Comments by "Markus Müller" (@markusmuller6173) on "'Pak shouldn't lecture...': India's harsh counter as Pak PM rakes up Kashmir I Watch" video.

  1. When an intended cooperation meeting degenerates into an arena of blame, just to mock the efforts of the host from two sides :D :D :)
    3
  2. When an intended cooperation meeting degenerates into an arena of blame, just to mock the efforts of the host from two sides :D :D :)
    2
  3.  @sp-tj9ye  Wise are those who make their statements in front of a mirror...
    2
  4.  @harshsharma7900  Who needs a mirror to reflect their own knowledge? Schizophrenic people with more reflexes than brain cells? - My polite suggestion to mirror one's own statements was made in the context of the Indian and Pakistani blame game. Wise are they who go forward with better (constructive and convincing) suggestions.
    2
  5.  @harshsharma7900  Those who compare self-reflection with a look into a mirror, didn't understand that much. It's nothing but the reading of the own memoires... Nothing less than the analysis and exchange of the own habits (well selected and trained reflexes) is the subconscious complex control panel to determine the future heading beyond current awareness.
    2
  6.  @shivangitripathi1505  I doubt that really everyone understood my first comment. What is the use of going to a cooperation meeting if the participants only blame each other? Their statements sounded to me more like the speeches at a wrestling match.
    2
  7.  @divinebeing5720  SIXTH CICA SUMMIT (1:01) !!! Who commented also below the UNGA video clip "🇵🇰 Pakistan - First Right of Reply, United Nations General Debate, 76th Session" posted by "Die Vereinten Nationen" ? At that video clip I quoted the PAK satement: "If India has nothing to hide, it must accept a UN commission of inquiary and agree to implement the Security Council resolutions stipulating a plebiscite to enable the people of Jammu and Kashmir to excercise their right to self-determination." And I added: First of all: The rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs! Abolition of the right of veto for all cross-border aggressors and reduction of the yes quorum for the deployment of a peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority. After all, it is not only UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force to ensure FAIR referendums in disputed crisis areas: Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara, Kurdistan... In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, referendums must of course also offer the option of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that of Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia) Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? As soon as people honor again good suggestions from individuals - for fair dispute resolution and compare, discuss and choose respective improved regulations, we will be able to climb the next step on the evolution ladder.
    2
  8. When an intended cooperation meeting degenerates into an arena of blame, just to mock the efforts of the host from two sides :D :D :)
    2
  9. SIXTH CICA SUMMIT (1:01) !!! Who comment also below the UNGA video clip "🇵🇰 Pakistan - First Right of Reply, United Nations General Debate, 76th Session" posted by "Die Vereinten Nationen" ? There I quoted the PAK satement: "If India has nothing to hide, it must accept a UN commission of inquiary and agree to implement the Security Council resolutions stipulating a plebiscite to enable the people of Jammu and Kashmir to excercise their right to self-determination." And I added: First of all: The rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs! Abolition of the right of veto for all cross-border aggressors and reduction of the yes quorum for the deployment of a peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority. After all, it is not only UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force to ensure FAIR referendums in disputed crisis areas: Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara, Kurdistan... In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, referendums must of course also offer the option of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that of Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia) Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? As soon as people honor again good suggestions from individuals - for fair dispute resolution and compare, discuss and choose respective improved regulations, we will be able to climb the next step on the evolution ladder.
    2
  10.  @divinebeing5720  It's you, who contacted me initially in a direct reply. - Now you may ask yourself, why your nose led you to me...
    1