Comments by "Ralph Bernhard" (@ralphbernhard1757) on "maneco64"
channel.
-
5
-
The USA is a casino masquerading as a country.
"The US national interest is controlling other countries so that any economic surplus generated by that country is transferred to the US, to US investors, to the US government, and especially to US bondholders." - Prof. Michael Hudson (the "giant vacuum cleaner").
It is the dollar tributary of the weaker economies, and junior partners, being vacuumed off in order to please the controlling master.
To those who stand up to these systems, and who have their "princes" (Machiavelli/gatekeepers) intact, the citizens live under perpetual danger of becoming the victims of the US MIMAC-written and crafted BLACK LEGEND of being the collective "bad guys" of history. The USA insists on acting like a neutral third party when it is in reality the direct instigator of crises and wars where their "interests run". Look way back at the Nye Commission of the 1930s: Washington DC has always been a belligerent party that is on the constant lookout for proxies (favouritism as strategy of divide-and-rule/conquer) to implement long-standing plans to subject other states and turn them into "dollar tributaries", or if not possible, to balkanize regions of the globe. Words like balkanize, fragmentation, drawing lines on the map, "our friends fighting for freedom," puppet regimes, corporate interests, etc. are always indicative of a strategy of divide-and-rule, hidden behind the narratives of the innocent doves, who think they are the benevolent empire, "always helping the good guys and the weak and oppressed."
The current pariah for the "future carving knives" is Russia, using a whole bag of US tricks and schemes it's been famous for since 1776. Ask the First Nations.
2
-
The USA/Washington DC has always fought wars to create systemic disunity/division somewhere else on the planet, for own systemic gains, using a variety of means at its disposal (power). The only wars it has ever fought in history on the own continent (North America), was to create systemic unity/gain for itself.
This is the theory.
According to the scientific process, these proclaimed "rules" must now be countered, by trying to find exceptions to these two rules.
According to the concept of "meaning of words" all exceptions to the rules which have been proclaimed, must be questioned: does this war for which the foundation was lain, or the war which was instigated, not avoided, "false flagged" into being, funded/supported, goaded, or declared, lead to disunity in another region of the planet (another continent). The theory, as stated by the words used, is not interested in anything else. It can either be falsified or it cannot.
-------------------------------------
"The primordial interest of the United States – over which for a century we have fought wars (the first, second, and Cold War) - has been the relationship between Germany and Russia. Because united they are the only force that could threaten us. And to make sure that that doesn't happen. Therefore, it's not an accident that General Hodges, who's been appointed to be blamed for all of this, is talking about pre-positioning troops in Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, and the Baltics. This is the intermarium from the Black Sea to the Baltic that Pilsudski (edit: post-WW1 Polish dream of power in the wake of Russian and German weakness) dreamt of. This is this is the solution for the United States. ... For the United States: The primordial fear is German technology, German capital, and Russian natural resources, Russian manpower as the only combination that has for centuries scared the hell out of the United States. So how does this play out? Well, the US has already put its cards on the table. It is the line from the Baltics to the Black Sea." - George Friedman, Stratfor, Feb 2015
Yes, that has always been the aim of the naval powers, Great Britain and the USA.
That includes this current war in the Ukraine" which was not avoided (grand strategy) by the USA/NATO even if it could have been avoided by very simple diplomatic means around the year 2000 (with a signed comprehensive European security agreement which incl. Russia).
Several historians like Richard Overy (GB) and Daniele Ganser (Switzerland) have continuously and conclusively come to this conclusion, which is that imperialism were the root causes of all European wars, as based on the study of historical data. It is not a "conspiracy theory." That IS the premier priority of the powers not IN Eurasia, and still is.
Here are the critical questions.
If that is the realization, then HOW were the naval powers going to implement such continental Eurasian/European division?
How were, both currently and historically, London and Washington DC going to (quote) "make sure that that doesn't happen"?
Answer: Proactively implement the "divide and rule"-technique of power.
In a nutshell: Implement and fund delusional propaganda games. Nothing of substance, with the implemented events often the exact opposite of the the loudly proclaimed "values". In the background, keep other systems either down or out of the own systems of gain and luxury life (50% for us, the minority), on ALL tiers, often by force, coercian, or at gunpoint, if it cannot be bought or corrupted, all accompanied by continuous flurry of words without meaning, spread by the exact systems which gain from keeping everything the way it is (a "divide and rule"-setup of the world).
That is the "divide and rule"-strategy of politics (or the associated divide then gain/control technique of power).
It is to create confusion, which can be exploited.
1
-
1
-
Lies and hypocrisy are a dead giveaway of a divide-and-rule strategy. A strategy of divide-and-rule does not intend to be "fair", but sets out to impose unfair "rulings" top-down...
A 125 years ago Central Europe's neighboring regions set out to encircle and encroach on Germany and Austria-Hungary, something these states would never have found as acceptable, if done unto them by any coalition of powers. A clear cut case of hypocrisy.
Today the USA/collective West can only "win" if the rest of the world "loses" (zero sum reality of the globalized world).
The group that can divide all other groups, and avoid them from uniting into larger entities, will rule over all the others.
Such "rulings" are accompanied by acts of favor, or "favoratism," and favoratism is another dead giveaway of an active policy of divide-and-rule.
It's divide-and-rule/conquer.
They grew into North America using this technique, gained North American hegemony using this technique, gained global hegemony using this technique, and are now using the divide-and-rule technique as desperate attempt to hang on to global hegemony...
1