Comments by "Ralph Bernhard" (@ralphbernhard1757) on "Wendover Productions" channel.

  1. We in the the West/NATO are not "free". You and me are a victim of "divide and rule" Washington DC employing an age-old strategy. Very simple strategy: Keep the tension high. An age-old political strategy. Old as the mountains... Today everybody is afraid of the big bad wolf... Of course the afraid little sheep will flock to the shephard (alpha). The alpha has no interest in achieving lasting peace. The alpha adores the dependency of the afraid sheep who flock around him... And re. "strategies" and how "the truth is revealed on scraps of paper" (Roehl) The USA has practically admitted that it misuses all small nations as "lightning rods" and "tools" to advance own global domination. Adam Schiff, in 2020, two years before the war: "Most critically, the military aid we provide Ukraine helps to protect and advance American national security interests in the region and beyond. America has an abiding interest in stemming Russian expansionism, and resisting any nation’s efforts to remake the map of Europe by dint of military force, even as we have tens of thousands of troops stationed there. Moreover, as one witness put it during our impeachment inquiry: “The United States aids Ukraine and her people so that they can fight Russia over there, and we don’t have to fight Russia here.” From a short ebook "Adam Schiff Impeachment an Opening Argument". Note the use of "Russian expansionism", when it is actually the USA/NATO which has been acting as an icebreaker these last 30 years to create PNAC/EU markets in the traditional Moscow sphere if influence, the Black Sea region. In other words, a typical attempt of "flipping the script". Note also that this US policy regarding "tools to fight for US interests" was incidently revealed as a by-product of the probe into the alledged attempt by Trump to blackmail the Ukraine to dig up "smear material" on the Biden family for dirty domestic political games. They say say "the devil is in the detail". I say the details reveal the devils among us.
    1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8.  @ArmchairMagpie  Mostly agreed. As long as one is already "signed up" to NATO, there is nothing to fear. The "Big Brotha" USA will pwotect you... If not. Tough. See "poor little Ukraine". Call this cynisism on my part, because of my personal lack of ability to change reality. Writing this, is not disrespect for the victims of war, who always have my sincere support. I don't subscribe to any ideologies or predescribed thinking pattens, but look at historical events and compare current events to find out what age-old strategy is being implemented. Why do I write "poor Ukraine", being "not signed up" yet? Because if you're not "signed up" in a binding mutually beneficial alliance, you're simply "cannon fodder" for the "machine". How do I know this? Because the strategists said so themselves. Suitably "hidden" behind flowery formulations of course. What lessons can we learn from history. Today, we watch on while history repeats itself in the Ukraine, because leaders make the same mistakes again and again. A virtual repeat of the leadup to WW1, as history "rhymes" in eternal cycles. On the micro level, only a fool would try to ensure own safety, by making friends 200 miles away. No, of course, a strong neighborhood, and support of a competent local police is what people choose. Yet, when it comes to states, and empires, leaders become erroneous in their decisions on alliances or co-operation. Choosing a faraway state or empire to ensure own interests, is simply not a good idea. A lesson I fear which will never be learnt. Re. the British Empire at the time, and their self-appointed role of Pax Britannica "defenders of the world" (lol) Lord Palmerston stated: “Therefore I say that it is a narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow.” And regarding the post-WW2 Pax Americana as the new alpha USA took over the role of "protectors of the world" (lol again), Henry Kissinger repeated the policy almost verbatim for the American Century: “America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests”. Has anybody ever explained what such a policy meant in practice? It means that if the safety of "poor you" wherever you live, doesn't serve the "interests" of these kind eternally smiling gentlemen, you'll be coldly written off with a few "thoughts and prayers". It means the slimy deceitful "Albions" and their modern associates and political inheritors expect you (personally) to be there to advance their interests today, but that they probably won't be around to protect you tomorrow... Solution: If they won't be around to protect you tomorrow, to hell with them today. A lesson I fear which will never be learnt... The road to hegemony and spheres of influence is paved with blood. There is no such thing as an innocent party, only "guilty" and "less guilty", or "bad" and "worse".
    1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. Oh. And I also predicted that nobody would help "poor Ukrainians" if/when war broke out. Why? Because it had all happened before. What lessons can we learn from history. Today, we watch on while history repeats itself in the Ukraine, because leaders make the same mistakes again and again. A virtual repeat of the leadup to WW1, as history "rhymes" in eternal cycles. On the micro level, only a fool would try to ensure own safety, by making friends 200 miles away. No, of course, a strong neighborhood, and support of a competent local police is what people choose. Yet, when it comes to states, and empires, leaders become erroneous in their decisions on alliances or co-operation. Choosing a faraway state or empire to ensure own interests, is simply not a good idea. A lesson I fear which will never be learnt. Re. the British Empire at the time, and their self-appointed role of Pax Britannica "defenders of the world" (lol) Lord Palmerston stated: “Therefore I say that it is a narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow.” And regarding the post-WW2 Pax Americana as the new alpha USA took over the role of "protectors of the world" (lol again), Henry Kissinger repeated the policy almost verbatim for the American Century: “America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests”. Has anybody ever explained what such a policy meant in practice? It means that if the safety of "poor you" wherever you live, doesn't serve the "interests" of these kind eternally smiling gentlemen, you'll be coldly written off with a few "thoughts and prayers". It means the slimy deceitful "Albions" and their modern associates and political inheritors expect you (personally) to be there to advance their interests today, but that they probably won't be around to protect you tomorrow... Solution: If they won't be around to protect you tomorrow, to hell with them today. A lesson I fear which will never be learnt...
    1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1