Comments by "Rob McCune" (@robm6645) on "David with Sam Seder u0026 Abby Martin, at the Boston Marathon" video.

  1. +Bobbie Walschots They're liberal, your not.
    9
  2. +Mason TerHorst You don't realize the irony there do you? Well it's not surprising since you people have no self awareness. Think about it like this, you people have a word to demonize people you agree with 90% of the time. Why is that? And why is your word synonymous with apostate, thought criminal, enemy of the state and blasphemer?
    5
  3. Bobbie Walschots If you think universal human rights and not respecting authority make a person not liberal, then you are not liberal. Sorry to break the news.
    4
  4. +Peace Harmony "Most liberals/progressives make the distinction between themselves and the regressives/SJWs." Actually that is just a narrow subculture on the internet. Most liberals in the English speaking world haven't heard about it, and most of those that have consider it to be a sideshow at best. Although, interestingly, quite a few in that subculture are quick to consider right wingers and right libertarians to be true liberals even though they call all liberals regressive left. The word regressive lets them wallow in a common victim narrative commiserate.
    3
  5. Bobbie Walschots  That is literally the outrage politics Rush Limbaugh has built his career on. What you just said could have come out of the mouth of any right winger in the past 40 years. You forgot to add "What about the rights of that little girl Chief?"
    3
  6. +Hyde Hill No regressive is just a slur used by right wingers. "Classic liberals" as you call them, (even though it's just a code word for libertarians) are just people who agree with those right wingers and use the word regressive to shut down liberals debating each other, which is not a very classical liberal thing to do.
    3
  7. +Peter Mogensen Ironically you people are more the black listing, erase Trotsky from photos types.
    2
  8. Peter Mogensen I said you people not you personally. It is entirely possible you personally have internalized your rhetoric in ways the majority of you people have not. Also how do you know Martin and Seder? 
    2
  9. For those who don't know "prince of regressives" is equivalent to prince of darkness in this guy's religion.
    2
  10. +Evan Acey Well she's a good person doing good work who gets hated on by idiots who can't think for themselves, so yeah she is the epitome of a regressive leftist.
    2
  11. Evan Acey And what is your evidence for any of that? 
    2
  12. Bobbie Walschots They used to have liberals like you, they were called Reagan Democrats, now they are called Republicans.
    2
  13. Bobbie Walschots And that's what the Reagan Democrats said. Of course their rad feminists wanted women in the work place (outside the typing pool) and considered marriage optional. And yes, I've probably seen as much of it as you, but instead of holding on to resentment, my reaction is "that's stupid" and I move along. I don't get that red mist tunnel vision when reading or watching it, it's a silly side show.
    2
  14. +SJW101, the political gamer That is the attitude that got him on the Maury show.
    2
  15. Credo-Ape-Thor What is it with you thinking youtube comments will get you laid? 
    2
  16. Axel De Decker Well I'm glad you put so much thought into your criticism. They should put you in charge of the dictionary. The definition of bad is bad mmmkay, very succinct. 
    2
  17. Axel De Decker That is what I am doing. Why do you have a word for people who agree with you 90% of time that means apostate, blasphemer, enemy of the state and thought criminal?
    2
  18. Axel De Decker You're the guy slandering people who disagree with one man on policy. 
    2
  19. Peter Mogensen I don't consider wallowing in bitterness and resentment a better use of anyone's time.
    1
  20. +Top Flight Security Not a person, an unperson, an enemy of the state. True liberals and classical liberals don't associate with regressive thought criminals. True liberals have seen a picture of her with Leon Trotsky, unfortunately that picture contains no people in frame.
    1
  21. Evan Acey So that's no evidence.
    1
  22. Evan Acey Well that's evidence that disproves your assertion, but at least it's evidence.
    1
  23. Credo-Ape-Thor That's what you call game? That's just sad man.
    1
  24. Credo-Ape-Thor Why?
    1
  25. Credo-Ape-Thor No, do you have a blog?
    1
  26. Credo-Ape-Thor I don't know, you like what you like I guess.
    1
  27. Credo-Ape-Thor How do you handle dissenting opinions when it comes to music art and film?
    1
  28. Credo-Ape-Thor Like what?
    1
  29. SJW101, the political gamer Can't blame him, if the globalist illuminati beyonce reptillians were sapping and impurifying my precious bodily fluids I would want to know about.
    1
  30. Credo-Ape-Thor Beleive it or not, there is a life beyond youtube comments. I know you think it is mythical, but it exists.
    1
  31. Credo-Ape-Thor What are you hoping to accomplish? Besides attracting a mate with your mating display here, just keep all that to yourself.
    1
  32. Credo-Ape-Thor Sure you did.
    1
  33. Credo-Ape-Thor I'm talking, what are you doing? 
    1
  34. Credo-Ape-Thor What? 
    1
  35. Credo-Ape-Thor Who said anything about that? 
    1
  36. Credo-Ape-Thor Oh no, I just wanted to make a South Park reference that went over your head and you've since run into the ground. Didn't you see the episode where Cartman went on the Maury Povich show and was like "whatever I do what I want." But you're free to convince me that Sam Seder and Abby Martin are time wasting cunts. You've clearly wanted to do that for over 10 hours.
    1
  37. Credo-Ape-Thor So now you want youtube comments to get you a friend? Well that's more realistic than your display attracting a mate. Still not a very good idea.
    1
  38. Credo-Ape-Thor No. Now you're just getting creepy.
    1
  39. Credo-Ape-Thor Keep it to yourself, fantasize about that in private.
    1
  40. Credo-Ape-Thor Probably because right now you're fantasizing about that in public. That's just gross. 
    1
  41. Axel De Decker So then they aren't regressive. You can't have it both ways, either you can label them regressive and you'll have to use a definition similar to mine or you cite your authority figure and you concede regressive applies only to a small group of people. I was kidding before, you would do terribly at most dictionaries, except NEWSPEAK of course.
    1
  42. Axel De Decker Now your definition of regressive is blasphemy toward Sam Harris? Keep your story straight there buddy. Also, they disagree with Harris on policy.
    1
  43. Axel De Decker By calling them regressive for disagreeing with one man on policy. You yourself admitted it.
    1
  44. Axel De Decker Yes, and your example was that they disagreed with Sam Harris on policy, which is tantamount to blasphemy. 
    1
  45. Axel De Decker They do use counter arguments. This is just a game where any disagreement with the policies he advocates is changed into saying that islam can't be criticized or people call him names. That is not the reality of the criticism of Sam Harris, that is Sam Harris's description of the criticism of Sam Harris. This is microcosm of the whole regressive debate.
    1
  46. Axel De Decker Again, you are just repeating Harris's version of events.
    1
  47. Axel De Decker And she's right. You use the term regressive left because you're dependent on authority, but she's accurately describing at least 75% of the people who use it.
    1
  48. Axel De Decker Well you say people can't criticize your leaders or your group, that sounds like someone depended on authority to me.
    1
  49. Axel De Decker You've been done for a while. You have three arguments that you have just repeated over and over. 1(The best one). Maajid Nawaz tells me it's people who don't criticize Islam.  2. They criticize the leader Sam Harris. 3. They say things that aren't nice Frankly you just kept repeating 2 and 3 and expect an enlightenment to come over me that would take the form of a dark red mist descending over my vision.
    1
  50. Hyde Hill Yes it is classical liberalism is dead and has been for over 100 years, it's a code word for libertarianism and now a kind of reactionary movement among people who vote democrat. If you think that source you cited proves you correct rather than me, you're incapable of talking about this academically. Ironically you being incapable of talking about this either academically or to normal humans is the exact point of the sources you use to get your information.
    1
  51. Bobbie Walschots There is clearly difference between a dead ideology and an ideology that only exists in the mind of right wing reactionaries. Those differences fail to support his argument however.
    1
  52. Sreejith j I'm pretty sure there aren't any liberals in that group they're just centrists.
    1
  53. How dare you work for liberal causes David! That's regressive. Don't you know the point of a True Liberal Classical Liberal channel is to myopically hate on fellow liberals to the exclusion of all else. Didn't you learn about how the media is supposed to function from your Peter K. Enns interview earlier in the week? https://youtu.be/on-LcBgI2LA?t=2m49s
    1