Comments by "CaptainVanisher" (@captainvanisher988) on "Is there a Place for Women on the Right?" video.

@kybercat7 You can't fix it if you can't make hard decisions. Carl's solution to "fixing" that is compromising our goals and values so feminist women are comfortable voting for us.
6
@jersyflame8952 That's ridiculous and I can do the math for you. If men manage to make 70% of men to stay chaste and wait until marriage, the women will still be plowed. Just not by that 70% of men. If we manage to get 20% of women to stay chaste and wait until marriage, we'll have an extra 20% of successful marriages. Sex and dating culture in a free dating market will always be decided by women because they are the gatekeepers of sex. Simple as. No matter how many men you change, there will always be some that will be ready to enjoy polygyny whilst staying unmarried. But for every 1 woman you change and make her stay chaste and virgin until marriage, you get 1 successful marriage as well.
4
@zimzam6319 You're categorically wrong. Men in traditional spaces are overrepresented by 10 to 1 to women. Conservative, young, Christian, healthy weight women are seeked in almost all traditional, right and far-right spaces. Go to an Orthodox church and count the single men ready to be married and count the young single women ready to be married. It's not even a discussion. She can easily find a decent conservative man to marry her, she just doesn't. Sure it may not be entirely consciously but it's 100% on her that she is not married. It's not the same as men. There are far more marriageable men than marriageable women. And that alone disproves your comment.
4
@kybercat7 Is it moral? Perhaps not. But society today has literally nothing moral about it. NOTHING.
3
@Leon_Sullivan In true Christianity there is a path for salvation and forgiveness for single mothers, and it's certainly not through marriage. But through becoming a nun and giving her child away for the church to raise it. They have no place seeking a man whilst holding onto another man's progeny. It rarely ever works if a single mother is to be married.
3
@sebsebski2829 Have you been asleep? What happened in Afghanistan? All those "educated women" and their simps lost all their rights within 1 week of big daddy American leaving them. A bunch of cave dwellers came down from the mountains, took over the country and extinguished every "right" women had there. And I mean EVERY right. And at a far higher degree than it ever was in the Christian world. What did there "successful" and "educated" women that the 20 year Us occupation bred do about it? Nothing. They either fled or got subjugated. Once men reach the point of no return, no "powerful" woman will be able to stop them. Women can't collectivize to this level. Women can't lay their lives for a cause. Women can't win against men in a war. Your entire presupposition is fallacious from the beginning.
1
@cornbreadisbetterthanpizza6866 I don't know what you're on about but the 1920s is when feminism took strong root in our societies. Women always worked but they worked in the home and usually under their husband. They did some farm work, they did sewing, they did household work, they helped with the family shop etc. They never had "careers" when they were also wives. They never submitted to a boss whilst they had a husband. Women need to be fully pushed out of the work force. Women as stay at home mothers can exist nowadays because men have achieved material abundance. The market will suffer but will be corrected within 1 or 2 generations. Women at large should've never been let into the work force, end of story.
1
@PropagandalfderWeiße "Go on and sin no more" Head that phrase? Theodora was forced into prostitution from childhood, that was all she knew. Yet when she married Justinian, she somehow stopped all promiscuous acts. Insane right? Funnily though, promiscuous women nowadays abuse those second chances and third chances and fourth chances. And usually choose prostitution instead of being forced into it.
1
@someguy4405 It will certainly happen in the near future. It only takes as much decadence to get to that point. A modern example is Afghanistan. Many decades of feminist progressivism reversed within 1 week by cave dwelling theocrats.
1
@NoName-pi3dx Yep, Lauren Chen is the only good Lauren. An actual virgin, that didn't seek for "Chad" and is open to be fully reprogrammed by the right and hopefully the task will be completed.
1
@jtfam363 And how did this happen? Is it perhaps that the demand stayed the same while the work force doubled? Cutting the wages by 30% and rising the prices by 20%? Even then, a non-luxurious humble lifestyle can 100% be funded by 1 income.
1
Funnily or not, the Ancient Greek version of democracy was far more viable than this travesty we have now. Only men over 20 could attend meetings and vote. (btw 20 back then is the maturity equivalent of 30 nowadays)
1
@Shockguey Britain was already in their decadence period when Elizabeth took over. It was the largest empire long before she was in the picture.
1
Sorry but unless you get married you have not fulfilled your role as a right wing woman. I don't know how you find it hard to find a man? Traditional churches are FILLED with good men ready to marry conservative women. People bash you and other "conservative" women with "you should be married by now" because that's the reality of the situation. You SHOULD have been married by now and if you are not, it should be by all means your aim every day forward. That "feeling" of atomization is self-made. You created it and it's nowhere similar to what men feel. YOU can change it, men can only hope to change it. For every conservative young chaste woman there are 10 conservative strong men ready to marry them. Spreading a fairy tale isn't your job as a woman, finding a husband and submitting to him is. And in order for that to happen you need to actually chase it. Put yourself out there and you should be married in no time if you pass the bare minimum of conservative, Christian, healthy weight , young and submissive.
1
@ShayPatrickCormacTHEHUNTER Yes that's obviously where I am going with this. Even the so-called "conservative" women are hypergamous. They can't outdo their own nature. As for conservative men, yes there are plenty of physically attractive conservative men that want marriage. The issue is, as you said, they're not "hot". They do not have a bunch of women chasing them. They are not players. They just good godly men.
1
@Sanakudou You seem to not understand the precedent of all this. "Feminists are proven right that men that are humiliated and stripped from love and any basic humanity will destroy the society that brought them to this point". That's what you're actually saying to anyone understanding the situation. It's not necessarily a threat but an observation of reality. If you look throughout history, when young men do not have a family to protect, a God to bow down and a community to serve, society tends to collapse. There is a reason why societies that saw the aristocracy practicing high levels of polygyny are so unstable. The islamic nations are a perfect examples of this but also the subsaharan nations prior to complete colonization as well. "The “world” doesn’t owe anyone anything they want, other people do not exist for us, it’s always going to be their choice if we have a place of significance in their life or not." Again that's not the point here. You can say "the world doesn't owe you sh*t" and they will say "then I don't owe the world sh*t". What can you do to stop them? You can't do anything. The idea of equality amongst men and women is fallacious by nature. Why? Because rights are not tangible, they exist because there is force that is used to apply them. Who wields that force? Men. It was always men. And the moment men decide to stop using the force to enforce those "equal rights", they suddenly vanish. Take a look at Afghanistan. Somehow all this equality vanished within a week of the Us leaving the place. But how can this be possible? You might ask. Well, women protested for a few days and nothing happened. Why? Because women inherently cannot fight with their lives and win against men. It's against their nature. So all you have to do as a woman isn't be afraid of men. But ask yourself this: What did feminism achieve in the West? Did it achieve that utopia of female empowerment? Not really. Did it achieve a greater happiness for women? Not that either. What it did is destroy Western societies. Women in the West were always the most privileged class in history. Men protected them, men provided for them, men gave them rights and freedoms, men cherished them and men died for them. Western women were living a life of privilege due to the successes of Western men. They had husbands that loved them and were loyal to them, children that respected them, communities that listened to them and a safe environment to live life in. Yet because of some weak simps, feminism entered into play and threw all that away for what? A materialistic vain life that is clearly driving women crazy. Saying "men need to make peace with leading a loveless and sexless life" is just a dream. It's as real as Marx's classless, moneyless and borderless utopia. But to make you understand it better I'll give you an analogy: It's like saying to a group of people in a field: You will eat the cow sh*t for the rest of your life, sure it might be disgusting but at least you will survive. All while the owners of that land are eating beef steaks, yogurt and cheese and drinking milk and orange juice. But the catch is that if all those people in the field wanted to, they could kill the owners of the land and enjoy their food instead of eating sh*t for the rest of their life. Now would it be morally wrong to kill for a better life quality? Perhaps. But when did "morality" stop desperate people? Never. Even if the owners pleaded with them "Please, eat the cow sh*t and try to enjoy life outside of eating", why would those people listen? In conclusion, I hope that the "threat" is actualized through civil means aka feminism is eradicated through men wielding political power but with little human life loss. I really do. But as much as I hope that the transition is peaceful and harmless, it probably won't. In history it rarely was, so why would it be now? In my opinion, the bloodbath can be mainly prevented if women as a whole trend a little to the right and show respect to the average man. But we all know it won't happen. I'd jump in joy to the day women see "unattractive" low level men as human beings or women appreciate men at their level instead of chasing the out of their league men. But as I said, that'd be going against their nature. It's similar (although far less outrageous) to your claim about men.
1
@ryanh6971 "Muh Christ befriended prostitutes" And what did he tell them? Go on and sin no more? Are these women continuing to sin in the same ways? Probably. But the most important part is what did his disciples say about marriage? Oh they barely even allow widows to marry, nevermind prostitutes and loose women. Ridiculous.
1