Comments by "CaptainVanisher" (@captainvanisher988) on "Based Camp with Simone & Malcolm Collins" channel.

So we take away the handouts. I agree.
10
@onionfarmer3044 Enforced monogamy was never a "socialist" institution. Neither was it a right-wing one either. It was a Christian ideal. The Christian church made it a widespread practice throughout human societies and it proved to create the most stable societies.
7
@ClarkNewman rejecting logic and philosphical stances that have been held for thousands of years in favor of extremely biased research ?
7
And even Simone as an exception is subjected to this female behavior btw. If she were to be the provider for a prolonged period of time, then their marriage would be over and that's undeniable.
6
@s1gmap175 Your position is a logical paradox. Your claim states that anti-natalists are still alive because they find purpose within the idea of trying to reduce suffering. So if trying to reduce suffering is more purposeful than living life in suffering is you create a paradox. If you have sliver above average IQ you could've noticed it.
6
All societies collapse. The question is what will collapse them. They all enter a decadence period which in modern societies we've already entered and promptly collapse after that period has ended. It's either through population collapse, mass disease/starvation, infighting or getting conquered by outside forces. Nevertheless it always happens.
5
@dogperson432 Yes but the ridiculous thing is that she had dozens of people actually show up and pretend this sh*t was normal and she didn't get ridiculed by any mainstream publication. Unlike the Japanese guy that married the hologram who did it by himself and got ridiculed by everyone including mainstream publications.
4
Loyalty is innately tied with chastity. If she were loyal, she'd also be loyal prior meeting me. She'd value the fact that she will only give it up to the man she will forever be loyal. That's true loyalty. As for other traits, I'd say virtousness. A non-virtuous woman will never be a good wife in the long term. Last but not least, understanding the preferred family dynamic that is prescribed in the Bible. Meaning the wife submits to the husband. The same way men understand it aka the man loves their wife like Christ did to us, meaning that we ought to be ready to sacrifice everything for our wife and kids even our life. I agree with cuteness. I don't care as much for conventional attractiveness, I prefer cute and shy girls which you might've meant by autistic tomboyish.
4
"Conservative". Korea is an insanely feminist country. They have enormous feminist cults. Feminist cults that have had extreme influence in the government for decades. They are the ones that pushed for the immense internet restrictions. They had so much power that they even created a "gender equality ministry" in that "so much conservative country". I disagree with the idea that if they fix the gender wars, the birth rates won't be fixed. I believe if feminism is eradicated from South Korea, they will have above replacement levels of birth rates. It's the most pressing issue and the reason why most men tap out of the dating market there. From what I've encountered: Feminism + Conservative social values : Incredibly bad fertility rates Feminism + Progressive social values : Bad fertility rates No feminism + Conservative social values : Good fertility rates
4
I don't know if the correlation is: city -> lower birth rates or people that don't want children -> city. I think it's moreso the latter. Maybe if you could artificially make the cities a lot more unattractive then you could push some people that don't want kids to have them, but I am not sure about that.
4
@GIBI_360 But the issue with Iran, is that most Iranians are not devout islamists. The amount of Iranians that despise Islam and islamists is very high and I can attest to that personally. What we know though is that religious people tend to have high fertility rates compared to non-religious people. Usually they will be marked in studies as "very-religious" which is just actually religious people that go regularly to church and pray. Transhumanism is a garbage take on all this. Technology won't solve this decline and decadence. It can't solve it. It will only give an alternative as everything is going down around us, but in the end it won't change anything. Once the demographic collapse commences, there will be a lot of death and regression. The question is that if we can ensure the survival of the superior cultures of Europe and East Asia or if we will cave and be destroyed by the mobs of the 3rd world.
4
Such an amazing anime. It actually reminded me the relationship my grandma and grandpa had. True undying love. They were married for more than 50 years before death separated them.
3
So you're a weak father that can't discipline their child?
3
@nicholaslauder4592 Highly disagree. Physical discipline is one of the hardest actions a loving parent must partake. But it's integral to the correct development of a child in most cases. Moreso for boys though. A child can still love and trust its parents after they discipline it physically. It's not a mutually exclusive thing.
3
"I also did not have a happy childhood, and i don't view life to be a net positive" I still don't understand why are you here? If you find non-existence better, why in the world are you still wandering in this mortal realm? Another thing is that you're proving their point. YOU don't enjoy life (although it seems like you're still enjoying it enough to not become non-existent) and you project that idea to the rest of the world. YOU believe that everyone has to be thinking the same way (or at least most people) sanctifying the fact that you at least have narcissistic tendencies. "We all make fun of poor people who have a soccer team worth of children". Nope that's a projection on your part just like the rest of your comment.
3
@scholaroftheworldalternatehist The phrase "rest in peace" is tied with Christianity and heaven. Unless you are a religious Christian and believe in heaven, then you cannot use that argument. And if you are a Christian and believe in heaven then you automatically can't be anti-natalist.
3
@debrawehrly6900 Your comparison is bad at best. There is a difference between dressing up as a character of your favorite show/movie and organizing an entire event where you imitate one of the most important events in our lives aka sanctifying an eternal bond without the other person that is integral to said event existing. One is plain entertainment, the other is a narcissistic ridicule of the most important institutions in society. Imagine being so delusional to compare cosplay to someone marrying themselves.
2
Women see men as 3 types: Not--people, R*pists and Chads. 95% of men fall under the first 2 types.
2
Important note is that women could almost always own property. BUT they couldn't own property after they were married. The man was the owner of the property and the money in the family. At least that's how it worked in the Us and most of Europe. Which is the funny part about the bank account. Married women couldn't have a bank account, non-married ones could. As for women working back then and now. It's very different. When women worked at the same level as they work now, they only did so for the family. Meaning that their husband was their employer or at least worked with the husband. The same went for children. It's was more of "helping around" than the modern definition of working. When women had children, they almost always worked with their children around to take care of them. Meaning that they worked from the home. Women NEVER chased a career over a husband which is the important take away from this. So yes, if we eliminate the ideology implanted in young women's heads of chasing a career and replace it with chasing a husband, then fertility rates will almost certainly rise. I am more on the libertarian side so I don't necessarily support barring women from education, work, property etc. However, freedom of association is mandated. If I am a businessman I HAVE to have the right to decide if I want to hire women or not. It was one of the most destructive part of our societies when we allowed the government to take away freedom of association. The vote is also an issue. Democracy is obviously not working that well, especially the democracy of "everyone has an equal vote". It's a ridiculous concept. Especially considering that we gave bums, young people and women the same power to the men that built society and are biologically capable of being the decision makers.
2
@scholaroftheworldalternatehist Those quotes are referring to people that have conquered their sexual desires. Which is less than 1%.
2
It's still all around convincing women. We NEED to change women because the way they are now, no matter how hard men try they will never meet their expectations. That would necessarily include rolling back the sexual liberation movement and women's emancipation, allowing corporations to have freedom of association and therefore being allowed to not hire women, remove the hand outs from the state that universally go to women, destroy social media and its influence.
1
Not really. Romanian issues started after communism took over. China already has the issue and they putting those in place. The truth is that targeting and exterminating homosexuality will indeed increase fertility rates, just not enough to fix it.
1
Diets are just part of the entire decadence of modern societies. It's not diets, it's complacency and lack of religiosity. We left our religious values that built our great societies for what? Self-centrism, materialism and ideology. It's the decadence period that will result in the complete destruction of our societies.
1
are there any studies not "conforming" to that "bias"? The studies' results make perfect logical sense and they don't seem to suffer from poor techniques.
1
@justdoit2521 So by your own admition, your instincts and fears give more meaning to your life, than your entire anti-natalist agenda is taking from life. That means that by instincts and fears alone, life is more worth to live than not to live. You can choose to end it all and many do so everyday. But you don't. Why? Because there are clearly things in life that are worth more than the things you claim life is not worth. In your case the character trait of cowardice is more overbearing that your anti-natalist values or nihilism. The common su**ide does not require any kind of bravery, you're not committing seppuku, it just requires you to not be an extreme coward or at least put your values above your character traits. I am replying to you because I find it amusing how willfully ignorant and smug people like you are.
1
@oliviastratton2169 Because it's "easier" materially and economically nowadays to live in cities. Materialism is the driver for high urbanisation as well as low birth rates. People who value the material more than to create a family, won't have children and will most likely move to an urban center.
1
It's completely the opposite. Men nowadays have extremely low standards. I have far more standards than most men out there and I still don't expect half of what you described. I just want an attractive woman (30-40% of women instantly qualify for me), that has been waiting till marriage, is young enough so we can have many children (24 and below) and is a devout Christian that abides by Christian doctrine and family structure, or at least be ready to be taught about it. If she refuses to abide by the Christian doctrine of "Wives submit to your husbands like the church submits to Christ and husbands love your wives like Christ loved us" then nothing can be done about it. I don't care if she likes what I like, although usually feminine women that are into a guy adopt some of his habits and hobbies and it would certainly be optimal, it's not even close to be a demand. If she can't abide by the most basic standards my grandma abided by, then why would I even pursue a marriage with said woman? If she can't be a virgin, young, Christian woman that is moderately attractive then there is no point on pursuing sh*t. Even the Christian part can be worked on as long as she is "coachable" or otherwise ready to be taught. The other 3 are not even difficult requirements yet modern women have a hard time with them. As for girly stuff she might like. It always depends. There are many modern stuff marketed towards women that are extremely harmful to a healthy relationship like reality shows or sex and the city esque shows, social media validation etc. But there are also certainly neutral or at least harmless girly hobbies that women should be able to enjoy. So I get your point on that one.
1
It's 100% about sex. Hence why femcels is a generally not accepted word in those circles since women can get sex whenever they decide. At least that was the original use of the word.
1
@s1gmap175 "breeders"? You mean normal humans? You are the one not doing the most fundamental part of human nature. And it's because other humans that were normal created the soft society that accommodates you.
1
@fluffyribbit1881 Women never really had as much power as they do now which is why fertility rates have dropped so low. It's an unforeseen event in human history for countries to have less than 1.5 fertility rates. Usually what you'd see in periods of decadence was a fall in fertility rates, fall in marriage rates, rampant degeneracy, complacency, stagnancy in innovation and economy, high depression/suicide.
1