Comments by "Rob McCune" (@robm6645) on "Would David Debate Dave Rubin u0026 Sargon of Akkad with Kyle Kulinski?" video.

  1. Sargon would be anti-Sanders if Bernie had won, he's also a Trump apologist along with Rubin.
    10
  2. You're profoundly ignorant about the opinion of some or all of the people you are referring to.
    8
  3. He's most intelligent and is very no-nonsense when he wants to be.
    6
  4. The dude is too lazy to read, watch a video, and speak, only in straight white male identity politics can some make so much money for so little time and effort.
    3
  5. Jager Mitchell Not really, Kyle is a progressive, he has a deep humanistic concern for fairness, justice and equality, and has a coherent critique of the consolidation of power in the government and corporations and it's effect on people, democracy, and international affairs. Kyle shares this critique and many opinions with David Pakman. David expresses this with a dry emotionless deadpan while Kyle yells "My Asscheeks!" every chance he gets. Sargon and Rubin don't have anything like comparable to that. For example Rubin is a libertarian who is for single payer and wants healthcare to be provided by a regulated private market, all at once without contradiction. Sargon wants a rightist nationalist government in the U.K. and Europe, but claims to want Bernie Sanders while also supporting Donald Trump, both at once without contradiction. What both of them peddle is the idea that white identity, male identity and straight identity are under attack from government backed "social justice warriors," that is their beef with the system. Not only does it have nothing to do with the progressive worldview of David and Kyle, it is in many ways either sabotages it or is directly opposed to it.
    3
  6. So what formed your interest in politics is two people who criticize the connection between economic interests and political power creating a self reinforcing system that undermines democracy and creates numerous problems affecting the average person in nearly every country across the globe, and two people who say snooty women and uppity minorities are ruining a basically perfect society by advocating for fairer treatment in a way that hurts their feelings. Interesting...
    3
  7. Different methods for what?
    1
  8. Christopher Taveras What "ideology" would that be? And for that matter how would I know they opposed my ideology if I hadn't listened to them?
    1
  9. Christopher Taveras Don't back down when you get called out for your bullshit. I would rather deal with someone who is honest than someone so who passive-aggressively cowers when confronted. I've watched Rubin and Sargon enough to know they won't stand by any position or principle, but only seek to perpetuate straight white male identity politics and victim culture.
    1
  10. Sure, but that doesn't mean that their not disputes within the same any more than beef between Kyle Kulinski and Sane Progressive means Kyle is not involved in progressive politics or that Mike Cernovich is somehow good because Richard Spencer hates his guts. Just because there are people more extreme and more blatant about their identity politics and victim complexes doesn't absolve Rubin or Sargon. The fact is this kind of politics came back because people like Rubin and Sargon spread the idea that white males are the victims of the modern status quo that is giving unfair advantage to all these different identities. They don't need to say that Jews are trying to replace them, they don't even need to believe it and they don't, they just need to make their followers like they are being excluded and victimized by other identities rather than the government or corporations.
    1