Comments by "CaptainVanisher" (@captainvanisher988) on "penguinz0" channel.

  1. 26
  2. 21
  3. 17
  4. 12
  5. 10
  6. 10
  7. 10
  8. 10
  9. 10
  10. 9
  11. 8
  12. 8
  13. 7
  14. 7
  15. 7
  16. 6
  17. 6
  18. 5
  19. 5
  20. 5
  21. 5
  22. 4
  23. 4
  24. 4
  25. 4
  26. 4
  27.  @ancientalien000  No you seem to not understand how that works. The bell curve was normal only after the woman knew the man she was rating. But here's the thing, do you think that it's easy to get passed the appraoching stage of a woman for most men? Most men are unattractive when women don't know them. That means that they will ultimately be rejected if a woman finds them unattractive. So if they can't get passed through stage 1 due to their attractiveness, it's 100% understandable why they would "whine" about it. It's a paradox. First it's "no women do not have high standards for looks" to "okay women have high standards for looks, but if you get to know them you the standards normalize". And the question to that is "How will you get to know a woman to drop into their reasonable standard scale if you get rejected insantly due to their unreasonable standard scale?" Do you even understand the absurdity in this? Cultivating social skills and good personality traits won't get you anywhere either. There's something called game. That's how men can have an easier time to pass stage 1. But that alone won't make you succeed. Looks are essential. I've seen so many men with great social skills that can have a discussion with anyone fail time and time again to land women. The only men I've seen that were at best average looking getting away with having great success with women were men that were borderline narcissistic psychopaths. And I am not joking about this. Every narcissistic psychopath I know is a chick magnet. Coincidence?
    4
  28. 4
  29. 4
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1