Comments by "Markus Müller" (@markusmuller6173) on "What Russia’s annexation means for the war | DW News" video.

  1. What the regions of Donbas, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson bombardment means for the suffering people?!? In the UN sits a bunch of distracting useless puppets who only assigns blame on others instead of suggesting reasonable helpful solutions! Citizens of disputed areas suffer most of competing powers. (Donbass and Luhansk, Jammu and Kashmir, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine or the multi-country Kurdistan region...) The standards and rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum could and have to be adapted urgently to current global needs! Abolition of the right of veto for cross-border aggressors (eg Russia, India or Israel) and reduction of the yes quorum for peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority. After all, it is not only the UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be sent within the framework of a task force coordinated by the UN at short notice to carry out fair referendums in disputed areas. In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums must of course also offer the option of completely self-determined sovereignty. (Equivalents to the successor states of Yugoslavia: Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia; or Czechoslovakia to Czech Republic and Slovakia) Or do we exclusively put in charge idiotic representatives whose policy always leads to bloody confrontations?
    3
  2. What the regions of Donbas, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson bombardment means for the suffering people?!? In the UN sits a bunch of distracting useless puppets who only assigns blame on others instead of suggesting reasonable helpful solutions! Citizens of disputed areas suffer most of competing powers. (Donbass and Luhansk, Jammu and Kashmir, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine or the multi-country Kurdistan region...) The standards and rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum could and have to be adapted urgently to current global needs! Abolition of the right of veto for cross-border aggressors (eg Russia, India or Israel) and reduction of the yes quorum for peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority. After all, it is not only the UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be sent within the framework of a task force coordinated by the UN at short notice to carry out fair referendums in disputed areas. In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums must of course also offer the option of completely self-determined sovereignty. (Equivalents to the successor states of Yugoslavia: Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia; or Czechoslovakia to Czech Republic and Slovakia) Or do we exclusively put in charge idiotic representatives whose policy always leads to bloody confrontations?
    2