Comments by "Ralph Bernhard" (@ralphbernhard1757) on "Eurodollar University" channel.

  1. What most MSM and established historians seem to forget, whilst proudly advocating the "fighting for democracy" virtue signalling, is that it had been the democratic "liberal empires" (USA/GB) which had lain the foundation of Europe`s demise around the year 1900. From the position of a GEOGRAPHICAL ADVANTAGE which afforded the slight edge in power, which was then exploited by seeing to it that others where kept "down" and "out" of the reach of resources which were needed to succeed. These resources were controlled via that slight edge which geography afforded, at that was ture at ALL times. It a systemic conclusion, which unlike all other theories out there, is true at ALL times, never mind how far one goes back into the past. Those who carry out such "rule," are not going to tell us how they rule by division on ALL tiers, and how they have ruled by division on all tiers for thousands of years. It is about the oldest trick in the book, to rule by division from a position of POWER. They will tell us, their "good fools," that it is all about the good vs. the bad but guess what they are NOT telling us? They never state HOW they manage it. The top tiers divide and rule, and this functions in one direction only: down, to the base, which is "we the people." They divide us, but we have no way or means to divide them, the top tiers, in return. Revealing capitalist gain systems, to put things in perspective a bit: "Mr. Brown, do you mean to tell me you would let (workers) work until they dropped dead?" Corporate CEO Lewis H Brown: "Yes. We save a lot of money that way." Source: Charles Roemer, a Johns Manville employee recalling what Brown said in a deposition. Topic: an already known deadly health risk posed by asbestos in the lung aka mesothelioma, and the associated almost 100-year lasting coverup attempts by DuPont, etc. This is not just some obscure example out of context, or the proverbial anecdotal evidence, but as thousands of similar examples have shown, is systemic. The disinformation playbook regarding coverups and corporate 101 of denial and business as usual, even against scientific evidence of the harm caused by own policies/products. The Fake: Conduct counterfeit science and try to pass it off as legitimate research. The Blitz: Harass scientists who speak out with results or views inconvenient for industry. The Diversion: Manufacture uncertainty about science where little or none exists. The Screen: Buy credibility through alliances with academia or professional societies. The Fix: Manipulate government officials or processes to inappropriately influence policy. These are all typical divide and rule strategies, which are employed on all tiers of systems intent on aggressive gain, and which are therefore typical of all systems of gain, including capitalist and democratic systems. The technique is more than adequately explained in the below comments section, and the similarities between the systems of "capitalism/corporatism" and "democracy/globalism" can be examined in meta studies. These systems are systemically infested by sociopaths and psychopaths of all kinds, who who put interests and profit first, above all else. Key words for further research: 1) 21 percent of CEOs are psychopaths 2) Lobaczewski's definition of pathocracy 3) The dark triad of malevolent personality traits: psychopathy, narcissism and Machiavellianism 4) Dr Namie's research revealing the "Four Bully Types" A large portion of our fellow human beings perceive these as valid traits to achieve the own political and personal priorities. "Might is right", and "end justifies the means" are still axioms of so-called superiority. There is also no reason to believe that any other system which promises power, will not attract similar numbers of bullies and psychopaths. Reality: Liberal democracies and capitalist gain models and the pleasing narratives they spread, attract psychos like moths to the flame, and most human beings wouldn't be able to spot a psycho even if their lives depended on it. Most human beings living in symbiosis of systems either don't have the skill to recognize bad actors, nor the inclination to remove them since it is tangentially beneficial to own favored systems which affords the own good life, or have become directly entrapped by the gain models (pyramidal shaped hierarchies) lead by such bad actors. It doesn't seem to bother sufficient decent people enough to make such management styles which lead to the direct and indirect deaths of millions around the world impossible (effect a stopper against such models de jure or de facto). Indeed, based on observation, and looking back in history it can therefore be concluded that such behavior is only given a slap on the wrist, and therefore continues in so-called "good empires". Studies have shown that models based on intent of gain have rates of people with psychopathic tendencies as high as 20%. Compare that reality to the average for a normal society, or usual non-gain models of cooperation, which is around a 1% psycho rate. There is no reason to believe other models of intent of gain (like politics) do not have similar high rates of psychos. All empires as collectives of individuals have by nature, psychopathic and bullying tendencies. Note that the Hollywood image of the psycho and the bully is far removed from reality. The unfortunate reality is that most psychopaths/bullies remain undetected, and undetectable, because they manipulate entire groups of non-psychos/non-bullies into following them as beneficiaries, who then start entire campaigns of coverups and deception themselves.
    1