Comments by "bloodgout" (@bloodgout) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1. ⁠ @BojanPeric-kq9et no anyone that refuses to help Ukraine is a russian asset whether they know it or not. The rest of your screed has nothing to do with the current situation.
    12
  2.  @simonschneider5913 pro Russian analysts are literal propagandists. Come on🙄
    11
  3. ⁠ @barexampasser lol wut? It’s Ukraine that is at war with Russia not Denmark. Did you hit your head while you were drunk or something ?
    9
  4. How can you quietly shoot down a drone in technologically aware societies?
    8
  5. ⁠ @traumvonhaiti why not expel the ethnic Russians? If they want to be Russian and part of Russia they can move to Russia. They don’t get to unilaterally declare Estonian territory Russian
    7
  6.  @Ss3gokus what country has the US annexed and called its permanent territory?
    7
  7.  @evgeniya7853 what sovereign territory has the US annexed?
    7
  8.  @JELmusic um russia started this. Anything that happens to them is their own fault.
    6
  9.  @andyhadjivasiliou russia is wasting manpower and equipment at an unsustainable rate to take a few kilometers of territory. It’s got to be embarrassing to be russian these days 😂😂😂😂😂
    6
  10.  @andersjjensen he thinks listening to russian propagandandists is a path to objective understanding 😂
    6
  11.  @stevealba56 what a pathetic attempt to excuse russian aggression. Does putin reciprocate the reach around or is your relationship one sided?
    6
  12.  @evgeniya7853 everything you say is nonsensical and delusional 😂
    6
  13.  @TankandDimples russia is just messing with people like you and you’re falling for their bullshit. Relisten to the video.
    5
  14.  @szabyleo 😂😂😂😂 aw, honey, you just have no idea what you’re talking about 😂😂😂😂😂
    5
  15.  @yellowtunes2756 because the russian soldiers in the Donbas are “rebels” 😂😂😂😂😂😂
    5
  16.  @Ollies2CentsWardill there are thousands of HAWK missile systems that are doing good work in Ukraine and the US has plenty of other older missile systems that can be sent to Ukraine without any loss to NATO or US defense capabilities
    4
  17. ⁠ @hendrikvanleeuwen9110 nah you’re disingenuous. Anders said nothing of the sort. He also explained the catch-22 that Johnson has deliberately put Ukraine in: Ukraine needs to know what weapons will be available in order to develop a strategy but are being required to come up with a strategy without that information. You’re another bad faith commentator
    4
  18. Those long costly wars are why our current crop of leaders is reluctant to put more skin in the game
    4
  19.  @yellowtunes2756 then they can move to russia.
    4
  20.  @evgeniya7853 you have a weird obsession with gophers 😂😂😂😂😂😂
    4
  21.  @BobAbc0815 you mean US Special Forces counterattacked the Wagner troops that attacked them
    3
  22.  @shardovl586 nah the US honored the NPT and developed conventional capabilities that can destroy russia
    3
  23.  @dmitriyzhukov9193 no it’s a strategy of not giving russia what it wants which is a reaction
    3
  24. ⁠​⁠ @ragnardunderdase3473 we can supply hundreds of thousands of troops because we have a huge amount of surplus equipment and the US military by itself has over two million troops. We have extra just for them much less the older equipment we’ve been sending to Ukraine. No one has proposed sending all of Ukraine’s men to war.
    3
  25.  @BojanPeric-kq9et keeping russia pinned in the east and attrit their forces? Yeah it is working. They need more weapons in order to move beyond that.
    3
  26.  @FunnyBunny-pd5xx 😂😂😂😂😂😂 omg you’ll believe anything 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    3
  27. ⁠ @kogorun you know the war already started, right? And, no, we would not rather disband NATO than fight russia. Where are you getting these ideas?
    3
  28.  @thomasthereal4067 it is against the law to sell the F-22. The F-35 is a much more complex aircraft requiring a lot of maintainers and a well established pipeline of parts. This is also true of the Abrams. Both these machines require a lot of training, robust logistics that take time to establish and then lots of real world practice to become effective users.
    3
  29.  @martin-cheers these systems require lots of training and logistics support. That just wasn’t there at the beginning and much of it is still being developed. You can’t just drop off an Abrams and tell people to have fun with it. It requires, fuel and lots of parts and well trained maintainers, in addition to training the operators.
    3
  30.  @valeriesolanas4077 like what?
    2
  31.  @mr.o5501 russia’s population is about 144 million people. It’s not that big.
    2
  32.  @evgeniya7853 further aggression. Obviously.
    2
  33.  @AnthonyGTrees your tinfoil hat is on too tight
    2
  34.  @ericp1139 because you have no more understanding of the situation than Johnson does
    2
  35.  @obsidianjane4413 I see you don’t know anything at all about US military doctrine. All russian logistics hubs, air defense, military bases and troop concentrations would be destroyed in the first 24-48 hours before a single boot touches Ukrainian soil. The russians are struggling with Ukraine and you think the US would have trouble? You’re not dealing with reality.
    2
  36.  @Intel-i7-9700k you really have no idea what you’re talking about at all 😂😂😂😂😂😂 the US is a combined arms military with the two largest air forces in the world with 2 million people under arms not including our extensive reserves. Turkey could probably be persuaded to allow our ships into the Black Sea since we provide a lot of weapons to them and they’re a member of NATO. Russia’s crappy weapons can’t even subdue Ukraine but you think russia could handle the US 😂😂😂😂😂😂 go take your meds
    2
  37. Which country had a warehouse full of military equipment burn down by a russian weapon that isn’t Ukraine?
    2
  38.  @FunnyBunny-pd5xx and putin never lies 😂😂😂😂😂😂
    2
  39.  @FunnyBunny-pd5xx 😂😂😂😂 pootie is the one that fucked up😂😂😂😂😂give him that advice
    2
  40.  @blazunlimited right? Where do they get these stupid ideas like returning the f16s 😂😂😂😂😂
    2
  41.  @stevealba56 what is this far west era 😂😂😂😂😂😂
    2
  42.  @andersa4667 trump doesn’t support NATO or Ukraine
    2
  43.  @Intel-i7-9700k the US is more than capable of mobilizing and most Americans support Ukraine
    2
  44. The US isn’t at war. We advise we don’t force the Ukrainians into any kind of decisions. Their way forward is up to them. If they want to continue defending themselves rather than accepting a peace agreement russia won’t honor, then they should do that despite what whiny little cowards in the comments think.
    2
  45.  @emilsohn1671 yeah there are authoritarian scumbags in power in some places. So what?
    1
  46.  @Writeous0ne lol no 😂😂😂 are you really that brainwashed 😂😂😂😂
    1
  47.  @Writeous0ne you’re lame even by vatnik garbage standards. 😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  48.  @Writeous0ne you don’t understand how NATO works 😂😂😂😂😂 just moronic lies 😂😂😂😂
    1
  49.  @lancerevo9747 what nuclear radar are you talking about?
    1
  50.  @evgeniya7853 more nonsensical vatnik horseshit 😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1