Comments by "justgivemethetruth" (@justgivemethetruth) on "The Bulwark" channel.

  1. 7
  2. 4
  3. 3
  4. LOL, That was impressive! Tim Miller ran Mehdi Hasan's ass all over the place forcing Mehdi to agree with him. Miller is a rhetorical genius. An interesting argument would have been to say who should Jews have voted for after or during WWII where the US with US bombs bombed trains with POWs on them, and Jews headed for the death camps, or the death camps themselves, or the rocket factories where they had slave labor. Or who should the Japanese Americans have voted for, although that was is more sensitive, if they even got to vote after American had bombed Japan into oblivion? Hasan is a very clever person a great arguer ... I won't say debater because he does not debate he does the weave, like Trump. They are both deeply dishonest in my opinion. The issue is the over-arching solidarity of Muslims all around the world that hate Jews and actively work for their deaths and dehumanization. I could say I really don't like Muslims, though I have several Muslims friends, but if they showed signs of antisemitism that would be a problem for me. So I don't particularly like Muslims or vocal politically active Muslims because I think they work against America and I cannot tell perfectly which Muslims are "secular" and which are peaceful and which are radicalized. I worked with a kid from Pakistan and a man from India and they would occasionally blow off signs of holding Islam higher than America. Very clear they came to America to get education and make money - and screw any American they had to put up with. I think I have the right to comment on that, and express my extreme dislike for people who do that and opinions that those people should not be here without being called Islamophobic. I would be happy to support a politician who wanted to bad extremist Muslims - though no matter what I would not vote for Donald Trump.
    3
  5. Mehdi Hasan benefits like Trump does by having real serious people platform him. Hasan calls himself a socialist or progressive - and both of those descriptors scream democratic where all citizens and genders have equal rights. The problem is that if you look around there are all kind of videos where Hasan describes himself as a devout Muslim. From a discussion where he confounds Richard Dawkins, and wastes his time saying that he believes LITERALLY that Mohammad flew to the moon and split it in half on the back of a donkey to videos where he is agreeing with Islamic beliefs that Islam must spread all over the world and rid the world of non-Muslims as well. Somehow he has avoided showing this side of him while he infiltrates the programming and minds of real Progressives and the TV screens of aveage Americans who don't seem to understand what Progressivism is anymore after all this disinformation and lies. I think Mehdi Hasan is a very dangerous agent of radical Islam. An antisemite and hater of Israel and spreader of misinformation about Israel's genocide in Gaza ... and of everything Israel does, and silence about Hamas' attack on Oct 7th. I guess I'd say that someone who starts the show lying about themselves and who they are is not someone there is much value in listening to. Point being hard for Mehdi call himself a democrat ( small-d ), Socialist, or Progressive when he does not believe in the ultimate humanity of non-Muslims and who expresses belief in Islam to the point where he would take up arms against Israel and drive Jews & Christians into the sea - i.e. genocide. He would have non-Muslim under the sword, or paying ransom for their own lives under the Islamic jizzya as subhuman non-citizens. Sorry that you have this guy on your program, Tim. I'd love it if you take some time or a show to explain why? Maybe to persuade some Michigan Muslims not to vote for Trump or sit out the 2024 election and instead vote for Kamala Harris. I guess mathematically that makes some sense, but yuck!
    3
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. I am so interested in AA's book, but when I hear stuff like Hungary is taking orders from Donald Trump when he is out of power .... it really makes me skeptical. I am sure there is some kind of massive political machine somewhere in some way, but I don't think Donald Trump is at the head of it. I could be wrong, but all this stuff begs for conspiracy theories because there is not enough information to really base any world view on. I read a lot of Ukraine, and how the US couped the Ukrainian government and drive the President out of the country. Then there was shelling and war in the Donbas for 8 years, and here we are calling it a great democracy, in which Zelensky got elected because he promised Ukrainians that he would keep the peace - and the shelling kept on - and in fact increased. That doesn't make sense. The US actions led directly to war, and if we don't accept that, it was true that Boris Johnson went to Turkey and broke up negotiations between Ukraine and Russia. I think a book as she writes ought to keep free of debateable history and focus on what we know about the mechanics of how the world works and how this system stays in power. And if Michael Steele actually believes this stuff ... how is he so involved in these systems? Especially the Republicans. A main point here seems to be to make democracy neutered by keeping people insulated from reality so that we can push around Russia and China. That may be necessary, but why is there no attempt to incentivize or convince Americans to support a national of global project to do this ... and why are we are involved in the UN when it is obviously totally corrupt? I want to know how and where are all these organizations run, and who works for them, and if they exist, how do they keep it under wraps? How is no one spoken out. It makes the whole of humanity as individuals irrelevant.
    1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. Once things move towards war - an involved country is obligated to propgandize or at least confuse their people to support it. Putin said a lot of things before the war going back years, and then we had European leaders later saying they signed the Budapest Agreement with no intention of honoring it. They were moving to and covertly declaring war against Russia at that time. We couped the Ukrainian government. Trump is the one who first sent weapons to Ukaine, and to goad the Russians shelling from Ukraine to the Donbas was monotonically increasing day by day until something had to happen. And why was Russia even interested in the Donbas? Because they knew the US wanted to push war to take Crimea away from Russia, which had made the mistake in the 50's or giving Crimea to Ukraine. Just to be fair, I don't see why ( My government surely did not tell me, unless I am to believe that we were against the evil Russians? ) the US had to do that? Yanukovych was trying to place Ukraine as a neutral trading partner with Russia - and the US needed to stop that. We, the US, also needed to cut Russia off from getting revenue from gas through the pipelines - so SOMEONE, probably us, or charged by us, blew the pipelines. That pushed Russia toward China and forced a path of war or at least non-cooperation with Russia and China both. We know that Russia was not militarized to go to war, and China is never going to attack Taiwan because they have too much business there. Then, surprise, after the Covid pandemic, the US economy comes out the strongest in the world. OK, great, but it really did not help the working Americans, who don't seem to count. Then this led to the forming of the new Axis of Evil, Russia, China, and Iran, and North Korea even - right a time when the world is burning up and flooding from Climate change. Who plans this stuff, and who gets to weight in. This is not just about autocracy - and when you look at democracy in the US, we are going that way too, and may have been there since at least 2000 when the Supreme Court appointed Bush President.
    1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1