Comments by "Markus Müller" (@markusmuller6173) on "How America can respond to threats from Russia, China, and Iran" video.

@yellageechee1882 I don't recognize too much benefit in replying to the content of your comment (which was addressed directly to me about an hour ago) if it is not visible to all panelists. This type of "off-screen communication" had already been tried out by the somewhat old-fashioned GDR Stasi... and ended up delivering rather disappointing results from a general government perspective, right?
2
@yellageechee1882 For whatever reason, I see your previous direct to me addressed comment on my screen only below the notification bell, but not in the discussion comment thread below the video clip.
2
@yellageechee1882 Wrong! - If I want to send information directly to someone, there are many other, better ways to do it... But YT is an internet site to offer comments on video-clip topics to a wider audience. If this option of disseminating information and ideas is reduced "A-rt-I-ficially" to one person exclusively, I am not interested in continuing the communication.
2
This is not just a task for the USA, it is a task for the UN! No one can consider a veto by an attacking aggressor in the UN Security Council to be permissible, even if the statutes have so far provided for it !!!
2
@Chris Viking No ! - This private orginized club of UN is deliberate silent. - No promotion at all for what should be done. The form of organization of the UN is the root cause of constant and systematic failure to improve global critical situations. The money sharks of the UN administration have urgently to be substituted by a fair mix of national state representatives !
2
YT states 6 sub-comments altogether, but only two of them are displayed to me (beside this one). That's the reason why I don't answer ...
2
@Maria_Skolop I have already outlined the problem.
2
@Maria_Skolop There are still global problems that need to be solved by a sensible organizational structure that fairly balances the wants and needs of all living beings. Or do you support the current human path of expulsion and extermination in order to reduce the confusing diversity? Volunteers to the moon when it's too colorful on earth...
2
@Maria_Skolop There is extremely little common ground between what I have been talking about and currently applied international law.
2
This is not just a task for the USA, it is a task for the UN! No one can consider a veto by an attacking aggressor in the UN Security Council to be permissible, even if the statutes have so far provided for it !!!
1
This is not just a task for the USA, it is a task for the UN! No one can consider a veto by an attacking aggressor in the UN Security Council to be permissible, even if the statutes have so far provided for it !!!
1
This is not just a task for the USA, it is a task for the UN! No one can consider a veto by an attacking aggressor in the UN Security Council to be permissible, even if the statutes have so far provided for it !!!
1
@sportsfanivosevic9885 This private orginized club of UN is deliberate silent. - No promotion at all for what should be done. The form of organization of the UN and tha lack of a standardized referendum option for break away regions (who merely want to gain more self-determined independence) are the root cause of constant and systematic UN's failure to improve global critical situations. The money sharks of the UN administration have urgently to be substituted by a fair mix of national state representatives and its statutes need more than urgently an update !
1