaws in a nation's leadership which one can "smear honey around the mouth", then infiltrate and then overpower: Which is what the USA did after 1895, "starting" with the first Venezuela Crisis.
Didn't anybody notice?
Washington DC sold out the "protection" they had offered to a "little nation" called Venezuela in the form of the Monroe Doctrine, as a sacrificial gift to London, and a "friendship" which could drive a wedge between arising European attempts at more unity.
Nope.
Nobody noticed.
Today, the new rich, proud, hectoring, swearing, squibbing, carnivorous "rulers of the world" in Washington DC are imitating exactly what they critized a quarter of a century before.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Very simply answered:
Keep the tension high.
An age-old political strategy.
Today everybody is afraid of the big bad wolf...
Of course the afraid little sheep will flock to the shephard (alpha).
The alpha has no interest in achieving lasting peace.
The alpha adores the dependency of the afraid sheep who flock around him...
And re. "strategies" and how "the truth is revealed on scraps of paper" (Roehl)
The USA has practically admitted that it misuses all small nations as "lightning rods" and "tools" to advance own global domination.
Adam Schiff, in 2020, two years before the war:
"Most critically, the military aid we provide Ukraine helps to protect and advance American national security interests in the region and beyond. America has an abiding interest in stemming Russian expansionism, and resisting any nation’s efforts to remake the map of Europe by dint of military force, even as we have tens of thousands of troops stationed there. Moreover, as one witness put it during our impeachment inquiry: “The United States aids Ukraine and her people so that they can fight Russia over there, and we don’t have to fight Russia here.”
From a short ebook "Adam Schiff Impeachment an Opening Argument".
Note the use of "Russian expansionism", when it is actually the USA/NATO which has been acting as an icebreaker these last 30 years to create PNAC/EU markets in the traditional Moscow sphere if influence, the Black Sea region.
In other words, a typical attempt of "flipping the script".
Note also that this US policy regarding "tools to fight for US interests" was incidently revealed as a by-product of the probe into the alledged attempt by Trump to blackmail the Ukraine to dig up "smear material" on the Biden family for dirty domestic political games.
Don't be a sheep.
1