Comments by "Iazzaboyce" (@Iazzaboyce) on "The public are angry with Boris Johnson because he 'abandoned' Brexit | LBC" video.

@weediestbroom OK - as a subject of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, I demand that Micheal Martin resigns with immediate effect.
5
@ghfdt368 I only made one video - but, thanks and you're welcome.
2
As an Englishman and UK citizen I demand Micheal Martin resigns with immediate effect.
1
@CerdicTheGreat Yep! Well, more your 'sarcasm' really - it is directed at 'Max' who is a citizen of Southern Ireland and appears to have devoted his entire life to denigrating the elected prime minister of the United Kingdom.
1
@tomellis4324 Allow me to explain; I as a UK citizen would not be so presumptuous as to set up a YouTube channel with sole purpose to incessantly berate Taoiseach Micheal Martin and his government, because that would be very disrespectful to the nation he and his government represents. I made a single 'tongue in cheek' comment to that effect, and already many (including yourself) have clearly found such conduct deplorable, which serves to make my intended point in a nonpartisan way.
1
@tomellis4324 Isn't that like saying: It's OK for Joe to insult his brother's wife, because he used to insult her before she married him? The Brexit issue is settled in the UK, so we really don't need someone from another country attempting to create dissent against the democratic will of the UK people and the democratically elected UK government. The UK is a democracy, with fair elections. There were no 'inaccuracies' on the red bus. The figure used on the red bus was an official EU figure taken from an official EU document - the UK people were allowed to see it. The Remain side had ample opportunity to question anything the Leave side said and the UK people are able to understand such matters. As for the NHS - of course any money not sent to the EU would be used to 'fund' the NHS 'instead'. On that note; the NHS is an entirely free healthcare service - perhaps Max should direct his efforts toward achieving this in his own country.
1
@tomellis4324 What has the UK leaving the EU got to do with peace process? Why should the UK not being in the EU prevent peace or rather cause one side to perpetrate violence?
1
@tomellis4324 I can't really talk about what happened in Ireland 100+ years ago. Though, my grandfather and his brother were living in Dublin at that time. We are somewhat limited in scope on here - what next 'The Great Famine'?
1
@tomellis4324 This is your true motivation: Hatred of the English and any foul means to get Northern Ireland out of the UK - you thought the UK's membership of the EU would bring this by the back door. The simple answer to your 'peace process' point, is despite your side's false assertions to the contrary, the Belfast Agreement states nothing about the border and nothing about trade between the UK and EU.
1
@ClannCholmain My grandfather and grand uncle were English stationed at the Royal Hibernian Military School for orphans of British soldiers.
1
@ClannCholmain Are we playing 'orphan trumps' now? When are people like you going to understand that other people can suffer hardship too? Perhaps the Native Americans whose homelands were taken from them by the displaced Irish you lament when it suits. Of course, when 'quaint' 'harmless' Irish people go takeover other people's countries they build a museum in Dublin to celebrate. What? You think the impoverished indigenous peoples of America, Australia, New Zealand want to watch St Patrick's Day parades?
1
@tomellis4324 Laws do change - 'The Act of Union' was law and the Irish government signed it. I'm going to take a guess that, you think that law should have changed - yet we both know some would prefer it did not and I hope you will accept that everybody should be able to have a political opinion. Yes, I already know the vast majority of Irish people get along with English people - sadly, there are some that hate the English. The 'back door' is easy. In the early 70s when ROI and UK were joining the EEC those 'English haters' opposed 'further' union with the English and anyone else. However, over time they began to realise that a federal Europe would gradually destroy English/UK sovereignty, a Single Market and Customs Union would erode the Irish border, UK adopting euro and single currency would be a massive step toward a united Ireland. And the island of Ireland would be able to gain financial support from the wealthy EEC/EU countries that included the English and get to vote against English MEPs in a parliament. Also, ROI and some NI MEPs could complain to other members about their 'oppression' at the hands of the English. In short - they believed all this would lead to the UK being forced to give up on Northern Ireland. And this is why some Irish are so rattled by the UK leaving the EU. The GFA (if you prefer) and threat of republican violence was used (erroneously) by Remainers in EU and UK governments as a propaganda fear weapon to achieve another UK referendum to prevent Brexit/hard Brexit. Like I said, the GFA does not say anything about the border or trade. There's no reason why EU/UK trade could not be regulated over the Irish border. The GFA accepts ROI and NI are separate countries and it is quite normal and accepted practice for separate countries to regulate trade. The CTA is not affected by this.
1
@fredplat467 I'm guessing you're not keen on having an actual argument...
1
@davidfaraday7963 The Belfast Agreement provided for the removal of 'security installations' as quickly as was safely possible. These were military/police strongholds that were mostly not situated on the border, they did not carry out customs checks on goods or check passports/issue visas. They had nothing to do with the Irish border and have nothing to do with the context the border is being discussed today.
1
@tomellis4324 Perhaps, I could have used a better choice of words or even cited the actual text. It was agreed that, the 'security installations' would be removed as soon as the UK government believed it would responsible to do so. The 'security installations' were not 'border check points' they were not situated on the border, they were not operated by immigration or customs officials, they did not make checks on goods for customs purposes, they did not check visas or passport for immigration purposes. As I have said, the lie that 'A border between UK and EU would contravene the GFA' was part of a propaganda campaign intended to prevent Brexit. The Agreement recognises there are two separate countries with a border, which is why there's a section about a 'border' poll.
1
@tomellis4324 Since, you are the one asserting the GFA states there will be no trade customs or immigration regulation over the internal Irish border; why not simply cite the parts of the text you are relying on?
1
@tomellis4324 That is an exercise in sophistry and you know it. You are clutching at your own partial assurances, your own interpretations of your own claimed experiences, you replace legal text with your own chosen words, you conflate material fact with your own irrelevant inconsequential matters. It was all remoaner propaganda and it failed. Brexit isn't going to lead to the break-up of the United Kingdom. Brexit has made 'the change' greater and the greater the change the harder it is to persuade people to vote for it. I can see it 'got your tails up' but trust me - it was nothing but 'fake news'.
1