Comments by "Markus Müller" (@markusmuller6173) on "Zelensky doubts Poland blast was caused by Ukraine missile, adding he feels Putin wants talk" video.

@seggy93stormpersonelchanne58 I have already made a specific proposal which I believe the UN General Assembly should adopt. Whoever really intends to support this attitude to solve international disputes, might want to consider to add my public playlist "ethnic groups, nations, countries + continents in an interactive global context" to their YT channel ;) The initial statement can be found in the description text of that playlist... Regarding your second issue, I recommend introducing TRIPLE ASSESSMENT to put trusted representatives systematically at the forefront of decision-making powers.
3
And all the words spoken cannot hide the fact that the action of the Puti-linskiy cartel is nothing but a large-scale expulsion of the population of eastern Ukraine to rob their resources and industrial assets! The rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs! Abolition of the right of veto for all cross-border aggressors and reduction of the yes quorum for the deployment of a peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority. After all, it is not only UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force to ensure fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno Karabakh, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara... In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a region must of course also offer the option of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that of Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia) Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? As soon as people honor again good suggestions from individuals for fair dispute resolution (and compare, discuss and choose respective improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next step on the evolution ladder.
2
And all the words spoken cannot hide the fact that the action of the Puti-linskiy cartel is nothing but a large-scale expulsion of the population of eastern Ukraine to rob their resources and industrial assets! The rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs! Abolition of the right of veto for all cross-border aggressors and reduction of the yes quorum for the deployment of a peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority. After all, it is not only UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force to ensure fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno Karabakh, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara... In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a region must of course also offer the option of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that of Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia) Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? As soon as people honor again good suggestions from individuals for fair dispute resolution (and compare, discuss and choose respective improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next step on the evolution ladder.
2