Comments by "Ralph Bernhard" (@ralphbernhard1757) on "David Pakman Show"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
THE RULES BASED ORDER
Making the "rules" is very profitable for oneself.
In February 1948, George F. Kennan's Policy Planning Staff said: "[W]e have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. ... Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity."[end of]
During most of the previous centuries America's allies and foes in Europe burned in order to achieve primacy for the USA with a pattern of aligned/allied relationships before 1945, and after 1945 are still being burnt to ensure this disparity continues, with a (quote) "pattern of relationships".
It is how divide and rule is implemented. Set up European and Eurasian nations against each other in a (quote) "pattern of relationships."
Look for the patterns, and see the technique.
The people don't need a political "rules based order", because the wise use the GOLDEN RULE.
Do unto others, as you wish to done onto.
Do not do to others, as one does not wish to be done onto.
------------------------------------
With regards to the current mess called "Europe", just remember what was agreed following the collapse of the USSR.
"The Charter of Paris for a New Europe (also known as the Paris Charter) was adopted by a summit meeting of most European governments in addition to those of Canada, the United States and the Soviet Union, in Paris from 19–21 November 1990. The charter was established on the foundation of the Helsinki Accords and was further amended in the 1999 Charter for European Security. Together, these documents form the agreed basis for the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. However, not all OSCE member countries have signed the treaty." (wiki)
One of the key points agreed upon, and signed into being, was that no member state would engage in behaviour which would undermine the security concerns of another member state or signatory. Now let's leave it to the finger pointers and obfuscators who will happily point you in the wrong direction with regards to whose fault it was that the spirit of these accords (dove work) were untangled, step-by-step in the same way the spirit of the Concert of Europe (post-1815) was once undermined, step-by-step.
Here is one point the finger pointers will however never address: Why any European state, specifically those who stand most to gain, in the middle of Europe/Eurasia, and who would gain most from European/Eurasian unity, would set out to create division.
It is easy to see how the Paris Charter (1990), if abided by to the letter would have lead to unity in Europe, and by extension also to Eurasia if Russia had used their location as link between Europe and East Asia.
However, history has shown that every intention to create unity automatically triggers an instinct in ... ahem... "some people" to destroy it, by use of proxies, or directly: in steps "NATO enlargement" as the means to inject dissension into a formatting unity.
The intentions of the doves wishing unity, interacting with the strategizing and cajoling of the hawks of division.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1