Markus Müller
ShanghaiEye魔都眼
comments
Comments by "Markus Müller" (@markusmuller6173) on "Beijing again demands answer from US on Nord Stream explosion, questions media choice on stories" video.
6
2
2
2
2
2
@jordanbrown7403 This is exactly why it is so important in a society who we SYSTEMATICALLY empower or make harmless based on previous experience!
The sorting process for the representatives of our delegated powers with far-reaching influences and consequences should be significantly improved!
Let us formulate a common political goal:
All representatives with delegated public power should be systematically empowered and, if necessary, recalled (level-deposted): in parties, governments, police, courts, media, banks, infrastructure, health care system - also in church and military, regardless of the current form of government (democracy, republic, constitutional monarchy, kingdom, dictatorship).
We know the people in the direct (professional) environment best. In order to promote socially engaged people and demote charlatans and hypocrites, we need TRIPLE ASSESSMENT by SUPERIORS and PEERS and SUBORDINATES, effective for the professional development of all public servants, both upward and downward - everywhere and regularly!
The current global, predominantly exclusive top-down selection and empowerment processes are good for nothing but breeding boss-kissers with hidden selfish and generally anti-social behavior. Hypocritical quislings !
2
@jordanbrown7403 NArZIssistic perversion and ignorance make it difficult to find a good solution to any problem. I have repeatedly asked you to consider which of the PERSONS YOU PERSONALLY WELL KNOW you believe to be able to bring about fair solutions to problems, especially after voluntarily supporting them in the empowerment ("your [temporarily preferred] savior with the answers" ). As the suitable systematic steering tool for a sustainable (desirable) social development, I have suggested TRIPLE ASSESSMENT (which of course also contains effective sanctions against charlatans, free-loader and quislings). With this control and steering tool, needed and appropriate value systems ("act responsibly") are defined commonly by all individuals involved, depending on the given surrounding situation.
In your statements, I only recognize a complaint about inadequacies of daily life. Regarding my suggestions, I do not receive any constructive criticism as feedback. A completely alternative approach to solving the issue is also not outlined on your part. Anyone who, as a parasite, cannot spread continuously to defenseless or unsuspecting areas has doomed "their own brood" to failure with their behavior, at least in the long term. Only open negotiations and fair trade are sustainable. History taught us already: For some species ("players"), "the global game" is quite soon over again.
To sum it up: Useful "discoverers" do not just blindly discard traditional existing sets of rules, but first analyze very precisely the inadequacies of currently established "rules of the game" in order to then improve them. Doubts keep our perception awake - transparency in explanations creates trust. Truth costs - lies collapse, always and everywhere.
2
@jordanbrown7403 If you don't have someone to solve your problems, nor do you know someone you trust, then you have to do everything on your own!
Do you know the movie Pirates of the Caribbean? Sometimes we need striking examples to actually understand what we're talking about. Apparent problem was: "Pirates' freedom is at risk" Suggested solution: "Pirate King is needed to declare war on East India Trading Company" Actual problem is "No pirate captain trusted any other pirate captain" - except Captain Jack Sparrow ;) Watch the clip: Captain Teague Scene, pfcymbaline, 07/14/2013
Throughout human history, "patents (ideas)" have been stolen so far everywhere. These guys that we know through the media hype are often just puppets of the hidden "masters". Be it Newton, Einstein, you named them too...
The problem is rooted in traditional social behavior. Nowadays, who praises those (e.g. with public YT playlists ;) who have contributed to their personal wisdom?
When and where does China praise its current inventors and developers? What's their name? M. Copy, Ms. Back-Then, Mme Pyle-of-money?
The State Department spokesman shown here merely distracts from a serious attempt to solve international problems. He just blames other countries instead of negotiating meaningfully, with words like: "China offers - China wants".
With regard to a sound international security policy, I would like to reiterate the following suggestion:
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must urgently be adapted to current global needs! Abolish the veto for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Not only states of the UN Security Council already have armies that could be deployed within the framework of a task force coordinated by the UN for fair referendums (referendums) in disputed crisis areas such as: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, western Iran), DR Congo, eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a contested region must of course also offer the possibility of completely self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia .... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we really only admire those "representatives" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people reward good individual suggestions for fair dispute resolution again (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
Finally, one more time:
Who do you support voluntarily and pro-actively with words and deeds because, based on your previous experience, you believe that these people can and want to improve your life and that of your children?
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
@jordanbrown7403 I assumed that we've just educated each other a bit ("by adding to a common discourse") here on YT, while observing how the interlocutor and readers react...
You have associated your favorite films with terms such as "narration, different perspectives, cleverness, cool, three-way dynamic, supporting characters, mix of myth and loose history". Thereafter I was interested in, which (scenes from your) memory of each film triggered this impression.
My previous statement was merely my summary of our conversations so far. Would you like to explain to the passive readers why my thanks triggers associations such as "moral superiority, insult, put in place etc." in you or are these also merely "gut feelings"? Film quote: "Are you paying attention" or do you prefer to remain in "conditioned" routines (of basic programming ;) ?
We negotiate about words and deeds in the manner of: "I offer - I want." And it's still you who has to interpret and react to my wisdom and behavior. I'm still amazed to see to what you tend...
1
@jordanbrown7403 If all I ever gave you is a ("mean") hammer, everything else is just a nail (of "weakness"). -- Most "(power) games" are designed and perceived as a possibility for the evaluation of the sociological ranking (in the dog pack), trying to prevent serious harm for the individuals. -- "Fair trade" is the exchange of desired and expendable "items/info" between peers (not mentors). Wisdom and assets are the perceivable results. -- So choose wise your preferred kind of interaction !
Do you really expect me to manipulate your feelings (praise, agree, insult, mock, belittle, put down...)? If I'm meaningless for you, I can't do it, right ?!?
When you "don't trust governments (power representatives) in any country or mafiaso/cartels/any group", how do you intend to organize, or at least choose, a/your preferred society? Did you actually perceive and comprehend my TRIPLE ASSESSMENT proposal? Well, you at least might want to decide for yourself which "actor" of all tricksters you trust (currently) most. Are you merely a leaf in a storm? Are you aware of which (spiritual) society tree (organized structure) you support (with your words and deeds) at the moment?
At least I may satisfied claim, that I have again learned something from your knowledge ("Psychologist tactics, like how do you feel about that") and your behavior (reaction to my free interpretable statements) ;) :)
1
@jordanbrown7403 I am saying that each person (yes, including you) is responsible for whom they willingly and proactively support with their words and actions in the contemporary community. And I maintain that each individual can only really judge the people with whom they work intensively on a daily basis. Who actually knows the ("fair and firm") character of (well-known) celebrities, (heavenly) popes, (righteous) kings and other supposedly "(honorable) salvific leaders" [like "your Arthur"]? A roundtable of witches can always trick third parties (distant subordinates) at least temporarilay.
TRIPLE ASSESSMENT is not about assigning a person (once in a lifetime) their place in the community, but rather empowering individuals from a respective group in their personal professional environment, at least in public service. Who is considered by a surrounding group (boss, peers and subordinates) to be the most suitable leader? Who is regarded by a group to better guide than a previously established hypocritical quisling. Motto: "Who do you voluntarily support because of admiration? Whose decisions do you prefer to follow in the future?"
This evaluation system, regularly applied across all hierarchical levels and is specific to the environment, will in the medium to long term, at least in the public service, gradually raise socially committed competent decision-makers ("willing to self sacrifice and compromise") to management positions, while disempower obvious hypocrites/charlatans.
Those who prefer to stick their heads in the sand during the ongoing selection process for their own guides ("keep head down") need not complain about their own fate at the butcher's at the end of the day. Do not stay at back off line waiting to die like a patient lemming! Rise your voice and promote about who should be the/your guide within your professional social environment!
In the same (respectively inverted) way: People of your vicinity know best, what you are good at in, the position they prefer you should obtain. I'm quite sure, at least in your hobby (technic history [cooking, design, music, entertainment] ... whatever) you have developed quite good (better) than other average-skill competitors.
1
1
1
1
1
1