Comments by "Rob McCune" (@robm6645) on "David Pakman Show"
channel.
-
405
-
288
-
232
-
184
-
183
-
172
-
149
-
142
-
131
-
122
-
107
-
100
-
99
-
95
-
93
-
92
-
91
-
88
-
82
-
80
-
78
-
78
-
77
-
76
-
68
-
62
-
60
-
59
-
58
-
56
-
54
-
52
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
47
-
46
-
44
-
43
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
38
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
Well yes, Rubin isn't an investigative journalist because Rubin isn't a journalist, in the same way he can't be a station wagon because he is not a car. He's a political hack who is only interested in promoting the right. The fact you think anything but softball questions is "tricking the guest" or being an activist shows this isn't about journalism because it isn't about truth, it's about safe space for bad ideas where facts can't hurt your feelings.
I hate to break it to you bud, but post-modernism is wrong. Truth is a real thing that we can get closer to, and by not challenging his guest, Rubin doesn't get anyone closer to the truth and in fact moves people backward by saying the truth doesn't matter, ideas matter regardless of the facts, or the evidence, or logic or the counter arguments, those are all things that stop a free exchange of ideas which means they are bad. According to Dave you can believe what ever you want to believe, unless you're on the left.
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
Actually he wants to ban the gender neutral pronouns of I, me, we, us, you, they, this, that, these, those, it, myself, yourself, ourselves, themselves, itself. I don't see how limiting a fundamental part of English grammar helps with freedom of speech.
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
Most of Rubin's guests have their own youtube channels, saying they are being censored for being on the right is part of Rubin being on the right. The idea that they don't have platform for their ideas is a lie he uses to excuse his political bias.
The fact is Rubin is guilty of everything he complains about, creating safe spaces for the right(the fact you think basic critical thinking is a brutal blood sport is evidence of this), including the alt-right, postmodernism where nothing matters and everything is relative(the grounds you are defending him on), and valuing feelings of right wingers (that are victims of left wingers, women, minorities, immigrants, educators, scientists, etc.) over the reality that their ideology is in power, unpopular, or just empirically wrong.
In fact you just unwittingly contradicted yourself by admitting that he and all his guests complain about that, because if all his guests complain about the same thing then his show is by definition pushing an agenda. If his show were about a free exchange of ideas he would actually have guests on who would not tow the line that the left is a bunch of evil safe space post-modernists, which is objectively factually wrong. So thank you for admitting all his guests promote a single thread of lies designed for a specific propagandistic purpose.
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
Seeing how you are subbed to The Daily Wire, Steven Crowder, Oppressed Media, Fox News, RockingMrE, AltRight. com, Mark Dice, Pat Condell, Millenial Woes, Tommy Robinson, Son of Europe, Blaire White, Black Pidgeon Speaks, Baked Alaska, American Renaissance , Matt Christianson, Karen Straughan, Paul Joseph Watson, Rebel Media, Roaming Millennial, Stefan Molyneux, and Lauren Southern, you can't call anyone else a bigot you fucking Nazi.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
LabTech His statements are backed up by facts? That's laughable. He selectively quotes and misrepresents science as badly as Deepak Chopra, and most of his statements are about the mind, values, meaning and mythology and are meant in a symbolic way that aren't about rational literal truth or empirically verifiable. You apparently only love him for his enemies, which is pretty pathetic in and of itself. Newman was a terrible interview who was out to get him, but so what? It's not as big a deal as you make it out be and it certainly doesn't make Peterson a martyr or a hero just because he was subject to a hit job by an asshole.
The right does have identity politics, it's identity politic are the belief that that straight white males are victimized by an increasingly diverse society. It doesn't matter if you're on the right or not if your politics are motivated by it just like it doesn't matter whether you're on the left or right if you are a climate change skeptic and let it influence your political affiliations. Saying your a "classical liberal" is just another game that comes out of right wing identity politics, FYI. The closest thing to a classical liberal in modern politics is a libertarian, if you think Garry Johnson was the best presidential candidate, then it's an accurate label. If you don't like globalization, wealth inequality, corporate wrongdoing or cuts to the welfare state, then your classical liberalism is full of shit.
Don't give this shit about having an open mind, I've watched a number of Peterson lectures in full and came away convinced he's more full of crap then when I started. The idea that he's a savior who has my best interests at heart just shows you're part of a cult.
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
MattMexor So it's all a giant conspiracy that goes all the way up to the president? You forgot to add "WE HAVE THE DOCUMENTS SHEEPLE!!!!!" Again, you're just listing the modes of inquiry that you want to suppress, goodbye history, philosophy, literature, and the rest of the humanites. Odd that the freedom fighters want to get rid of those two things, because in George Orwell the totalitarian state wants to get rid of those. But no, Sargon is a freedom fighter, that's why he wants the state to get rid of them, to save the west which preserved traditions of history, philosophy and literature in universities. Both at once without contradiction.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
***** Ok, if I am wrong then explain which gender the following pronouns refer to: I, me, we, us, you, they, this, that, these, those, it, myself, yourself, ourselves, themselves, itself.
6
-
6
-
Mark Clemmens What makes you think I haven't done my own research? And what makes you think I am regressive? Is the fact I don't believe that marxists burrowed underground in the 1960s and allied themselves with the mole people? I actually haven't watched TYT in over a year and half, so that shows me you are full of shit right off the bat. You are operating off a script while I am composing things freely with my mind. If one of us has a superior objective view of the other, it's probably me.
Yes or no: Sargon, Rubin, TAA, AIU, Thunderf00t, Gaad Sad, Shoe on head, Milo, Crowder, Rebel Media, Bearing, Armored Skeptic.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Duck Supremacy "Also, the importance of race in all facets of a society."
You admitted to seeing everything from individuals to entire societies through a racial lens, and you admitted to believing in "white genocide." I don't see what's so "a leftist ideologue" about pointing that out. You're just whining that I didn't put a positive spin on it.
As for arguments, you don't have arguments, you just copied and pasted a brochure by Richard Spencer, a brochure that doesn't have arguments. To the point that you have made fact checkable statements, they are wrong.
"The recognition of the biological reality of race, meaning sub-species,"
What you call races aren't subspecies, they don't meet the biological definitions of sub species, and the actual genetics of different races show that what you consider race is biologically meaningless because there can be more genetic difference between two people of the same race than two people of different races. The differences mostly are a handful of genes determining skin, hair and eye color.
"With current demographic trends, whites will become the minority in nearly every nation they have created by the next 50 (or less) years. "
That's not true. Even if were demographic trends don't hold true 50 years into the future, 50 years in the past there was a baby boom and kids weren't dying of polio so it seemed like there was going to be a white population explosion. Demographic trends don't hold true for 50 years, globally when people enter a developed standard of living birth rates fall, and the children and grand children of immigrants have birth rates in line with the general population.
"The dilution of the white population in their own societies will effectively be the slow global (and voluntary) disenfranchisement of the European peoples."
I hate to break it to you, but majority white countries have majority white governments disproportionately so. You can't be disenfranchised when not only do you have a vote, but an overwhelming majority of government positions. "Whites" already hold all the power in majority white countries, you just don't like that those governments aren't racist.
"If this were happening to another race, it would not be seen as hateful or evil for that race to be attempting to secure a homeland for themselves to exist peacefully on their own."
I hate to break it you, but all those things you hate about modern western countries like freedom and race mixing are what white people actually want. Your vision of a secure "the existence of your people and a future for white children" was defeated by a coalition of white nations in 1945.
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Alex Smart I have no problem viewing the alt-right as gamergate++. However this was originally about anti-feminism. Am I to take it that the alt-right, gamer gate and anti-feminism are one and the same? Your framing here doesn't really put the feminists at fault, it seems like your solution is to bend over backward to accommodate irrational crazy people lest something worse arise. I on the other hand do not view appeasement as a solution, or an acceptable compromise. People are responsible for their own behaviors, sheeple or no. The fact people get so worked up should be seen as a sign of an underlying problem that needs addressing. Trying to sweep it under the rug just means it will ooze out again later.
I don't see this as game of moral points, I also don't see how the actions of a small group of people as scoring those moral points. In fact this sort of thing is one of the reasons I don't like anti-feminism and anti-feminists it's a huge percentage of what they do. I also don't think any kind of objectionable part of feminism dominates society or culture. The parts about women being able vote, go to college and pursue the same careers as men have dominated, victim culture and hatred of men, not so much. I can see how it would be bad if it was Kant's categorical imperative, but that is nowhere near happening.
I don't know why you want me to ask a feminist why anti-feminists are full of rage and bile, it seem their answer further undermine your argument. And yes, I have heard of block lists, it is one of the catalog of grievances held by anti-feminists.
Well since you mean they were an upper class, a petite bourgeoisie, I am much more sympathetic to that argument. You have to understand in the conversations like these someone will inevitably pop out of the word work screaming about cultural marxism and saying feminism is some kind of trick to tear down the powerful.
Well speaking of trickery to tear down the powerful, Fredrich Nietzsche has made an appearance. I haven't read any Nietzsche in around over a decade. I don't really see your argument here. Compassion is bad because some philosopher disliked Christianity? It seems like you are playing 6 degrees Kevin Bacon here.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
mrBorkD Yes, because they live in a bubble that feeds them bullshit and demands they respond to it. If you think the left is actually making policy with this stuff, show me the actual laws or agencies implementing it on a national level.
I do look at why people are joining the right, and most of the time it's because they only care about identity politics and can't look a the big picture. They claim to be not only liberals, but true liberals as they become Trump supporters. It's a joke. This also has historical precedent, the Reagan Democrats of the 1980s, they were angry about black "welfare queens" who didn't exist, but were somehow living like rich people while not working, they also felt that women doing things like putting off having children, getting a right to an abortion, or putting career over family had gone too far. This happened to your parents generation, I'm going to need some proof that your grievances are any more legitimate, and no, laci green talking about manspreading doesn't count.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Biggsy DaBoss My hateful rhetoric? What about my rhetoric is hateful? Do you think I'm discriminating against Basement-Americans? I'm actually out to help you as well, you only think I'm not because of the alt-right propaganda you've been watching. Speaking of...
"Do you remember that part where I said this wasn't the only incident. Do you need me to list them off now?"
You treat this like some kind of threat. Petulant flailing and fake outrage won't harm me in the slightest. Honestly do your worst, I'm not going strain a muscle rolling my eyes at your horseshit, or facepalm myself to death at your sheer pettiness and stupidity.
It's a far cry from people not liking it and people are hunched over a computer all day watching videos by Sargon, Logiked, Thunderf00t, GirlWritesWhat, Dave Rubin, Armored Skeptic, ShoeOnHead, and the myriad of other imitators out there. The fact is you're in a little alt-right bubble of people telling you you're the victim of these evil minorities. The average person lives in the real world. Thinking you represent Nixon's Silent Majority and your politics elected Trump are part of the propaganda. The average Trump voter is the average Republican and all this is just how you rationalize supporting the right.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Mathesonguy I, me, we, us, you, they, this, that, these, those, it, myself, yourself, ourselves, themselves, itself, all SJW words apparently.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Jager Mitchell Not really, Kyle is a progressive, he has a deep humanistic concern for fairness, justice and equality, and has a coherent critique of the consolidation of power in the government and corporations and it's effect on people, democracy, and international affairs. Kyle shares this critique and many opinions with David Pakman. David expresses this with a dry emotionless deadpan while Kyle yells "My Asscheeks!" every chance he gets.
Sargon and Rubin don't have anything like comparable to that. For example Rubin is a libertarian who is for single payer and wants healthcare to be provided by a regulated private market, all at once without contradiction. Sargon wants a rightist nationalist government in the U.K. and Europe, but claims to want Bernie Sanders while also supporting Donald Trump, both at once without contradiction. What both of them peddle is the idea that white identity, male identity and straight identity are under attack from government backed "social justice warriors," that is their beef with the system. Not only does it have nothing to do with the progressive worldview of David and Kyle, it is in many ways either sabotages it or is directly opposed to it.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Explain. What has the right done to advance progress? The left in modern countries has ended slavery, ended segregation, given women the right to vote, fought for equality in the workplace, raised wages, ended child labor, massively expanded public education, built infrastructure, reduced air and water pollution, ensured the safety of pharmaceuticals and consumer products, and that's a short list.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
***** Systematic manipulation is part of brainwashing but it is not synonymous with brainwashing. Brainwashing would best be described as a subset of systematic manipulation. The term brainwashing should not be watered down as you seem to be doing here. Boiling it down to left wing and right wing is too broad a term, because there are counter-examples with-in each subset. A counter example on the right would be the wall street journal, at least before it was taken over by Rupert Murdock, because it tried more often then not to be a real journalistic organization. A counter example where the left borders if not engages in brain washing would be Cenk Uygur of TYT who is constantly giving an over the top performance akin to talk radio or Fox News on many stories which have about as much substance. The goal is to influence people with the emotions created by the performance rather than the substance of the story.
To prevent this from being watered down I'm just going to say notice how when I cited Cenk Uygur as an example I was comparing one man to an entire genre of radio with at least hundreds if not thousand of hosts and a multi-billion dollar media empire that gets it's reporters invited to the white house. This is what allows me to generalize about the left and the right in the way I do.
Now to get more into the substantive details as I have already pointed out right wing media depends on theatricality to influence the viewer more than the substance. Compare the presentation of Bill O'reilly who is usually angry and upset and yells at guests, to David Pakman who is very calm and serene, and does not yell and interrupt his guests. Even though both shows focus on a reaction to current events one, namely O'reilly is designed to provoke emotion, namely anger, fear, and aggression. This is there to shut down reasoning and make discussion hostile, and needless to say these kind of tactics impede reasoned debate.
Beyond provoking emotion, there is also misinformation. While it is true that there are plenty of examples of both sides using misinformation, the cumulative effect of right wing media has been demonstrated to actually reduce it's audiences understanding of current events. Studies have shown for instance that Fox News viewers are less informed than people who watch no news at all. Another aspect of this that is largely, but not totally absent on the left is the outrage machine. A good example of this would be the war on christmas, where a disproportionate amount of time is taken for Fox hosts to be angry at David Silverman trying move nativity scenes off public property. It is petty slights that are blown out of proportion and portrayed as an attack on the viewer. Another example of the outrage machine is given in the video where the woman said feminists might have a point about hooters and was threatened with being left on the side of the road. It is highly unlikely a Rush Limbaugh listener would do the same thing about a Christian opposition to Hooters.
Another difference between left and right wing media is the attempt to isolate the viewer, using demonization of both liberals and a "liberal media" to make viewers dependent. Again, Fox viewers have been shown to be less informed than people who watch no news at all. It is reasonable to infer that they this would not be as much of a problem if their audience were watching other news sources as well as Fox. The study also included news programs that aren't on dedicated news channels so the study could conceivably measure people who left Fox to watch network news and then switched back.
There is more to it, but I think these three work as good triad for starters, right wing media isolates it's viewers in ways left wing media does not, then constantly seeks to anger and outrage them rather than informing them and getting them to think. Again, this is far, far more true of a much larger entity on the right than it is in isolated instances on the left.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
+Nina Williams The Quran is the same as the bible, islam is just a religion, it doesn't want to take over the world more than any other religion, everyone interprets some parts of a text symbolically, political correctness is less of a threat than, global warming, the food supply, pollution, wealth inequality, asteroids, nuclear war, USA, CHI-NA, Putin, North Korea, global capitalism, neoliberalism, neoconservatism, European fascism, ... many many threats later... lightning strikes, and Justin Beiber.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Tespri That's it? The problem with the EU is "regulation?" If you think that's the problem you are reading far worse sources than buzzfeed lol. The average English person isn't the average American conservative, and as the Trump phenomenon has shown, the average American conservative isn't concerned with all this deregulation garbage. Brexit isn't the rise of a purely free market conservative anymore than the tea party was. Essentially the Brexit campaign blamed the problems of austerity on foreigners, whether in the European Parliament or immigrants, in actuality austerity was imposed on the U.K. by the U.K. Parliament. For example there is the infamous promise that all that dirty money going to the EU would go to the National Health (not a very free market thing) that was immediately dismissed once Brexit actually passed. Brexit didn't even get rid of the immigrants it supporters wanted because immigration from outside Europe is allowed by U.K. laws rather than European laws. European laws only cover immigrants from within the EU, meaning Brexit was only useful for getting rid of Pols and Romanians, not Muslims. That is what Brexit passed on, not any kind of free market sentiment.
That said Brexit doesn't even deliver on free market sentiment. EU "regulations" address issues that would have to be regulated in any modern nation. They prevent incongruity of regulation that might impede commerce within the EU. Britain is going to need clean air laws, consumer product safety laws, clean food laws, ect. and there is no evidence that the conservative government is going to begin some kind of radical deregulation regime. Not only that but Brexit has also cut the U.K. off from a free trade zone encompassing most of it's neighbors, and now has trade barriers erected against it. Not only that but it now has a weaker position in trade negotiations since it is no longer an entry to the European Market. I somehow doubt that you, who quotes Milton Friedman, are anti-free trade, yet here you are promoting a move that erects barriers to trade.
What does the conservative equivalent to buzzfeed that you get your information from say to that?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Firstly I agree with all that, and a lot of shitting on Trump voters has classist, regional bias and anti-rural connotations, and these are problems that need to be resolved. However that is a long term project, as in it will take years, and there are 3 weeks left in the election. Second I find a lot of this sympathy for the white working class to be hypocritical. Having compassion for the plight of these people rather than writing them off as racist thugs who beat up people who disagree with them is being the bigger person. The thing is when African Americans express the same kind of frustration the people who have sympathy Trump supporters beating up an old woman with an oxygen tank will immediately say groups like BLM are racist thugs who beat up people who disagree with them despite the fact that there are more assaults at Trump rallies and African Americans have been hit harder by these changes than the white working class.
Third and finally there is the issue of whether or not Trump represents any kind of honest or authentic attempt to deal with this, and the answer is no on just about every level and just about every issue. Just to get it out to the way Trump is a con man, and a liar, and he contradicts himself all the time, but even ignoring those facts he is not really addressing their concerns. And to address another caveat, I'm not referring to these people not knowing about policy or economics or government. Tax cuts for the rich and corporations are a giveaway to the elite, and adults regardless of education, profession and location in this country should know that. It is easy and intuitive to grasp. Bombing ISIS and taking their oil is not a position that helps the common man, it also undermines any anti-war cred that Trump claims to have. "Law and Order" or "Stop and Frisk" don't help the common man or take on the elite. These just bluster from a wanna be tough guy. So what issues does Trump have where he takes on the elite and stands on the side of the common man? Trade, but even on trade he doesn't actually have a real plan, he just says he will threaten companies to keep the from leaving, he won't actually change the laws or tax incentives to make it less attractive to leave. It is just more of his fake tough guy bluster. There is also the TPP which is also opposed by Hillary. So basically there is one issue that these people can identify with that deals with their problems, and even then they should be able to see through it. And finally there are Trumps other issues, Mexicans are rapists, build a wall, ban all muslims and calling any opposition to that "political correctness." That is just cheap appeals to bigotry.
As you can see the common denominator with most of Trump's policies are authoritarianism and bigotry rather than any kind of anti-elite politics or rhetoric. So then what is his populist appeal if his rhetoric is authoritarian and bigoted in nature? As I see it there are two possibilities, the first it functions as some kind of scape goat or outlet for their frustrations, this I why I said Trump and Trump supporters aren't honest or authentic about their problems. It deal with the issues even on a superficial level. The other possibility is that their grievances with the elite are really about bigotry and authoritarianism. This is why so many white nationalists, klansmen and neo nazis support Trump. Both these combine to make support for Trump an illegitimate means of redressing the grievances you sympathize with .
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Gerbil13 You don't know, well at least you're honest. And at least you're not overtly pushing an alt-right agenda as it first seemed. I don't really see how that video was supposed to help, since the guy alternated between legitimate criticisms of the media as well as Hillary's campaign strategy, and right wing non-sense. The only thing that your recommended video could have set me straight on was instead of inauthentic grievances with a minorities being expressed by voting for Donald Trump, inauthentic grievances with the centers of entertainment, culture and fashion (NY and LA) were expressed by sending Donald Trump to the center of power, D.C. Take that Taysway!!!!!
Just out curiosity what hot iron do you think I am grabbing? Throughout the broader world the saying is commonly attributed to the Buddha, and is interpreted to mean that one shouldn't hold grudges or a sense of perceived wrong. I only bring this up because immediately after giving this sage advice, you then proceed to list wrongs done to you youtube commenters and then seem to revel in the fact that posting alt-right talking points on liberal channel will get you some pretty nasty comments. The direction of the country that I live in is a hot iron that burns my hand the harder I grasp it, but mean internet comments, that is a legitimate wrong.
To quote another religious leader, "You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye." Not to say I'm a turn the other cheek fellow, since that hypocrisy is what provoked my original response to your alt-right talking point.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Agreed, the test doesn't measure authoritarianism of these internet alt-right sympathizers who claim to be about free speech. However have you ever considered that these passive-aggressive alt-right youtubers like Sargon of Akkad, Dave Rubin, Armored Skeptic, Paul Joseph Watson, Steven Crowder, Blaire White, ThatGuyT, Karen Straughan, Black Pidgeon Speaks, Milo, etc. are just an internet sideshow designed to feed you a victim culture and identity politics for straight white males and aren't real politics?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
But David, Trump is a great liberal, he opposes TPP because our leaders are weak and incompetent at making deals and he makes the best deals. Clearly what he is doing by saying that is repudiating globalization and global capitalism despite all his chintzy merchandise being made in China and Mexico. He also said the Iraq War was a mistake because our leaders were weak and incompetent, he also says he's the best at war, he loves war, and promised to invade Syria and take the oil, but this is clearly hinting at the fact Trump is really a pacifist. On the rest of the issues he is bragging about how he is the best, everyone else is terrible, and he will make America great again, but on these issues when he says he is the best, everyone else is terrible and he will make America great, he really saying he believes what I as a liberal believe and that he will do what I as a liberal want him to do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
readonly pdf Good examples include the UK, France, Spain, The Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Italy, Portugal, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The United States, The United Kingdom, Canada, France, West Germany, Japan, Germany, South Korea, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland. It's more than one but you get the point.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
+anamaxy101 America not being first isn't the problem, Wall Street is American, the establishment is American, and they get put first on trade, on war, on taxes, on regulation, on the minimum wage, on mass incarceration, voting and elections, the list goes on and on. "America First" is anti-immigrant, foreigner, and few if any of Americas's problems come from immigrants and foreign nations, so deporting immigrants, building walls, and bullying foreign nations for nationalist purposes, won't fix the problem
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I wonder what a conversation without the following gender neutral pronouns will be like. I, me, we, us, you, they, this, that, these, those, it, myself, yourself, ourselves, themselves, itself.
I wonder how this psychology professor intends to communicate with other people once those words are gutted from the dictionary.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That-dude-with-a-really-long-ass-screen-name.Ha-you-actually-read-it. What HentaiPentagram TentaclePentacle has done is clean up the original story. Here is how it was originally reported.
"Look, every body is welcome at my rally. Everybody. It's true. I have these fantastic rallies. They're great. They're the best rallies. They are so full of love. Fantastic people. It's amazing. They say there is hate there but there is no hate there. I don't know where they're getting it, I don't see any hate. There are professional agitators. They're there to cause trouble. These are not nice people, very nasty people. Look these people are not good, they are very bad alright. Now let me just thank the police. We have fantastic police and they do an excellent job. One of those was a liberal, a black guy, a black gentleman if I can say that, he was at the rally and he felt threatened. I don't know is that racist? I don't think that's racist, but the media all they do is say it's racist, they don't look at the people holding up the signs. These people they say terrible things. Nasty things I can't repeat the things they say they're so terrible..."
--Donald Trump, making up bullshit
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I admit it is a lot to unpack, but let me explain in brief. This caller doesn't care about the culture of false accusations that landed the central park 5 in prison or called for them to be executed, or the kind that landed all the people exonerated by the innocence project on death row. These kinds of things are actually embedded in American culture, they have been there for the callers entire lifetime, and the consequences are far more damaging than a rich man becoming a public pariah, and that is the difference He has no problem with a culture of false accusations that puts innocent people on death row because those people are assumed to be a threat in their day to day lives, but has a problem with a culture of accusations that results in public scandal for people previously deemed to be upstanding citizens, like the boss he sucks up to or the Jones's he's trying to keep up with. From this it is clear that the culture "believing accusations" is not the issue. The difference then can be attributed to who is on the receiving end of these accusations. The newer trend is accusations against powerful and wealthy people who are assumed to be good by society, on the other hand the people exonerated by the innocence project or the central park 5 are poor and come from backgrounds that lead to a societal assumption that they are criminals before they were falsely accused of crimes and exonerating evidence was ignored or suppressed because of that. From this difference between the people he concerned about(wealthy men assumed to be upstanding citizens) and those who have actually been falsely accused(poor young men assumed to be dangerous) it's clearly about these accusations scandalizing powerful men rather than "a culture of false accusations."
If someone values the social status of people above them and is concerned about this social hierarchy being disruptive this means they value that hierarchy and order. Emphasizing that hierarchy and order over other concerns such as justice is a strong affinity toward authority and people who consistently do so are authoritarians. Authoritarians understand and relate to the world through hierarchy and differentiate people by their status in that hierarchy, higher status people are those who they deem to have authority while lower status people are expected to be servile or seen as threats if they do not conform. We can see this in the caller's view that this is not victims coming forward, but "oppression olympics." He views this as people trying to climb in social status(which is what he views victimhood as) rather than trying to rectify or seek justice for wrongs done to them. We have established the caller values the wealth and perceived status of figures such as Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby, Bill O'reilly, Roger Ailles, etc. over concerns of justice for the victims. A culture where accusations against people like that are treated seriously makes him uncomfortable, but he voiced no objections to the way false accusations have falsely imprisoned or executed innocent people with the help of police and prosecutors. From this we can conclude the caller is an authoritarian with regard to the current societal order of power and privilege for famous wealthy people based on how he views scandals and civil suits compared to false convictions and executions.
So since the caller is an authoritarian and views wealthy powerful men as people possessing status and authority and views these accusations by women as disruptive to the order of that hierarchy, or the culture as he calls it. The issue here is that high status men are using their power and authority to violate the bodily autonomy of women with impunity. This is an injustice, assuming that one views violations of bodily autonomy and consent to be categorically wrong in all instances. Based on the aforementioned assumption, seeking to rectify the situation of wealthy powerful men using their power and authority to violate the bodily autonomy and consent of women is the pursuit of justice. This same pursuit of justice is what the caller views as so dangerous to the culture, aka socio-economic hierarchy and the order it provides. From this we can conclude the caller views order as more important than justice, and this is consistent with the caller being an authoritarian. By expressing concern that women's bodily autonomy is a threat to order he is showing that he views that perceived order to be a higher priority than women's bodily autonomy and by valuing the socio-economic status of these men over justice for the women who are their victims he shows that he views them as lower in that socio-economic order. Since he is an authoritarian that comes the assumption that their assertion of their grievances, their rights and their needs against people deemed to have higher status is dangerous and that they are untrustworthy for doing so.
Long story short: What we can determine is that he is an authoritarian who values order and social status more than the lives of human beings especially women who he regards as lesser and untrustworthy as well as having contempt for their bodily autonomy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How did Trump even get on the ballot in the first place? DNC chair elections are for party members only, and vast majority of state presidential primaries are too. Again, when Trump said stupid things about race on stage, the right ate it up, when that woman said stupid things on stage, she went nowhere. The only people who have ever heard of her were you people, most people on the left have no idea who she is. If you think she's going to bring about the gulag, then you are mistaken. The left needs broad appeal to win and that won't happen with SJWs, period. However the issue was never SJWs, it was always racism and SJWs were just a convenient way to hide it.
Matt Christiansen's supposed worry about "identity politics" and his white supremacist views are one and the same, he just wasn't open about it when he made the video. And that goes for you too, the reason you're so freaked out about it is because you feel you are the victim here because of race, sex, orientation, etc. Since you already knew his politics that just discredits you even more because that means you're thought some woman who got failed miserably was the greater threat despite the fact there are racists and white supremacists in the white house because you feel that the powerless person is attacking your identity. The fact you called him out for the talking points that are mild in white supremacist circles shows how self contradictory you are.
The left doesn't have it's house in order because of institutional opposition to popular movements, not basement dwelling neckbeards watch youtube "skeptic" videos all day.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You said social democracy wasn't liberalism, social democracy is center left meaning liberalism would be on the center or to the center right.
And yes, "classical liberal" is virtue signalling to the right that you're not going to threaten certain sensibilities they have unlike those bad Marxists over there. The fact you admit you fear liberal as a smear shows exactly what I was describing. An actual classical liberal would want a return to the 19th century, when social progress was purely a function of increasing negative liberty. The 20th century saw progress as the advancement of both positive and negative liberities, with positive liberties like universal healthcare, the right to vote, anti-discrimination laws, workers rights, some forms of health, safety, and environmental regulation etc. Sargon redefined the term classical liberalism too back in 2014-2015, and as I have said earlier, dressing up reactionaries as some kind true heirs to the enlightenment is passe and him trying to do it again is proving to be a flop. As I said earlier a lot of the story of this "classical liberal" fad ends with Nazis and white supremacists, Sargon and Kraut are a few of the last holdouts as so many of their fans and friends embraced the alt-right that they're being undone by opposing it and they've validated so much of the alt-right victim complex they have no ground to criticize their solutions. They should have listened to Niemöller because there is no one left to speak for them. If you're going to oppose the redefinition of liberalism by America, then you also need to oppose the redefinition of liberalism by internet reactionaries.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1