Comments by "CaptainVanisher" (@captainvanisher988) on "GEN" channel.

A few things you missed. 1. You didn't talk about anti white hate crimes which are a lot but they NEVER get covered. If you think anti asian hate crimes aren't covered, imagine anti white hate crimes. 2. Kyle Rittenhouse had an AR15 not an assault rifle 3. There are far far more churches and christian institutions being attacked than mosques. And that's after considering the ratio churches/mosques Great video overall.
325
At least you're honest enough to say that you are a narcissist, immature and egocentric. Most women who don't want to have children are not that honest.
60
@declanhugors Well if pulling out statistics and realities make you right wing then all sane people should fall under right wing. But I can easily tell you that in the traditional sense, he is not right wing at all. I can guarantee you that he believes in manmade climate change, he supports extensive government welfare, he is probably not extremely religious (not believing in divorce and only dating for marriage), probably supports lgbtq and he probably doesn't believe in traditional gender roles. But yeah of course with the modern idea of right wing he is. Since free speech seems to be right wing, non victim mentality is right wing, race blindness is right wing, anti illegal immigration is right wing etc etc.
49
@declanhugors if that's the case then his entire motto is devalued. It's not true journalism and search for the truth if he is trying to appease certain groups. I personally believe that it happened due to his own unconscious biases but at least he is working on them.
35
@jazzm786 Oh really? Let's actually analyse some data and statistics on why men are actually heavily disadvantage today. Legally: 1. Justice courts heavily disadvantage men and give them harsher penalties for the same crime compared to women 2. Family courts are so stacked against men that alimony, child support and child custody goes at rates higher than 90% to women 3. Affirmative action, which gives male students lower scores when try to enter unis solely due to their gender Socially: 1. Men commit suicide at 3:1 rate compared to women 2. 70% of homeless people are men 3. 90% of deaths in the workplace are men 4. 78% of homicide victims are men 5. Almost all war deaths are men 6. Men are more likely to get robbed 7. 33% of young men(in 2018 now it's higher) are virgins or haven't had s3x in a year 8. Men are more likely to have mental disorders like autism 9. Women outweigh men in college enrollments and graduations with the disparage being higher than that of men against women in the 1970s 10. Women are more likely to be hired in STEM jobs 11. Men are very oftenly deemed p3dophiles when being around children 12. Testicular cancer raises a lot less money than breast cancer through charity 13. Men have 0 reproductive rights 14. There are almost no help centers for male victims of rape or domestic abuse 15. Physical abuse against men committed by women is at many times socially acceptable and almost never punished 16. School systems are built in a way that heavily discriminates against the male nature of the students 17. The average man is considered unattractive by the average woman 18. Women swipe on 4.5% of men compared to men swiping on 60% of women in dating apps And those are just a few things that popped on my head. Your argument is a logical fallacy by the way. "Men are ruling the world". Yes most elites and politicians in high positions are men. These people are less than 1% of the male population. They do not remotely represent the average man. The average man has it fare worse than the average woman.
31
@ThundaFuzz You're right on most of what you said. But women are not at a disadvantage at walking outside alone. Men are far more likely to be targeted for assault, murder or robbery on the street.
16
@thomasbuchovecky171 The definition you gave can be applied to bolt action rifles, to shotguns with mags etc. So it's faulty by default. No I didnot hear any republican youtuber say that, I just have some basic knowledge about fire arms.
15
@jazzm786 Guess what? There are countries with different standards and different societies. Are you suggesting that we invade them or cripple them economically so they conform with Western societal norms? As for inequality. How about we fix the inequality we have in the West? The inequality against men.
15
@thomasbuchovecky171 What you described is every gun besides rocket/grenade launchers and hand guns. No , "assault rifle" is not a correct definition.
13
@funnygaming2672 What are you on about? Giving birth is not dangerous in this age we live in. In fact mortality rates of healthy women during birth are extremely low. Dying in a car crash is far more likely to happen than dying while giving birth.
13
@corneliusoswald6139 Nope. Let's start the list 1.Afghanistan 87% male victims 2. Bangladesh 64% male victims 3.Cambodia 75% male victims 4.China 80% male victims 5.North Korea 77% male victims 6.India 59.5% male victims 7.Indonesia 80% male victims 8.Iran 81% male victims 9.Iraq 68% male victims 10.Israel 72% male victims 11.Jordan 76.6% male victims 12.Kazakhstan 82% male victims 13. Kuwait 83% male victims 14. Kyrgyzstan 68.7% male victims 15.Laos 79.7% male victims 16.Lebanon 79.5% male victims 17.Malaysia 72.6% male victims 18.Mongolia 77.8% male victims 19.Nepal 77.3% male victims 20.Oman 73.3% male victims 21.Pakistan 76.7% male victims 22.Philippines 88% male victims 23.Qatar 81.9% male victims 24.Saudi Arabia 66.7% male victims 25.Singapore 65.2% male victims 26.Taiwan 86.6% male victims 27.Syria 84% male victims 28.Tajikistan 85.5% male victims 29.Thailand 87.7% male victims 30.UAE 86.8% male victims 31.Uzbekistan 84.2% male victims 32.Vietnam 71.5% male victims 33.Yemen 79.5% male victims Only two countries that have more female victims of homicide in Asia are South Korea and Japan. But even in these two the disparity is so low that it's statistically insignificant (less than 6% disparity) with Korea having 47.5% male victims and Japan 47.1% male victims. While if we look at every other Asian country the disparity is from 20% up to 76% more male victims of homicide. So you are 100% wrong.
8
@corneliusoswald6139 Baby murders are counted in this. If you are talking about abortion that's an entirely different topic. But even then (as a pro lifer and against abortion) no abortion is not the same as homicide. And in this particular case we are talking about grown human males and females walking in the street, not babies in the womb.
5
@nonhic Never forced any beliefs of any religion kid. That's why I said nature/God. Whether you see it as a natural thing or a religious thing it's the same. The same responsibility. The same duty. I listed off a lot of other things that are besides your personal beliefs (duty to your country, to your community and to your ancestors). I clearly explained why it's all of these things and then some more.
5
@GEN understandable. I think you made one of the most neutral and true journalistic videos in a while, so missing out on some things isn't a big deal.
4
@Justice Keith-LeClaire Because they choose to not carry one of the most integral responsibilities humans innately have. They choose themselves, before nature, before God, before their country, before their community and before the struggle of their ancestors. They've finally reached a point where it is close to 100% safe to procreate and decided their own materialistic and inane needs are more important than carrying out their responsibilities and duties. P.S. I am Greek, and narcissism is a Greek word so I probably know a lot more about it than you do.
4
@nonhic I didn't insult her. I made some pretty accurate observations on her choice. The choice of going childless is all the things I listed there. Whether these traits she displayed in this decision leak on other parts of her life is outside my knowledge. It's not my "belief" that humans are biologically responsible to have children. Literally nature made us prone and obligated to procreate. We mask this proclivity through things like masturbation (usually to p*rn) or safe s3x (condoms or birth control). Science can mask or put down these urges that nature throws our way. But they are still there.
4
@Silvy2621 You're acting as if it's damaged beyond repair. I know many women who have given multiple births including my mother. Rehabilitation exists and if done correctly it's not even noticeable that she gave birth and it doesn't take that much time either as many people might think. We don't live in the middle ages where maternal mortality rates were through the roof. The reason why many pregnant women remain fat after getting pregnant is because they don't put the more effort that is needed to go back to the stage they were before.
3
@james__anna_burns4885 "I'm selfish with my time and energy, and genuinely believe I would have resented having a child" This one screams narcissism and egocentrism. Valuing your time and carrying out your natural/God given responsibilities can co-exist you know. "No child should grow up resented (feeding ground for neglect and abuse) and no woman (or man) should feel trapped." This one screams immaturity and lack of responsibility. As for the accountability part, now that I read her comment again I can see that she tried to make excuses to take away some of the accountability she initially carried with the last sentence : "I wish more people really thought about the consequences of having children unplanned, unprepared, or emotionally incapable." She seems to make excuses that she actually thought and researched about the subject of having children when she clearly did not. All these things are devoid of the fact that you can grow them along with having children. She seems to be extremely focused on the "negatives" instead of the positives that largely outweigh the negatives. (if that wasn't the case, the vast majority of parents wouldn't claim that children are the best thing they've done in their life).
3
@thatguy9088 It's odd that you'd think I wouldn't know who my great grandfather was or my great great grandfather. In fact I know their entire life stories. My great grandfather was close to a genius of his time but that's besides the point. Legacy is the least of my worries when it comes to children. If you are religious (which you probably are not) you do have God given responsibilities. But even if you are not, humans are by nature responsible to procreate so we keep our species from extinction. It's not only a proclivity of ours, but even if you look at the Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, procreation is at the bottom level along with shelter, food, water, etc. It's great that we've outsourced this through technology, but that imperative is still there deep ingrained in your DNA. I'll say this. I do believe that men can occupy themselves with other things (such as physical labor or hobbies that create things) to alleviate some of the emptiness that having no family brings better than women can. And since it's bound that some men will be unable to procreate (it's a very common thing throughout history) ,the burden of procreation doesn't weighs on us as much. I'd still say as a man, that building a family is not only the most important responsibility but also the greatest source of true happiness. Eudemonia. Relationships and bonds are the stronger sources of true happiness and that's a theme perpetrated not only by the greatest philosophers but also some very credited psychological studies. And the greatest and strongest bond one can build, is that with his children. Being respected, being acknowledged and awarded are great. But in the end, they can't replace a family. That's my bit. I can only respect someone who goes in the childless way as long as they themselves acknowledge that this is an innately selfish and egocentric decision.
3
Population collapse will only work as a benefit. Because it's easier to control individualistic and materialistic people that have no family to put above everything. You think that these rich people are controlling the poor family in a village in Africa or the 40 year old single mother in Switzerland? Because let me tell you, one makes them all their money the other makes them almost nothing. Some of the things that the latter would buy are : contraceptives, depression and anxiety medication, designer clothes, make up, wine etc.
2
@thatguy9088 If you are religious then you are completely wrong on the procreation part. The people in the bible that went unmarried and childless, were married to God. Monks, pastors, saints etc dedicated their entire lives into faith and God ,so they married God. Those who don't though, definitely have the responsibility to procreate. But that's religious talk, which isn't the point here. I am not going to force anyone. I am criticising and I am 100% free to do so. In fact without people criticising and caring about social issues that are so important, society would crumble in an instant. This idea that we should not give a damn about anything other than our own life is a very egocentric and individualistic way to view life. And that's fine as long as you understand that. From what I have experienced, the most happy old people did have children. I have never met a truly happy senior that had no children but ofc that's just my experience, so I can't bring facts into it. Are there loners that will be happy living without a family well into their senior years? Sure. But most people are not meant for it. As for "jumping off buildings and despair". That's actually partially true. The main reason men commit suicide at such high rates is because of loneliness. As for women, childless women over 40 have the highest rates of depression and anxiety medication consumption (1 in 3). That's a pretty scary thing to think about. So yes, I ain't gonna change your mind but that's not my goal here anyways. My goal is to deter as many people as possible from this (usually) destructive path of narcissism and individualism which the vast majority of people will regret. You may be the exception and enjoy the life you've built up to the end without family. Who knows? I certainly don't. As for your last statement, I don't have children (yet) but my woman was never and is still not a slut and dear technology blessed us with a thing called paternity tests. Something we've both agreed on when the time comes. Good day back to ya.
2
@sharonpopolow6874 I am not prideful the least. Critique and spreading the will of God through that isn't a sin. In fact I'd say the opposite. Am I perfect or sinless? Of course not. I've had premarital s3x, I've masturbated to p*rn, I've sworn or brought up the name of God in vain. Of course I've sinned. Does that mean that I shouldn't call out other obvious sins for what they are? Should I stand by as my neighbor is being murdered because I have sinned? The logic doesn't stand and it is not in line with the Bible's teachings.
2
@rose-yeah That makes 0 sense. P3dophiles are the vast minority of the population and their existence doesn't excuse the narcissism that takes to not have children. People who have children are the opposite of selfish. Because they know that they have to sacrifice a big part of their life to raise them well and one day they'll have to let them venture into this world that is full of suffering and beauty. It's probably one of the hardest and greatest things a human can do in their lifetime.
2
@mantabsekali920 Actually 60 million more tax payers. A big amount of that 60 million would be by now grown adults that work and pay taxes. So that the Us wouldn't have a labor shortage and employ illegal aliens for a cheap wage that doesn't get taxxed.
1
@thomasbuchovecky171 yes hence why the definition is useless. It literally includes 50%+ of weapon types that are produced today. It's absolutely useless.
1
@thomasbuchovecky171 Do you understand that no one with fire arm knowledge uses the term "assault rifle"? Kyle had an AR-15 which is one of the most popular gun types in the Us.
1
@FrozenPantiezzz It's an AR-15 as far as I know.
1
the one that was getting cucked, was a brokie and didn't really have solid views on many things that are happening in the world?
1
@PedroTricking Being smart isn't a fluid state. And although it can change, this is definitely not the case here. Just because he believes in things you may disagree with doesn't make him not smart.
1
@VS-0987 "I can't remember a very trivial thing such as a birthday so I deserve to be divorced". Only women can think so emotionally and idiotically. Men have far more important things to worry about than "muh birthday'. Especially when we have to protect and provide for our family. There is a reason why 99% of the sane human societies didn't allow emotional women like yourself to divorce or have intercourse prior to marriage.
1
@Juno_Kujo It is our job to judge. Mathew 7:3 talks about hypocrisy. You can't be judging someone for a sin whilst you do the same thing in secret. That's why in the Bible it directly tells us to "Judge with rightful judgment."
1
@Caro.tito23 Totally agreed. As long as paternity can be insured (by paternity testing) then child support should be mandatory. Of course that's if abortion is outlawed completely, besides the cases of health issues. I bet most pro-lifers can absolutely agree with that statement.
1
@jazzm786 You're clearly delusional. There's a men's rights movement but no one gives a solitary f*ck about it. But please, enlighten me on how Western feminism has actually helped those "billions of women" the past decade or two. Just give me a few things that they actually did. Another big fallacy you make is that you think that the elites are working in favor of men. They are not. In fact they step on men's backs to get where they want. Men are the best gender to use as a slaving stepping tool due to their biological characteristics. No these court laws exist because society was set out to punish men and the elites to get pocket money. The reason why divorce was pushed and insentivised was because the government pockets some of the money that the men are forced to pay child support for. You clearly don't care about women's issues because I don't see you protesting or funding organisations on countries that there is actual inequality. Of course though you definitely don't care about men's issues. You're just like everyone else in this evil society, men are 2nd class citizens and society does absolutely nothing to solve the social issues of men that I pointed out. So the only issue for women you can bring up is abortion? First and foremost abortion is not a right. Secondly it wasn't outlawed, it was given back to the states. Thirdly abortion is an objectively evil act. Whether they should be legal or not is up to the morality of the people. If you think killing a baby is a right then maybe you should rethink your life choices. As for 0 reproductive rights. Men have 0 say on whether their child is born or not. A man wants the child? If the woman doesn't ,it gets aborted (in most of the West). A man doesn't want the child? If the woman wants it, it will be born and on top of that the man would be financially reliable for it. So in a sense, states that banned or heavily restricted abortions only leveled the playing field. Now no one is allowed to dispose of their baby and now everyone is responsible for their own children. We still need feminism? Really? Why? Give me a couple of good reasons on why we actually need feminism in the West. Because from what I've seen feminism nowadays is a female supremacy movement that has only caused heavy destruction in our societies. From broken families, to depressed lonely old career women.
1
@corneliusoswald6139 If a baby is killed after it is born, it is considered murder and it will be counted in the statistics I showed you.
1
@someone-ql6pu Not really. It's a simple concept. They hook people on materialism and deprive them of their nature (men from their masculinity and women from their femininity) and they can easily control the population. Abortion in particular was a great invention to serve just that purpose. The thing is that what that Swiss 40 yo single mom will spend in a month, an African person won't spend in their lifetime. Hence why they have primarily targeted Western countries. Because citizens there are wealthier.
1
@benjaminh.9139 Oppositely, women are far more emotionally abusive than men in marriages and when it comes to physical abuse the statistics show that it's mostly mutual DV and the one-sided ones are about the same rates for men and women.
1
@eddyalonsomoramorales6069 Reasons for divorce are trivial since divorce skyrocketed once no-fault divorce went into place. Meaning women weren't divorcing in high rates with actual fault depicted (adultery, physical abuse, neglect of duties).
1
Delusional and bad analogies. No one forced you to give birth because no one forced you to have s3x. If you consent to having s3x ,you consent to the possibility of conceiving and giving birth. Your analogy can be so easily picked on with this example: If a woman is in labour and dies then and there, even though she has specifically said she is not an organ donor, the doctors will try and save the child. Why is that? Because in one, it's organs and in the other it's separate human life. Why would we have to be for welfare programs for irresponsible people? Also adoption is a perfect way out of it if you are that irresponsible. There are too many couples waiting to adopt newborn babies that the market cannot satisfy.
1
@frede1905 You confuse moral, ceremonial and civil law. Christians are still bound by the same moral laws of the OT, but we are not bound by ceremonial or civil law.
1
Your last quip can be correct for some. But not for me. I listen to differing opinions and people a lot and my ideologies have changed a lot and will probably still change. Having said that, I didn't become more centrist, I became more and more right wing. At this point I am a Christian patriarchist supporting either a small power monarchy or a small power republic with not an egalitarian democratic vote. What Destiny said is probably right. Most people have varied opinions on the political spectrum. My opinions range from center-left to far-right. I used to listen to Destiny a ton, he didn't manage to make me left wing. In fact he radicalized me more lol.
1
@JohnSmith-fo5cx It's narcissism they are trying to hide. People nowadays are extremely egocentric, immature and irresponsible. We have every single amenity that could help us raise a child and we find every small hazard to make an excuse out of. People who claim that cost of living is why they don't have children are clowns or wilfully ignorant. Because families raise children that are far happier in what could be considered today poverty line. And on top of that money give away policies in Japan and other countries with serious birth rate problems have not done anything to resolve the issue.
1
@Justice Keith-LeClaire Your bs excuses keep coming. I don't know which one is funnier, throwing years of your life into a useless degree or making excuses to defend a clearly selfish decision, which is prioritizing yourself and your inane needs over your responsibilities and duties. Again you seem to be repeating that I bring up religion when I never explicitly did. As for bringing up country. Do you think people who give 0 sh*ts about the country they live in are not narcissists? The country you live in is the extended community you live in. If your country collapses, you are gonna be greatly affected. So acting partly on your duties to your country should be on every normal person's checklist. "Choose a better life for THEMSELVES". Here, you just proved my entire hypothesis. People seem to chase momentarily or even prolonged happiness instead of searching for eudemonia. How do you think your life will be better? If you have a bigger house? Maybe a better car? Or how about working 10 hours a day on your career that can fire you on a whim? Dying alone seems great right? These inane and superficial goals and dreams only manifest in this superficial and materialistic society. Instead of striving to create strong bonds and relationships with people, you strive for pointless dreams and aspirations. And guess what? There is no stronger bond and relationship than that of a parent and a child. That's the problem. "Provide the best life possible". What's this bs? Do you think you need to cuddle your kid and give him a fully comfortable life for him to have a happy childhood? From my experience, children in the middle-lower middle class are having the best childhoods. They grow up and learn how to be grateful and humble (most do). The excuses of "the costs are too high" or "I can't provide the best life for my child" are utter bs. Garbage excuses. Children can be raised extremely well in the poverty line. Money is the least of the things you should be worrying about when raising children. As long as you can provide them with food, a place to live and clothes you don't need anything else. Everything after that is extra. The life lessons and the character of your child are the integral part. Another fallacy is saying that poor children or unwanted children "don't stand a chance". That's an extremely privileged way to view things. I've met some great people who were orphans or lived in sh*tpoor conditions. In my country, I grew up in lower-middle class which would be considered close to poverty line in the Us. Had a great childhood and now working towards my best self. Bringing children to this world and abandoning them are two very different things. Unless you are the type of person to abandon your children, why would you use that as an excuse? And if you are the type of person to abandon your children, then you got far bigger problems than narcissism. See, all your inane excuses are easily debunked. Most excuses to not have children are that way. Why? Because putting yourself and what you think you need above everything else is by definition a narcissistic mindset. Maybe one day you people will grow up and mature and understand that sacrifice is part of life.
1
@doctordarcy4 Well, being mature and useful are also responsibilities of a good citizen and yes they certainly hold more weight than the responsibility of having children. Having said that , people who have somewhat matured and have become useful definitely "must" have children and raise them. It's a responsibility for sure.
1