Comments by "justgivemethetruth" (@justgivemethetruth) on "Judicial Watch president’s take on latest Clinton email news" video.

  1. Are all Republicans force to be pathological liars every moment of their lives? The country didn't like it when they spent tens of millions to investigate a blowjob and shutting down the government ... and they have gone after Hillary for 30 years and nothing has stuck. When it sticks to Republicans they deny it, when there is nothing on Democrats you make it up. You people are mentally ill.
    2
  2. This crime family nonsense is funny anyone would believe, but you low information Republicans really seem to think the President of the United States can be some kind of criminal. Almost every President and powerful person we have had has been a little frisky sexually, that is what men do when they get powerful and famous. Trump's best friends are people worse than he claims Clinton is, and they both have the same friend Jeffrey Epstein ... may be you want to look him up. Maybe you want to see who is funding Trump support groups. the Koch Brothers and other billionaires. You guys love to get all miffed about these fantasy stories, but by believing them or passing them around with no evidence you are the scum you've been looking for.
    2
  3. Writing a big long essay when none is needed to make your point is the signature of a Right-winger. Hillary was at the highest level of government as Secretary of State ... the laws are to protect information FOR the policymakers, not inhibit and harass the policymakers. Clinton knew what she was doing, and so did all the other policymakers from George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, etc. Since you just parrot the Right-Wing media on this you are either a tool or allowing yourself to be used as a tool ... and Trumps backers are billionaires that whenever asked he agrees to do favors for. You have to be completely dedicated to the Right or completely naive to say what you are saying. Does the CEO of a company have to worry about documents that are proprietary? These are policymaking roles and they can damn well do what they like. The only reason this is taken seriously is for public consumption so non-policiymakers to not think it is OK, like Julian Assange or Edward Snowden. This is as much energy as I am going to dedicate to answering you since you are not really being honest about your argument.
    1