Comments by "CaptainVanisher" (@captainvanisher988) on "TLDR News EU"
channel.
-
69
-
55
-
36
-
35
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
25
-
24
-
22
-
17
-
15
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@nobody-y7i1r Social cohesion and social trust are two major ones.
Yes there were plenty of European countries that had 95% ethnic natives. Also just because a European country might have a few native ethnic groups, doesn't mean that they are not homogenous.
Let's start.
Albania is at 97% right now.
Greece is at 93% after mass migration from Albania in the 90s and then the middle east in the 2010s entered the country. It was around 98% prior to mass migration, with the 2% being the small Turkish minority and gypsies.
Poland right now is at 97% as well.
Portugal is at 95% even after mass migration came from North Africa. Prior to it, they were 99% ethnic Portuguese.
Finland is at 98% if you include Finland-Swedes.
Hungary right now is at 92.3%
Italy is at 91.7% and if you exclude non-European immigrants that mainly arrived in the 21st century, it shoots up to 98%.
Croatia is at 91.6% however the 8% of those non-ethnic Croats are Serbians, Albanians, Bosniansks, Italians. Meaning that without their neighbours, they reach 99% homogeneity.
Iceland is at 91%, but if we include European migrants it's at 99%.
I can go on and on.
We can allow migration from civilized European countries, but if we remove all the Africans and the Middle Eastern and islamic Europeans (Albanians and Bosniaks), most European countries would be fine. and all of them would have over 90% homogeneity and more than half would've over 95% homogeneity.
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6