Comments by "Markus Müller" (@markusmuller6173) on "ShanghaiEye魔都眼"
channel.
-
73
-
40
-
29
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
10
-
10
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
UNO, stop these ugly cheap acts of distraction!
The rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs! Abolition of the right of veto for cross-border aggressors and reduction of the yes quorum for peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority. After all, it is not just UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force to ensure FAIR referendums in disputed crisis areas: Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara, Kurdistan...
But in addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums must of course also offer the option of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that of Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia) Or do we simply admire these "representatives of the people" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts?
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be adapted to current global needs!
Let's abolish the veto for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Not only states of the UN Security Council already have armies that could be deployed within the framework of a international task force coordinated by the UN for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas such as: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, western Iran), DR Congo, eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a contested region must of course also offer the possibility of completely self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia .... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we really only admire those "representatives" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people reward good individual suggestions for fair dispute resolution again (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
4
-
@Tortuosit If you would like to discuss German foreign policy, I recommend that you do so under "German Chancellor Scholz urges unity in New Year's Eve address | DW News". I also posted a comment there.- But it was Russia and China who vetoed a protective intervention in favor of Ukraine at the UNSC. - Therefore: The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority.
Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas:
Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts?
As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Those who support fair peace demand: The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas such like: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Too much distraction from the core problem ! - The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas:
Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
4
-
@Key-Wound That's why we need to improve our sorting process of people's representants and delegated powers with far-reaching influences and consequences ! Let us formulate a common political goal:
All representatives with delegated public power should be systematically empowered and, if necessary, recalled (level-deposted): in parties, governments, police, courts, media, banks, infrastructure, health care system - also in church and military, regardless of the current form of government (democracy, republic, constitutional monarchy, kingdom, dictatorship).
We know the people in the direct (professional) environment best. In order to promote socially engaged people and demote charlatans and hypocrites, we need TRIPLE ASSESSMENT by SUPERIORS and PEERS and SUBORDINATES, effective for the professional development of all public servants, both upward and downward - everywhere and regularly!
The current global, predominantly exclusive top-down selection and empowerment processes are good for nothing but breeding boss-kissers with hidden selfish and generally anti-social behavior.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
UNO, stop these ugly cheap acts of distraction!
The rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs! Abolition of the right of veto for cross-border aggressors and reduction of the yes quorum for peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority. After all, it is not just UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force to ensure FAIR referendums in disputed crisis areas: Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara, Kurdistan...
But in addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums must of course also offer the option of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that of Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia) Or do we simply admire these "representatives of the people" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
If China actually wanted peace, they could have proposed: The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must urgently be adapted to current global needs!
The right of veto for cross-border aggressors is to be abolished and the yes quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission has to be lowered to a 2/3 majority! Not only states of the UN Security Council already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed areas like: Kurdistan (northern Syria, western Iran), DR Congo, eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Berg -Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a contested region must of course also offer the possibility of completely self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia .... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we really only have such "representatives" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? Once people reward again good individual proposals for fair dispute resolution, (and compare, discuss, and select improved rules,) we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
(0:18) Since China verbally attacks merely the US and the EU, I have to assume China regard's Russia's raid of East Ukraine "as peacefull settlement of international disputes"
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs! Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Because not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolition of the right of veto for all cross-border aggressors and reduction of the yes quorum for the deployment of a peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority.
After all, it is not only UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force to ensure fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas like: Eastern Ukraine, Kurdistan, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno Karabakh, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a region must of course also offer the option of fully self-determined sovereignty.
(A state transition like that of Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia)
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? As soon as people honor again good suggestions from individuals for fair dispute resolution (and compare, discuss and choose respective improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next step on the evolution ladder.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
China intends to continue fair trade with any intruder as long as it doesn't involve secession from regions like Tibet, Xinjiang, Taiwan, Hong Kong...
If China really wanted to advocate a fair peace, it would demand the following:
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs! Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated international task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas such as: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia). BREXIT is also possible without bloodshed...
Do we actually only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Inquisition exorcists of the Plandemic Religion meet again... (4:15) If China really supported peace talks, it would demand:
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas such as: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
(0:18) Since China verbally attacks merely the US and the EU, I have to assume China regard's Russia's raid of East Ukraine "as peacefull settlement of international disputes"
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs! Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Because not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Inquisition exorcists of the Plandemic Religion meet again... (4:15) If China really supported peace talks, it would demand:
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas such as: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@edhiepitz I do apply reasonable abstract criteria to everyone and everything ...
If there is an "ancient region" where people want to separate themselves from the "motherland" (or the occupier), then free elections should make that possible and (at least partially) enable separation and independence. The "governing country" will on the long term not be able to lead this group of people without violence under the neglected and long outdated regulations anyway...
Many regions have published a demand for more independence [ Western Sahara, Tibet, Pyrenees, (Bavaria, Saxony ;) ... ] But a possible (at least partial) separation should be driven by the desire of an (ethnic/historical regional-language) majority to be polled in an independent standardised electoral process, and not driven by extremists... (e.g. ballots in a local language like Basque, Cherokee, Tibetan, Swabian, Saxon...etc. ;)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Toxic4262 Please don't distract by merely finger pointing.
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas like: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Almost everything at the UN is unfocused disinformation!
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority.
Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas such as: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
If there is an ancient region where people want to separate themselves from the "motherland" (or the occupier), then free elections should make that possible and (at least partially) enable separation and independence.
Because the "mother country" will no longer be able to lead this group of people without violence under the neglected and long outdated regulations anyway...
Many regions have published a demand for more independence [ Western Sahara, Tibet, Pyrenees, (Bavaria, Saxony ;) ... ]
But a possible (at least partial) separation should be driven by the desire of an (ethnic/historical regional-language) majority to be polled in an independent electoral process, and not driven by extremists...
(ballots in Basque, Cherokee, Tibetan, Swabian, Saxon...etc.)
2
-
@Len Attard Sure, I do have influence on the US foreign policy, but perhaps not in the same way, as you assume ...
If you aks me, how I would deal with territories, occupied or strangled by a dominant (mother-) country, I will answer this:
If there is an ancient region where people want to separate themselves from the "motherland" (or the occupier), then free elections should make that possible and (at least partially) enable separation and independence. Because the "governing country" will no longer be able to lead this group of people without violence under the neglected and long outdated regulations anyway...
Many regions have published a demand for more independence [ Western Sahara, Tibet, Pyrenees, (Bavaria, Saxony ;) ... ]
But a possible (at least partial) separation should be driven by the desire of an (ethnic/historical regional-language) majority to be polled in an independent electoral process, and not driven by extremists... (ballots in Basque, Cherokee, Tibetan, Swabian, Saxon...etc.)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
And all the words spoken cannot hide the fact that the action of the Puti-linskiy cartel is nothing but a large-scale expulsion of the population of eastern Ukraine to rob their resources and industrial assets!
The rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs! Abolition of the right of veto for all cross-border aggressors and reduction of the yes quorum for the deployment of a peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority.
After all, it is not only UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force to ensure fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno Karabakh, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a region must of course also offer the option of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that of Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia)
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? As soon as people honor again good suggestions from individuals for fair dispute resolution (and compare, discuss and choose respective improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next step on the evolution ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
And all the words spoken cannot hide the fact that the action of the Puti-linskiy cartel is nothing but a large-scale expulsion of the population of eastern Ukraine to rob their resources and industrial assets!
The rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs! Abolition of the right of veto for all cross-border aggressors and reduction of the yes quorum for the deployment of a peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority.
After all, it is not only UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force to ensure fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno Karabakh, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a region must of course also offer the option of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that of Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia)
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? As soon as people honor again good suggestions from individuals for fair dispute resolution (and compare, discuss and choose respective improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next step on the evolution ladder.
2
-
If there is an ancient region where people want to separate themselves from the "motherland" (or the occupier), then free elections should make that possible and (at least partially) enable separation and independence.
Because the "mother country" will no longer be able to lead this group of people without violence under the neglected and long outdated regulations anyway...
Many regions have published a demand for more independence [ Western Sahara, Tibet, Pyrenees, (Bavaria, Saxony ;) ... ]
But a possible (at least partial) separation should be driven by the desire of an (ethnic/historical regional-language) majority to be polled in an independent electoral process, and not driven by extremists...
(ballots in Basque, Cherokee, Tibetan, Swabian, Saxon...etc.)
2
-
2
-
2
-
@lillyshi2705 TRIPLE ASSESSMENT is explained in the descriptions of the playlists within "my" YT channel.
In short:
--- Let's formulate the following common political goal: "Internally, bosses must also become responsible to the grassroots, especially in groups with delegated powers (police, parties, governments, courts, media, banks, infrastructure, health system ... even church and military).
We know good, bad and ugly people in our (professional) environment. In order to support socially committed people and degrade charlatans, we need TRIPLE ASSESSMENTS by superiors, colleagues and subordinates that are effective for promotion up and down - everywhere and regularly!" ---
So you don't want to be aware of the gap between rich and poor in China and why it is like that ?!?
Those people who know you, do judge about how social commited you are, at least in their mind.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Inquisition exorcists of the Plandemic Religion meet again... (4:15) If China really supported peace talks, it would demand:
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas such as: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
If there is an ancient region where people want to separate themselves from the "motherland" (or the occupier), then free elections should make that possible and (at least partially) enable separation and independence.
Because the "mother country" will no longer be able to lead this group of people without violence under the neglected and long outdated regulations anyway...
Many regions have published a demand for more independence [ Western Sahara, Tibet, Pyrenees, (Bavaria, Saxony ;) ... ]
But a possible (at least partial) separation should be driven by the desire of an (ethnic/historical regional-language) majority to be polled in an independent electoral process, and not driven by extremists...
(ballots in Basque, Cherokee, Tibetan, Swabian, Saxon...etc.)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
If China actually wanted peace, they could have proposed: The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must urgently be adapted to current global needs!
The right of veto for cross-border aggressors is to be abolished and the yes quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission has to be lowered to a 2/3 majority! Not only states of the UN Security Council already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed areas like: Kurdistan (northern Syria, western Iran), DR Congo, eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Berg -Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a contested region must of course also offer the possibility of completely self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia .... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we really only have such "representatives" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? Once people reward again good individual proposals for fair dispute resolution, (and compare, discuss, and select improved rules,) we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
China and the UN are the worst and most far-reaching hypocrites of our time!
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority.
Because not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara....
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The money priests and their friends distract that first of all the regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas such as: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we actually only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Almost everything at the UN is unfocused disinformation!
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority.
Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas such as: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and have to be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. More than merely the UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jordanbrown7403 This is exactly why it is so important in a society who we SYSTEMATICALLY empower or make harmless based on previous experience!
The sorting process for the representatives of our delegated powers with far-reaching influences and consequences should be significantly improved!
Let us formulate a common political goal:
All representatives with delegated public power should be systematically empowered and, if necessary, recalled (level-deposted): in parties, governments, police, courts, media, banks, infrastructure, health care system - also in church and military, regardless of the current form of government (democracy, republic, constitutional monarchy, kingdom, dictatorship).
We know the people in the direct (professional) environment best. In order to promote socially engaged people and demote charlatans and hypocrites, we need TRIPLE ASSESSMENT by SUPERIORS and PEERS and SUBORDINATES, effective for the professional development of all public servants, both upward and downward - everywhere and regularly!
The current global, predominantly exclusive top-down selection and empowerment processes are good for nothing but breeding boss-kissers with hidden selfish and generally anti-social behavior. Hypocritical quislings !
2
-
@jordanbrown7403 NArZIssistic perversion and ignorance make it difficult to find a good solution to any problem. I have repeatedly asked you to consider which of the PERSONS YOU PERSONALLY WELL KNOW you believe to be able to bring about fair solutions to problems, especially after voluntarily supporting them in the empowerment ("your [temporarily preferred] savior with the answers" ). As the suitable systematic steering tool for a sustainable (desirable) social development, I have suggested TRIPLE ASSESSMENT (which of course also contains effective sanctions against charlatans, free-loader and quislings). With this control and steering tool, needed and appropriate value systems ("act responsibly") are defined commonly by all individuals involved, depending on the given surrounding situation.
In your statements, I only recognize a complaint about inadequacies of daily life. Regarding my suggestions, I do not receive any constructive criticism as feedback. A completely alternative approach to solving the issue is also not outlined on your part. Anyone who, as a parasite, cannot spread continuously to defenseless or unsuspecting areas has doomed "their own brood" to failure with their behavior, at least in the long term. Only open negotiations and fair trade are sustainable. History taught us already: For some species ("players"), "the global game" is quite soon over again.
To sum it up: Useful "discoverers" do not just blindly discard traditional existing sets of rules, but first analyze very precisely the inadequacies of currently established "rules of the game" in order to then improve them. Doubts keep our perception awake - transparency in explanations creates trust. Truth costs - lies collapse, always and everywhere.
2
-
@jordanbrown7403 If you don't have someone to solve your problems, nor do you know someone you trust, then you have to do everything on your own!
Do you know the movie Pirates of the Caribbean? Sometimes we need striking examples to actually understand what we're talking about. Apparent problem was: "Pirates' freedom is at risk" Suggested solution: "Pirate King is needed to declare war on East India Trading Company" Actual problem is "No pirate captain trusted any other pirate captain" - except Captain Jack Sparrow ;) Watch the clip: Captain Teague Scene, pfcymbaline, 07/14/2013
Throughout human history, "patents (ideas)" have been stolen so far everywhere. These guys that we know through the media hype are often just puppets of the hidden "masters". Be it Newton, Einstein, you named them too...
The problem is rooted in traditional social behavior. Nowadays, who praises those (e.g. with public YT playlists ;) who have contributed to their personal wisdom?
When and where does China praise its current inventors and developers? What's their name? M. Copy, Ms. Back-Then, Mme Pyle-of-money?
The State Department spokesman shown here merely distracts from a serious attempt to solve international problems. He just blames other countries instead of negotiating meaningfully, with words like: "China offers - China wants".
With regard to a sound international security policy, I would like to reiterate the following suggestion:
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must urgently be adapted to current global needs! Abolish the veto for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Not only states of the UN Security Council already have armies that could be deployed within the framework of a task force coordinated by the UN for fair referendums (referendums) in disputed crisis areas such as: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, western Iran), DR Congo, eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a contested region must of course also offer the possibility of completely self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia .... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we really only admire those "representatives" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people reward good individual suggestions for fair dispute resolution again (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
Finally, one more time:
Who do you support voluntarily and pro-actively with words and deeds because, based on your previous experience, you believe that these people can and want to improve your life and that of your children?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
China and the UN are the worst and most far-reaching hypocrites of our time!
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority.
Because not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara....
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Almost everything at the UN is unfocused disinformation!
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority.
Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas such as: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gruja000 Argentina's FM spokesperson hasn't spat the same vulgar remarks as China over the fence yet, has he?
Therefore I propose for the Falkland Islands:
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must urgently be adapted to current global needs! The right of veto for cross-border aggressors has to be be abolished and the yes quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission reduced to a 2/3 majority. Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed in disputed crisis areas as part of a task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) coordinated at short notice by the UN! Take also a look at Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a contested region must of course also offer the possibility of completely self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia .... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
2
-
And all the words spoken cannot hide the fact that the action of the Puti-linskiy cartel is nothing but a large-scale expulsion of the population of eastern Ukraine to rob their resources and industrial assets!
The rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs! Abolition of the right of veto for all cross-border aggressors and reduction of the yes quorum for the deployment of a peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority.
After all, it is not only UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force to ensure fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno Karabakh, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a region must of course also offer the option of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that of Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia)
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? As soon as people honor again good suggestions from individuals for fair dispute resolution (and compare, discuss and choose respective improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next step on the evolution ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be now urgently adapted to current global needs !
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. - Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan (Northern Syria), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara....
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolition of the right of veto for all cross-border aggressors and reduction of the yes quorum for the deployment of a peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority.
After all, it is not only UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force to ensure fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas like: Eastern Ukraine, Kurdistan, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno Karabakh, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a region must of course also offer the option of fully self-determined sovereignty.
(A state transition like that of Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia)
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? As soon as people honor again good suggestions from individuals for fair dispute resolution (and compare, discuss and choose respective improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next step on the evolution ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be now urgently adapted to current global needs !
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. - Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan (Northern Syria), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara....
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
And all the words spoken cannot hide the fact that the action of the Puti-linskiy cartel is nothing but a large-scale expulsion of the population of eastern Ukraine to rob their resources and industrial assets!
The rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs! Abolition of the right of veto for all cross-border aggressors and reduction of the yes quorum for the deployment of a peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority.
After all, it is not only UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force to ensure fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno Karabakh, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a region must of course also offer the option of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that of Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia)
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? As soon as people honor again good suggestions from individuals for fair dispute resolution (and compare, discuss and choose respective improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next step on the evolution ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
And all the words spoken cannot hide the fact that the action of the Puti-linskiy cartel is nothing but a large-scale expulsion of the population of eastern Ukraine to rob their resources and industrial assets!
The rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs! Abolition of the right of veto for all cross-border aggressors and reduction of the yes quorum for the deployment of a peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority.
After all, it is not only UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force to ensure fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno Karabakh, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a region must of course also offer the option of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that of Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia)
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? As soon as people honor again good suggestions from individuals for fair dispute resolution (and compare, discuss and choose respective improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next step on the evolution ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@vikingrasarya5792 If there is a region where people want to separate themselves from the "motherland" (or the occupier), then free elections should make that possible and (at least partially) enable separation and independence.
Because the "governing country" will no longer be able to lead this group of people without violence under the neglected and long outdated regulations anyway...
Many regions have published a demand for more independence [ Western Sahara, Tibet, Pyrenees, (Bavaria, Saxony ;) ... ]
But a possible (at least partial) separation should be driven by the desire of an (ethnic/historical regional-language) majority to be polled in an independent electoral process, and not driven by extremists... (ballots in Basque, Cherokee, Tibetan, Swabian, Saxon...etc.)
Or does your "logic" consider it to be legitimate, that Turkey occupies the whole of Berlin to protect some districts of Berlin to "protect" the majority of their citicens living there ?!? In my opinion men and women and all in between beyond the age of 25 only deserve a passport of a country, if the person has served one year in and for public services for this country (no matter whether: military, health system, transport services, garbage collection, landscaping ... you name it) ! This would prevent a lot of false flags from living here but supporting there.
Just look how Great Britain developed itself during the centuries! There was a constant gain and loss of colonies/countries in its commonwealth and it joined and left EU, NATO and other bigger clubs. Such processes need to be standardized to substitute military conflicts by transitions driven by referendums.
2
-
2
-
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and have to be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. More than merely the UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stopthejew875 The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas:
Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
1
-
@stopthejew875 Anyone can draw attention to shortcomings. - Only a few make plausible suggestions for improvement.
The sorting process for the representatives of our delegated powers with far-reaching influences and consequences should be significantly improved!
Let us formulate a common political goal:
All representatives with delegated public power should be systematically empowered and, if necessary, recalled (level-deposted): in parties, governments, police, courts, media, banks, infrastructure, health care system - also in church and military, regardless of the current form of government (democracy, republic, constitutional monarchy, kingdom, dictatorship).
We know the people in the direct (professional) environment best. In order to promote socially engaged people and demote charlatans and hypocrites, we need TRIPLE ASSESSMENT by SUPERIORS and PEERS and SUBORDINATES, effective for the professional development of all public servants, both upward and downward - everywhere and regularly!
The current global, predominantly exclusive top-down selection and empowerment processes are good for nothing but breeding boss-kissers with hidden selfish and generally anti-social behavior. Hypocritical collaborators !
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@johnli6782 Well, not exactly what I'm interested in... Of course, I am aware that the horizon of many people takes into account only what is happening within a small group of people, such as a family clan or the population of a village or former sisters in arms.
But the self-determined independence that I have in mind and about which I have spoken concerns the entire society of a region with identical or very similar history, culture, language and basic value system, which must also be checked by a test in the context of the referendum according to (yet to be agreed) international law for intended separations.
I have not yet begun to talk about the legislation of that society that defines then the self-determined limits and goals through (at least partially) independent (legal) sovereignty. Just think about EU and UK, or former USSR and Russia, or Germany and Bayern, or Morocco and Western Sahara ... you name it.
PS: I still didn't receive any internet link regarding the content of the referendum in Donbass and Luhansk region, of which I am most interested in according to my previous comments.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@trololoev Wrong ! - There is also the possibility of a special political negotiation. Sooner or later people realise that, too. Of course the outcome in most cases depends very much upon what has already been destroyed before the dispute is settled...
The rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolition of the right of veto for all cross-border aggressors and reduction of the yes quorum for the deployment of a peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority.
After all, it is not only UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force to ensure fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara, Kurdistan...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a region must of course also offer the option of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that of Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia)
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? As soon as people honor again good suggestions from individuals for fair dispute resolution (and compare, discuss and choose respective improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next step on the evolution ladder.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@userwsyz After a territorial separation, different ethnic groups who find it difficult to get along with each other at least have a chance to lead a more peaceful life for themselves. - And aggressive border violations can be discovered more easily by third parties... Like in kindergarten: If two children are always arguing, then it is better to separate them in good time in order to identify the actual aggressor.
At the very least, people need to be clear about what kind of government structure and levesl they want (Here we got: EU, Federal, State, Regionial and commune legislation and its executive). Otherwise, an oppressive supremacist government quickly will prescribe people what they can and cannot do.
The old treaties signed with natives are often simply inappropriate to reflect the migratory and hunting traditions of those natives to preserve their cultural heritage. I think also about Australia.
Compare ethnic groups with the monarch butterfly for example. There are groups of this species, with stay all the time in the same region. But there is also this Mexican group, which travels huge distances within three genations. Or a comparison with orcas: Sure, you can put them in a swimming pool, called reservat.
But I still really hope that these animals will kill any "trainer" who dares to jump into their starvation prison.
When will humans finally learn to interact with other living beings on a voluntary basis in a free, unrestricted environment? Don't you think that orcas would also do a few stupid tricks in the sea if they were offered attractive food there?!? Just imagine what else they could show us in their natural habitat! And I'm quite sure that even migrating butterflies still have more than one secret...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@userwsyz Apparently our ethnicity theme is now being changed from annihilation to expulsion, isn't it?!?
Names like UN, EU, British Commonwealth, CIS, countries, federal states, regions are nothing more than an attempt to describe the current organizational form and sovereignty. But sovereignties change regularly, for example when the European states united to form the EU or when Yugoslavia fell apart.
I already mentioned the region/country of Kosovo yesterday. What is your criterion according to which Serbia and Great Britain should be given the status of a sovereign country after they leave the former alliance, but not Kosovo?
Now that Serbia is the official successor of Yugoslavia, do you want to expel all other ethnic groups living in Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia and Montenegro from their home region (the former Yugoslavia)?!? The same applies to the former USSR!
So, do you prefer to grant a region again more souvereignty about its self-determined independence like it happened with the UK or the former colonies of the British Commonwealth (India) - or do you prefer the complete disintegration of China ?!?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jordanbrown7403 I assumed that we've just educated each other a bit ("by adding to a common discourse") here on YT, while observing how the interlocutor and readers react...
You have associated your favorite films with terms such as "narration, different perspectives, cleverness, cool, three-way dynamic, supporting characters, mix of myth and loose history". Thereafter I was interested in, which (scenes from your) memory of each film triggered this impression.
My previous statement was merely my summary of our conversations so far. Would you like to explain to the passive readers why my thanks triggers associations such as "moral superiority, insult, put in place etc." in you or are these also merely "gut feelings"? Film quote: "Are you paying attention" or do you prefer to remain in "conditioned" routines (of basic programming ;) ?
We negotiate about words and deeds in the manner of: "I offer - I want." And it's still you who has to interpret and react to my wisdom and behavior. I'm still amazed to see to what you tend...
1
-
@jordanbrown7403 If all I ever gave you is a ("mean") hammer, everything else is just a nail (of "weakness"). -- Most "(power) games" are designed and perceived as a possibility for the evaluation of the sociological ranking (in the dog pack), trying to prevent serious harm for the individuals. -- "Fair trade" is the exchange of desired and expendable "items/info" between peers (not mentors). Wisdom and assets are the perceivable results. -- So choose wise your preferred kind of interaction !
Do you really expect me to manipulate your feelings (praise, agree, insult, mock, belittle, put down...)? If I'm meaningless for you, I can't do it, right ?!?
When you "don't trust governments (power representatives) in any country or mafiaso/cartels/any group", how do you intend to organize, or at least choose, a/your preferred society? Did you actually perceive and comprehend my TRIPLE ASSESSMENT proposal? Well, you at least might want to decide for yourself which "actor" of all tricksters you trust (currently) most. Are you merely a leaf in a storm? Are you aware of which (spiritual) society tree (organized structure) you support (with your words and deeds) at the moment?
At least I may satisfied claim, that I have again learned something from your knowledge ("Psychologist tactics, like how do you feel about that") and your behavior (reaction to my free interpretable statements) ;) :)
1
-
@jordanbrown7403 I am saying that each person (yes, including you) is responsible for whom they willingly and proactively support with their words and actions in the contemporary community. And I maintain that each individual can only really judge the people with whom they work intensively on a daily basis. Who actually knows the ("fair and firm") character of (well-known) celebrities, (heavenly) popes, (righteous) kings and other supposedly "(honorable) salvific leaders" [like "your Arthur"]? A roundtable of witches can always trick third parties (distant subordinates) at least temporarilay.
TRIPLE ASSESSMENT is not about assigning a person (once in a lifetime) their place in the community, but rather empowering individuals from a respective group in their personal professional environment, at least in public service. Who is considered by a surrounding group (boss, peers and subordinates) to be the most suitable leader? Who is regarded by a group to better guide than a previously established hypocritical quisling. Motto: "Who do you voluntarily support because of admiration? Whose decisions do you prefer to follow in the future?"
This evaluation system, regularly applied across all hierarchical levels and is specific to the environment, will in the medium to long term, at least in the public service, gradually raise socially committed competent decision-makers ("willing to self sacrifice and compromise") to management positions, while disempower obvious hypocrites/charlatans.
Those who prefer to stick their heads in the sand during the ongoing selection process for their own guides ("keep head down") need not complain about their own fate at the butcher's at the end of the day. Do not stay at back off line waiting to die like a patient lemming! Rise your voice and promote about who should be the/your guide within your professional social environment!
In the same (respectively inverted) way: People of your vicinity know best, what you are good at in, the position they prefer you should obtain. I'm quite sure, at least in your hobby (technic history [cooking, design, music, entertainment] ... whatever) you have developed quite good (better) than other average-skill competitors.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1