Comments by "Markus Müller" (@markusmuller6173) on "China: US lacks honesty u0026 reflection, ignores history, facts of Taiwan question u0026 Sino-US relations" video.
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@userwsyz After a territorial separation, different ethnic groups who find it difficult to get along with each other at least have a chance to lead a more peaceful life for themselves. - And aggressive border violations can be discovered more easily by third parties... Like in kindergarten: If two children are always arguing, then it is better to separate them in good time in order to identify the actual aggressor.
At the very least, people need to be clear about what kind of government structure and levesl they want (Here we got: EU, Federal, State, Regionial and commune legislation and its executive). Otherwise, an oppressive supremacist government quickly will prescribe people what they can and cannot do.
The old treaties signed with natives are often simply inappropriate to reflect the migratory and hunting traditions of those natives to preserve their cultural heritage. I think also about Australia.
Compare ethnic groups with the monarch butterfly for example. There are groups of this species, with stay all the time in the same region. But there is also this Mexican group, which travels huge distances within three genations. Or a comparison with orcas: Sure, you can put them in a swimming pool, called reservat.
But I still really hope that these animals will kill any "trainer" who dares to jump into their starvation prison.
When will humans finally learn to interact with other living beings on a voluntary basis in a free, unrestricted environment? Don't you think that orcas would also do a few stupid tricks in the sea if they were offered attractive food there?!? Just imagine what else they could show us in their natural habitat! And I'm quite sure that even migrating butterflies still have more than one secret...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@userwsyz Apparently our ethnicity theme is now being changed from annihilation to expulsion, isn't it?!?
Names like UN, EU, British Commonwealth, CIS, countries, federal states, regions are nothing more than an attempt to describe the current organizational form and sovereignty. But sovereignties change regularly, for example when the European states united to form the EU or when Yugoslavia fell apart.
I already mentioned the region/country of Kosovo yesterday. What is your criterion according to which Serbia and Great Britain should be given the status of a sovereign country after they leave the former alliance, but not Kosovo?
Now that Serbia is the official successor of Yugoslavia, do you want to expel all other ethnic groups living in Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia and Montenegro from their home region (the former Yugoslavia)?!? The same applies to the former USSR!
So, do you prefer to grant a region again more souvereignty about its self-determined independence like it happened with the UK or the former colonies of the British Commonwealth (India) - or do you prefer the complete disintegration of China ?!?
1
-
1