Comments by "Ralph Bernhard" (@ralphbernhard1757) on "Vox" channel.

  1. Back when I was a kid, when we all fought about the same toy, my wise mother used come and take it from BOTH of us...and [hint, hint] there was peace...
    68
  2. Meanwhile, in a refugee camp inhabited by the 700,000 forcibly evicted Palestinians....
    57
  3. ra bababa Oh really. Now, imagine Muslims start buying up land in London, with a CLEAR agenda to slowly displace the local population, and a political objective to call out a caliphate as soon as they are the majority ....and if there are protests, the Muslims start setting up control posts, armed protection, secret instigators.... Yes. Just imagine... Because that is what you see here.
    31
  4. Sebastian Alba Oh you mean like the crook who robs the bank, and then people saying "poor boy, must have had a difficult childhood"?
    14
  5. Christopher Beatty Uhm....the Bible? You know, "Philistines"? Sodom? Gomorrah? Ring a bell?
    13
  6. Serbian Conspiracy What makes you think one version of "fairy tale'' is better than another version of "fairy tale"?
    8
  7. Jared Thibodaux A bit rich coming from the invader. In 1919, floods of...hint, hint..."imgrunts and refgees" poured in, and proclaimed themselves boss. Guess the locals didn't like it....
    8
  8. Roberto Augusto Gómez Loenzo Yup. Navajo in dusty dry reservations are probably watching, thinking: "Now what does this remind me of?"
    6
  9. Sebastian Alba Yes, it is ironical that a people who once complained about a state confiscating their property throughout the 1930s, based on the laws of that country (Germany), now live in a state which confiscates the property of other people, based on the laws of that country (Israel)... https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/10/israel-confiscate-palestinian-lands-absentee-abandoned.html
    5
  10. Yup. The old "jaywalking oppression trick" of a police state...
    5
  11. Arrogance of power?
    5
  12. The video is 7 years old, Einstein.
    4
  13. Pallywood Lies Debunked LOL...no. It was actually a historical term. The British also used "Palestine" for the land west of the Jordan River....
    4
  14. There are more Jews now than there were in 1939. Some "genocide," genius...
    4
  15. Razorback1, ...others are already scheming an eternal war, fighting for Eretz Israel. If you don't know what that means, I suggest google... Thank you for your support: those Lebensraum dreamers surely appreciate your propaganda effort.
    4
  16. Alexander S ...because after WW2 (Nuremberg) "wars of conquest" are illegal. It is THE LAW. Laws are not a "shopping list" from which one can cherry pick favorites.
    4
  17. Sebastian Alba Money creates the means and incentives for people without moral values...
    3
  18. Spot the imperialist...
    3
  19. And?
    3
  20. henrikhansen LOL. Arabs had lived in the Levant for hundreds of years. They had different religions, but have a common genetic code. You are falling for a simple propaganda trick. Confusing terminology.
    3
  21. Wars of conquest are against international law.
    3
  22.  @elitren6423  It was. That "preemptive" part is a lie. Your leaders knew that there were no plans to attack Israel. They fooled the world into thinking that Israel was "just in time".
    3
  23. Trump only likes illegal immigrants who are not caught. That's why he likes Melania...
    3
  24.  @yshrenianknight2516  lol Go back to 1919, when mass immigration of Europeans started to the Levant. Do you like mass immigration?
    3
  25. chained2it I can't possibly respond to ALL of that, but here goes: You obviously don't understand "cause and effect". If a "cause" doesn't have have "an effect" then its not causality. So a jungle pigmy knocking in the head of another jungle pigmy in Papua Neu Guinea doesn't EFFECT world politics. Nothing which happened in the Levant in the years previous to 1919 had ANYTHING to do with Zionism. There was No connection between what happened in the Ottoman Empire, and Zionists dreaming up their Israel. Get it? No causality. However, if I turn on my TV tonight, and watch world events (Arab terrorism) the that IS an EFFECT of mass immigration of Jews to the Levant from 1919 on. The locals were not asked (politically disenfranchised) and fought back against the WHITES they saw coming on boats. They did not WANT a "colonial master". It was the START of resistance to foreign meddling, which continued UNINTERRUPTED until today = causality.
    3
  26. chained2it You are confusing two terms: 'Historicity' and 'Causality'. In order for something to be 'causal', there MUST be a connection between and action, and the resulting events. The one that comes first, MUST cause the next in the chain of events. (Note, not to be confused with 'correlation') So when you write "500 years ago Muslims dominated the globe (actually it was the Med and ME, Central Asia)..". My answer is: nice, there are some ruins and buildings I can visit... (In other words, NOTHING a Muslim did 500 years ago in Spain, or North Africa, has ANY bearing on world events today) Muslim domination of the Med, etc. ENDED at the end of WW1. NO causal effects.
    3
  27. chained2it Yes. A FLOOD of white immigration (Jews) to the Levant from 1919 on. Not before. These were seen as people who came to DOMINATE, not share. Therefore, resistance. "Flood" in relative terms. Compare the total population.... https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jewish-and-non-jewish-population-of-israel-palestine-1517-present ...to the number of immigrants... https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jewish-immigrantion-to-palestine-1919-1941 That was a 1-3% per annum. Imagine 500,000 to 1,500,000 immigrants coming into GB EVERY YEAR. Note here. These immigrants come as self-proclaimed MASTERS, not to share. What would Brits do?
    3
  28. Alexander S LOL. No, when Jordan annexed the West Bank, that was similarly criticised and considered illegal at the time... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordanian_annexation_of_the_West_Bank Please read...
    3
  29. The League was a failure, since the overwhelming majority of the founding members were either colonial powers, or dependent nations, all with vested interests in carving up the world...not the best foundation for...ahem...stability and peace...
    2
  30. This is very one-sided. Not a single mention of James "not an inch further East NATO" Baker promising no NATO expansion into the ex-Soviet sphere of influence ...
    2
  31. White Europeans have nothing to do with Palestine or the entire Levant, so there goes your entire argument....
    2
  32. richard brooks Nope. Not really. It was an Israeli war of aggression, and against international law. It was a classical "land grab", and the often repeated "narrative" is a hoax. https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium.MAGAZINE-israel-deceived-the-world-in-67-and-paid-the-price-in-73-1.5479696
    2
  33. CJ White LOL. In the ME it ACTUALLY started in 1919, when hordes of whites arrived proclaiming to be the boss of a new colony they wanted to settle in. Before that. Nope. No major issues during the 400 year Ottoman rule...
    2
  34. LOL, no. He was bragging about misusing his status to PUSH himself on women.
    2
  35. Woody Stemms Yup...Lebensraum in the east... "From the Nile to the Euphrat", as their "God" promised them. The ideologically indoctrinated, and their ignorant supporters, are mankind's biggest scourge...
    2
  36.  @TheBullDozer703  Says who?
    2
  37.  @TheBullDozer703  Oh cool. Sounds so... em, em...like imperialism.
    2
  38. Traia Ties The Crimea is predominantly inhabited by Russians, who don't mind Moscow/Russia taking over. That means there is no or little local opposition...no uprisings, no terrorism, no angry locals throwing stones at "occupation forces"... So. Fine by me. I'm happy if the locals are happy....
    2
  39. Oh, and BTW. If my country's warmongering leaders ever came to me saying we should declare war on Russia, I'd show them the big fat middle finger....
    2
  40. Great script. When is the movie coming out?
    2
  41. Sword of Pendragon Yup..
    2
  42. Union of sore losers...
    2
  43. Georg Bush: "I'm gonna set the bar really really really low..." Trump: "Hold my golf clubs..." Obama: "Well, I raised the bar and it's going to be hard to beat..." Sanders: "Hold my sweat-soaked handkerchief..."
    2
  44. Looks like the adversaries have discovered the steel warrior's clay feet....
    2
  45. I bet he has clean drinking water. I'm sure US tax payers in Flint Michigan are not amused....
    2
  46. Yup...the superhuman infallible "dear leader" who always knows best...what can possibly go wrong?
    2
  47. Yup. God instructed his followers not to steal. Apparently, they are being naughty and not listening again. Just like the last time God abandoned them...
    2
  48. How America became a superpower? Geography. Any questions?
    2
  49.  @yshrenianknight2516  "My country" is always what the people who live there decide for themselves, without outside meddling or interference. The best way to determine that, was by democratic means, for example voting for representation, or direct plebiscite. You can try, but you won't find a single historical example of people arguing about borders, when these borders were a result of mutual agreement. Violence is guaranteed if one side imposes borders on the others. Nobody likes to get swamped by immigration. Where do you live? Throughout the 1920s and 1930s something like 400,000 Europeans came to Palestine which had an indigenous population of around 600,000 people. Imagine you lived in GB (pop. 60 mil) and about 40 million immigrants come in 20 - 30 years without asking the people who already lived there....
    2
  50.  @amireinav1  It is not correct to generalize about "what the Palestinians want", as it is also not correct to generalize about "what the Israelis want". There are different people on both sides who want different things, and need i remind of your own ultra right wing, and their "God promised Eretz Israel"... Needless to say that in the early-1990s there was a realistic attempt at peace, but the issue remained East Jerusalem, overwhelmingly Palestinian inhabited, which Israel refused to give in to (still the PLO and Arafat at the time). That train has departed. Today there is no realistic chance for peace.
    2
  51. avi moyal Liar... https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/palestinian-authority-threatens-to-scrap-recognition-of-israel-over-donald-trumps-proposed-us-a7548936.html Palestine recognized Israel right to exist 20 years ago, and are in turn waiting for Israel to acknowledge its right to exist.... Nice try anyway...
    2
  52. chained2it Im still in 1919, the start of the current conflict. Note here, that at ANY particular point in time, nobody can foresee the future. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historian%27s_fallacy Therefore, the people who lived in 1919 ONLY had the world around them to make judgements. Correct? So, what did they see? Correct. Colonialism. White people cutting off the hands of child laborers in the Kongo, Hawaii (an independent Kingdom) being annexed, Native Americans stuffed into dusty desert reservations, Moro Massacres if "naughty natives" refused to pay taxes, chased into to the desert to die of thirst (Herero) or starve (India) , children stuck into concentration camps (Boer War), etc. THAT is what influenced opinions back then, and why local inhabitants did not WANT whites to rule them.
    2
  53. chained2it So, still in 1919. Yes, I'm sure that the Zionists who came to Palestine in...uhm..floods from 1919 were nice people. Im sure the brought bouquets of flowers and baked cookies for the local kids... Irrelevant. It doesn't matter how "nice" they were. Certainly, the first white colonists who showed up in North America were also nice people. The first traders and merchant in the Pacific were also "nice". How "nice" these first encounters were, is IRRELEVANT, because the Palestinians had the world around them to judge what came AFTER the first "nice people", and what could POTENTIALLY happen to them too...
    2
  54. chained2it Still in 1919 Yes. The Zionist who arrived then WERE white Europeans. The Jews evicted from Muslim states after 1948 (ME Jews) are not relevant to the events directly following 1919. (See "Historians fallacy")
    2
  55. chained2it Oh, and finally. Eretz Israel is a wet dream in a SMALL FRACTION of Jew's heads. It's the dream of the right wing (roughly 20% of voters). I never said "all Jews". Yes, I assume you right. How can 8 million make space for all those millions in the diaspora, against millions of Arabs. Sort of like 1948. Kinda stupid for 800,000 Jews to declare independence in the face of much larger and more populous Arab neighbours, who warned them not to do it... Wait a minute.... LOL
    2
  56. Sergio Aguirre The Jews rode into Palestine in the backs of the British Empire. During ww1 the Jews were NOT an entity. The fought for, or worked in the factories of where ever they held citizenship. A German Jew therefore sat in his trench, mowing down British and French Jews storming "his" side, "his" buddies, and fighting "his" cause... Period. Those are the facts. Here are some more concerning Palestine.... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Eastern_theatre_of_World_War_I Well, well...by golly. It looks as if MORE ARABS fought and died for Palestine than Jews ever did... What was that about "reading books". Thanks for the tip, buddy. I've read a few thousand....
    2
  57. richard wilmot Ph.D ROTFL...
    2
  58. LOL...all they would need to do is go to Dubai, or Qatar...
    2
  59. LOL..."installing pro-American regimes in..."...more like instating pro-American puppets and crooks, and imposing them on the locals...
    1
  60. Good and neutral analyses. The reason there are problems, is the same reason there are problems everywhere a large group of foreigners immigrate (or come as refugees), anywhere in the world. The original inhabitants can simply NOT be expected to accept being overrun by a influx of non-natives. Simple. The Jews were Europeans (foreign passport holders) who came in masses as immigrants and refugees....
    1
  61. "There was this time it was a little scary..." Well, little girl. At least there is nobody using your ass as football practice like these soldiers are doing with a little Palestinian boy. https://youtu.be/gvjAE4KV32Q Consider yourself lucky...
    1
  62. Connolly West So a question to the "white world". Why don't you just hand over Arizona to the Jews? You know, seeing how much land whites have....
    1
  63. You can run away from a baseball bat...
    1
  64.  @crossrhodes14  Tyrannical gobbumints use helicopter gunships and drones whih come at night to where you're sleeping... Welcome to the 21st Century.
    1
  65. Md Lp LOL. Talk about a long winded justification for land grabbing. Simple truth. The people who lived in British Palestine (Semites) in 1919 were the original inhabitants. Palestinians. Sort of like when the USA declared its independence and the people who lived there became "Americans". There was no meed for long-winded explanations about what they were or where they came from. Same counts for hundreds of other countries, made of of culturally mixed inhabitants. Simple.
    1
  66. Pickle Rickle Yeah I know. God commanded "Thou shalt not steal....unless you win a war...."
    1
  67. Stupid people. Spend the money on the down payment for a house.
    1
  68. Who is going to enforce a "no fly zone" and shoot down Russian planes ignoring it? Honestly. Stop wasting our time with a bunch of well-meaning but incapable and illogical "suggestions"... Imposing a "no fly zone" over the Ukraine without NATO enforcing it, is like imposing a "no crime zone" in a city without cops to enforce it. Bury it. It won't happen.
    1
  69. There's a saying in business: First first generation establishes. The second generation expands. The third squanders it. How's life in the 3rd generation? :-)
    1
  70. John S. Elfrank-Dana Yup. Interests groups, and "ingroup vs. outgroup dynamics"... Religion is simply a tool.
    1
  71. Hmmmm...the making of a "Stalin" or a "Hitler" all over again....
    1
  72. There will never be peace, because the Israeli society is undermined by a minority (I'm assessing 1 of 5) of dreamers who want to create an Eretz Israel stretching from the Nile to the Euphrat. They can only achieve this goal in a situation of eternal war, duress, or by fear mongering (even their own people). Even any Jew who stands in their way, will die... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Yitzhak_Rabin
    1
  73. Thunkful2 Why don't the Jews go to Arizona, and leave the locals alone?
    1
  74. LOL...you are so fake that you are actually funny. Do you think the rest of the world is stupid enough to fall for fake accounts?
    1
  75. As a nation that once suffered under a colonial master... https://crimesofbritain.com/category/india/ ...why do you sympathize with the cause of the colonial power? Did you know that the waves of immigrants and refugees which arrived in the Levant after 1919 are genetically (DNA evidence) nothing but whites/Europeans? Did you know that every single Israeli leader in the first few decades was also terrorist?
    1
  76. Against the common held belief, the "Muslims" did not steal the land from Jews. That is a popular myth, spread by the propaganda machine of Israel, and by Zionists. The reality is that the Jews were chased out of their holy land in 3 waves, the last wave by Italians (Romans) about 2000 years ago. For more than a 1,000 years, Christian invaders (Byzantine Empire) captured the Levant. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine_Empire The Ottoman Empire defeated the Byzantine Empire, and then dominated the region for around 500 years, until they were in turn defeated during WW1. Therefore, the erroneous belief that "Muslims" stole the land is incorrect. During the reign of the Ottomans, the population stayed more or less the same, but many converted to Islam because it had obvious advantages (taxation, business, etc.). The Muslims did not "steal" anything. They are for the most part the descendants of people who had lived there for generations. For most of history, the rulers were foreigners (upper classes), but the local population (the simple people) remained more or less the same people (Semites). Of course, there was some immigration, meaning that the Levant, like the Lebanon, had always been a region of mixed ethnicity, religions, and cultures. Here you can see a graph of the demographics of the Levant for the last 2000 years or so. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_history_of_Palestine_(region)
    1
  77. UnKnowN So what? The Mayan Empire was established long before Mexico. So? Why not ARTIFICIALLY recreate the Mayan Empire? Mayas would sure be happy....
    1
  78. Wars of conquest are illegal according to international law. Use your brain please....
    1
  79. Laws are not made to stop crime. Laws are made in order to prosecute crimes. That's like saying speed restrictions don't stop speeding, so let's abolish all signs...
    1
  80.  @williambonac8157  Huh? Run that by me again...
    1
  81. Slowly oozing their way onto another man's land...
    1
  82. Let them all go back to their churches... Certainly, Jesus will save them.
    1
  83. Gh0st Because the original inhabitants way back were Semitic tribes of various religions, and religion wasn't too much of a political issue during the days of the Ottoman rule. It wasn't until after 1919, when whites appeared in droves as immigrants and refugees, surfing the wave of a colonial power's victory in WW1, and propagating that they were the real "mastah" and that the locals should move over and obey... What could possibly go wrong?
    1
  84. henrikhansen Oh you mean it would be perfectly OK if Mexican immigrants started fighting back and killing ICE troopers?
    1
  85. Jews won't accept it. Because then there will be too many Arabs and in a democracy you cannot impose yourself on others.
    1
  86.  @jackkessler9876  It's not about religious freedom but political freedom. Look at Israel's declaration of independence, in which white immigrants and refugees dictated their political rule over a 2/3 majority... Before that, religious freedom wasn't an issue in Muslim dominated empires like the Ottoman Empire, where millions of Christian Armenians, Greeks, Jews and many others co-existed in relative peace. That only changed after Europeans came in and dictated their politics to the local population... You should work on your timeline. It all started with the end of WW1.
    1
  87. Carlo Ayars You conveniently leave out that a religion should not and does not (normally) grant land rights. So, if I'm a Christian, I don't (and logically SHOULDN'T )get the right to settle in Christian New Zealand. Especially not if a Kiwi has to get kicked off to make room for me. That is how logical (not indoctrinated) people see it.
    1
  88. Dan Livni In all of history, there has never been a state called South Sudan. Today there is, so your point is moot. The fact that a state has never existed in history, does not mean that it doesn't have a right to exist today, if the inhabitants want it to.
    1
  89. OOO OOO They didn't "give it back". It was illegally occupied land, and ever since the end of WW2 (Nuremberg) "wars of conquest" are illegal according to international law. They therefore simply ended the occupation of occupied territory....
    1
  90. According to the logic of the Zionists, Norwegians have a right to demand living in Nova Scotia, and declare their own state there. All they need to do is recreate some ancient myths, and find some ancestral graves... Then, arrive in droves with guns, and start displacing the local population. All they have to do is cheat enough people into believing that they are just "returning home", and that they are really only "taking back" what "Thor gave his chosen people"... Sorry, Canadians. I really respect you, but...you know, "Thor" and all that...(ROTFL) [Google "Vinland Nova Scotia Vikings]
    1
  91. GO VIKINGS. Take back your historic homelands... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinland_map
    1
  92. Francis Van Meerbeek White Europeans, following an ancient ideology and an agenda....Slowly oozing their way onto another man's land. Are you South African? You must loooove the way blacks are oozing their way onto white lands, right? Perfectly OK, right?
    1
  93. Francis Van Meerbeek Here, the unbiased and objective history of the Levant, after 1919... https://youtu.be/nufBpHmWhtQ ...without any of the bullshitting and ideology.
    1
  94. Francis Van Meerbeek Of course you do. Because you've been conned by a myth... http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-ashkenazi-jews-dna-diseases-20140909-story.html Yes, Francis. In 1919, the Jews were just plain old white men from Europe, with an agenda to steal land in the Levant.... DNA does not lie. People do...
    1
  95. Francis Van Meerbeek Where did I ever write that? They should simply stop stealing, that's all. It's not possible to change history, but this agenda of land theft must stop.
    1
  96. Yes, "Israel" probably sounds to the local Palestinians the same way as "Manifest Destiny" to the Native Americans, or "Lebensraum" to Poles or Ukrainians...
    1
  97. jumpingjflash LOL...you are still in "History Channel" propaganda mode. Ever since Begin admitted in a speech in 1982 that 1967 was a classical "land grab", the ENTIRE world knows that Israel attacked first as "a war of choice" (euphemism for "ah well, we lied. We actually did start it...") Begin also admitted that two other wars were started by Israel (1956 Suez, and 1982 Lebanon). https://theintercept.com/2017/06/05/a-50-year-occupation-israels-six-day-war-started-with-a-lie/
    1
  98. Microphonix Virtual Studio A thief who uses conquest to steal land is still a thief....
    1
  99. Jo Alex Sg What goes around comes around... https://theintercept.com/2018/02/19/hamas-israel-palestine-conflict/ Hamas was funded by Israel as a typical ex-colonial "divide and rule" tool to weaken Fatah in the West Bank, thereby torpedoing the Oslo peace plan... The Bible says "reap what you sow". Sow a good seed, reap a good harvest. Sow an evil seed, reap an evil harvest. Even primitive farmers barely out of the Stone Age understood...
    1
  100. Jo Alex Sg I did not write "create". You did. I wrote "fund". http://www.israeltoday.co.il/NewsItem/tabid/178/nid/16447/Default.aspx Israel funded Hamas for years. It is part of the "divide and rule" policy to split the opposition by strengthening opposing fractions.
    1
  101. Wim M I think you probably don't realize why your comment has me ROTFL...
    1
  102. Wim M That isn't why I'm laughing. Look up the words "piece" and "peace". But you know what, buddy? It doesn't really surprise me that people who can't even spell properly, grovel and crawl at the feet of the first best cause that comes along, without realizing what they signed up for....
    1
  103. They are ideologues, basing their "purchases" on a political agenda. Sort of like Nazis... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost You obviously have not watched the video... If you enter a contract with an opposite, would you like the other party to lie and cheat? (aka "withhold information)
    1
  104. zerocooljpn That is the often repeated "narrative", the well-honed stories fathers tell their children...which then turns to myth, and legend...until nobody bothers to fact-check anymore....
    1
  105. Bismarck said something to that effect. "Lucky" because they have weak neighbors in the north and south, and only fish to the east and west :-)
    1
  106.  @AirborneMOC031  ...and no-one cares what happened 2.000 years ago...
    1
  107.  @AirborneMOC031  ...and I can guarantee to you that everybody who brings up 2.000 year old history in the current context, is an ideologue advocating for lebenstraum.
    1
  108. Yes. All of that. And don't forget the system of plea bargaining. Basically, if innocents are picked up and can't afford a good lawyer, they'll often plead guilty (despite being innocent) by advice of their lawyer, because it is too difficult to prove innocence in a system stacked against the poor and minorities.
    1
  109. Hire and fire is great...until you get fired....
    1
  110. Sandra Kreisler It's actually very simple. The inhabitants of an area are named after the area. So, the inhabitants of Australia are called Australians. The inhabitants of Canada, Canadians, and so on. After WW1, there was a British Mandate called "Palestine", whose inhabitants (predominantly Semites of three main religions, Muslims, Jews and Christians) were collectively called "Palestinians".
    1
  111. One person = one vote Easy...
    1
  112. Yoni Shalom LOL... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Mandate_for_Palestine_(legal_instrument)
    1
  113. Yoni Shalom Your reasoning is so flawed that it's not even worth trying to address it. In 1919, a Palestinian was every single person who lived in Palestine. These were Semites of three main religions. Yes. 6% were Jewish. And? A religion does NOT grant the right to citizenship. In which country is that so? Can I (a Christian) immigrate to New Zealand because it's Christian? You are confusing "religion" and "citizenship".
    1
  114. Yoni Shalom All of that is incorrect, because you don't use the correct terminology. ANY group of people can become a "nation". I suggest looking into a dictionary, to see what "a nation" means. So if Switzerland can become "a nation", then so could the people who lived in the 1919 British mandate of Palestine. They were a FULLY functioning society, had their own laws and legal representation in the form of councils. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine_Arab_Congress
    1
  115. Yoni Shalom Furthermore, if the Jews of 1919 who came from 3 continents and dozens of countries and who spoke dozens of different languages could consider themselves "a nation", then so could the 600,000 indigenous population of Palestine.
    1
  116. Daniel Moshe Johnson So white colonists destroyed yet another local culture, as they would proceed to do for the next 2,000 years in the future. Doesn't mean anything. Do Incas get the "right" to claim their 500 year old (now dead) kingdom back? No? Should Bolivia, Peru, or Ecuador "give the land back" to the Incas so that this racially discriminated prosecuted group can have an own state today?
    1
  117. Константин Георгиев Because Gaza is in the hands of radical Muslims (Hamas) once funded by Israel as a "divide and rule"- tool. In the 1980s, they funded Hamas in order to undermine the PLO and later Fatah. They did this so they would have an excuse ("they are terrorists") not to carry on the Camp David and Oslo Peace Accords...
    1
  118. anonymous scribe LOL. Google Semites. Nice try anyway...
    1
  119. Oshri Ben Moshe Because Muslim Israelis don't buy apartments with a strategy behind the purchase. Ever since 1919, Jewish land/property purchasing were used as weapons. To squeeze out however was living there. The locals are not stupid. They know that the idea behind the purchases are to first encircle, then evict them.
    1
  120. "My doctor...", "Ask your doctor...", "Your doctor...", are, uhm... fake paid actors. Needless to say, don't forget to read the small print...
    1
  121. Too many "dreamers" in Israel... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliyah_Bet
    1
  122. Hus chappa They actually ARE Europeans, or the offspring of Europeans. Their ancestry has NOTHING to do with the region. From 1919 onwards, they were immigrants and refugees which flooded the region and displaced the original inhabitants
    1
  123. Nope. Not really. It was an Israeli war of aggression, and against international law. It was a classical "land grab", and the often repeated "narrative" is a hoax. https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium.MAGAZINE-israel-deceived-the-world-in-67-and-paid-the-price-in-73-1.5479696 Even Israeli heroes and patriots like Dayan and Begin have admitted that Israel started that war.
    1
  124. QDUDE005 Oh you mean like the Bible says: "THOU SHALT NOT STEAL....unless you win a war of course".
    1
  125. Lindsay Chai Arabs fought for Palestine. During WW1, they sided with the British Empire to liberate their homelands from Ottoman rule. They fought for a SINGULAR cause. Liberation. During the same the Jews of Europe fought for whichever cause their host nations fought for, and which they were citizens of. The irony was that a German Jew would mow down British and French Jews storming "his" trench, "his" buddies, and "his" cause. During WW1, Jews fought for multiple causes. So how many Jews actually fight for their "promised land"? In 1919, Zionists surfed into Palestine on the blood of countless Arabs, who had actually fought and died for it...
    1
  126. You mean that all modern Americans, Kiwis, and Australians are "squatters"? I don't think they'll be amused by your opinion of them...LMFAO
    1
  127. What history? You mean like 2,000 years ago, when their "god" chased them out of their fairy tale Stoneage holy land? Actually, that isn't history. The reality is that they were thrown out or left in 3 waves, the last wave by Italians (Romans). So, for 2,000 years the Religion of Judaism was only around 5% of the local population. The majority then became Christian (Byzantine) and later Muslims (Ottoman Empire). In the meantime, the "diaspora" intermingled with the local populations of Europe, and other places they immigrated to, and today their maternal DNA today diluted down to 80% European, and only 8% of the original Levant Semites. So yeah...I know history....
    1
  128. http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-ashkenazi-jews-dna-diseases-20140909-story.html
    1
  129. They are thieves with a myth, and legends. Nothing to admire. Ah, I see... you admire thieves? According to the logic of the Zionists, Norwegians have a right to demand living in Nova Scotia, and declare their own state there. All they need to do is recreate some ancient myths, and find some ancestral graves. Then, arrive in droves with guns, and start displacing the local population. All they have to do is create a myth of "returning home", and that they are really only "taking back" what "Thor gave his chosen people"... Correct? Do Norwegians have a Thor-given "right" to "return" to Canada today, because of "being first" 1,000 years ago? [Google "Vinland Nova Scotia Vikings]
    1
  130. Chris E They are not abiding by YOUR logic. They have their "God's promised land". So google Eretz Israel to find out what that means. Then you know what you're signing up for....
    1
  131. Eretz Israel This is your story today, when you "only want the West Bank". What will your story be tomorrow, when you want a little piece of Syria? And Jordan? And Saudi Arabia? You know, like your god promised you.... http://www.ahavat-israel.com/eretz/future
    1
  132.  @jamalbaklau6661  @jamal baklau  👏 👏 👏 Straight A's in your history exam.... ....but, it's a lie. The technique is called "lying by ommitance" (aka "not telling the whole truth). In case history really interests you, then please read the article. It is the ENTIRE story.
    1
  133. Can you see the link I posted?
    1
  134.  @jamalbaklau6661  ok Your "timeline" is incorrect, and therefore you are confusing "cause" and "effect". Let's take it 1 step at a time, to show how you've been fooled. Did you know that the UN controlled Sanai was set up after the 1956 war to protect Egypt from Israeli (together with France and GB) aggression? Yup. After that war, the world decided that Egypt needed protection from Israeli expansionism. Ten years later, the Sanai isolated Israel from Egypt. Fine. Then, Israel started the provocations against Syria. Of course, comfortable in the fact of being far stronger than Syria, and that Egypt couldn't interfere in case of a war between Syria and Israel, because of the UN buffer zone. After Israeli provocation increased, Egypt therefore asked for the removal of the UN, in an effort to stop Israeli provocations against Syria. Note, the UN proposed keeping the buffer zone intact, by moving to the Israeli side of the border, but Israel refused. Israel didn't want the UN there. Furthermore, Israeli historians have already agreed that both 1956, and 1967 were "wars of CHOICE". The archives have already revealed the lies still being sold to kids on "History Channel*.
    1
  135.  @jamalbaklau6661  For the complete timeline of the events, google www.foreignpolicy.com who started the six day war
    1
  136.  @jamalbaklau6661  @Reach41 " In 1976, Israeli defense minister Moshe Dayan said that Israel provoked more than 80% of the clashes with Syria, although historians say the remark was part of an informal conversation.[82] The provocation was sending a tractor to plow in the demilitarized areas. The Syrians responded by firing at the tractors and shelling Israeli settlements.[83][84] Jan Mühren, a former UN observer in the area at the time, told a Dutch current affairs programme that Israel "provoked most border incidents as part of its strategy to annex more land".[85] UN officials blamed both Israel and Syria for destabilizing the borders." For sources, see the original wiki text
    1
  137.  @jamalbaklau6661  "Former Israeli General Mattityahu Peled said that more than half of the border clashes before the 1967 war "were a result of our security policy of maximum settlement in the demilitarised area."[80] Israeli incursions into the zone were responded to with Syrians shooting. Israel in turn would retaliate with military force.[66] Sir Alec Douglas-Home, former Prime Minister of the UK, stated that when he was visiting the Galilee a few months before the 1967 war "at regular intervals the Russian-built forts on the Golan Heights used to lob shells into the villages, often claiming civilian casualties." He said after the 1973 war that any agreement between the two sides "must clearly put a stop to that kind of offensive action." For sources, see the original wiki article
    1
  138.  @jamalbaklau6661  Google "cause and effect". Israeli tractors being sent into the DMZ were intentional provocations, irrelevant what a "court" would decide. There was no negotiation about the economic use of the DMZ, and Israel therefore forced this issue with a unilateral decision. Israel could have stayed out of the DMZ If they had really been interested in a peaceful settlement of the economic use of the DMZ, they should habe negotiated. And pointing out that Russia backed Syria is bogus. GB and France, and later the USA backed Israel. It was therefore a proxy conflict. Same as Syria or Yemen is today (proxy war). Pointless bringing that up.
    1
  139. https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/236531/israeli-security-cabinet-secret-transcripts-part-2 Sounds like a war plan to me...
    1
  140.  @jamalbaklau6661  Your history is basically this... 1967 Israel: THEY ATTACKED US!!! Neutral observer: The archives show you shot first... Israel: ok, ok...but they were going to attack us and OUR ATTACK WAS PREEMPTIVE!!!!! Neutral observer: But the archives don't support that claim... Israel: ok, ok...but we thought they were going to attack us. I mean, we didn't know.... Neutral observer: But the archives show your leaders knew there was no Arab plan to attack... Israel: ok, ok...but, but...Uhm, Uhm...Hitler you know... Geez, buddy. Can you finally agree on what "history" you want for yourself? https://www.wrmea.org/1994-july-august/middle-east-history-begin-s-admission-in-1982-that-israel-started-three-of-its-wars.html
    1
  141. Seyfun 14 Oh. I see. So LORD Balfour "recognized the need for a Jewish state"... I guess he forgot to ask the people whose political rights he was giving away what they thought about that...
    1
  142. Seyfun 14 There was no UN before WW2....
    1
  143. ​ @lennardchurch8483  Wars of conquest are illegal. It's called "law."
    1
  144. james norse If a nation needs all that, it is doing something wrong...
    1
  145. It is actually "intellectually dishonest" to simply write something, and then state that any criticism is "intellectually dishonest".... But, I guess "god made us from mud" (sic.), and to point out the limited scientific basis for such a statement, is...ahem..."intellectually dishonest"...
    1
  146. Because if one has a "for profit" system, then, you...well, uhm...create incentives to INCREASE the prices. What is there about capitalism that these people don't understand?
    1
  147. Well, I propose forcible removing all Canadians to the USA, which is also mostly "white" and "Christian"...right?
    1
  148. Simon zapati Nobody cares about "terminology". Terminology is obviously manipulated by those who wish to rule. Those who wish to rule today, is EVERY single person who came by boat with a foreign passport from 1919....
    1
  149. sivan rottelman In what exact year did this happen?
    1
  150. Marc Fromme LOL. They did. You should stop watching old "History Channel" re-runs of the 6 Day War. From 1980s on wards, the evidence for a "land grab" became so overwhelming that even Israeli PM Begin, and top generals like Moshe Dayan admitted that there was no immediate threat to Israel, and the motivation had been to gain territory.
    1
  151. Marc Fromme Thanks for having an open mind... https://mondoweiss.net/2017/06/provoked-fighting-survival/
    1
  152. Marc Fromme In my opinion, if a leadership changes its tune from "it was pre-emptive" (1967) to "well if we had attacked Hitler in 1936...." (1982), then there is definitely something fishy :-) https://www.wrmea.org/1994-july-august/middle-east-history-begin-s-admission-in-1982-that-israel-started-three-of-its-wars.html
    1
  153. whisperingsage Well, I suggest going back to Europe or the USA and waiting until he arrives... Then, he can simply proclaim what he really meant, and mortals can stop killing each other arguing....
    1
  154.  @ultimatedeatrix9149  My mother was wise enough not to set brothers against each other. We either got similar "toys" or were taught how to share "toys". Pity states are not like that.
    1
  155. Dane Hart Some nations are very proud of their terrorists. They even name streets, parks and airports after murderers... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionist_political_violence
    1
  156. sean mc namara Why don't you just piss off?
    1
  157. Rudster14 Sure sure....buy "a dot" here, buy "a dot" there.... Then, combine the dots... Then come the control posts, the police, the discrimination, the secret deals behind closed doors, the oppression.... Has been carrying on since 1919, and the locals have long seen through the agenda.
    1
  158. Rudster14 Have you seen the entire video? The Palestinians don't want to sell to Jews, because they know that the "land purchases" are a part of an agenda which has been carrying on since 1919, and will eventually see them displaced from their homelands... Are you a fan of con men? If a con man cons a victim, where do your sympathies lie?
    1
  159. Rudster14 They won't sell if they knew who was trying to buy. That's the entire issue,. Jews then con their way by lying to the owner about the buyer's background, which is a political agenda to slowly ooze onto Arab lands, until there is a majority, and then displacing them... Tell me honestly, if you make a deal with somebody, any deal, wouldn't you want your partner to be honest?
    1
  160. Rudster14 Why is it "discrimination" if one choses not to sell to a person following a political agenda?
    1
  161. http://www.yourmiddleeast.com/culture/palestine-how-the-land-was-lost_36973
    1
  162. Rudster14 https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/10/israel-confiscate-palestinian-lands-absentee-abandoned.html
    1
  163. Rudster14 https://youtu.be/5r2vaOIShpI
    1
  164. Rudster14 https://youtu.be/FkxJd88xkBU
    1
  165. Rudster14 Here, a typical tactic....surround, cordon off, and prohibit from entering own land... https://youtu.be/mWEBQxyxHcQ
    1
  166. So....most Cubans have two jobs in order to survive? Basically "paycheck to paycheck"? Where have I heard that before?
    1
  167. Hmmm...a group of people, following an ideology declaring them to be the master religion, and all others to be of lower quality... Moving into lands already inhabited by others who had lived there for generations... Hmmm. What does that remind me of? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost
    1
  168. At 5:35 minutes in... Oh, look at Mr Fleisher smirking.... http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-ashkenazi-jews-dna-diseases-20140909-story.html Of course he knows he is really just a plain old white dude, from Europe, and that you have been conned by the myth of "returning to the homeland"... DNA does not lie. People with an agenda do....
    1
  169. Israel. Probably sounds to the local Palestinians the same way as "Manifest Destiny" to the Native Americans, or "Lebensraum" to Poles or Ukrainians...
    1
  170.  @jackkessler9876  "Land" doesn't belong to foreign invaders, the same way as a stolen car doesn't "belong" to the thief... The land belongs to the people who live there, and before the British Empire came, with their mindset of "colonialism" and rule (thinly disguised as "mandates"), there were no major problems.
    1
  171. Rich white people wanting to rule the world, giving away stolen 'brown people land' to other rich white imgrunt people.... What could go wrong?
    1
  172. MelodicNostalgic That's the attitude that leads to ETERNAL war...
    1
  173. Henry V Israel could be the jewel of humanity. https://youtu.be/nM4FAJ9rFz4 But yeah. It seems as if God let a few misfits through...
    1
  174. dinorino2 Are you stating that you think ALL UN resolutions should be seen as "law" rather than "suggestions"?
    1
  175. dinorino2 The UN reflects the consensus of the entire planet's population. You can't cherry pick what you like and what you don't like. You obviously loved the UN while it was for the creation of a Jewish state, but when it points at atrocities, then you suddenly don't like it anymore... Furthermore, will YOU also denounce all terrorism? Are you going to campaign for Israel to change every street name, airport, or town square named after terrorists? (Google: Irgun, Lehi, Palmach, Haganah, Stern Gang, the Special Night Squad and Orde Wingate, etc.)
    1
  176. Green Panda Somehow, the Semites who inhabited British Palestine in 1919 (Arabs of three main religions, plus various sects) got along just fine....until MASSES of European (white) immigrants and refugees turned out proclaiming to be THE BOSS from then on...
    1
  177. I have a great idea. Let's build a 5 billion $$$ big beautiful wall to stop the tunneling....
    1
  178. People who have money and guns don't have to care about "fair". They simply steal what they want, and if there is a strong sense of cognitive dissonance, they merely turn to a suitable passage in their holy books, which can be torn out of context, to justify their current actions...
    1
  179. bochap21 Arabs can't really be "anti-Semitic", since they are Semites themselves. Semites, as you might or might not know, were the original inhabitants of Palestine, before the onset of white (European) immigration after WW1.
    1
  180. bochap21 The word became "hijacked" after WW2. The meaning changed.
    1
  181. Christian Nation Google "ipse dixit". Nobody cares what you write. You must find majorities who agree with your stone-age ideological standpoint....
    1
  182. Joshua Lifetree A dude called....ahem...'Joshua' thinks the West Bank belongs to Israel, and is willing to threaten world peace by creating terrorism because of stealing it....
    1
  183. Because if billionaires get million dollar tax breaks, it causes an inflation of luxury goods, and "desirability" is created by hype....
    1
  184. david 466 Not like that. The state of Israel carries on stealing land as we speak...
    1
  185. Dave Stonehill Nice ideology....you know..."invisible friends in the sky" giving you freebies and handouts. That way, one can circumvent that inconvenient "thou shalt not steal" bit in the Bible... Blame it in God, right?
    1
  186. Dave Stonehill The logical fallacy of "historical claims" is (after ideology) the biggest reason for war on this planet. "We were first, and therefore we are just 'taking back' what belongs to us", is the typical slogan of a thief... Tell me, who would you cheer for if Norway attacks Canada? Who would you cheer for if Norwegians stream into Nova Scotia, call out their own country, and start oppressing and displacing the people already living there? Once the first batches have their foot in the door, more and more come.... Bear in mind, that you'd have to cheer the invaders... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinland ...because they were "first"...LMAO
    1
  187. 0tube0user Yup. Ideologues. Worst kind of people on the planet.
    1
  188.  @Decius.  That's correct. They use planes, drones and snipers. That makes them better people.
    1
  189. Interesting... But irrelevant. Because in 1919 "Palestine" was a British mandate, and GB stated that it would lead it to independence. The locals who already lived there for hundreds of years were Semites of three main religious groups (Muslim, Christian, and Jewish) who had previously lived together without too much strife. These people who already lived their voiced their hope for independence (or as part of a greater unity), and were betrayed. The problems started in 1919, when hordes of foreigners (European DNA) stated arriving.
    1
  190. greggy boten Yes. So true. I also think masses of Chinese should come to Israel, and open new settlements there....
    1
  191. robby dobby Iran and Russia won't like that...so yeah....
    1
  192. Tasmar They have nukes. Deal with it..
    1
  193. According to the logic of the Zionists, Norwegians have a right to demand living in Nova Scotia, and declare there own state there. All they need to do is recreate some ancient myths, and find some ancestral graves. Then, arrive in droves with guns, and start displacing the local population. All they have to do is create a myth of "returning home", and that they are really only "taking back" what "Thor gave his chosen people"... [Google "Vinland Nova Scotia Vikings]
    1
  194. God instructed his followers not to steal. Correct? Apparently, they are being naughty and not listening again. Just like the last time God abandoned them...
    1
  195. werewolf 78 LOL. Says who exactly?
    1
  196. Why kill? If I could travel back, I'd kidnap him and send him to Argentina into a nice artistic family who would advance his other qualities 😂😂😂😂 Then, I'd also set off and do the same to hundreds of others...
    1
  197. Lior Lev Yup. Like God always says: "THOU SHALT NOT STEAL....unless you win a war of course..." ROTFL
    1
  198. Lior Lev You think God needs a history lesson? I'm literally quoting the Bible of the Torah. Do not steal.
    1
  199. Pallywood Lies Debunked You see? "Jews" are not a race. It is a religion.
    1
  200. @Fayth Osborn LOL, "impossible to invade" because of "geography" :-) It is simply too far away from everybody else...
    1
  201. Youssef Dirani Actually, WW1 is the start of the chain of events we witness today. Before that, there was no casual chain of events. That ended with the end of the Ottoman Empire.
    1
  202. Youssef Dirani It certainly wasn't OK. White people back then wanted to set up a colony in the Palestine, and rule over the 600 000 people already living here. Arabs felt betrayed of course, because during WW1 they fought for liberation from colonialism. The promise was "south of the 37th parallel". They were betrayed.
    1
  203. William Bedard ROTFL....pick up a history book, will you?
    1
  204. Thunkful2 Arab states are not all the same. Sort of like "white Christian" countries in Europe are also not the same. Look at a map sometime....
    1
  205. Do I have AD what? I dunno, I didnt time time finish this video...
    1
  206. samir32118 Fine by me. As long as Israel FIRST throws out everybody who is actually a European, an American, a Russian, a....
    1
  207. Israel is approved by people who condemn terrorists who sow terror randomly...but cheer when terror is sown randomly by a state...
    1
  208. chained2it LOL. Maybe you should 'learn some history". GB sent it's murderers and killers undercover, while on the surface "remaining neutral"... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Night_Squads
    1
  209. MOHAMMAD wajdi In 1919, GB was a "land grabber supreme", which was stealing land (aka 'colonialism'), murdering people and sticking children in concentration camps all over the world.... Even today, they chose not to apologize for past crimes. What's to be expected from such people?
    1
  210. Association of Stupid YouTube Comments The USA was a vile and evil land grabber in past history. Even "heroes" were nothing else but crooks and murderers.... https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/ulysses-grant-launched-illegal-war-plains-indians-180960787/ Yup. What to be expected from a nation which thought "annexing" (nothing else but an euphemism for effin stealing) Hawaii, then an independent nation, to be perfectly OK?
    1
  211. Association of Stupid YouTube Comments 'Muricans even make their kids sing hymns to murderers... https://therivardreport.com/david-crockett-the-alamos-hero-villain-and-myth/ But who cares? The victims were only 2nd class "brown people" defending their land.
    1
  212. chained2it ....because you are confusing "cause" and "effect". Google it. The easiest way to muddle up history is confusing cause and effect. The current situation is an EFFECT of past actions, which started following WW1. Before that, the political conditions in the Levant /ME did NOT effect the world at large. Irrelevant of whether YOU personally considered it "right" or "wrong", it did NOT effect world politics. Constant western meddling has turned it into the situation we now witness. In 1919, floods of immigrants and refugees arrived, following an ancient myth, ideologically indoctrinated to think that they already owned the land. They were WHITE immigrants, and foreigners (passport holders i.e. nationality). They arrived in hordes and started displacing and politically disenfranchising the people who ALREADY LIVED there. These locals were not stupid. They had seen what happened for 500 years when "white man with forked tongue" arrived somewhere, suggesting a...cough, cough..."mutually acceptable deal".. Of COURSE they had the right to fight back. Do you think they wanted to end up like the Hawaiins, the Aborigines, the Native Americans, the Mayas or Incas? Today, the land grabbing continues. It will also never stop, because a certain fraction of Jews believe that their "god" gave them ALL the land between the Nile and the Euphrat, and the only way to achieve that is in the condition of constant duress, strife, or war. THAT is "the cause", which started by grabbing "a little bit of Palestine" in 1919...
    1
  213. Selma Kelly ...Because on key issues, Democrats and Republicans "switched sides"... http://factmyth.com/factoids/democrats-and-republicans-switched-platforms/ The Democrats were the original "conservative party", bundling many conservative ideas NOW favoured by the Republican Party. As the Dems leant further left (center left), the GOP leant further right (center right).
    1
  214. Zaphod Beeblebrox For most of recent history, Jews were a minority.... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_history_of_Palestine_(region) A statement like "Jews had the RIGHT to return and unanimously call out an own state, because 6% of the population was Jewish" is ridiculous. That would be like saying "in 1,000 years from now Native Americans should have a RIGHT to return to New York and unanimously call out an own state, as long as 6% of the population has Native American roots"...
    1
  215. Dan Morgan Yup....of course they're just doing...ahem...."God's work"... http://www.ahavat-israel.com/eretz/future
    1
  216. Dan Morgan Yes, that is correct. One could also state that it was one of the first successful attempts at stopping colonial expansion -- "nipping it in the bud", so to speak. Of course, times had changed since 1919/1948. Who knows. If it hadn't been for the Cold War, "Israel" today could have spanned from the Nile to the Euphrat. After WW2, the Cold War started, and the two Alpha males in the ME were now the USA and the SU. The two previous Alpha males (France, British Empire) had to take a back seat. At this stage, the USA was not willing to risk a world war as a result of Israeli hawks expanding their borders. Today, with Trump/Pence...not so sure. The area is extremely volatile. The balance of power which had been in place for 50 years is beginning to erode due to the various wars, civil wars, wars of proxy in the region. Israel is forging an alliance with the Saudis, directed at Iran. If there is going to be a spark, the whole region will blow up. In such a chaotic mess as war, the "Eretz Israel"- dreamers might seek to expand Israel's borders at the expense of one of her neighbors (like we saw in Europe after WW2).
    1
  217. Itay Ezra LOL, no. The land was FIRST promised to Arabs, in a series of agreements from 1916 in an effort to get them to join GB in WW1 (against the Ottoman Empire). Later on, when they still couldn't win WW1, they made a deal with influential Jews (Balfour Declaration) in an effort to influence the USA to join the Allies. The Arabs were back stabbed, because an influence group with more money turned up...
    1
  218. Itay Ezra https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damascus_Protocol
    1
  219. Elisheva 777 So according to your misguided logic, every "Indian sounding" name in the USA should be "given back" to the First Nations? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_place_names_of_Native_American_origin_in_the_United_States Honestly...with rhetorical "skills" like yours, you are not doing your side any favors....
    1
  220. Panglima Dusun Oh, you mean like Mayas converted to Christianity. Interesting, but they're still Mayas. And?
    1
  221. TheRantingCabby Big pile of guns. I bet those are God's guns...
    1
  222. Why would they go there? It's not their homelands...
    1
  223. Poor kids being indoctrinated to think that forcing others out of their homes is what their god wanted them to do...
    1
  224. Big Papi Chosen by whom exactly?
    1
  225. Yisroel Meir Vogel Arafat was born in Cairo... Name me a SINGLE signatory if the Israeli declaration of independence who was born on the territory of the British mandate area called Palestine? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine_Arab_Congress [Think] [Think] [Think] ....and there goes your entire argument down the drain....
    1
  226. Yisroel Meir Vogel Correct. He was one of the original inhabitants of Palestine in 1919. One of the 6% of Jews, who lived in relative peace alongside their neighbors, with 600 000 other Palestinians... So according to all the logic in the world (freedom, liberty, and all that), he should have remained the ONLY Jewish signatory, and the others should have been the representatives of Christians, Arabs, etc.... Then, white people showed up with theirs plans to colonize (aka Zionism). Sorry dude. You were 100 years too late...
    1
  227. Yisroel Meir Vogel Im also familiar with the history of Gush Etzion It happened directly after the terrorist attacks on Deir Yassin... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deir_Yassin_massacre ...in a long list of causal events which started with Zionist immigration after WW1.
    1
  228. 1919: "MY invisible friend in the sky gave me this land, so move over locals....HERE I COME..." What could go wrong?
    1