Comments by "Ralph Bernhard" (@ralphbernhard1757) on "World Affairs In Context"
channel.
-
584
-
The USA/collective Western plot is always the same.
The people of the Greater Middle East, including the Levant (most of whom are Semites, and the followers of Abrahamic religions) have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. Because it is easier to divide people based on personal differences, than it is to unite them, based on what they have in common. Strategically ambiguous outsiders make use of this, for own advantages. In the era of empires, first Rome/Constantinople, then during WW1 the seat of POWER playing these games changed to London/Paris (Sykes-Picot/Balfour Declaration/WW1), then after the 1950's as European colonialism's power decreased, starting around the time a bark by Washington DC in 1956 (Suez Crisis/War) showed who the new boss was, the role of divider was simply taken over by Washington DC (the entire ME was the playground during the Cold War). Now the intention is simply to avoid unity in the ME, in order to rule over the dissent which is classical divide-and-rule. Today, their leaders are ALL tools. Draw lines on the map without asking any of those affected. Exploit and foster endless wars, meddle for constant dissent.
Divide-and-rule connects the dots on the timeline of history.
Who has had (in all historical cases in the ME/Levant) the GEOGRAPHICAL ADVANTAGE of distance from the events resulting out of the own meddling and political activities, being able to reach all the other regions, but could not be reached itself as hegemony, at any given point of a historical timeline? Pax Romana, Rome. Pax Britannica, London. Pax Americana, Washington DC. All they ever wanted was pax, because they said so, but who picks up the pieces of great wealth and the systemic gains when all the others can be avoided from uniting?
Different Empires. Different era. Same games...
-------------------------------------
The people of the Africa have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. Tribalism makes it easy to divide people, then keep them poor under the "kind foot" of exploitation. In the era of empires, first Rome/Constantinople in North Africa, then during the era of Western imperialism the seat of POWER playing these games changed to the USA/Europe, then after the 1950's as European colonialism's power decreased, Africa was the playground during the Cold War. Once the dividers had reached peak power for themselves, by simply drawing lines on the map without asking any of those affected (Congo Conference/1884) the own systems of gain could siphon off wealth like a giant vacuum cleaner. The intention was simply to avoid unity in Africa, in order to rule over the dissent which is classical divide-and-rule. During the Cold War, Moscow took on the role of arming the resistance to the colonial dividers. Today, all African dissenters fighting against unity, including some of Africa's own greedy corrupt leaders, are ALL tools. Endless wars, constant dissent.
Give the weak mind money, and they will dance for the outside dividers...
Divide-and-rule.
Oldest trick in the book...
Different people and systems. Different places on the map. Same games.
--------------------------------------
The people of the Americas, including the USA, have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. In the beginning stages of era of European Imperialism, first Spain and Portugal entered the Americas, employing the divide-and-rule technique of top-down power on the local systems (Aztecs/Incas), and as European colonial powers' influence decreased during the 19th century, the role of divider was simply taken over by Washington DC. As the own power increased incrementally, the entire world became the playground after around 1900. Today, it is the globalists who employ imperialist tools to play divide-and-rule games on their neighbours.
Forget nukes. The divide-and-control/rule/conquer strategy is the most powerful force on the planet, because it can be employed equally in times of peace to CONTROL, in times of crises to RULE, and in times of war to CONQUER.
Ever since the two-faced snake slithered down that tree of unity (fable), speaking out of both sides of the mouth (lies, deceit), the wisest human beings have fruitlessly warned, and the easily divisable have continuously been warned against divisions within a peaceful status quo. When you bow to the division caused by deception, you will lose the good life..."and much that once was, is lost; for none now live who remember it." Such divisions create GAIN for OUTSIDERS (Eden as a system divided by lies and deceit).
Now the intention is simply to avoid unity in the Americas, in order to rule over the dissent which is classical divide-and-rule. Endless wars on anything and everything from "drugs" to "terror" (sic.), constant dissent with everything's a war war war...
Insert levers of lies, mistrust. The two-party-duopoly is two cheeks of the same golden hind which set out to create favourites: Favouritism, by granting access to the own POWER/WEALTH, to those who volunteer to act as proxies and extensions for the own power projection. The small picture lives of domestic political chaos, of the big picture reality of international insanity. Point the systemic (MSM) finger, everywhere else, by use of the own paid stooges of power by presenting their deep state-orchestrated three-letter-agency astroturfed violence on multiple tiers as being the reactions of "the poor oppressed people, who need our help for freedom and democracy" (sic.). Liars, deceivers, creators of the BLACK LEGEND for the "other side".
In February 1948, George F. Kennan's Policy Planning Staff said: "[W]e have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. ... Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity." Kennan: A prototype GLOBALIST. And that is what they did to increase their own wealth. Set up people against each other, then siphon off the wealth of entire regions of the planet.
And that is what you are fighting for. That is what the hegemon has always done, pretending to be the "good pax", but playing "good cop/bad cop" with the world, from a position of power. In the past, the "good cops" were the INTERNATIONALISTS, and the "bad cops" were the IMPERIALISTS. In the present that has morphed into the "good cops" being the GLOBALISTS/NEOLIBS, and the "bad cops" being the NEOCONS. Name-branding and doublespeak for the slumberland plebs, enchanted by their "bread-and-circuses"-existences.
America's friends and self-proclaimed default rivals in Eurasia are still being burnt to ensure this disparity continues, with a (quote) "pattern of relationships" which are beneficial to the own rule. Set up European and Eurasian nations (including the Middle East/North Africa) against each other. It is how divide-and-rule is implemented. The imperialist playbook of Great Britain and the USA for more than 100 years. Read Halford Mackinder (Pivot of History, 1904) and Zbigniew Brzezinski (Grand Chessboard, 1997) regarding Eurasia for the template. Read W.T. Stead (Americanization of the World, 1901) for the guideline of political-, cultural- and economic capture. Read Smedley-Butler (War is a Racket) for the modus operandi of imperialism/militarism.
Some say Europe is a divine goddess. I say, it is a humble apple tree, from an allegory as old as modern civilizations, because it is easy to divide.
Divide and Rule.
Oldest trick in the book...
Four corners of the globe. Different cultures and religions. Same games.
THE LINK OF THE WORLD.
The entire system they favor in the USA/collective West is based on a pre-set managed and moderated division, for the benefit of a very few at the top of the pyramids accompanied by the often-repeated nice-sounding storyline. Create the script of the own heroes. Their entire scripted money-funded history sounds like a Hollywood superhero movie that sounds too good to be true. Guess what? It is. It is what they are NOT telling you, that they try to hide.
Who wields the POWER? Who has had the GEOGRAPHICAL ADVANTAGE of being able to reach all the other little buck catchers (tools, and other Roman-era style instruments of POWER), but could not be reached itself, because of a geographical-, technological-, organizational-, military-, strategic-, political advantage at any given point of a historical timeline? Create the default rival/enemy on their own marching routes. It is usually the power most likely to succeed which is determined as the default rival/enemy. Notice how, as soon as a rival starts mass-producing products high up in the value chain of capitalism, and starts vying for markets, and becomes successful, it immediately becomes the systemic rival, and is then geopolitically encircled by the greater empire. It happened around 1900, as Germany started building high-value products, and it happened around 2000, as China started moving away from building cheap toys and labor intensive kitchen appliances...
The games start on the home turf. The first victims are their own people in the USA/collective West, locked in the eternal struggle for wealth and personal gain which they have been deceived into thinking is "good greed", but which WILL be exploited by the snakes who deceive them on the domestic tier of the divide-and-rule system of power. Because ..."most of the great problems we face are caused by politicians creating solutions to problems they created in the first place." - Walter E. Williams
War is a great divider. It goes straight through the heads of millions and billions of people from the very top tiers, right down to the individual level. War divides alignments and alliances, goes straight through organizations, divides political parties, tears through families, and finally at the very bottom tier, goes straight through individual hearts and minds as individuals struggle with themselves.
49
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
4
-
The USA has lived beyond its means for more than 50 years. Now it's all coming to a head.
After 1945 the US government and 1%-ters set out to gobble up as much of the world's resources for themselves if not direct control then indirectly via implementation of the dollar hegemony.
Money in the form of printed fiat currency (post-1913) of course, is a means to exercise CONTROL, and to funnel the resources of the world in ONE direction: upwards, towards the hegemon issuing the fiat currency as a means to steer the resources.
That is the reality on ALL tiers, even within the own borders, not only International Relations. Divide and rule implemented downwards, onto their own people, and outwards, onto the entire planet.
This is how limited factor (resources) can be CONTROLLED by printing a potentially unlimited factor (money), and affording this unlimited factor to FAVORITES (divide and rule).
Observation reveals that it is not "hard work" which determines how the resources are divided (WHO you are), but a pre-selected standing (WHAT you are). Americans, are slowly waking up to this reality, as we speak, because it is not 1950, or 1970, or 1990 anymore.
The USA came out "on top" after 1945 because of a GEOGRAPHICAL ADVANTAGE, not because of better leaders, a better government, or anything else.
A geographical advantage meant the ability to employ division as tool, more successfully than other systems: which is the employment of the divide an rule technique.
No, the US government was not "good," unlike its people, but rather used geographical advantages to be more slimy than everybody else. Sorry, if reality triggers anybody. Sorry, but at least 50-90% of Americans are NOT privileged enough to benefit from the "50%" of resources the empire vacuums up, claiming it as its justified "right" to CONTROL.
Whatever.
You'll soon find out.
Then, from the position of the "top of the hill" (shiny house) point at other systems, and via the use of false argumentation, claim that all other systems are bad/evil, want to rule the world or whatever: it doesn't really matter because the entire rotten own system is filled the brim with every imaginable ideologue, idealist, nutcase, cutthroat, and everything else. These will soon simmer and percolate to the top of the froth, as and the true reality of human nature will be revealed soon, when the entire card house of lies implodes, and the USA can no longer CONTROL "50%" of the world's resources.
footnote
In February 1948, George F. Kennan's Policy Planning Staff said: "We have about 50% of the world's wealth, but only 6.3% of the population*...Our real task in the coming period is to develop a pattern , of relationships that allow us to maintain this position of inequality."
And that's what these internationalist/globalist gentlemen did in the past, and still do today.
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Meanwhile, after more than two years Boris Johnson has admitted that the war in the Ukraine is a proxy war for US/collective Western interests, and Vladimir Zelensky has stated that "there are those in the West who don't mind a long war [in Ukraine]" to extend Russia, using his peoples as tools for the gain of outsiders who drool over the profits (Mitch McConnell), or lust after the systemic expansion possible as result of great upheavals amongst human beings. Does this take the wind out of the sails of the "paid Putin puppet"-screamers, blindly chanting their MSM narratives against those who have said this from day 1? Not at all. In order to fit their idealist world views, and ideologically-inspired standpoints, these tools will deny reality, rattle down the narrative to a point of making total fools of themselves. They would now have to believe that Boris Johnson, or Vladimir Zelensky are "paid Putin puppets", in order to square a circle...
This is exactly what is meant with fools arguing their way into the trenches their own leaders have deceived them into.
The Atlanticists' strategists and world views, far away from the divisions they foster and pay for by proxy, the constant crises they instigate, the cold wars they lay the foundation for, or the hot wars they avoid avoiding (double negative); and whose navies give them access to the world's resources (incl. "human resources") have always wanted long wars, if there was prospect of systemic gains using a geographical advantage (distance from warring states) or if there was any danger of unity formatting in Europe/Eurasia.
World War 1 (Seven Years War)
World War 2 (Napoleonic Wars)
World War 3 (Great War/WW1)
World War 4 (World War 2)
"During World War II, study groups of the (US) State Department and Council on Foreign Relations developed plans for the postwar world in terms of what they called the 'Grand Area,' which was to be subordinated to the needs of the American economy. The Grand Area was to include the Western Hemisphere, Western Europe, the Far East, the former British Empire (which was being dismantled), the incomparable energy resources of the Middle East (which were then passing into American hands as we pushed out our rivals France and Britain), the rest of the Third World and, if possible, the entire globe. These plans were implemented, as opportunities allowed... These declassified documents are read only by scholars, who apparently find nothing odd or jarring in all this." - GEORGE KENNAN AND THE HISPANIC-LUSITANIAN WORLD: A CONTEMPORARY REFLECTION Antonio Luis Ramos Membrive
“Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world.” — Henry Kissinger (attr.) The beauty of "history", is that the "control freaks" of history tell you exactly what they aim to do. Whether Kissinger actually said this or not, is not important. What is important is that it is one of those age-old truisms known to the average history fan as the "siege" of towns and fortresses, as the "naval blockade" (military strategy) as technology improved, or in modern times the "political/economic sanctions", all with a host of variations as our world became more and more complex.
But even that Kissinger quote is not the entire truth. When these few have the MEANS (economic, military, political clout), they control the RESOURCES, and that includes human beings all over the globe as potential PROXIES as "human resources". It is the control of the resources they are after.
There is the big picture.
US primacy, to be defended at all costs per declaration.
1
-
1
-
Die Geschichte der Einkreisungpolitik eine Eurasischen Grossmacht wiederholte sich nach 1990.
Die Absicht der Hegemoniemacht besteht darin, die kleineren Systeme zu „verwandeln“, um sie zu Werkzeugen der Einkreisung (Stellvertreter) oder zu „unsinkbaren Flugzeugträgern“ für die eigene systemische Kontrolle oder Erweiterung zu machen.
Dann produzieren Sie die gesamte Geschichte auch noch als „Schutz der Freiheit/Freunde/Demokratie,“ als "Freiheitskampf," oder irgentwelche andere Story das auch in Hollywood noch gut wirkt (Strategie des "Bread and Circuses" für die heimische Massen).
Die später als 1. und 2. Weltkrieg bezeichneten Ereignisse waren Teil derselben Feuersbrunst, die um das Jahr 1900 begann, als die Seemächte ihre kontinentalen Nachbarn umzingelten.
Für das amerikanische Jahrhundert nach dem Jahr 1900 war Europa einfach ein etwas größerer Landstrich als Großbritannien für Rom um das Jahr „0“: Die von Washington D.C. verwendete Technik war dieselbe, nämlich die Nutzung bestehender Teilungen. Solche Spaltungen für eigene Zwecke auszunutzen, ist die Strategie „Teile und Herrsche“.
Ein proaktives Mittel, um eigene Interessen auf Kosten anderer voranzutreiben, besteht darin, einige zu bevorzugen (die Macht der Begünstigten zu erhöhen) auf Kosten anderer (die Macht der Geächteten zu verringern).
Für den „Spalter“ sind die Vielzahl der Gründe, Motivationen, Ideologien, Rechtfertigungen, Meinungen, Ausreden oder die Interessen derer, die mitwirken, um die nützliche Spaltung für die höhere Macht zu erreichen, nicht von Bedeutung. Für die spaltende Macht spielt es keine Rolle, wie die Spaltung umgesetzt wird, oder wie bestehende Spaltungen vertieft werden, oder wer aus welchen Gründen auch immer hilft, oder ob diejenigen, die die Spaltung begünstigen und begünstigen, überhaupt wissen, dass sie die Spaltung unterstützen: Was zählt, ist, dass es umgesetzt wird.
Für den Teiler ist es nicht wichtig, warum die Werkzeuge zusammenarbeiten, sondern die Tatsache, dass die ausgesuchte Werkzeuge zusammenarbeiten, um Spaltung zu schaffen und irgendwo einen Teil des Planeten zu überwältigen.
Wie und das sind unterschiedliche Prämissen ...
Das Imperium ist auf der Suche nach Gewinn sind nur „Interessen“ wichtig.
Der Flächenbrand, der sich nach 1914 abspielte, war ein weiterer europäischer 30-jähriger Krieg (mit einer 20-jährigen Pause dazwischen).
Die so eingerichteten Spaltungen waren:
1) die Seemächte (Großbritannien/USA) mit ihren kontinentalen Verbündete (wie beispielsweise Frankreich nach 1904 und Russland nach 1907).
gegen:
2) die kontinentalen Allianzen, die durch die Seeherrschaft von 1) eingekreist und daran gehindert wurden, ausreichende Einflussbereiche für ihr Wachstum zu erreichen, und diese Einkreisungsstrategie begann als vorsätzliche Aktion der Seemächte um 1900.
Diese Strategie wurde nach 1990 einfach wiederholt (Wolfowitz-Doktrin/US-imperialistischer Machtanspruch mit „US-Primärität“ als oberste Priorität. Niedergeschrieben, für alle sichtbar.). Nur wurden diesmal die „neuen Rivalen“ weiter nach Osten verlagert. Die „neuen Rivalen“ heißen nun Russland und China.
"Kanonenfutter-Stürme!!"
1
-
What do they want?
A tale as old as the Bible.
Esau and Jacob is of course a cautionary tale to beware of brothers who come to you with a GIFT which has morphed over time and now means "winning means everything". Note that in this biblical "tale" about eternal deceit and "cheating own brothers out of their inheritance", that the deceiver is the hero of the story, and this warning has been taken as a guideline by strategists.
Those who end up with the RICHES under your feet, are the heroes. The deceiver's name and slimy ways continue.
Esau the inheritor and his father's favourite, as a name has sorta died out. Just remember, wherever you live, that you just a "dog" in a "manger" (Churchill), and that the RESOURCES intended to be passed onto you as natural inheritance, belong to these OUTSIDERS, in these OUTSIDERS heads, and according to the strategies of these OUTSIDERS. The "smooth talking good guy", the spiffy clean deceiver, scamming his own brother, whilst arguing like a woman creating division within unity and creating the BLACK LEGEND of his brother (the "bad guy"), is the "hero" of history. The original wedge diplomacy, to avoid unity between the owner of the resources, and the inheritor. Very telling indeed.
The owner/donor/ruling class want your "inheritance", and they will lie, steal, and send their ki!!ers to get CONTROL of it...
Divide-and-rule.
"If you want the present to be different from the past, study the past." - Baruch Spinoza
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The USA has only always gained greatly by setting up a world in which others fail.
The faster the rest of the world realizes this, the better.
Washington DC power mongers employ the divide and rule technique of power.
In the past, and as one of the Big Three at Versailles, they covertly set up Europe for failure, masked behind overt expressions of "fighting for freedom and democracy." In reality, Versailles was a covert implementation of the divide and rule technique. Europe was divided, with a ruling.
This strategy is often misunderstood, in narratives composed mostly of "being friends" or "being rivals/enemies", even though it only means that one can gain greatly if others are divided and fail. It is as simple as that. "Friends" or "enemies" play no role: if others fail, the own systems gain. After Europe failed, the final domino stone Washington DC actively toppled was the British Empire. Washington DC used the same techniques (favoritism of specific "buck-catchers") that it had previously used to overpower European states and empires.
After two world wars, with countless emerging struggles in the colonies, so by 1945 the already seriously weakened and overextended Great Britain was an easy pushover...
When Europe failed, as all states fought to mutual exhaustion, who gained most?
From "Super Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire." -- Michael Hudson, 2nd edition 2003
"What actually occurred was that Britain and other countries became hopelessly indebted to the United States once again (edit: during World War 2) ... “We have profited by our past mistakes,” announced Roosevelt in a speech delivered on September 3, 1942. “This time we shall know how to make full use of victory.” This time the U.S. Government would conquer its allies in a more enlightened manner, by demanding economic concessions of a legal and political nature instead of futilely seeking repayment of its wartime loans (of World War 1). The new postwar strategy sought and secured foreign markets for U.S. exports, and new fields for American investment capital in Europe’s raw materials producing colonial areas. Despite Roosevelt’s assurances to the contrary, Britain was compelled, under the Lend-Lease agreements and the terms of the first great U.S. postwar loan to Britain, to relinquish Empire Preference and to open all its markets to U.S. competition, at a time when Britain desperately needed these markets as a means by which to fund its sterling debt. Most important of all, Britain was forced to unblock its sterling and foreign-exchange balances built up by its colonies and other Sterling Area countries during the wartime years. Instead of the Allied Powers as a whole bearing the costs of these wartime credits to British Empire countries, they would be borne by Britain itself. Equally important, they would not be used as “blocked” balances that could be used only to buy British or other Sterling Area exports, but would be freed to purchase exports from any nation. Under postwar conditions this meant that they would be used in large part to purchase U.S. exports. (page 115/116) By relinquishing its right to block these balances, Britain gave up its option, while enabling the United States to make full use of its gold stock as the basis for postwar lending to purchased generalized (primarily U.S.) exports. At a stroke, Britain’s economic power was broken. What Germany as foe had been unable to accomplish in two wars against Britain, the United States accomplished with ease as its ally.(Page 117) Furthermore, under the terms on which it joined the International Monetary Fund, Britain could not devalue the pound sterling so as to dissipate the foreign-exchange value of these balances. Its liability thus was maximized – and so was America’s gain from the pool of liquidity that these balances now represented." (end of)
Only ONE attribute decides whether a system is THE DIVIDER, or becomes a part of "the divided": POWER.
After 1945 London was turned from its role of "divider of the world" into the role of "one of the divided" (the role of FAVORITE junior partner, the "peaceful handover of power" and related "special relationship"-narrative. "Special"-relationship in a power balance. These Washington DC power mongers must be rotfl...)
London went from chief divider to chief of the divided in less than a quarter of a century.
Whatever...
If your state or nation is "not at the table," you are "lunch" (Anthony Blinken).
The dividers telling everybody in no uncertain terms, that their interests and even their lives don't count. There is no doubt that Washington DC is attempting to repeat this "success" (pov) in the rising powers of Asia. Indian Minister of External Affairs Dr. Jaishankar said: "The era of US dominance, which began after the end of the Cold War, has effectively ended." The strategy can be observed to be implemented in the same way as was set up post-1900 in Europe, but in Europe the "buck catchers" (John Mearsheimer theory) were Great Britain and France. Today, it is India being used in the same role as France was 100 years ago. In case of a wider war in Asia, as India is set up against China, qui bono if all lose?
The technique Washington DC employed up to the year 2000, is an almost exact repeat of the technique they used to overpower Europe around the year 1900: DIVIDE AND RULE.
Divide and rule creates all that follows in its wake:
1) The terrorist.
2) The state of terror.
3) The terror state.
Ukraine, Taiwan, now Poland, and many more will follow, being set up as tools and sacrificial offerings to extend the rule of the American Century.
1
-
Mike Pompeo tweeted about BRICS: "The B and the I both get that the C and the R are threats to their people."
Him and his cohorts, are going to do their utmost to steer the inhabitants of the BRICS states against each other, so that the one is set up against the other.
How? By employing the divide-and-rule technique.
Oldest trick in the book...
My sincere thanks to a fellow youtuber (@realvipul) who thought my one of essays explaining the divide-and-rule/conquer strategy of power was "TLDR" or too complicated and therefore ran it through AI...
"The comment discusses the concept of "divide and rule" as a strategy employed by powerful entities to maintain control. It argues that human systems are inherently chaotic due to the complexity of human nature, making them susceptible to manipulation through division. The example of the Roman Empire's conquest of Britain around the year "0" is used to illustrate how this strategy works, emphasizing that the motivations of individual collaborators are less important than the overall effect of division in enabling the empire's dominance. The comment then extends this analysis to the American Century, suggesting that the same strategy was used to exert influence over Europe. It highlights that the goal is to create maximum division among opposing groups while maintaining unity within the ruling power. The comment criticizes the media and political leaders for perpetuating a cycle of lies and wars, often under the guise of opposing territorial expansion while simultaneously promoting systemic expansion. In essence, the comment argues that the "divide and rule" strategy is a fundamental tactic employed by powerful entities to maintain control, and that understanding this strategy is crucial for comprehending historical events and current geopolitical dynamics."
How to break up larger entities like the EU or BRICS?
The same way North American Native American tribes were set up against each other: ally with some, against others and hide the strategy behind a nice-sounding story of heroes and glory. European settlers once grew into North America using this technique, morphed into "the USA" and then gained North American hegemony using this technique, morphed into the American Century and gained global hegemony using this technique, and Washington DC/Pentagon/"think tanks" are now using the divide-and-rule technique as desperate attempt to hang onto global hegemony...
Can it really be that simple to understand complicated historical and current events? Yes, it can.
1
-
"If the USA gets a cold, the rest of the world gets the flu".
GEOPOLITICAL ANALYSIS
Honestly, what more is there to say? USA: "If I get a cold, the rest of the world suffers worse." This must be the most pathetic acknowledgement of subjection I've read my entire life. If your global neighbor gets an economic "cold" and you can't simply send them a get well soon card and continue with your own life unaffected, you are already in a globalist entanglement. Analysts should stop calling out hypocrisy/lies/double standards and start naming it what it is.
It is a concerted effort of imperialism as practiced since ancient times, called divide and rule.
If a side has a position of power, it does not stand to lose from all the false narratives, deception, and bloodshed it finances around the world. If you have a geographical advantage, you don't make "mistakes" or one isn't simply a "hypocrite" but one actually implements a strategy of power, which are old proven Roman strategies.
These hypocrites face no disadvantages from being a hypocrite.
These liars are far away from the foundations of the disasters they had sown.
When the showdowns come, don't expect to see any of these "narrative shapers" on the front lines.
These hypocrites will send YOU there when the shtf.
This is divide and rule.
One takes over a sphere of influence one slow step at a time. When there is a response, blame the side being encroached upon, and use any action by the other side as excuse for further encroachment or escalation.
Others take the disadvantages, leaving the side in the position of power to sweep in and gain advantages.
"Never argue with fools. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." ― Mark Twain.
Me: "Never argue with imperialist/globalist tools. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with inexperience."
1
-
1