Comments by "Ralph Bernhard" (@ralphbernhard1757) on "UnHerd"
channel.
-
1948?
Oh, it goes back looooong before that.
THE PROTOTYPE US COLOR REVOLUTION
It's old, very old.
"In March 1786 Jefferson joined Adams in London on several items of official business ... In Holland, a bourgeois democratic revolution had been defeated and its leaders, who had been instructed in the American Revolution by John Adams, (EDIT: THE "MAIDAN"-STYLE REVOLUTIONARY TRAINING EXPERTS HANDING OUT COOKIES) were cruelly suppressed or driven into exile by the Stadtholder, William V, Prince of Orange, in league with the old oligarchs and with the intervention of Britain and Prussia (EDIT: the monarchical principle of keeping the Holy Roman Empire, therefore the European balance of power, intact by suppressing such revolutions). Adams and Jefferson agonized for the Dutch Patriots, (EDIT: the "freedom fighters not terrorist"-narrative, because they are OUR "trained terrorists") but felt that they had been betrayed by their own excesses as well as by their Bourbon ally."
(from ugapress manifoldapp)
I'm sure the revolutionary trainers were very disappointed by the trainees, same as trying to instigate trouble in Georgia the past 20 years or so.
WHY HOLLAND?
The ulterior motive for such support by Washington DC of revolutionary movements in Europe, in strategic locations, was at least partly clarified: "... the proud wave of democracy was spreading and swelling and rolling, not only through that kingdom, but into England, Holland, Geneva, and Switzerland, and, indeed, threatening an inundation over all Europe.” While in spirit on the side of the "reformers" Adams was sceptical of their success and of one thing was absolutely sure: “that if they aimed at any constitution more popular than the English, they would ruin themselves, after setting Europe on fire and shedding oceans of blood.”
(from ugapress manifoldapp)
The evolving violence from the "revolutionary spirit", same as the 1980s in Yugoslavia, in the pre-2014 Ukraine, Hong Kong, Myanmar, and everywhere else the USA supports such movements all over the world, which could always be exploited in a divide-and-rule strategy of power for own gains, and sold to the generally unaware global public as "supporting freedom and democracy". Of course, and regarding the original PROTOTYPE US COLOR REVOLUTION should revolutionary France and revolutionary Holland unite that would create the "pistol pointing at the heart of England", a strategic danger to Great Britain posed by Antwerp. Such a resulting constituted reality, would not have please the London lords at all, and it could be expected that in London “the English, they would ruin themselves, after setting Europe on fire and shedding oceans of blood.”
This is how a divide-and-rule strategy is aided and deepened, by supporting a "side."
That is what happened in May 1803, when London finally expanded the previous series of limited continental engagements, into a fully fledged world war.
In the shadows of this "world war" the USA could then expand in North America, which is exactly what they did (study the expansive events in the USA from 1803 to 1815).
This is how divide-and-rule works in a society inundated with it, and predisposed to "believe" the truths they read about are also "always right."
2
-
1
-
1
-
The biggest danger to the world are ideologically indoctrinated systems, filled to the brim with "usefull innocents/idiots" which have always wanted to rule the world.
Search the term ideology in a dictionary.
It is a system of ideas and ideals, especially one which forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy.
ALL of these, need vast amounts of support in order to break out of the theory level of things, towards a real existing form of POWER.
It is is easy to become the tools, of ideologues.
These power players preach from their "soap boxes" called "TV" and millions bow down to them, and these power players have got millions to believe they should lie and kill for their ideology, and become ideologically indoctrinated warriors. When the ideology they openly and proudly flaunt kills millions, their leaders say that the death of 500,000 children was "worth it" (Madeleine Albright), and there are no repercussions at all. Millions look at such deaths, and don't even bat an eye. They carry on with their lives. Millions cheer and cherish their ideologues and dear leaders. The ideology their ideologically indoctrinated leaders openly state they should send soldiers to kill for, is democracy in marriage with corporatism, and the slogan they have chanted since World War 1 is "Make the world safe for democracy". The greatest example of doublespeak ever: it was actually always the intention to "make the world safe for corporations" as Smedley-Butler already revealed 100 years ago.
Strange, that the Bible these ideologues hold dear, says not to "lie, steal, and kill", but their leaders call upon them to kill to spread democracy.
One of these axioms, must be wrong.
1