Comments by "Ralph Bernhard" (@ralphbernhard1757) on "blckbx" channel.

  1. The USA/Washington DC has always fought wars to create systemic disunity/division somewhere else on the planet, for own systemic gains, using a variety of means at its disposal (power). The only wars it has ever fought in history on the own continent (North America), was to create systemic unity/gain for itself. Elsewhere, wars were instigated, not avoided, "false flagged" into being, funded/supported, goaded, or declared, leading to disunity in the world, for the advantage of the dividers, in the USA. ------------------------------------- "The primordial interest of the United States – over which for a century we have fought wars (the first, second, and Cold War) - has been the relationship between Germany and Russia. Because united they are the only force that could threaten us. And to make sure that that doesn't happen. Therefore, it's not an accident that General Hodges, who's been appointed to be blamed for all of this, is talking about pre-positioning troops in Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, and the Baltics. This is the intermarium from the Black Sea to the Baltic that Pilsudski (edit: post-WW1 Polish dream of power in the wake of Russian and German weakness) dreamt of. This is this is the solution for the United States. ... For the United States: The primordial fear is German technology, German capital, and Russian natural resources, Russian manpower as the only combination that has for centuries scared the hell out of the United States. So how does this play out? Well, the US has already put its cards on the table. It is the line from the Baltics to the Black Sea." - George Friedman, Stratfor, Feb 2015 Yes, that has always been the aim of the naval powers, Great Britain and the USA. That includes this current war in the Ukraine" which was not avoided (grand strategy) by the USA/NATO even if it could have been avoided by very simple diplomatic means around the year 2000 (with a signed comprehensive European security agreement which incl. Russia). Several historians like Richard Overy (GB) and Daniele Ganser (Switzerland) have continuously and conclusively come to this conclusion, which is that imperialism were the root causes of all European wars, as based on the study of historical data. It is not a "conspiracy theory." That IS the premier priority of the powers not IN Eurasia, and still is. Here are the critical questions. If that is the realization, then HOW were the naval powers going to implement such continental Eurasian/European division? How were, both currently and historically, London and Washington DC going to (quote) "make sure that that doesn't happen"? Answer: Proactively implement the "divide and rule"-technique of power, or the associated divide then gain/control technique of power. It is to create confusion, which can be exploited.
    6
  2. Revealing capitalist gain systems: "Mr. Brown, do you mean to tell me you would let (workers) work until they dropped dead?" Corporate CEO Lewis H Brown: "Yes. We save a lot of money that way." Source: Charles Roemer, a Johns Manville employee recalling what Brown said in a deposition. Topic: an already known deadly health risk posed by asbestos in the lung aka mesothelioma, and the associated almost 100-year lasting coverup attempts by DuPont, etc. This is not just some obscure example out of context, or the proverbial anecdotal evidence, but as thousands of similar examples have shown, is systemic. The disinformation playbook regarding coverups and corporate 101 of denial and business as usual, even against scientific evidence of the harm caused by own policies/products. The Fake: Conduct counterfeit science and try to pass it off as legitimate research. The Blitz: Harass scientists who speak out with results or views inconvenient for industry. The Diversion: Manufacture uncertainty about science where little or none exists. The Screen: Buy credibility through alliances with academia or professional societies. The Fix: Manipulate government officials or processes to inappropriately influence policy. These are all typical divide and rule strategies, which are employed on all tiers of systems intent on aggressive gain, which are typical of all sysyrms of gain, including capitalist and democratic systems. The technique is more than adequately explained in the below comments section, and the similarities between the systems of "capitalism/corporatism" and "democracy/globalism" can be examined in meta studies. These systems are systemically infested by sociopaths and psychopaths of all kinds, who who put interests and profit first, above all else. Key words for further research: 1) 21 percent of CEOs are psychopaths 2) Lobaczewski's definition of pathocracy 3) The dark triad of malevolent personality traits: psychopathy, narcissism and Machiavellianism 4) Dr Namie's research revealing the "Four Bully Types" A large portion of our fellow human beings perceive these as valid traits to achieve the own political and personal priorities. "Might is right", and "end justifies the means" are still axioms of so-called superiority. There is also no reason to believe that any other system which promises power, will not attract similar numbers of bullies and psychopaths. Reality: Liberal democracies and capitalist gain models and the pleasing narratives they spread, attract psychos like moths to the flame, and most human beings wouldn't be able to spot a psycho even if their lives depended on it. Most human beings living in symbiosis of systems either don't have the skill to recognize bad actors, nor the inclination to remove them since it is tangentially beneficial to own favored systems which affords the own good life, or have become directly entrapped by the gain models (pyramidal shaped hierarchies) lead by such bad actors. It doesn't seem to bother sufficient decent people enough to make such management styles which lead to the direct and indirect deaths of millions around the world impossible (effect a stopper against such models de jure or de facto). Indeed, based on observation, and looking back in history it can therefore be concluded that such behavior is only given a slap on the wrist, and therefore continues in so-called "good empires". Studies have shown that models based on intent of gain have rates of people with psychopathic tendencies as high as 20%. Compare that reality to the average for a normal society, or usual non-gain models of cooperation, which is around a 1% psycho rate. There is no reason to believe other models of intent of gain (like politics) do not have similar high rates of psychos.
    1