Comments by "Markus Müller" (@markusmuller6173) on "Russia seeks closer military ties with China: What it means | DW News" video.
-
It was Russia and China who vetoed a protective intervention in favor of Ukraine at the UNSC.
Therefore: The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Let's abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority.
Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas:
Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts?
As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
3
-
It was Russia and China who vetoed a protective intervention in favor of Ukraine at the UNSC.
Therefore: The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Let's abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority.
Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas:
Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts?
As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
It was Russia and China who vetoed a protective intervention in favor of Ukraine at the UNSC.
Therefore: The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Let's abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority.
Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas:
Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts?
As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
1