Youtube comments of Iazzaboyce (@Iazzaboyce).
-
1300
-
594
-
494
-
455
-
443
-
434
-
393
-
375
-
355
-
324
-
296
-
290
-
273
-
268
-
232
-
226
-
216
-
213
-
197
-
187
-
186
-
185
-
183
-
177
-
175
-
165
-
162
-
154
-
146
-
145
-
144
-
138
-
138
-
134
-
129
-
126
-
117
-
115
-
107
-
105
-
105
-
97
-
95
-
95
-
94
-
87
-
83
-
80
-
80
-
80
-
77
-
77
-
75
-
75
-
73
-
72
-
70
-
70
-
65
-
64
-
64
-
63
-
62
-
61
-
58
-
57
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@Gph0367 Perhaps, but only around 10% are based on humanitarian reasons. The majority are students coming to the UK, because UK has 5 universities in the world top 25 (EU has 0 universities in the world top 25) 21 universities in the world top 25 are in English speaking countries. The majority coming to the UK to work are high skills and many are from EU countries. The UK has processed 7.5 million settled status applications for EU citizens to stay in post Brexit UK. Also the cost of living in the UK compared to other countries in Europe has improved since voting for Brexit. In 2016, the cost of living in EU countries like the Netherlands, France, Germany, Finland, Sweden, Portugal, Austria, Southern Ireland was lower than in the UK. In 2023, the UK cost of living was lower than the Netherlands, France, Germany, Finland, Sweden, Portugal, Austria, Southern Ireland.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@I2383R Into a mixing bowl put 3 cups of almond flour, 3 tablespoons desiccated coconut, 3 tablespoons sultanas, 3 tablespoons chopped nuts, 4 tablespoons erythritol sugar, 1 heaped teaspoon sweet cinnamon, rounded teaspoon baking powder and mix well.
Into a separate mixing bowl put 150ml sour cream, 3 eggs, 1 teaspoon lemon essence and mix (beat) well.
Prepare oven 180 deg, melt 70g butter and grease tin for 8 (weetabix size) buns.
When ready incorporate dry and wet mix and melted butter, spoon mix into baking tin and bake for 15 minutes (spin tin half way).
Believe it or not, if you cut flour and sugar out of your diet you can eat buns and cream and cheesecake (made with almond flour/butter base) every day and lose weight.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Yes, there was 'skinny and starving' people in the past, as a direct consequence of the 'free market economy' you seem to think will solve these problems. Before Labour was in a position to do anything (1945) five evils were identified: want, disease, ignorance, squalor and idleness. Labour policies were for full employment, welfare state, national health service, education and decent housing. That's why the working class are no longer 'skinny and starving' and have better health, housing, and education. Rich people do not tend to give money to others (which is how they get rich), but they always need to exploit others to get that money. Today's problems in NHS funding, high unemployment, underemployment levels, wage compression, unaffordable rents/mortgages, tuition fees, cuts in welfare, zero hours contracts.... These things should be making you think we're going back to 'skinny and starving' people.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
We need to set up a new political party with genuine pledges to the UK people:
1, The UK will become part of the united states of Europe.
2, The UK will become part of an EU army.
3, The UK will adopt the euro.
4, The UK will allow anyone from Europe to live and work in the UK.
5, The UK will have a new principal flag.
6, The UK will have 10% say in a controlling EU parliament.
7, The UK will pay £350 million each week to the EU.
8, The UK will allow the EU to decide UK trade policy.
9, The UK will be ruled by an unelected EU executive.
10, The UK allow anyone from Europe to use the NHS and claim UK benefits.
We should call our new party 'The United Kingdom In Party'.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
We need to set up a new political party with genuine pledges to the UK people:
1, The UK will become part of the united states of Europe.
2, The UK will become part of an EU army.
3, The UK will adopt the euro.
4, The UK will allow anyone from Europe to live and work in the UK.
5, The UK will have a new principal flag.
6, The UK will have 10% say in a controlling EU parliament.
7, The UK will pay £350 million each week to the EU.
8, The UK will allow the EU to decide UK trade policy.
9, The UK will be ruled by an unelected EU executive.
10, The UK allow anyone from Europe to use the NHS and claim UK benefits.
We should call our new party 'The United Kingdom In Party'.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Probably learned how to be successful in all those universities the British built: Harvard University, College of William & Mary, Yale University, University of Pennsylvania, Moravian College, University of Delaware, Princeton University, Augusta Academy and Liberty Hall (Washington and Lee University), Columbia University, Brown University, Rutgers University, Dartmouth College, College of Charleston, Salem College, Dickinson College, Hampden–Sydney College, St. John's College (Annapolis/Santa Fe).
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@maxwild1212 Has the EU secretly left the EU? It's just that 'your' experts say the Eurozone is heading into recession and say the cause is the war on the Ukraine/Russia border and the pandemic. It's just you seem to think the same economic pressures somehow do not apply to the UK and the UK's economic problems all stem from leaving the EU.
“The eurozone economy looks set to contract in the fourth quarter given the steepening loss of output and deteriorating demand picture seen in October,” said Chris Williamson, chief business economist at S&P Global, adding that a recession looked “increasingly inevitable”.
Growth figures for the third quarter for the region’s two largest economies, Germany and France, are due to be published on Friday and are set to show the impact of soaring fuel and food prices. Russia’s squeeze on gas supplies to Europe has led energy-intensive companies to cut, or even suspend, production. Consumers facing soaring energy, food and borrowing costs have cut back on spending as the summertime boost from the lifting of Covid-19 restrictions fades.
The grim outlook was underlined by the IMF, which warned in its report on the region published at the weekend: “Europe has been hit by a massive terms-of-trade shock that has weakened the growth outlook, further raised the level and persistence of inflation, and led to a cost of living crisis that threatens social cohesion.” (Financial Times 24 Oct 2022)
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@sueyourself5413 Many people have been misled in to thinking Brexit has caused UK food prices to increase. However, when these people learn that, the causes of this were not Brexit, but pandemic and war against Russia and that, when compared to EU countries like Austria, Italy, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Southern Ireland, Netherlands, Finland, Sweden, France, Germany the UK is actually less expensive for food - they will understand they have been lied to.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The British Empire did great good - it was really about a world coming together in a natural inevitable way. Yes, it wasn't all ideal by today's thinking, but those quick to criticise are not able to explain the alternative or understand that, we're all were we are today, because of the journey. Slavery had existed from the beginning of time and in many instances slaves and non-slaves had similarly difficult lives. The British Empire was foremost in outlawing slavery and policing the practice. The reason so much of the former Empire has retained a formal link with the UK, is because there was much good done in terms of military protection, infrastructure, education, legal system, political development, health and social care and wealth creation. No man, woman or child loves the sports of their oppressor.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
We need to set up a new political party with genuine pledges to the UK people:
1, The UK will become part of the united states of Europe.
2, The UK will become part of an EU army.
3, The UK will adopt the euro.
4, The UK will allow anyone from Europe to live and work in the UK.
5, The UK will have a new principal flag.
6, The UK will have 10% say in a controlling EU parliament.
7, The UK will pay £350 million each week to the EU.
8, The UK will allow the EU to decide UK trade policy.
9, The UK will be ruled by an unelected EU executive.
10, The UK allow anyone from Europe to use the NHS and claim UK benefits.
We should call our new party 'The United Kingdom In Party'.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@kaba_me "In what one MP described as a "scandalous failure", it has emerged that the UK pays more than £670m to EU countries for Brits' healthcare abroad, while claiming back less than £50m from the EU, even though there are significantly more EU citizens in the UK than UK citizens in the EU.
Under the European Health Insurance Card (EHIC) - countries can claim back health costs from other EU countries if their citizens use medical services abroad.
The new figures reveal that nearly every country claims more from the UK than the UK claims back from the rest of the EU.
For example the UK pays France £147,685,772, but France only pays UK £6,730,292 and the UK pays Germany £25,873,954 but Germany only pays the UK £2,189,664." (Sky News 2016)
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Architrion
"In what one MP described as a "scandalous failure", it has emerged that the UK pays more than £670m to EU countries for Brits' healthcare abroad, while claiming back less than £50m from the EU, even though there are significantly more EU citizens in the UK than UK citizens in the EU. Under the European Health Insurance Card (EHIC) - countries can claim back health costs from other EU countries if their citizens use medical services abroad. The new figures reveal that nearly every country claims more from the UK than the UK claims back from the rest of the EU. For example the UK pays France £147,685,772, but France only pays UK £6,730,292 and the UK pays Germany £25,873,954 but Germany only pays the UK £2,189,664." (Sky News 2016)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
We need to set up a new political party with genuine pledges to the UK people:
1, The UK will become part of the united states of Europe.
2, The UK will become part of an EU army.
3, The UK will adopt the euro.
4, The UK will allow anyone from Europe to live and work in the UK.
5, The UK will have a new principal flag.
6, The UK will have 10% say in a controlling EU parliament.
7, The UK will pay £350 million each week to the EU.
8, The UK will allow the EU to decide UK trade policy.
9, The UK will be ruled by an unelected EU executive.
10, The UK allow anyone from Europe to use the NHS and claim UK benefits.
We should call our new party 'The United Kingdom In Party'.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This is what Paddy Ashdown had to say on referendum night when he thought Remain would win:
“Those that asked for this and I was the first leader ever to ask for a referendum way back in 89/90; have said so, because they believe it to be an act of democracy. I will forgive no one, who does not accept the sovereign voice of the British people once it has spoken. Whether it’s by one percent or twenty percent; once they have taken it, it is our duty, as those who serve the public to make the best use and to make sure that, our country does the best it can with the decision the people have given us. I heard Mr Farage say tonight: ‘We’re coming back even if we lose”. Excuse me! He is the person that complained about lack of democracy in Europe, if he will not accept the sovereign voice of the British people, when they vote, whatever they say, then I think he does not have the national interest at heart, he has his own interest at heart.” (Paddy Ashdown)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
If the Labour Party, Conservative Party, Liberal Democrat Party, Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, BBC, ITV, Channel Four, Sky News, The Times, The Telegraph, The Financial Times, the IMF, the Bank of England, the CBI, world leaders, the EU, Universities, 'experts' and Eddie Izzard couldn't persuade the British people to be 'EU citizens' - it ain't happening. What is it about 'Britons never never never shall be slaves' don't they get?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This is why British are 'ex-pats': Former colonies of the British Empire: Afghanistan -1919 Antigua and Barbuda
Australia-1901 -1986 The Bahamas-1973 Bahrain-1971 Barbados-1966
Belize-1981 Botswana-1966 Brunei-1984 Canada-1867–1982-(From 1949 this included Newfoundland and Labrador). Cyprus-1960 Dominica-1978
Egypt-1922 Fiji-1970 The Gambia-1965 Ghana-1957 Grenada-1974
India-1947 Iraq-1932 (British Mandate) Jamaica-1962 Jordan-1946
Kenya-1963 Kiribati-1979 Kuwait-1961 Lesotho-1964 Malawi-1964 Malaysia-1957 Maldives-1965 Malta-1964 Mauritius-1968 Myanmar-(Burma) Nauru-1968 New Zealand-1907–1986 Nigeria-1960 Pakistan-1947 Qatar-1971 St lucia-1971 Saint Kitts and nevis-1983 St Vincent and the Grenadina lines-1979 Seychelles-1976 Sierra lione-1961 Soliman islands-1978 South Africa-1910–1961 Sri Lanka-1948 Sudan -1956 Swaziland-1968 Tanzania-1961 Tonga-1970 Trinidad and Tobago-1962 Tuvalu-1978 Uganda-1962 United Arab Emirates-1971 Vanuatu-1980 Yemen-1967 Zambia-1964 Zimbabwe-1980
United States-1776. Prior to the American Revolution the 13 colonies were governed separately, these were New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia.
Current British Territories Overseas: Anguilla, Bermuda, British Antarctic Territory, British Indian Ocean Territory, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, Gibraltar, Montserrat, Pitcairn Islands Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Island, Turks and Caicos Islands.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@seriousthree6071 The message contained a statement of fact: "We send the EU 350 million per week" and a suggestion: "let's fund the NHS instead". The statement of fact appears to be accurate, as the UK does send this amount to the EU (confirmed by the UK Statistics Authority). Whilst, it is true that, the EU returns and uses some of this money for projects in the UK, this fact does not alter the validity of the original fact and this is particularly so, given the ‘fiscal independence’ context of the Brexit referendum. This first part of the bus message is therefore, not a lie. Now the 'suggestion'. A 'suggestion' or ‘proposal’ cannot be a statement of 'fact' under any circumstances, so this part of the bus message cannot be adjudged to be 'false'. Also a 'suggestion' cannot be a 'promise' so there can be no expectation that the terms of a referendum suggestion should be carried out by the person that made the suggestion or by a person that, concurred with the suggestion when there has been no opportunity to do so. So the bus message is not a lie. In pure fiscal terms, the bus message was entirely accurate, as the saving would be always used to 'fund the NHS' for as long as NHS was state funded and expenditure exceeded 350 million per week. This is because all government spending comes from the same coffer; moreover, the government was borrowing more than this amount to meet its spending commitments. The referendum was not a general election, the Leave supporting MPs were not going to form a government and the public fully understood this. Indeed, the only people complaining the NHS has not received this money are people that, voted to keep sending it to the EU. An example of a message that is an actual lie, is the claim made repeatedly by the Remain supporting media and Remain activists that, 'the EU funds the UK' in various ways. Of course, this is fiscally impossible, as the facts easily prove the UK has always funded the EU.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@NB-gu9rs Why was it a lie? The message contained the word: “instead” however it did not contain the word: ‘extra’ this is always added by Remainers as a straw man. The message contained a statement of fact: "We send the EU £350 million per week" and a suggestion: "let's fund the NHS instead". The statement of fact appears to be accurate, as the UK does owe this amount to the EU (the figure was not contested by the UK Statistics Authority). Whilst the EU rebates and uses some of this money for projects in the UK, this fact does not alter the validity of the original fact and this is particularly so, given the ‘fiscal independence’ context of the Brexit referendum. This first part of the bus message is therefore, not a lie. Now the 'suggestion'. A 'suggestion' cannot be a statement of 'fact' under any circumstances, so this part of the bus message cannot be adjudged to be 'false'. Also a 'suggestion' cannot be a 'promise' so there can be no expectation that the terms of a referendum suggestion should be carried out by the person that made the suggestion or by a person that, concurred with the suggestion. So the bus message is not a lie. In pure fiscal terms, the bus message was entirely accurate, as the saving would be always used to 'fund the NHS' for as long as NHS is state funded and expenditure exceeded 350 million per week. This is because all government spending comes from the same coffer; moreover, at that time, the government was borrowing more than this amount to meet its spending commitments. So, the only people complaining the NHS has not received this ‘extra’ money are people that, voted to keep sending it to the EU. An example of a message that is an actual lie, is the claim made repeatedly by the Remain supporting media and Remain activists that, 'the EU funds the UK' in various ways. Of course, this is fiscally impossible, as the facts easily prove the UK has always funded the EU.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@JonB1995 you don't know what ad hominem means, do you? "argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand [Brexit] is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument [low wage payer, mean, wealthy, multi millionaire, elite, person], or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sueyourself5413 Would you agree domestic workforce employment is an indicator of how well a country is performing in economic and trade terms? Because, UK unemployment is 3.9%, France is 7.5%, Germany is 5.9%, Spain is 11.7%, Greece is 10.4%, Sweden is 8.5%, Austria is 7.6%, Finland is 8.3%, Italy is 7.2%. Portugal is 6.6%, Ireland is 4.2%, Poland is 5.4% and the entire EU is 6%.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@verystripeyzebra OK so, the 2023 cost of living index (which obviously takes account of earnings) shows that, when compared to countries like Norway, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Netherlands, Southern Ireland, Iceland, France, Germany, the UK is an easier place to eke out a living.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@stephenconway2468 A 'cost of living comparison by country' looks at typical earnings and typical essential outgoings like rent, petrol, food, hygiene, clothes, electricity, etc.. If looking specifically at 'food' it would see how much of certain food items could be purchased with typical earnings. So, a basic example would be: 'We took the average of what a typical bus driver, shop assistant, nurse and firefighter earned in a week and went to normal supermarkets. We calculated how much bacon, beef, bread, butter, pasta, cereal, eggs, milk, cheese, fish, carrots, mushrooms, potatoes, tomatoes, apples, bananas, orange juice could be purchased with this average weekly wage. We then compared this data with data gathered using the same criteria in other countries." The idea being to establish which countries are easier/harder to live in. The figures I previously cited show that, though in the UK since Brexit prices may have increased in relation to wages. The same has happened in EU countries and the UK population has fared better by comparisons. The 'cost of living index, Europe' shows in 2016 the UK was the 6th most difficult country in Europe to live in and in 2023 the17th most difficult county in Europe to live in.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
No one suggested Brexit would present no initial trade difficulties or that, there would be an instant upturn in the UK economy. And of course covid is making normal economic activity impossible. The British people were fully aware the UK leaving the EU would not be a seamless transition. The Remain campaign had ample opportunity to inform the UK electorate of all its perceived economic negatives of Brexit. There was a UK Government leaflet posted to each home in the UK at a cost of £10m (over the fair spend rules) explaining the UK would be financially better off in the EU. Then there were the Remain supporting economic experts, the Governor of the Bank of England, President Obama, The Conservative Party, The Labour Party, The Liberal Democratic Party, The Green Party, The leaders of the EU 28, The UK Universities, UK Business organisations, Tony Blair, John Major, Richard Branson, the BBC, the Guardian, the Financial Times, ITV News, Sky News, Channel 4 News. All giving the UK electorate plenty of information before the vote. The people listened, reflected and weighed the evidence and then when the arguing was over and in the seclusion of the voting booth they chose freedom over fear. These are the people who will make Brexit a success.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
We need to set up a new political party with genuine pledges to the UK people:
1, The UK will become part of the united states of Europe.
2, The UK will become part of an EU army.
3, The UK will adopt the euro.
4, The UK will allow anyone from Europe to live and work in the UK.
5, The UK will have a new principal flag.
6, The UK will have 10% say in a controlling EU parliament.
7, The UK will pay £350 million each week to the EU.
8, The UK will allow the EU to decide UK trade policy.
9, The UK will be ruled by an unelected EU executive.
10, The UK allow anyone from Europe to use the NHS and claim UK benefits.
We should call our new party 'The United Kingdom In Party'.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ardakolimsky7107 This is why British are 'ex-pats': Former colonies of the British Empire: Afghanistan -1919 Antigua and Barbuda
Australia-1901 -1986 The Bahamas-1973 Bahrain-1971 Barbados-1966
Belize-1981 Botswana-1966 Brunei-1984 Canada-1867–1982-(From 1949 this included Newfoundland and Labrador). Cyprus-1960 Dominica-1978
Egypt-1922 Fiji-1970 The Gambia-1965 Ghana-1957 Grenada-1974
India-1947 Iraq-1932 (British Mandate) Jamaica-1962 Jordan-1946
Kenya-1963 Kiribati-1979 Kuwait-1961 Lesotho-1964 Malawi-1964 Malaysia-1957 Maldives-1965 Malta-1964 Mauritius-1968 Myanmar-(Burma) Nauru-1968 New Zealand-1907–1986 Nigeria-1960 Pakistan-1947 Qatar-1971 St lucia-1971 Saint Kitts and nevis-1983 St Vincent and the Grenadina lines-1979 Seychelles-1976 Sierra lione-1961 Soliman islands-1978 South Africa-1910–1961 Sri Lanka-1948 Sudan -1956 Swaziland-1968 Tanzania-1961 Tonga-1970 Trinidad and Tobago-1962 Tuvalu-1978 Uganda-1962 United Arab Emirates-1971 Vanuatu-1980 Yemen-1967 Zambia-1964 Zimbabwe-1980
United States-1776. Prior to the American Revolution the 13 colonies were governed separately, these were New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia.
Current British Territories Overseas: Anguilla, Bermuda, British Antarctic Territory, British Indian Ocean Territory, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, Gibraltar, Montserrat, Pitcairn Islands Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Island, Turks and Caicos Islands.
2
-
2
-
The British Empire did do some good things like build a few universities:
1592 - Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
1636 - Harvard University, USA
1693 - College of William & Mary, USA
1701 - Yale University, USA
1740 - University of Pennsylvania, USA
1742 - Moravian College, USA
1743 - University of Delaware, USA
1746 - Princeton University, USA
1749 - Augusta Academy and Liberty Hall (Washington and Lee University), USA
1754 - Columbia University, USA
1764 - Brown University, USA
1766 - Rutgers University, USA
1769 - Dartmouth College, USA
1770 - College of Charleston, USA
1772 - Salem College, USA
1773 - Dickinson College, USA
1775 - Hampden–Sydney College, USA
1784 - St. John's College (Annapolis/Santa Fe), USA
1785 - University of New Brunswick, Canada
1789 - University of King's College, Halifax, Canada
1794 - College of Engineering, Guindy, India
1802 - Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Canada
1813 - McGill University, Canada
1818 - Dalhousie University, Canada
1818 - Université de Saint-Boniface, Canada
1818 - Serampore College, India
1827 - University of Toronto, Canada
1827 - University of Sierra Leone
1829 - University of Cape Town, South Africa
1833 - Sydney Mechanics' School of Arts, Australia
1838 - Acadia University, Canada
1839 - Mount Allison University, Canada
1841 - Queen's University, Ontario, Canada
1841 - Dhaka College, Bangladesh
1845 - University College Cork, Ireland
1845 - NUI Galway, Ireland
1847 - Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
1850 - University of Sydney, Australia
1852 - Université Laval, Canada
1853 - University of Melbourne, Australia
1853 - Ajayi Crowther University, Nigeria
1856 - University of South Australia
1857 - University of Calcutta, India
1857 - University of Madras, India
1857 - University of Bombay, India
1857 - Presidency College of Madras, India
1860 - King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
1861 - Chittagong Cantonment Public College, Bangladesh
1864 - Stellenbosch University, South Africa
1864 - Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan
1864 - Forman Christian College, Lahore, Pakistan
1869 - University of Otago, New Zealand
1870 - Federation University Australia
1870 - University of Colombo, Sri Lanka
1873 - University of Canterbury, New Zealand
1873 - Mount Saint Vincent University, Canada
1873 - University of South Africa
1873 - Rajshahi College, Bangladesh
1873 - University of Allahabad, India
1874 - University of Adelaide, Australia
1878 - Sydney Technical College, Australia
1878 - Lincoln University, New Zealand
1878 - University of Yangon, Burma
1882 - University of the Punjab, Pakistan
1883 - University of Auckland, New Zealand
1886 - Bangalore University, India
1887 - Allahabad University, India
1887 - Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Australia
1890 - University of Tasmania, Australia
1893 - Maradana College of Technology, Sri Lanka
1896 - University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
1897 - Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
1902 - University of Khartoum, Sudan
1904 - University of the Free State, South Africa
1904 - Rhodes University, South Africa
1904 - University of Technology, Malaysia
1905 - University of Malaya
1905 - National University of Singapore
1908 - University of Pretoria, South Africa
1911 - University of Hong Kong
1911 - King George's Medical University, India
1914 - University of Mauritius
1916 - University of Fort Hare, South Africa
1917 - Patna University, India
1920 - University of Dacca, Bangladesh
1922 - University of Delhi, India
1922 - Makerere University, Uganda
1923 - Nagpur University, India.
1931 - College of Agriculture Malaya
1937 - Hong Kong Polytechnic University
1939 - Egerton University
1942 - University of Ceylon
1948 - University of Ibadan, Nigeria
1948 - University of Ghana
1948 - University of the West Indies
1948 - Technical University of Mombasa, Kenya
1952 - University of Zimbabwe
1956 - University of Nairobi, Kenya
1963 - Chinese University of Hong Kong
1984 - City University of Hong Kong
1991 - Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
2015 - University of Gibraltar
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mrmxyzptlk6042 Well, the act of consensual heterosexual sex is what makes every human exist, so this fact has to make it important on a level beyond casual recreation. Of course, there are great positives, as the act creates pleasure, contentment, individual people, family and society. However, there is harm which can arise from the act too. This could be human experiences like: unwanted pregnancy, regret, infidelity, divorce, relationship breakup, broken families, prostitution, sexual abuse, abortion, pornography, people not having or knowing parents, sexual disease. All of these things are harmful to individuals, family and society. We used to regulate the act of sex with 'marriage' and the 'consent' was needed of God and or society. Now we allow the woman to allow sex to occur with a man who is not her husband. It could be argued this is what's causing the 'harm' and that if each woman would just wait until marriage, there would be a lot less harm.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
There already is a border in Ireland - it separates different governments, different nationalities, different laws, different tax systems, different passports, different national flags, different heads of state, different police forces, different healthcare, different armed forces, different currencies..... What's not to get?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@megahedgehog8649 I'm not an expert, but I imagine the Civil Service is supposed to be non-partisan and implement policy decided and voted upon by MPs. If this were not the case the UK would not be a true democracy and be more like the EU in structure. Plainly, some civil servants advise on and assist with proposed legislative change, however, the wellspring of policy, must be the elected government with the elected MPs providing the necessary final 'checks and balances'. The ex civil servant in question, was voicing his own political opinions on a public platform, he was not drawing attention to any illegal or inappropriate activity - just complaining about government policy he did not agree with. He has a right to challenge his dismissal in the Employment Tribunal, however, I suspect he has been advised by his Union that, this would fail.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I only heard: "I, me, I, me, I, I, me, my, me, I, I, I, me, me, my, I, me, I, me, my, I, I, I, me, my, me, me, me...." "My nana was like me." Even reversing the cosmos to reflect self-importance...
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@denismorgan9742 Here's a few universities built by the English while they were doing all those other bad things in other countries like building schools. churches, hospitals, orphanages, roads, railways, water systems etc.
1592 - Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
1636 - Harvard University, USA
1693 - College of William & Mary, USA
1701 - Yale University, USA
1740 - University of Pennsylvania, USA
1742 - Moravian College, USA
1743 - University of Delaware, USA
1746 - Princeton University, USA
1749 - Augusta Academy and Liberty Hall (Washington and Lee University), USA
1754 - Columbia University, USA
1764 - Brown University, USA
1766 - Rutgers University, USA
1769 - Dartmouth College, USA
1770 - College of Charleston, USA
1772 - Salem College, USA
1773 - Dickinson College, USA
1775 - Hampden–Sydney College, USA
1784 - St. John's College (Annapolis/Santa Fe), USA
1785 - University of New Brunswick, Canada
1789 - University of King's College, Halifax, Canada
1794 - College of Engineering, Guindy, India
1802 - Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Canada
1813 - McGill University, Canada
1818 - Dalhousie University, Canada
1818 - Université de Saint-Boniface, Canada
1818 - Serampore College, India
1827 - University of Toronto, Canada
1827 - University of Sierra Leone
1829 - University of Cape Town, South Africa
1833 - Sydney Mechanics' School of Arts, Australia
1838 - Acadia University, Canada
1839 - Mount Allison University, Canada
1841 - Queen's University, Ontario, Canada
1841 - Dhaka College, Bangladesh
1845 - University College Cork, Ireland
1845 - NUI Galway, Ireland
1847 - Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
1850 - University of Sydney, Australia
1852 - Université Laval, Canada
1853 - University of Melbourne, Australia
1853 - Ajayi Crowther University, Nigeria
1856 - University of South Australia
1857 - University of Calcutta, India
1857 - University of Madras, India
1857 - University of Bombay, India
1857 - Presidency College of Madras, India
1860 - King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
1861 - Chittagong Cantonment Public College, Bangladesh
1864 - Stellenbosch University, South Africa
1864 - Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan
1864 - Forman Christian College, Lahore, Pakistan
1869 - University of Otago, New Zealand
1870 - Federation University Australia
1870 - University of Colombo, Sri Lanka
1873 - University of Canterbury, New Zealand
1873 - Mount Saint Vincent University, Canada
1873 - University of South Africa
1873 - Rajshahi College, Bangladesh
1873 - University of Allahabad, India
1874 - University of Adelaide, Australia
1878 - Sydney Technical College, Australia
1878 - Lincoln University, New Zealand
1878 - University of Yangon, Burma
1882 - University of the Punjab, Pakistan
1883 - University of Auckland, New Zealand
1886 - Bangalore University, India
1887 - Allahabad University, India
1887 - Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Australia
1890 - University of Tasmania, Australia
1893 - Maradana College of Technology, Sri Lanka
1896 - University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
1897 - Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
1902 - University of Khartoum, Sudan
1904 - University of the Free State, South Africa
1904 - Rhodes University, South Africa
1904 - University of Technology, Malaysia
1905 - University of Malaya
1905 - National University of Singapore
1908 - University of Pretoria, South Africa
1911 - University of Hong Kong
1911 - King George's Medical University, India
1914 - University of Mauritius
1916 - University of Fort Hare, South Africa
1917 - Patna University, India
1920 - University of Dacca, Bangladesh
1922 - University of Delhi, India
1922 - Makerere University, Uganda
1923 - Nagpur University, India.
1931 - College of Agriculture Malaya
1937 - Hong Kong Polytechnic University
1939 - Egerton University
1942 - University of Ceylon
1948 - University of Ibadan, Nigeria
1948 - University of Ghana
1948 - University of the West Indies
1948 - Technical University of Mombasa, Kenya
1952 - University of Zimbabwe
1956 - University of Nairobi, Kenya
1963 - Chinese University of Hong Kong
1984 - City University of Hong Kong
1991 - Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
2015 - University of Gibraltar
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The 2023 cost of living in EU countries like the Netherlands, France, Germany, Finland, Sweden, Portugal, Austria, Southern Ireland is higher than in the UK. When the UK voted to leave the EU in 2016, the UK cost of living was higher than the Netherlands, France, Germany, Finland, Sweden, Portugal, Austria, Southern Ireland.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The actuality, is that Heath, Wilson, Callaghan, Thatcher, Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron all selected and headed governments that worked towards a diminution of British sovereignty, when there was no evidence the British people ever wanted to surrender their right to self determination (be governed by foreigners). In my book, this makes them a bunch of traitors that acted against the interests of the British people, best represented by the Trade Unions.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
***** What exactly is 'least damage supposed to mean? As far as the voting system goes, I think it is highly probable that we will change to PR because people are seeing that the current system is not democratic.
The Telegraph has recently described the following 4 things as being “advantages” of the first past the post system (FPTP). I have provided some reasons why these so-called advantages are detrimental to the United Kingdom having a true democracy.
1) “It is easy to understand”... FPTP can appear simple, but only because its is not easily understood. For instance many people do not realise that if a person did not vote for the successful candidate their vote is automatically disregarded. Or that many of those who understand FPTP are put off voting because they believe their preferred candidate will not win and their vote will be disregarded. How many people are really aware that in each constituency every losing vote will count for nothing, along with every vote bar one in the winning candidate's majority.
2) “It can be quick to count the votes and declare a winner”... This is at best a moot point, as everyone knows that all voting systems require every vote to be counted. In any case it's hardly an issue if a better way to elect a five-year government takes a little longer to announce the results.
3) “Voters can express a clear view on which party they want in government”... This is true of every voting system with the exception of FPTP, this is because FPTP forces many to vote against a party they dislike and not for the party they would like to be in government. This is known as 'tactical voting' and is employed to reduce the possibility of a vote being disregarded and thus wasted.
4) “In a two-party system, it has normally produced a single-party government with a clear mandate to govern”... Firstly, we do not have a two-party system. Secondly, if the election method is not representative, then a 'clear mandate' actually constitutes unwarranted power. Under FPTP the 1997 General Election elected 418 Labour members of parliament (out of 650) for a 43% share of the national vote. In the 1980s FPTP delivered similarly unrepresentative majorities for the Conservative Party.
5) “It is a fair and democratic system”... No, the Telegraph didn't state this as being an advantage of FPTP - I added it for a joke!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So, you have stated and therefore presumingly believe that: "All MPs representing a particular party will have a party manifesto, which everyone should have read before they voted for a candidate."
Well, here's what the Conservative Party manifesto for the 1970 general election said Conservative MPs would do in relation to joining the EU (then European Economic Community) if they were to form the UK government:
"Our sole commitment is to negotiate; no more, no less. As the negotiations proceed we will report regularly through Parliament to the country." (1970 Conservative Party Manifesto)
As you will know, the Conservative Party won the 1970 general election and then in 1972, joined the UK to the EU (then EEC) which took effect from the beginning of1973. So, by your own stated belief that, everyone should read the party manifesto before voting for a candidate, You must accept that, 1), the people who voted for the Conservative Party in 1970, did so on a commitment that a Conservative government would not join the EU (then EEC) and thus that 2), the act of joining the UK to the EU (then EEC) in 1973, was wholly undemocratic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gerardjlaw The reality is the EU would do almost anything to get the UK back, but it's complicated. The UK is easily the most influential country on the planet. The UK's international role during the last few centuries has in many ways shaped the modern world. So plainly, the EU was damaged by Brexit - it was a blatant rejection and it severed the EU from UK's wealth, international connections and standing. If there was a referendum, the EU would be forced to stay out, it would not offer the UK special terms, as this would be seen as interference. As I say, the 'no' side would be free to claim the EU would be in the driving seat in any negotiations creating uncertainty, whereas, the 'yes' side would be unable to speak for the EU, unable to allay concerns. This would be just one of many advantages the 'no' side would hold.
1
-
1
-
@gerardjlaw The British Empire followed a natural and inevitable course, yes, there was some exploitation (What's old about that?) but, overall it was a story of development and collaboration, a 'family of nations' - still existing and loving cricket today. I'm not longing for empire, power or even influence. I was simply pointing out that, because of the UK's past influence in shaping the modern world and its wealth, Brexit was a humiliation and detriment for the EU. Like most people, I voted for Brexit because, I believe politicians voted into power by the UK people, should stick to making the UK the best it can be.
1
-
1
-
@gerardjlaw You appear to be assuming that, had we not joined the EEC/EU our standard of living would have declined even further - we cannot know this. If UK working class people were more content with their lot then Remain might have won. Politics is always about contrasting ideology and vision of the minority, there were those that really wanted in, and those that really wanted out, but most were/are not very interested. In the end the EU was expecting UK people to handover money, handover control, handover jobs, handover houses, handover medical care, handover education, handover fish and they could see no benefit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@paulmcmahon864 By 'other side' I mean the people living in Scotland that want to stay part of the United Kingdom. The wishes of these people must count too. You want to force these people out of their British nationality, their national flag, their monarchy, their rights to have MPs in Westminster, their British Pound, their National Health Service. You want to end 'Great Britain' which has existed as a country for more than 300 years and is known throughout the world as being a country with its own monarchy, armed forces, democratic parliament, national flag, legal system and the oldest currency in the world. You seem to have a selfish attitude that democracy is somehow only about you and what you want. And what about the other 60+ million people in Great Britain? I live as far away from Scotland as is possible (10 miles from Land's End), But, I believe Scotland is an area of Great Britain, just as England and Wales is an area of Great Britain... We just don't do 'tribes' in the modern world and the courts understand this.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't understand why the UK isn't backing down - the EU has repeatedly said time has run-out and this time it really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, does mean it....
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rowredround7206 You state: "We know it was a lie" but you cannot prove that assertion. The message contained the word: “instead” however it did not contain the word: ‘extra’ this is always added by Remainers as a straw man. The message contained a statement of fact: "We send the EU 350 million per week" and a suggestion: "let's fund the NHS instead". The statement of fact appears to be accurate, as the UK is obligated to send this amount to the EU (not contested by the UK Statistics Authority). Whilst it is true the EU currently rebates some and does use some for projects in the UK, this fact does not alter the validity of the original fact and this is particularly so, given the ‘fiscal independence’ context of the Brexit referendum. This first part of the bus message is therefore, not ‘false’ information. Now the 'suggestion'. A 'suggestion' cannot be a statement of 'fact' under any circumstances, so this part of the bus message cannot be adjudged to be 'false'. Also a 'suggestion' cannot be a 'promise' so there can be no expectation that the terms of a suggestion should be carried out by the person that made the suggestion or by a person that, concurred with the suggestion. So, the bus message is not a lie. In pure fiscal terms, the bus message was entirely accurate, as the saving would be always used to 'fund the NHS' for as long as NHS was state funded and expenditure exceeded 350 million per week. This is because all government spending comes from the same coffer; moreover, at that time, the government was borrowing more than this amount to meet its spending commitments. The only people complaining the NHS has not received this ‘extra’ money are people that, voted to keep sending it to the EU. An example of a message that is an actual lie, is the claim made repeatedly by the Remain supporting media and Remain activists that, "the EU funds the UK" in various ways. Of course, this is fiscally impossible, as the facts easily prove the UK has always funded the EU.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@quantumcomputation4963 Edward Heath signed the Treaty of Rome in January 1973 and the UK joined what was then called the Common Market. It was done on the basis of a commitment that we would retain our national sovereignty. Indeed, in June 1971, a leaflet had been sent to every home in the UK, promising that: “there is no question of Britain losing essential sovereignty”. Then, in a TV broadcast in January 1973, Edward Heath went even further saying: “There are some in this country who fear that, in going into Europe, we shall in some way sacrifice independence and sovereignty. These fears, I need hardly say, are completely unjustified.” Two years later, there was a referendum, on June 5, 1975, and the majority of voters supported the UK’s continued membership of the Common Market, now the European Union. But that vote was on the basis of assurances which were dishonest. Both Edward Heath and Harold Wilson knew that, in joining the Common Market they were ceding sovereignty and joining a political project with the end goal the creation of a federal united states of Europe. The preamble to the Treaty of Rome clearly stated that the objective was “ever-closer union”. From the release of government papers under the 30-year rule, we now know that both Labour and Conservative governments were briefed about the loss of national sovereignty. They were also warned the ultimate aim was political union across Europe. The loss of national sovereignty was confirmed by Judge Bruce Morgan on April 9, 2001. He said that, when the UK joined the Common Market parliament and the British people “quite voluntarily surrendered the once seemingly immortal concept of the sovereignty of parliament and legislative freedom”. So, when Remoaners talk about deception and misrepresentation in relation to Europe, the greatest deception of all was that it is just a ‘Common Market’ and ‘just about trade’ and not much more. That was the basis on which 67% of voters backed the European Community in 1975, but it was a lie.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@czarzenana5125 Some people tried to prove the '350 million' was a lie and failed: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jun/07/boris-johnson-wins-court-challenge-over-350m-brexit-claims
The message contained a statement of fact: "We send the EU 350 million per week" and a suggestion: "let's fund the NHS instead". The statement of fact appears to be accurate, as the UK does send this amount to the EU (confirmed by the UK Statistics Authority). Whilst, it is true that, the EU returns and uses some of this money for projects in the UK, this fact does not alter the validity of the original fact and this is particularly so, given the ‘fiscal independence’ context of the Brexit referendum. This first part of the bus message is therefore, not a lie. Now the 'suggestion'. A 'suggestion' or ‘proposal’ cannot be a statement of 'fact' under any circumstances, so this part of the bus message cannot be adjudged to be 'false'. Also a 'suggestion' cannot be a 'promise' so there can be no expectation that the terms of a referendum suggestion should be carried out by the person that made the suggestion or by a person that, concurred with the suggestion when there has been no opportunity to do so. So the bus message is not a lie. In pure fiscal terms, the bus message was entirely accurate, as the saving would be always used to 'fund the NHS' for as long as NHS was state funded and expenditure exceeded 350 million per week. This is because all government spending comes from the same coffer; moreover, the government was borrowing more than this amount to meet its spending commitments. The referendum was not a general election, the Leave supporting MPs were not going to form a government and the public fully understood this. Indeed, the only people complaining the NHS has not received this ‘extra’ money are people that, voted to keep sending it to the EU. An example of a message that is an actual lie, is the claim made repeatedly by the Remain supporting media and Remain activists that, 'the EU funds the UK' in various ways. Of course, this is fiscally impossible, as the facts easily prove the UK has always funded the EU.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@seamusoflatcap “Shepherd would not be guilty of manslaughter because it would not be a reasonable assumption to say he would be aware of any faults.” So here you clearly state Shepherd is guilty solely on the basis of knowledge of faults. Yet, there is no evidence these faults have caused the boat to tip over and the court did not find so. In reality, a speedboat comprises an engine and steering mechanism if these components are faulty the speedboat cannot be operated. I doubt there is evidence to show he believed the speedboat to be mechanically unsafe.
“He then knowingly let an inexperienced drunk woman take control of the boat. A boat that he knew to be faulty.” There is no legal requirement to have experience to drive a speedboat and he was supervising her driving. It seems they were both drunk.
“A faulty boat that he drove at more than twice the speed limit.” So, Do you mean a very 'functional' ‘faulty' boat? The court accepted evidence that, he was not driving at the time of the accident.
“There is evidence that Shepherd was driving the boat too fast.” The court accepted evidence that, he was not driving at the time of the accident.
“witnesses from Lambeth Fire River service, footage from Charlotte's mobile as he was driving and not her.” The court accepted evidence that he was not driving at the time of the accident.
“There is, incidentally, a witness who claims she saw Shepherd driving the boat alone, "chugging along" and peering into the water, it then veered to the bank and crashed.” The court accepted evidence that he was not driving at the time of the accident.
“Charlotte's mother has previously claimed that the crash was deliberately done by Shepherd covering up her daughter's death.” She was not a witness to the scene and cannot give such evidence. The court accepted evidence that he was not driving at the time of the accident.
“I dismissed it as her grief taking over but, with this other witness, it begs a question : did Shepherd lie when he said Charlotte was driving at the time of the crash?” The court accepted evidence that he was not driving at the time of the accident.
We're going around in circles here with me repeating the same points over and over again yet you don't seem to grasp them.” You are the one going around in circles – even making wild assertions that you cannot prove.
“This is the second strange scenario you've come up with. You say you've never said that you believe Shepherd to be innocent, yet you ignore every piece of known evidence that points to his guilt, you ignore the decision of the jury to find him guilty, you believe his unsubstantiated claim that Charlotte was driving, and you believe he has no responsibility for the safety of his passenger. You are wilfully ignorant.”
I have introduced scenarios to demonstrate why I believe the law has been applied wrongly. It is you that is incapable of understanding this. I have not ignored any evidence - you have introduced supposition. I have said I believe he is not innocent, but I do not believe he is guilty of manslaughter. A High Court Judge has allowed an appeal of the original conviction based on the law being wrongly applied - I would assume that, a person does not become a High Court Judge without knowing something about the law.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bryangeake5826 And so is your point about racists voting Leave irrelevant - I merely demonstrated that fact to you. Your attitude reveals an inner belief that, you can do things, but others cannot do the same things. Which is why you have this bee in your bonnet over Brexit - you just cannot stand it that, other people can think and vote and bring about democratic change that is different to your own political wants; that, only you should be able to achieve. You think you are the only one whose opinions should matter. You think your opinions are right and and all contrary opinion is wrong (or irrelevant) by very definition of being opposite to your own 'more important' opinion. In your mind's eye 17.4 million people are thick, racist, and irrelevant. I was ten years old when the UK was joined without referendum the EEC - I didn't like then and I never liked it - like others, I believed it was not the natural destiny of the British people - I could see it was a top-down imposition by an out-of-touch, greedy, selfish, uncaring anti-UK minority. I remember being disappointed with my parents for voting to stay in the EEC. The difference between me and you is, I accepted democracy, because I knew it was better than no democracy. Because no democracy would mean being controlled by people like you who believed anyone with opposing beliefs and ideas was simply 'irrelevant'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bryangeake5826 I don't know about all this race stuff - I have lived a while and I haven't seen any evidence the English are racist. Yes, there's a inescapable perceptible difference between people,of different race and this will flag up in various ways, but the same can be said about being tall or speaking with an accent or having red hair. There's no real harm meant in this. English white people don't consider themselves better than black or brown people and our history demonstrates this. Both my Grandfathers were career soldiers of Empire each serving five years in India, Iraq and elsewhere. My father was a career Fleet Air Arm serving in Ceylon and elsewhere. I only heard stories of affection and admiration for the people of these places. The British were never like other European countries with empires, history shows the British had respect for diverse custom and culture (OK we drew a line at throwing widows on their husband's funeral pyres). You just have to look at the White Rose Letters published in WW2 by German students which pointed out The British do not act this way against civilians Of course the German authorities quickly silenced the students under the guillotine. Or, let's look at Leroy Henry, a US GI stationed in England in 1944. A white English woman accused him of rape and the US Army court sentenced him to hang. The local English (you would call unconscious racists) began a petition, because it seemed the woman was a prostitute who had taken payment and consented to sex before making a false allegation. The petition raised 33000 signatures (before internet) and the US Army was forced to release Leroy without blemish to his record. The same year (1944) in USA they sat a 14 year old black boy (George Stinney) on a Bible on the electric chair and threw the switch while he pleaded his innocence. No we are not racist - people like you are more racist, because your superior attitude makes you bang on and on and on and on and on and on about how you think people who were not born looking like you need your help and approval to exist and you really do this, because it makes you feel good about yourself. I bet right now you support the killing of Russian soldiers because you don't like ethnic Russians voting for independence from the EU. I bet you support the pro-EU Ukraine government ban on the Russian language in education, on TV and in employment. You are so anti-racist you support the persecution of 9 million ethnic Russians.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Remoaners like Channel 4 'News' always harp on about how Leave would have wanted a second referendum based on Nigel Farage saying something like, a narrow win for Remain would be 'unfinished business'. However, they are knowingly comparing two very different things here. Nigel Farage was then leader of a political party that had long campaigned for Brexit, so, in those circumstances there would be no democratic incongruity for that campaign to continue. On the other hand, parliament had voted almost unanimously to hand the decision as to whether the UK should remain a member of the EU directly and very democratically to the electorate. The government had asked the electorate to vote Remain, but promised to carry out the final decision. This is how prominent Remain supporter, Lord Paddy Ashdown described the vital importance of democracy whilst the votes were being counted: “Here’s the single point: Those that asked for this and I was the first leader ever to ask for a referendum way back in 89/90, have said so because they believe it to be an act of democracy. I will forgive no one who does not accept the sovereign voice of the British people once it has spoken. Whether it’s by 1% or 20%, once they’ve taken it, it is our duty, as those who serve the public to make the best use and to make sure that our country does the best it can with the decision the people have given us. I’ve heard Mr Farage say tonight: ‘We’re coming back even if we lose’. Excuse me! He’s the person that complained about lack of democracy in Europe! If he will not accept the sovereign voice of the British people, whatever they say, then I think he does not have the national interest at heart.” (Lord Paddy Ashdown 24 June 2016)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If you are born into the Royal Family there is an understanding, if you will not do the role, you go away, keep your head down and stay quiet. Harry and Meghan are openly challenging the UK Government and Monarch as to what that role should be, which is absurd and perverse. It appears born out of the worst of human nature and makes for a very ugly spectacle. The narcissism, entitlement, malice, resentment, disloyalty, complete absence of decorum, is astounding. I don't see any way out of this hole they're busy digging themselves into - it appears they will not like the increasing shade and isolation and this will cause them to dig even deeper.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I would love there to be a second referendum on the following question: 'On 23 June 2016 the people of the United Kingdom voted to Leave the European Union was this the correct decision? Mark X in box 'YES' or 'NO'. I honestly think 'YES' would get more than 70%. There's a thing called the 'status quo bias' that causes people to vote against change even if they believe that change would be right, this is exacerbated by fear and risk (ring any bells?). Also, many people just assumed Remain would win and voted to be on the winning side. The big noises of the Remain camp 'Cameron, Osborne, Major, Blair, Clegg, Branson, Adonis, Geldoff, Izzard, Miliband' all just look like yesterday's losers. The Brexiteers are victorious and will cry 'establishment against the people'. Also, 'Project Fear' has been shown to be a load of bollocks with Remainer MPs admitting so. Also, if another pro EU MP was murdered by 'Britain first' a few days before the vote it would look a bit suspicious. And as for 'young people' - they will vote when they've tidied their bedroom and finished their homework ;o) So just give it up! The British people never wanted to be a part of a united states of Europe and the ruse has failed spectacularly!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@undogmatisch5873 I cannot deal with all of that on here. The first point is easy as the then prime minister confirmed that, voting leave would mean voting to leave the single market and customs union. The second point is more complex, but easy when understood. The message contained a statement of fact: "We send the EU 350 million per week" and a suggestion: "let's fund the NHS instead". The statement of fact appears to be accurate, as the UK does send this amount to the EU (confirmed by the UK Statistics Authority). Whilst, it is true that, the EU returns and uses some of this money for projects in the UK, this fact does not alter the validity of the original fact and this is particularly so, given the context of the 'Brexit' referendum. This first part of the bus message is therefore, not a lie. Now the 'suggestion'. A 'suggestion' or ‘proposal’ cannot be a statement of 'fact' under any circumstances, so this part of the bus message cannot be adjudged to be 'false'. Also a 'suggestion' cannot be a 'promise' so there can be no expectation that the terms of a suggestion should be carried out by the person that made the suggestion or by a person that, concurred with the suggestion. So this part of the bus message is not a lie. In pure fiscal terms, the bus message was entirely accurate, as the saving would be always used to 'fund the NHS' for as long as NHS was state funded and expenditure exceeded 350 million per week. This is because all government spending comes from the same coffer; moreover, the government currently borrows more than this amount to meet its spending commitments. The referendum was not a general election, the Leave supporting MPs were not going to form a government and the public fully understood this. Indeed, the only people complaining the NHS has not received this money are people that, voted to keep sending it to the EU. An example of a message that is an actual lie, is the claim made repeatedly by the Remain supporting media and Remain activists that, 'the EU funds the UK' in various ways. Of course, this is fiscally impossible, as the facts easily prove the UK has always funded the EU. The Remainers, 'news' media and the letter from the UK Statistics Authority have used the word "extra"in order to challenge the bus message. This is deliberately misleading, as the bus message did not say 'extra' it actually said "instead" which is materially different in meaning to "extra". So the bus message was really saying: 'If we don't give our money to the EU we will have this extra money to fund our NHS'. This is not the same as saying: 'We will give the NHS extra money' it is clearly saying: 'We will have extra money to fund the NHS'. As I stated earlier the UK currently borrows more than £350m per week, so this extra money will be very useful in ensuring adequate funding of the NHS is sustainable. I have explained this in as simple a way possible. Of course, it is not helpful when the Remain side have lied so much.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stephenconway2468
Data Collection and Processing Techniques
Numbeo's data collection process involves a combination of user-generated input and manually gathered information from reputable sources such as supermarket and taxi company websites, and governmental institutions. The manually collected data from each source are entered twice yearly and given a weight that is three times higher than user-generated input to improve the reliability of the data.
Numbeo performs both automatic and semi-automatic filters (algorithms) to reduce noise in the collected data.
Numbeo restricts entries from specific IP addresses that are identified as spammers, including public proxies and Tor nodes.
Some of our automatic filters use a combination of user behavior and previous data for the specific city/country to identify the likelihood of a certain input being spam. Currently, Numbeo uses more than 30 sophisticated filters to ensure data accuracy and integrity. The efficacy of each filter is enhanced as more inputs are included.
Numbeo's advanced filters are designed to eliminate bias in the algorithm development process. For instance, one filter examines previously discarded data (classified as spam) and reintegrates it into the calculation if it finds that a significant subset of this data is statistically relevant. Another algorithm used to identify irregular spam data works as follows: if a single item in a city has a high number of data classified as spam, and those data have a relatively small standard deviation from users who are not classified as spammers, it suggests that these data are probably misclassified, and the algorithm corrects the classification accordingly. These filters are crucial to ensure data accuracy and objectivity.
Numbeo's filtering and algorithmic technology is complex and proprietary, which limits our ability to discuss other methods in detail. In summary, Numbeo utilizes heuristic technology to maintain data quality, and regularly removes statistically improbable or incorrect data using existing data as a benchmark.
Numbeo archives the values of its old data for historical purposes. By default, data older than 12 months is removed, but for popular cities, this time frame can be reduced to 3 months. If fresh data are not available, Numbeo may use data up to 18 months old, but only if our indicators suggest that inflation is low in that country.
Numbeo collects and uses feedback from users to improve the methodology and data quality.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rocketscience4516 I didn't say the cost of the leaflet was 'the most important thing'. You said I said that and that I had somehow contradicted myself. When it comes to the economy, no one knows what the future will be. That leaflet that you say I should have paid attention to also said this: "It’s a big decision. One that
will affect you, your family and your children for decades to come." So, it was right to look at the long-term. Leave voters did not expect an immediate upturn in the UK economy - we all believed that big changes would take time to come together. The point is Leave provided an honest vision. Whereas, Remain just said 'We are the economic experts, we will not have the euro, there's no EU army, we don't want a federal Europe, do what we say or you will have no planes, no medicine, no food, higher taxes.' And they wonder why they lost! As for referendums; the pro-EU lot did not want a referendum on joining the EEC/EU, did not want the 1975 referendum on continued membership, did not want a referendum on joining the EU and did not want the 2016 referendum on continued membership... Then when they did not like democracy they wanted a referendum.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
+vordman What you fail to understand (or choose to overlook) is that all people are not all equal in terms of employability. Employers often seek young, strong, healthy workers, as these will be more productive. The EU has provided UK employers with an anomalous supply of young, strong, healthy workers and this has had a 'knock on effect' throughout the UK workforce, the upshot being that, less young, less strong, less healthy UK citizens find it impossible to compete for low skill jobs. So, your 'proof' that young, strong, healthy Eastern Europeans working in the UK somehow demonstrates that, UK unemployed are 'idle', is entirely erroneous.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cjreeve79 Your comment is an exercise in sophistry: "No, only a fool would not listen to expert opinion."......Yes, but not on the future, as no one is an expert on what has not happened.... "The whole point of the open trading block, that is the EU, makes us better off." .... What is meant by 'better off' and who will be better off and in what way according to your experts that you claim can see into the future?....."The whole point of the membership fee is to mitigate any exception." This doesn't mean anything. Trade can be free or tariff based as per agreement there is no requirement to be a member of a political federation to trade..... "I don't know about you but I spend most of the money I earn as will other EU workers." ....Here you conflate UK nationals with EU27 nationals and muddle facts. I did not say EU27 workers living in the UK do not spend money, I said they spend much of it in the EU27 at a loss to the UK economy..... "The key advantage of allowing free movement in the EU is that the most resourceful educated people come to work.".... This might benefit employers, but it does not benefit the million+ UK unemployed and underemployed that have to compete for employment, wages and housing...... "We get hard workers for very little training. Lucky us! How do the countries that trained these people benefit? This boosts the economy, which in tern creates more jobs." That should be 'turn' as a 'tern' is a sea bird. It might boost the economy if you ignore the cost of paying UK nationals to rot on the scrapheap in their charity shop interview suits..... "Yes, there are opportunities to be had outside of the EU but they are unlikely to match the benefits of being part of the club."...... Again more supposition that is politically motivated. Have you ever heard a politician saying their policies will make you 'better off'? Well, intelligent people gave up believing empty promises long ago. Oh, and how exactly are we 'better off paying' EU enforced VAT - when in the USA (that trades on tariffs) people pay purchase tax between 2.9% and 7.25%?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We need to set up a new political party with genuine pledges to the UK people:
1, The UK will become part of the united states of Europe.
2, The UK will become part of an EU army.
3, The UK will adopt the euro.
4, The UK will allow anyone from Europe to live and work in the UK.
5, The UK will have a new principal flag.
6, The UK will have 10% say in a controlling EU parliament.
7, The UK will pay £350 million each week to the EU.
8, The UK will allow the EU to decide UK trade policy.
9, The UK will be ruled by an unelected EU executive.
10, The UK allow anyone from Europe to use the NHS and claim UK benefits.
We should call our new party 'The United Kingdom In Party'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The problem is caused by women assuming a right to have sex with a man who is not her husband. Sex has many downsides with resulting harm being caused to the individual, family and society. Examples could be; abortion, infidelity, sexual abuse, prostitution, pornography, underage sex, promiscuity, relationship break-up, divorce, broken families, kids without fathers, sexual disease - all kinds of harm from sex visited upon our lives. 'Marriage' used to be the popular way of reducing harm from sexual behavior. We regulate speech because it can cause harm to others, but we are being indoctrinated to see regulating sexual intercourse (which is far more visceral human interaction and makes every one of us exist), as being wrong.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We have a pro-EU establishment majority House of Lords, majority House of Commons, Civil Service, UK universities, Church of England, UK police, BBC, ITV, Sky, C4 all working with the EU against Brexit and trying to get Labour into power. Probably, most Tory MPs are in on on too...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Shakwackla Sorry to disappoint, but neither Scotland or Northern Ireland were ever members of the European Union, so neither could as you suggest 'vote to remain'. The United Kingdom was a member of the European Union and all the United Kingdom voted and the majority was for Leave. As I said, it was the Leave votes from Scotland and Northern Ireland that gave Nigel and Boris the required number of votes to win. It's not 'spin' - it's *FACT*. The protocol works for some and not for others - time will tell which side succeeds. As for unification, we heard all this bluster from the English haters in Scotland and that turned out to be a damp squib. It's more difficult than you think to persuade people to reject their own country, monarchy currency, state pension, free NHS healthcare, welfare benefits, national flag, police force, armed forces, passport and more. Good day to you too, sir.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Martyntd5 I believe the quote was Nigel Farage saying something like, a narrow win for Remain would be 'unfinished business'. However, you (as others have) are comparing two very different things here. Nigel Farage was then leader of a political party that had long campaigned for Brexit, so, in those circumstances there would be no democratic incongruity for that campaign to continue. On the other hand, parliament had voted almost unanimously to hand the decision as to whether the UK should remain a member of the EU directly and very democratically to the electorate. The government had asked the electorate to vote Remain, but promised to carry out the final decision. This is how prominent Remain supporter, Lord Paddy Ashdown described the vital importance of democracy and deliberately distorted the distinction between Farage's political campaign and parliament, whilst the votes were being counted:
“Here’s the single point: Those that asked for this and I was the first leader ever to ask for a referendum way back in 89/90, have said so because they believe it to be an act of democracy. I will forgive no one who does not accept the sovereign voice of the British people once it has spoken. Whether it’s by 1% or 20%, once they’ve taken it, it is our duty, as those who serve the public to make the best use and to make sure that our country does the best it can with the decision the people have given us. I’ve heard Mr Farage say tonight: ‘We’re coming back even if we lose’. Excuse me! He’s the person that complained about lack of democracy in Europe! If he will not accept the sovereign voice of the British people, whatever they say, then I think he does not have the national interest at heart.” (Lord Paddy Ashdown 24 June 2016)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What? How do you think anyone is going to 'force' the removal of NI from the UK? The only way NI is leaving the UK is if the UK government allows a referendum and that referendum results in a majority vote to leave the UK. In reality, persuading 50+% to vote to give up their national identity, benefits, free healthcare, pensions, currency, national flag, national anthem, passport, monarchy, legal system, education system, UK armed forces, Commonwealth membership - is going to be more difficult than you might think.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@user-yl9wg6mx9h
We need to set up a new political party with genuine pledges to the UK people:
1, The UK will become part of the united states of Europe.
2, The UK will become part of an EU army.
3, The UK will adopt the euro.
4, The UK will allow anyone from Europe to live and work in the UK.
5, The UK will have a new principal flag.
6, The UK will have 10% say in a controlling EU parliament.
7, The UK will pay £350 million each week to the EU.
8, The UK will allow the EU to decide UK trade policy.
9, The UK will be ruled by an unelected EU executive.
10, The UK will allow anyone from Europe to use the NHS and claim UK benefits.
We should call our new party 'The United Kingdom In Party'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@random6809 Well, thank you for pointing out people drown in rivers and canals - I never knew that. Perhaps, spending 20 years working on deep sea fishing trawlers shielded me from the realities of water danger. Yes, it happens, but 99% of these people are not fit, they are not alert, and they are not competent swimmers - and there are contributing factors, such as, extreme temperature, rapid body temperature fluctuation, deep water, no practical means of escape, severe muscle cramp, heart failure, panic. Were are told this woman is physically fit, a strong swimmer and was in normal conversation with work colleagues. The water was shallow near to the bank and the river bed provided stable footing and easy egress to the bank. If she had slipped into the water and was conscious it seems absurd she would get herself into deep water and absurd that, if she did she would not be able to get back to shallow water. Of course, it's possible she was attacked and drowned as a result, but we're not discussing that right now. The police have followed a highly improbable theory and ruled out much more likely scenarios. Now, stop being such an irksome twit - you don't get to 'spell' anything out to me - I'd transport you into the middle of next week - just for tying!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@YanksandBritsProductions Only Remainers are saying those things it's known 'project fear' propaganda. The message on the bus contained a statement of fact: "We send the EU 350 million per week" and a suggestion: "let's fund the NHS instead". The statement of fact appears to be accurate, as the UK does send this amount to the EU (confirmed by the UK Statistics Authority). Whilst, it is true that, the EU returns and uses some of this money for projects in the UK, this fact does not alter the validity of the original fact and this is particularly so, given the context of the 'Brexit' referendum. This first part of the bus message is therefore, not a lie. Now the 'suggestion'. A 'suggestion' or ‘proposal’ cannot be a statement of 'fact' under any circumstances, so this part of the bus message cannot be adjudged to be 'false'. Also a 'suggestion' cannot be a 'promise' so there can be no expectation that the terms of a suggestion should be carried out by the person that made the suggestion or by a person that, concurred with the suggestion. So this part of the bus message is not a lie. In pure fiscal terms, the bus message was entirely accurate, as the saving would be always used to 'fund the NHS' for as long as NHS was state funded and expenditure exceeded 350 million per week. This is because all government spending comes from the same coffer; moreover, the government currently borrows more than this amount to meet its spending commitments. The referendum was not a general election, the Leave supporting MPs were not going to form a government and the public fully understood this. Indeed, the only people complaining the NHS has not received this money are people that, voted to keep sending it to the EU. An example of a message that is an actual lie, is the claim made repeatedly by the Remain supporting media and Remain activists that, 'the EU funds the UK' in various ways. Of course, this is fiscally impossible, as the facts easily prove the UK has always funded the EU.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is why British are 'ex-pats': Former colonies of the British Empire: Afghanistan -1919 Antigua and Barbuda
Australia-1901 -1986 The Bahamas-1973 Bahrain-1971 Barbados-1966
Belize-1981 Botswana-1966 Brunei-1984 Canada-1867–1982-(From 1949 this included Newfoundland and Labrador). Cyprus-1960 Dominica-1978
Egypt-1922 Fiji-1970 The Gambia-1965 Ghana-1957 Grenada-1974
India-1947 Iraq-1932 (British Mandate) Jamaica-1962 Jordan-1946
Kenya-1963 Kiribati-1979 Kuwait-1961 Lesotho-1964 Malawi-1964 Malaysia-1957 Maldives-1965 Malta-1964 Mauritius-1968 Myanmar-(Burma) Nauru-1968 New Zealand-1907–1986 Nigeria-1960 Pakistan-1947 Qatar-1971 St lucia-1971 Saint Kitts and nevis-1983 St Vincent and the Grenadina lines-1979 Seychelles-1976 Sierra lione-1961 Soliman islands-1978 South Africa-1910–1961 Sri Lanka-1948 Sudan -1956 Swaziland-1968 Tanzania-1961 Tonga-1970 Trinidad and Tobago-1962 Tuvalu-1978 Uganda-1962 United Arab Emirates-1971 Vanuatu-1980 Yemen-1967 Zambia-1964 Zimbabwe-1980
United States-1776. Prior to the American Revolution the 13 colonies were governed separately, these were New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia.
Current British Territories Overseas: Anguilla, Bermuda, British Antarctic Territory, British Indian Ocean Territory, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, Gibraltar, Montserrat, Pitcairn Islands Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Island, Turks and Caicos Islands.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@annaholley8913 Yes, but the point I am making is modern container ships are a very cost effective way of moving goods around the globe. They might take a couple of weeks to arrive but, in practice this is not a hold-up because goods are ordered in advance to replenish stock. The UK having an empire is old news. I think it was mostly a good thing at the time, encouraging, education, medicine, employment, wealth, trade, infrastructure, law, justice, democracy - but we have all modernised and these days we no longer do that sort of thing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Children get different food and kick-off all the time, William was bigger then and needed more calories - that is no big-deal. But, Harry is a grown man moaning about not having big enough accommodation in palaces (these places have pictures on the walls worth more than ordinary houses). Has Harry ever had to think about food bills, paying rent, putting the heating on? No! He doesn't even want to work - he just wants to live the high-life by inheritance, leeching off his kind father and betraying his family and country for money. Harry must see how ordinary people have to live, but he clearly believes he should have so much more, because in his drug addled, conceited, arrogant mind, he is so much better than ordinary people.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We need to set up a new political party with genuine pledges to the UK people:
1, The UK will become part of the united states of Europe.
2, The UK will become part of an EU army.
3, The UK will adopt the euro.
4, The UK will allow anyone from Europe to live and work in the UK.
5, The UK will have a new principal flag.
6, The UK will have 10% say in a controlling EU parliament.
7, The UK will pay £350 million each week to the EU.
8, The UK will allow the EU to decide UK trade policy.
9, The UK will be ruled by an unelected EU executive.
10, The UK allow anyone from Europe to use the NHS and claim UK benefits.
We should call our new party 'The United Kingdom In Party'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The facts show that sex outside of marriage results in harm to individuals, family and society. Infidelity, relationship break-up, divorce, broken families, children not knowing parents, abandoned mothers, unwanted pregnancy, abortion, underage sex, sexual abuse, sex regret, pornography, sexual disease, prostitution. All human experiences which bring harm to individuals, family and society and are caused by sex outside of marriage. If we use as criteria for acceptable behaviour - not causing harm to self and others; then we must ask what right can an individual have to consent to an act which will inevitably or even possibly cause harm to self and others? Is it acceptable behavour to consent to to pulling the bung on a passenger ship? We acknowledge this harm, because we protect young people by not allowing them to consent, but we cannot say how the harm goes away the day a person comes of age. This is why we cannot consent to a fun act, because it's not just a fun act, it's the way we all come into existence which makes it very serious.
And this is why we require the consent of God and His Consent is called 'marriage'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We have a song in England:
🎵Run rabbit, run rabbit, run, run, run
Run rabbit, run rabbit, run, run, run
Bang, bang, bang, bang goes the farmer's gun
Run rabbit, run rabbit, run, run, run, run🎵
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stephenconway2468 You still presume regulating trade across the internal border breaks the GFA, when it cannot, because the GFA does not say anything about trade across the internal border. If the ROI or UK leaving the single market/customs union was seen as a potential issue, then this would have been mentioned at the time - it was not mentioned. You casually mention 'security installations' as though these had something to do with trade - they did not - they were security installations not border checkpoints - they did not deal with customs, passports, visas, immigration. You casually mention 'keeping the border open' as though this has something to do with the GFA or EU - it doesn't - it has to do with the CTA since the 1920s. There is no 'limits' - NI is part of the UK with UK currency, UK laws, UK King, UK tax, UK flag, UK national anthem, UK language, UK Police, UK everything! A separate country to ROI and separate countries regulate mutual trade across borders. Now do you get it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Gph0367 The 2023 cost of living in EU countries like the Netherlands, France, Germany, Finland, Sweden, Portugal, Austria, Southern Ireland is higher than in the UK. When the UK voted to leave the EU in 2016, the UK cost of living was higher than the Netherlands, France, Germany, Finland, Sweden, Portugal, Austria, Southern Ireland.
I think experts agree the covid pandemic and war in Russia has caused a worldwide cost of living crisis. I have just returned from Australia where there is a cost of living crisis (presumably not caused by Brexit). All countries in Europe have seen living costs rise, but when the knowable earnings and essential cost facts are compared, we see that, between voting to leave the EU in 2016 and 2023, the UK has moved from 6th hardest country in Europe to eke out a living to 17th hardest country in Europe to eke out a living.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@pudpullertm All of those things you mention are valid reasons to vote to leave the EU. I cannot deal with each here, however, I will explain why your first assertion (that the message on the Leave bus was a lie) is not true. The message contained a statement of fact: "We send the EU 350 million per week" and a suggestion: "let's fund the NHS instead". The statement of fact appears to be accurate, as the UK does send this amount to the EU (confirmed by the UK Statistics Authority). Whilst, it is true that, the EU returns and uses some of this money for projects in the UK, this fact does not alter the validity of the original fact and this is particularly so, given the context of the 'Brexit' referendum. This first part of the bus message is therefore, not a lie. Now the 'suggestion'. A 'suggestion' or ‘proposal’ cannot be a statement of 'fact' under any circumstances, so this part of the bus message cannot be adjudged to be 'false'. Also a 'suggestion' cannot be a 'promise' so there can be no expectation that the terms of a suggestion should be carried out by the person that made the suggestion or by a person that, concurred with the suggestion. So this part of the bus message is not a lie. In pure fiscal terms, the bus message was entirely accurate, as the saving would be always used to 'fund the NHS' for as long as NHS was state funded and expenditure exceeded 350 million per week. This is because all government spending comes from the same coffer; moreover, the government currently borrows more than this amount to meet its spending commitments. The referendum was not a general election, the Leave supporting MPs were not going to form a government and the public fully understood this. Indeed, the only people complaining the NHS has not received this money are people that, voted to keep sending it to the EU. An example of a message that is an actual lie, is the claim made repeatedly by the Remain supporting media and Remain activists that, 'the EU funds the UK' in various ways. Of course, this is fiscally impossible, as the facts prove the UK has always funded the EU.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fundorgon Printing a false statement in capital letters does not make it true. The message on the bus contained a statement of fact: "We send the EU 350 million per week" and a suggestion: "let's fund the NHS instead". The statement of fact appears to be accurate, as the UK does send this amount to the EU (confirmed by the UK Statistics Authority). Whilst, it is true that, the EU returns and uses some of this money for projects in the UK, this fact does not alter the validity of the original fact and this is particularly so, given the ‘fiscal independence’ context of the Brexit referendum. This first part of the bus message is therefore, not a lie. Now the 'suggestion'. A 'suggestion' or ‘proposal’ cannot be a statement of 'fact' under any circumstances, so this part of the bus message cannot be adjudged to be 'false'. Also a 'suggestion' cannot be a 'promise' so there can be no expectation that the terms of a referendum suggestion should be carried out by the person that made the suggestion or by a person that, concurred with the suggestion when there has been no opportunity to do so. So the bus message is not a lie. In pure fiscal terms, the bus message was entirely accurate, as the saving would be always used to 'fund the NHS' for as long as NHS was state funded and expenditure exceeded 350 million per week. This is because all government spending comes from the same coffer; moreover, the government was borrowing more than this amount to meet its spending commitments. The referendum was not a general election, the Leave supporting MPs were not going to form a government and the public fully understood this. Indeed, the only people complaining the NHS has not received this money are people that, voted to keep sending it to the EU. An example of a message that is an actual lie, is the claim made repeatedly by the Remain supporting media and Remain activists that, 'the EU funds the UK' in various ways. Of course, this is fiscally impossible, as the facts easily prove the UK has always funded the EU.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We need to set up a new political party with genuine pledges to the UK people:
1, The UK will become part of the united states of Europe.
2, The UK will become part of an EU army.
3, The UK will adopt the euro.
4, The UK will allow anyone from Europe to live and work in the UK.
5, The UK will have a new principal flag.
6, The UK will have 10% say in a controlling EU parliament.
7, The UK will pay £350 million each week to the EU.
8, The UK will allow the EU to decide UK trade policy.
9, The UK will be ruled by an unelected EU executive.
10, The UK allow anyone from Europe to use the NHS and claim UK benefits.
We should call our new party 'The United Kingdom In Party'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
All this kerfuffle about 'Brexit leading to the break-up of the UK' is nothing but propaganda. It was started after the Brexit referendum when the pro-EU side got its ducks in a row and began trying to change enough minds for a second referendum. Patriotic types had voted Brexit and they knew these types would not want the UK to break-up. The propaganda campaign failed, the pro-EU MPs were told the research indicated a second referendum would kill-off their cause and this is why there was no second referendum to stop or soften Brexit. Had they believed they could win - they would have voted for a second referendum. Remember the pre-Brexit propaganda: 'The UK will break-up', 'there will be a return to IRA violence', 'Brexit breaks the GFA', people who support Brexit are thick', 'people who support Brexit are racist', 'only JRM supporters want Brexit', 'the Leave side broke the rules', 'the Leave side lied', Brexit will cause mass unemployment', 'Brexit will mean no food', Brexit will mean no planes can take off' Brexit will mean no medicines', 'Brexit will bla! bla! bla! Just think about it - is the UK being in the EU going to make Scotland leaving the UK easier or harder? If Scotland didn't want to leave the UK in 2014 - then Scotland really doesn't want to the UK leave post Brexit...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@acousticguitarcrazy6385 The 2023 cost of living in EU countries like the Netherlands, France, Germany, Finland, Sweden, Portugal, Austria, Southern Ireland is higher than in the UK. When the UK voted to leave the EU in 2016, the UK cost of living was higher than the Netherlands, France, Germany, Finland, Sweden, Portugal, Austria, Southern Ireland.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1