Youtube comments of Coco Taveras (@cocotaveras8975).
-
6000
-
2500
-
1700
-
1600
-
1400
-
1100
-
1100
-
879
-
531
-
475
-
464
-
449
-
439
-
422
-
396
-
380
-
379
-
378
-
370
-
369
-
335
-
330
-
319
-
288
-
270
-
270
-
269
-
269
-
255
-
250
-
237
-
228
-
222
-
202
-
199
-
198
-
188
-
185
-
181
-
181
-
176
-
169
-
164
-
162
-
162
-
157
-
152
-
146
-
144
-
142
-
139
-
126
-
124
-
123
-
119
-
118
-
118
-
112
-
110
-
110
-
105
-
101
-
98
-
98
-
97
-
97
-
92
-
89
-
89
-
87
-
87
-
86
-
84
-
84
-
83
-
79
-
77
-
76
-
75
-
75
-
74
-
74
-
72
-
71
-
70
-
69
-
69
-
Nae55 _ I'll give you the breakdown, watched it on Hulu abc 20/20 and whew the story goes from a WHAT??!!!!!! To an AWW!!!!! Really quickly... here goes....
I'll try to sum it up, watched it from HUlu right now,
Finds out he robbed banks in Oregon
Tries to manipulate kids into taking more heat for him and to tell his story in an exaggerated way to get people to give him more sympathy to get a lighter sentence
He takes a plea detail avoiding a sentence of 99 years and gets 24
His son, Hayden takes a plea and gets 10
His daughter, Abby takes a plea and gets 5, which for the crime is good as Dan Abrams said
Sheriff is nice and let's her go to county jail and not a prison, gets paroled in two years and adopted by family into home
Doesn't listen to rules and gets home late
Gets job in Laredo, TX gets mixed into wrong crowd used drugs and meets a bad boy with a long rap sheet who when one day she was under influence in gas station sleeps in car when she wakes up finds out he robbed gas station at gun point
Doesn't go to jail for it, but does for parole violation by not informing her parole officer about her actions which is a deal about parole
Serves a year in county jail, gets out, finds job at fish processing plant, meets boyfriend, and is pregnant.
That's pretty much it!!!!
68
-
68
-
67
-
67
-
66
-
63
-
62
-
61
-
60
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
Emma Lucy How original, like I've never heard that one before. You pro-choices make me so fed up with saying, "it's just a blob of cells" or "it's just a ball of cells" all the time. You do realize that humans in general are all balls of cells, right? After all, we're made up by cells: brain cells, red blood cells, white blood cells, skin cells, hair cells, etc. In total, the human body has about 200 different types of cells. So, your argument doesn't really work here since that means your a ball of cells too.
#Prolife
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
@uuhm6752 Trade war with China hurting American workers/farmers, government shutdown that the pres. said he would be "proud" to take responsibility for impacting 800,000 federal government employees, constant lying and saying misleading statements, check on Fact Checker, with real evidence if you were thinking that it was FAKE NEWS. ALSO, in Helsinki, in front of the Russian leader himself, he discredited the information of the intelligence agencies on Russian influence on the 2016 Presidential Election.
Also, economists are predicting more negative financial news in 2019 and a possible recession in 2020. Pres. Trump's only claim to success is starting to wane. (Btw. Obama didnt give them guns, do you even hear yourself? Have common sense. I'm so frustrated because of what good, rationale, and honest people have to hear ridiculous, and frankly wholly based on lies, things from people like you
If you want to debate me, well HEAR I AM LETS GO.
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
@jaythompson5102 History isn’t so black and white that you can make a snap judgement from one particular incident more than two centuries ago on a man’s whole character. Sure he had certain negatives, but the positive effects of his work completely outweigh the negative effects by a gigantic margin, he was still much more progressive and modern than most monarchs in that period, and he didn’t even start most of the wars he fought in. So if you don’t mind me asking, other than Jaffa - what else do you have? You have to take into consideration the totality of his life and events - and then you will see: a much more mixed result, but definitely leaning more overall positive than negative.
Positives.
-Destroyed feudalism.
- Still better than Robespierre and the Revolutionary governments (at least Napoleon brought a semblance of order and stability other than chaos, political instability, and constant massacres/murders of French citizens)
-Napoleonic code (Some of the most liberal and progressive reforms OF ITS TIME)
-Revolutionized warfare and tactics.
-Care for war veterans
-Separation of church and state
-Appointed officials by merit so people could rise by skill and efficiency instead of by simply blood like the ineffective systems of the previous monarchs.
- Set up a national bank.
- Implemented a fairer tax code.
- Stabilized the currency.
- Fired corrupt officials.
- Created lycées.
- Implemented the creation of massive public works projects such as libraries so people could expand upon their education.
Negatives
-Endless war (true, but again most of the wars he fought in weren’t started by him - Spain and Russia are the sole prominent exceptions)
-Continental system (it was war, blockades of enemies are quite normal even by today’s standards)
Yes he was a hypocrite at times appointments as monarchs over conquered territories and yes, the wars caused a huge number of deaths, but ALSO WORTH NOTING he also was the first ruler ever to give facilities to veterans. Yes, his continental system was ruinous to the economy, but it didn't last long.
On the other hand, his work such as separation of church is a cornerstone of modern day Europe. His destruction of feudalism led to the creation of nation states and Europe went through a century of peace. His law code is still used in many nations. His revolutionization of warfare meant that for the first time since the Roman empire the world was seeing standing armies (see how awesome Rome is).
To top this up, he was undoubtedly one of the greatest military commanders of all time.
So a bad dictator could do all this? Make so many achievements, be more progressive than all, if not most, of the surrounding monarchies, and actually move French contemporary society into a renewed focus with mass public works projects (including schools, bridges and monuments) in a more positive future direction - many of the projects of this era are still there such as the Fontaine du Palmier and three new bridges the Pont d'Iéna, Pont d'Austerlitz, including the Pont des Arts (1804), the first iron bridge in Paris. Again, you can’t make a speedy judgement about one man on only one event so long ago- it’s much more complex and needs a bigger scope. Was it bad? Yes! Was it sickening and morally repulsive? Yes! But do you need the bigger picture of him and his positive impact on world history to truly judge him overall? Also Yes! Everything needs to be taken into account - and if you did then you would find a complicated man with many, many flaws who managed to leave an unprecedented positive impact modern society even after such a long period of time.
Also something to take into consideration and especially dwell upon is that the allies, in some instances, were actually acting just as ruthlessly and doing the same thing - it wasn’t that uncommon in that time period unfortunately but it was still there! So are you going to judge them as ruthless commanders as well. Remember the It sounds messed up, but in every war - there’s massacres and violence. It’s unceasing, violent, and brutal which is exactly what war is and unfortunately no is spared.
To people who compare Napoleon to dictators where are the many massacres, concentration camps, and real crimes like real dictators Stalin, Mao, Hitler, and the Kim Family had? Answer: Because he wasn’t like them, not even close. He wasn’t a dictator, just a flawed man but his legacy still lives on well after his death.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
Joseph Mingle First of all dont offend Israel if you were trying to, and second the reason I dont want to spend the hardworking taxpayer's money, on a wall that if someone could find a way to crack a bank vault with 100 million possible combinations could find a way to climb up and over, thus making it absolutely useless. What that money has got to go towards its fixing America's aging infrastructure such as aging bridges, corrosive water systems, etc. grave dangers for the American people I'm trying to say. I remember watching a CNN Student News, several weeks back or maybe two weeks ago, that showed a scene where a woman and her son had gotten dirty plumbing water below the federal limit, meaning it was dangerous but her state government doesn't have the money. This isn't an isolated incident look at Flint, Michigan, maybe that amount of money, for the wall, cant fix all the water systems but it can do something and something has to be done. In general, I have no problem spending tax dollars but putting it into the right place that is an imperative that must be followed, done correctly.
8
-
Gooey 911 Same, no serious legislation in this White House as well only trade wars hurting American farmers and other workers, saying he was "proud" to start shutdown which hurt 800,000 government workers, made many misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you dont believe me, started embarrassing Twitter wars that degrade the office in which he serves by attacking others in an insensitive and sickening manner, made ill advised geopolitical decisions which tells you how bad it is if Jim Mattis with all of his experience resigns over it, and alienated many of our key allies abroad. Yeah, sounds much, much better than the Obama administration, MUCH.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@dwarow2508 They were illegally annexed against the will of the majority of their people + deportations + murders + assaults against women and children + looting + economic devastation + iron curtain. Ever heard of the 1991 Lithuanian civilian massacre? The fact that a country tries so hard to keep you in speaks for itself cough cough iron curtain. How would you feel if someone had forced you into a house filled with other kidnapped victims and told you that you couldn’t walk out when you wanted to and your movements would be restricted and you merely have to accept it. Yeah, now times that by two and that was the Soviet Union! Essentially, a depressing, decrepit and despairing cage. At least the US government let you leave.
Before the illegal occupation of Estonia, the country had a healthy and thriving economy as well as actually being economically more advanced than Finland. After Soviet occupation and having a state run economic system forced over them, that the people had no power to change (because you know what happens to dissents and those who challenge the authority of the state and try to enact reforms? - Prague Spring 1968), the exact inverse happened as Finland’s economic activity churned forward while Estonia trailed behind. Today Estonia is catching up and doing well for itself but imagine how far ahead they would be today if not for Soviet intrusion into the country’s own affairs?
The fact that Estonia’s GDP per capita in 1991 was $100, but now its $23,266.35 also speaks for itself. Do I actually need to explain this? The Soviet Union’s state centralized economic based system limited and hindered the Estonian economy’s prosperity, success, and development but in the years since the reestablishment of independence, without Moscow’s economic plans rammed down its throats, it has grown by a considerably healthy margin overall - same applies to Lithuania.
Short answer: Capitalism is more profitable than communism, even the Chinese figured this out and that’s why they implemented market based reforms in the late 70s and 80s under the guise of, “Socialism with Chinese characteristics.”
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
SINSH4W
Tbh, I'm not from the state but I feel like I have to defend it so can I just say...
I respect the state and its kind, hardworking people and it does have so much to offer including delicious foods, lovely sceneries, affordable living so people like I can fulfill their dreams of buying their own homes, great talent, vibrant optimism, spectacular charm, beautiful architecture, refined culture, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want to say to all our Mississippians brothers and sisters who might be reading this we care about you. You guys rock! 👍 😁
Love from far away in Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the state of MS and it's awesome people :)
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I'll try to sum it up, watched it from HUlu right now,
Finds out he robbed banks in Oregon
Tries to manipulate kids into taking more heat for him and to tell his story in an exaggerated way to get people to give him more sympathy to get a lighter sentence
He takes a plea detail avoiding a sentence of 99 years and gets 24
His son, Hayden takes a plea and gets 10
His daughter, Abby takes a plea and gets 5, which for the crime is good as Dan Abrams said
Sheriff is nice and let's her go to county jail and not a prison, gets paroled in two years and adopted by family into home
Doesn't listen to rules and gets home late
Gets job in Laredo, TX gets mixed into wrong crowd used drugs and meets a bad boy with a long rap sheet who when one day she was under influence in gas station sleeps in car when she wakes up finds out he robbed gas station at gun point
Doesn't go to jail for it, but does for parole violation by not informing her parole officer about her actions which is a deal about parole
Serves a year in county jail, gets out, finds job at fish processing plant, meets boyfriend, and is pregnant.
That's pretty much it!!!!
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@ev.c6 I hope that wherever you are from, not everyone feels this burning hatred towards America because if they do why do we help people who hate this country? No offense, and I'm sorry for saying this but this country is going through bad times with this tumultous administration, but it is still America, America is still there: life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness is still there no matter what happens and you calling this an, "ignorant nation" and saying America is useful for only two things that's offensive and wrong and you should be ashamed of yourself because wherever your from this country probably helped your country out a lot, there a lot of Americans who actually care about the world and do great things to help people around the world and risk their lives doing it, and you call this nation an "ignorant nation" only useful for two things, shame on you shame on you and if your an American that makes it even more sickening and horrid shame on you shame on you.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
GUYS AND GALS, REMEMBER TO VOTE IN FORCE IN 2020. VOTERS OF AMERICA UNITE!!! ✊✊✊
a) 57% of Americans do not want a wall along the southern border. GALLUP POLL, as of March 2018.
b) Historically walls dont work (ex. Berlin Wall and Great Wall of China)
c) The way to secure border is use of modern technology, increased border people, and more coordination with Mexico, saving us many tens of billions in materials, individuals, and costly maintenance.
d) If all this doesn't convince you, then how about the massive dangers / threats of our aging infrastructure like corrosive water systems, aging bridges and tunnels, etc. things that are very pressing to the safety and well being of our citizens and aren't getting NEARLY ENOUGH FUNDING THAT IT NEEDS.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
No, there just stating the obvious and also if you dont like it then tell me something, why are you even here? Because, guess what in my opinion, correct me if I'm wrong, your a Fox News viewer right? So wht dont you just go there and rant with your fellow wallloving, Democrat hating, chaos supporting friends. Ok? Because we the honest, rationale Americans really dont need people like you, sorry but learn the facts. Anyway other than that have a lovely NEW YEARS.
Edit: Sorry, I kinda lost my cool there. Forgive me. But honestly just please look at the facts, previous actions of President Trump and your mind will awaken to the obvious. Other than that, believe what you want to believe when the facts of the matter are staring you right in the face. Have a great NEW YEARS.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Streetsdisciple001 You do realize that science can prove life exists, which would make you someone who is capable of taking it away. So it’s not only about the genetic DNA sequence and separate blood type.
Science prove once again, with absolute fact that, the unborn baby’s heart begins to beat at three weeks, that brain waves can be detected as early as five weeks, and that all of the unborn baby’s organs are fully formed by 24 weeks. That’s literally life right there by any point of measure which would thus make anyone who takes it away a murderer!!
And I’m not blaming women for sleeping around, they can do what we want because we’re a nation of laws. But they shouldn’t automatically complain about it WHEN IT WAS THEIR ACTIONS THAT GOT THEM THEIR AND THEY KNEW PERFECTLY WHAT THEY WERE DOING AND WHAT WOULD COME OUT OF IT. IF THEY DIDNT WANT IT TO HAPPEN TO THEM, THEN THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN MORE CAREFUL.
SCIENCE IS ON THE PRO-LIFE SIDE, AND IF YOU DO YOUR RESEARCH YOU WOULD KNOW.
And if your fine with supporting babies, that science literally proved are living beings with the ability to have a beating heart just three weeks after conception and potential brain waves just two weeks after that, that are tested out of the womb piece by bloody piece, a leg here, an arm here, brain matter all over the place and then throwing the fetus in a biohazard trash bag. Yeah! Because that seems normal and that is perfectly defendable! Sick! Moral sickness! But yet I’m the sadist for pointing out the perversion of the actual procedure itself and the factual science that disproves the pro-life argument of non-existence, yeah that seems about right.
So please don’t call me a sadist when science literally has proven that fetuses are live beings, yet many still support the idea of sleeping around and using abortion as a form birth control. Which many women do and literally say they do. Oh come on! Please tell me you see something wrong with that! Where’s the humanity in it! I mean science has spoken so who is the real sadist here? Especially when many women say it’s a, “parasite” in a dismissive tone but fail to neglect both basic fact as proven by science.
My “absurd view” it’s science!
Want proof:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/pro-life-is-pro-science%3f_amp=true
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/549308/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/01/16/why_science_strengthens_the_pro-life_argument_139181.amp.html
https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2019/01/48339/
https://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/articles/embryoquotes2.html
And on and on and on. If science were a person, it would pick pro-life by facts alone!
And also why do so so many women, say that having an abortion and it’s effects are difficult yet still they see originally see it as nothing more than a, “clump of cells.” Maybe it’s their subconscious bringing the reality to the surface? Maybe it was the psychology of denial all along? If you don’t believe me, look at the polls. The hypocrisy is real!
3
-
3
-
Streetsdisciple001 When they know the possibility of what may take place, but still choose to do it anyway— in a way it’s most certainly premeditated, especially when many women say they use abortion as a form of birth control. It’s wrong. And it is another human being, whether you realize it or not, that cannot be comparable to the terminally ill or criminals. It’s a life it’s own right who does to deserve to have the chance to proper and be alive just as much as you or I right? Why deny a life with so much potential to the world? That precious soul will never be able to enjoy the natural splendors of life such as breathing the fresh air or seeing the beautiful sky? They won’t get the chance to find their true love or follow their dreams to the peak of happiness. You will be denying that from them forever. Tell me, please be honest with me, that you don’t even think that’s a little bit sad? Please? Don’t destroy my faith in humanity like that. 🥺🥺. A life extinguished forever, I’m trying to connect with your heart here, your soul. Tell me that there is at least a little bit inside of you that thinks that that fetus should deserve better than that? Should deserve to live it’s life to the fullest: education, dreams, love, adventure, the invigoration of living life. That child will never, ever get to experience that.
You say it’s liberty, but what about the liberty of the child? Self-sustaining or not, it’s still most certainly capable of many of the properties of fully formed humans from heartbeats to brainwaves to organ-development yet many don’t even acknowledge its existence. “Parasite” “clump of cells” well, it may not be self-sustaining but it’s certainly an existent life and Id like to we’re all taught from an early age common decency and respect towards every living thing and I mean EVERY, animal or not, human or not. We all coexist and we should all respect one another, no matter how small we are and no matter how insignificant some may portray them to be, they do classify as life and do deserve a chance as we both have received to exist.
Ronald Reagan said something very clarifying, “I’ve noticed that everyone for abortion has already been born”
Well, for those who are pro-choice and have been born I think they should be grateful and fortunate for their lives, considering they wouldn’t be here if their mom did what their advocating for. Never would have been able to follow their dreams, meet their soulmates, travel the world, and enjoy what life has to offer, while the tens of millions who have been aborted aren’t so fortunate. I just thought that was interesting.
Anyway, since I’m not going to change your heart with factual scientifically proven evidence nor by appealing to your humanity, I bid you a good day. Thank you for the constructive conversation, other than the part where you called me a “sadist” which personally I took offense to and by the way I’m not, I think we had a good chat. I sincerely hope you have a nice day and take care. Goodday.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@marmadukescarlet7791 I don’t even have a problem with feminism, just current western feminism. I also never once said women are evil or feminism is wrong. I actually considered myself a feminist too before I found out what it was in the current modern sense and what they were trying to fight against such as, “man spreading”, or all men are creeps with bad intentions, or claiming that AC’s are sexist, while the great pioneering feminists of over a century earlier were courageously fighting and risking their lives for the right to a vote. If feminist were advocating for the women in the Middle East who are truly oppressed in a backwards system then I can promise you I would be the first to sign up. However, western feminism, with women claiming they are oppressed without understanding they are actually on a higher playing field than men in things such as gender based affirmative action, lower criminal sentencing, and advantages in divorce courts while complaining about truly insignificant things such as, “man-spreading” that have no far ranging implication for society just is a contradiction that I have trouble fathoming. I wasn’t trying to be offensive or anything during this discussion so please don’t take it as being so. Anyway, I hope you have a lovely rest of your day and take care.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Alex Kess I know sorry, but if you would like to hear the rest of the story here it is...
I'll try to sum it up, watched it from HUlu right now,
Finds out he robbed banks in Oregon
Tries to manipulate kids into taking more heat for him and to tell his story in an exaggerated way to get people to give him more sympathy to get a lighter sentence
He takes a plea detail avoiding a sentence of 99 years and gets 24
His son, Hayden takes a plea and gets 10
His daughter, Abby takes a plea and gets 5, which for the crime is good as Dan Abrams said
Sheriff is nice and let's her go to county jail and not a prison, gets paroled in two years and adopted by family into home
Doesn't listen to rules and gets home late
Gets job in Laredo, TX gets mixed into wrong crowd used drugs and meets a bad boy with a long rap sheet who when one day she was under influence in gas station sleeps in car when she wakes up finds out he robbed gas station at gun point
Doesn't go to jail for it, but does for parole violation by not informing her parole officer about her actions which is a deal about parole
Serves a year in county jail, gets out, finds job at fish processing plant, meets boyfriend, and is pregnant.
That's pretty much it!!!!
3
-
Story, essentially goes from a WHAT????!!!!! To an AWW!!!! Very quickly... but, I think the ending with Abby was really nice
I'll try to sum it up, watched it from HUlu right now,
Finds out he robbed banks in Oregon
Tries to manipulate kids into taking more heat for him and to tell his story in an exaggerated way to get people to give him more sympathy to get a lighter sentence
He takes a plea detail avoiding a sentence of 99 years and gets 24
His son, Hayden takes a plea and gets 10
His daughter, Abby takes a plea and gets 5, which for the crime is good as Dan Abrams said
Sheriff is nice and let's her go to county jail and not a prison, gets paroled in two years and adopted by family into home
Doesn't listen to rules and gets home late
Gets job in Laredo, TX gets mixed into wrong crowd used drugs and meets a bad boy with a long rap sheet who when one day she was under influence in gas station sleeps in car when she wakes up finds out he robbed gas station at gun point
Doesn't go to jail for it, but does for parole violation by not informing her parole officer about her actions which is a deal about parole
Serves a year in county jail, gets out, finds job at fish processing plant, meets boyfriend, and is pregnant.
That's pretty much it!!!!
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Nathan Russell Hey, I'm not from MS but can I just say I really don't believe in the negativity he is saying and my feelings about the state are that...
I respect it and its kind, hardworking people and it does have so much to offer including delicious food, lovely sceneries, affordable living so people like I can fulfill their dreams of buying their own homes, great talent, refined culture, spectacular charm, beautiful architecture, vibrant optimism, and so much healthy and recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our Southern brothers and sisters, you guys rock! 👍 😁 Especially Mississippians!
Love from far away in Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the state of Mississippi and it's awesome people :)
Connecticut loves you all and is behind you all the way :)
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Alicia Gallagher I'm pro-life and adopting a kid from the system is exactly what I'm planning to do in the future.
Also, about your pro-choice stance, you do realize that when women undergo that surgery of pure human evil they are snuffing out a life that is taking shape. A beautiful baby in the throes of development will die and will never get the chance to live his or her beautiful young life. A being who will eventually grow to have a brain, a heart, two kidneys, a liver, two eyes, two ears, a nose etc. will never get the chance to look up at the pristine blue sky or take their first steps or frolic in a field or go to school and enrich their minds or meet their soulmate or live out their dream because of one cruel person deciding that their life just wasn't worth it. That their life meant nothing. That they could permanently take this life forever and never look back. How selfish do you have to be to do that? How truly despicable are those people? How do people who do that live with themselves? How can people like you defend that?
It's murder plain and simple, and if you want to deny it that's fine but it doesn't take away from that basic fact. Killing babies is evil and despicable, and these women who make that sickeningly evil decision took a life that will now never be. How would you feel if your parent decided that you weren't worth it and decided to forever terminate you and make sure you never existed? Can't wait until the SC overthrows Roe v Wade and let me tell you with the current makeup of the court it will be sooner than you think!
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mayamurali6583 With all due respect, the truth of the matter is there is no such thing as a “patriarchy”. The so called “patriarchy” is a manifestation of biological differences between men and women. I’ll explain myself with some examples. For example, our lovely feminist friends hate that women are objectified. Men are objectified too. I agree that women are objectified more in ad campaigns for example than men. But why is this? Very simple. Men love to see naked women more, than women like to see naked men. Thats why there are way more men who watch porn for example. This is a thing of supply and demand. I’ll give another example. Carreer women are often seen as arrogant, while men are praised for their success. Is this a product of our ‘sexist’ culture or the ‘patriarchy’ as you wish or is there a biological explanation. The thing is in general men dont find a women who is very carreer minded very attractive. While women find men who have a great carreer really attractive. Thats also why you see for example way more old ugly rich men with hot young women than old rich ladies with hot young guys. The biological reason is that in ancient times, the role of the woman was to give birth to children, and care for the children. The male role was to protect the women and the children and make sure there would be food. These days its money which is the protection and the food of the ancient times. When a man marries a woman who has a great carreer, he isn’t needed anymore. He is ‘disposable’. So this is the biological reason of my second example. I’ll give a third one. Why aren’t there more women in STEM fields. This also is most likely because of biological reasons. Research has shown that men and women have different preferences since birth. For example baby boys preferred cars over dolls in general. And girls preferred dolls over cars. The researchers concluded this had everything to do with hormonal levels. In very feminist countries like Sweden where people are very free to choose their field of study. You see that the gap between males and females in STEM widens instead of shrinks. When you see this there is a very good indicator that something is biological and not cultural. Last example, why are there not as much women in politics as men. A study with a size of 10 000 people showed women are less interested than men in politics. The gap was even bigger in modern societies than in developing countries. So could it be that women are less interested in politics and thats why they dont like to run for office as much as men? Men and women have different interests. For example men like football way more, and men like cars more than women. Why is this? Biology?
Also in the USA there are almost as much men raped as women. This is because of the insane prison population. Does anyone care? No, instead as a society we joke about it, dont drop the soap in the shower… While countless of males are completely ruined between the prison walls. But nobody cares. When a female is raped there is massive outrage. Why not when a man is raped? On average men commit more suicide, are 4 times as likely to be homeless, get longer prison time for the same crime, lose custody battles 8 times more often, a way bigger part of combat deaths are male. If there was something as a patriarchy, then why are these things the way they are?
If there are other things you think are sexist, please tell me, and I’ll see if I can debunk them.
There are countless reputable statistics and studies to reinforce this argument on a factual foundation.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
CoolRay
Hey, I'm not from Arkansas but I don't think it should have been that low so can I just say...
I respect the state and its kind, hardworking people and your state does have so much to offer including delicious foods, lovely sceneries, affordable living so people like I can fulfill their dreams of buying their own homes, great talent, vibrant optimism, spectacular charm, beautiful architecture, refined culture, good people, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our Southern brothers and sisters, you guys rock! 👍 😁 Especially Arkansas!
Love from far away north in Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the state of Arkansas and it's awesome people :)
Your state rocks and never forget that!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Elsa-pn5xw Where’s the patriarchy oppressing women? I only see mostly men suffering in society. Just look at the facts:
Unsheltered Homeless (2009)
Women – 12,000 – 4%
Men – 240,000 – 96%
Life Expectancy (2006)
Women – 80.8 Years
Men – 75.7 Years
Suicides (2008)
Women – 7,585 - 19%
Men – 28,450 - 81%
Deaths by Homicide (2004)
Women – 3,856 – 20%
Men – 14,717 – 80%
Deaths from Cancer (2004)
Women – 269,819
Men – 290,069
Deaths from HIV/AIDS (2004)
Women – 3,357
Men – 8,756
Federal Funds for Sex Specific Cancer Research
Women – Breast Cancer – $631,000,000 - 40,000 Deaths
Men – Prostate Cancer – $300,000,000 - 33,000 Deaths
Deaths on the Job (2010)
Women – 355 - 7%
Men – 4,192 - 93%
Injuries on the Job (2007)
Women – 36%
Men – 64%
College Enrollment (2009)
Women – 58% - 11,658,000
Men – 42% - 8,770,000
Affirmative Action Education Programs (Gender Specific)
Women – Yes
Men – No
Unemployment Rates (2010)
Women – 8.6% – 6,199,000
Men – 10.5% - 8,626,000
Average Hours Worked Per Week (2010)
Women – 36.1
Men – 40.2
High School Graduation Rates (2005)
Women – 72%
Men – 65%
Incarceration Rates (2009)
Women – 114,979 - 7%
Men – 1,502,49 - 93%
Child Custody Rates
Women – 11,268,000 custodial mothers
Men – 2,907,000 custodial fathers
US Military Deaths From 1950 – 2010
Women – 139 - 0.001%
Men – 100,063 - 99.99%
Federally Funded Battered Shelters
Women – 2,000+ $300,000,000 per year
Men – None – $0
Federally Funded Health Offices and Research 1970 – Present (not including cancer research)
Women Only – Office, Projects and Programs 70+ – Funds – $100,000,000,000
Men Only – None – $0
Forced Selective Service
Women – No
Men – Yes
Drug and Alcohol Addiction and Abuse Rates (2010)
Women – 5.8%
Men – 12.2%?Unsheltered Homeless (2009)
Women – 12,000 – 4%
Men – 240,000 – 96%
Life Expectancy (2006)
Women – 80.8 Years
Men – 75.7 Years
Suicides (2008)
Women – 7,585 - 19%
Men – 28,450 - 81%
Deaths by Homicide (2004)
Women – 3,856 – 20%
Men – 14,717 – 80%
Deaths from Cancer (2004)
Women – 269,819
Men – 290,069
Deaths from HIV/AIDS (2004)
Women – 3,357
Men – 8,756
Federal Funds for Sex Specific Cancer Research
Women – Breast Cancer – $631,000,000 - 40,000 Deaths
Men – Prostate Cancer – $300,000,000 - 33,000 Deaths
Deaths on the Job (2010)
Women – 355 - 7%
Men – 4,192 - 93%
Injuries on the Job (2007)
Women – 36%
Men – 64%
College Enrollment (2009)
Women – 58% - 11,658,000
Men – 42% - 8,770,000
Affirmative Action Education Programs (Gender Specific)
Women – Yes
Men – No
Unemployment Rates (2010)
Women – 8.6% – 6,199,000
Men – 10.5% - 8,626,000
Average Hours Worked Per Week (2010)
Women – 36.1
Men – 40.2
High School Graduation Rates (2005)
Women – 72%
Men – 65%
Incarceration Rates (2009)
Women – 114,979 - 7%
Men – 1,502,49 - 93%
Child Custody Rates
Women – 11,268,000 custodial mothers
Men – 2,907,000 custodial fathers
US Military Deaths From 1950 – 2010
Women – 139 - 0.001%
Men – 100,063 - 99.99%
Federally Funded Battered Shelters
Women – 2,000+ $300,000,000 per year
Men – None – $0
Federally Funded Health Offices and Research 1970 – Present (not including cancer research)
Women Only – Office, Projects and Programs 70+ – Funds – $100,000,000,000
Men Only – None – $0
Forced Selective Service
Women – No
Men – Yes
Drug and Alcohol Addiction and Abuse Rates (2010)
Women – 5.8%
Men – 12.2%
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
ERIKA MERRITT Hey, I'm not from Indiana but can I just say...
I respect the state and its kind, hardworking people and your state does have so much to offer including delicious food, lovely sceneries, affordable living so people like I can fulfill their dreams of buying their own homes, great talent, beautiful architecture, vibrant optimism, the crazy awesome Indy 500 like you mentioned, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our Indianian brothers and sisters, you guys and gals rock! 👍 😁.
Love from Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the great state of Indiana and it's awesome people :)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Celeste Jacobs Just because it’s in the womb doesn’t mean it’s not alive or a living organism who should be treated with respect! But yet again pro-choicers in general choose to blatantly deny facts and construct false realities in the justification of taking life. I brought a lot of evidence to my response in order to ensure that the Pro-Life position is well represented, so sorry in advance if it’s to lengthy or wordy.
And before you say oh it’s not a life, lets take a look at the scientific evidence shall we? :
https://www.justthefacts.org/get-the-facts/when-life-begins/ : A quote from this that I think you should pay specific interest to is, "In that fraction of a second when the chromosomes form pairs, the sex of the new child will be determined, hereditary characteristics received from each parent will be set, and a new life will have begun."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.desmoinesregister.com/amp/2286938002
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/549308/
In AP Psychology, we learned about coping mechanism and how the unconscious establishes such strategies as to cope with subjects that are more distressing in an intentional effort to lesson that trauma’s impact and thus makes it easier to be able to justify their actions, views, and or positions by being able to detach themselves from the realities they seek to oppose...so I’m going to respectfully go out on a limb here and say maybe the denial of plain facts and scientifically backed evidence is just your unconscious defense mechanism for something that you know in your heart is clearly immoral, ethically repulsive, simply inhumane, and barbarously sickening.
As shown in these truly saddening videos:
https://youtu.be/kAk0Ag-tfxE : This is from the baby’s perspective, the poor little sweet baby that is being murdered.
https://youtu.be/A16gzm9eaa8 : This one is from a doctor that acually performs abortions as he explains the violence of the procedure on tearing the child’s limbs apart piece by bloody piece. With all due respect, how does anybody have the right to do this? Women, men whoever. No one should be entitled to murder a living being and as well in such a violent and gruesome way.
But hey you be you for now, because with the way the Supreme Court is heading, especially with the addition of Brett Kavanugh to the court, it seems a very real possibility that Roe V. Wade can and will be overturned, so it’s only a matter of when and not if.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2018/7/10/17551644/brett-kavanaugh-roe-wade-abortion-trump
Also, the pro-choice position is funny. Supposing that you value your own life, don’t you realize that if your mother underwent this procedure you would have never seen the light of day? Never got the chance to enrich your mind through school? Make friends? Enjoy the beauty of life? Be married? Have children? Follow your dream? None of this would be a possibility. A beautiful life with so much potential will have been snuffed out forever. Be blessed that you even get the chance to be born. To breathe the fresh air and embark on the endless possibilities of how to move forward with your life considering so many other beautiful lives never even got the chance! So yeah be grateful, be blessed for the life you were able to live while so many thousands of others die everyday never even getting the possibility of having!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Lily Hampton Hey, I think your being to unnecessarily hard on yourself (especially towards the end of your comment). Alabama doesn't deserve to be ranked low at all and I know this not even being from the state itself but can I just say...
I respect the state and its kind, hardworking people and your state does have so much to offer including delicious foods, lovely sceneries, affordable living so people like I can fulfill their dreams of buying their own homes, great talent, vibrant optimism, spectacular charm, beautiful architecture, refined culture, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our Southern brothers and sisters, you guys rock! 👍 😁 Especially Alabama!
Love from far away in Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the state of Alabama and it's awesome people :)
So in conclusion, Alabama rocks and it shouldn't be rated bad at all! In fact it should be rated as one of the best and this country should be lucky to have her!! Especially, since up here in CT we have high taxes, high cost of living, and no real identity of our own---so everything that Connecticut doesn't have, Alabama does! Alabama has it all figured out and you should be proud to live there.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
But this one, starts a shutdown, declares trade wars, says many misleading statement to the American people, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you dont believe me, belittles people on Twitter which degrades the office in which he serves in as the nation's highest commander, alienates our allies, makes ill advised geopolitical decisions which Jim Mattis in all his experience, which really tells you something, resigned over because he knew it was wrong, and etc. Etc. Etc. He wants wins but yet he doesnt act like he wants it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Um, about the wall...
a) 57% of Americans don't support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls don't work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seared into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabilization throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenance, saving us a lot of money. These can include aerial and underground sensors, high tech drones, AI powered facial recognition, and human presence detection, according to the Guardian.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 21st century problem, especially when most Americans don't want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive than the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and let's use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@kennyng2289 Excuse me, but did I saw powerful I'm military? Read this, plesse...
https://www.nordeatrade.com/fi/explore-new-market/south-korea/economical-context
There is other power, other than military you know that, right? No offense. Its economy is one of the best in Asia, and considering other major economic powerhouses in the region like China, Taiwan, and Japan it really it really says something- It can stand with them, there bigger but there on the same list and theyco compete.
Also, dont forget soft power ...
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/koreas-cultural-juggernaut-soft-power-strategy-worth-copying-17246
I quickly skimmed these articles, and noticed that they generally support the viewpoint that I am asserting.
In these terms, South Korea is certainly powerful and is a continually rising star in the world. Power doesn't always manifest itself in terms of military strength, it can be shown through a variety of other outlets as well.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Walt Nelson Hey, I'm not even from the south but can I just say I have a deep respect for it and it's..
kind, hardworking people and all that it has to offer including delicious food, lovely sceneries, affordable living so people like I can fulfill their dreams of buying their own homes, great talent, vibrant optimism, refined culture, beautiful architecture, spectacular charm, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our Southern brothers and sisters, you guys rock! 👍 😁
Love from Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the states of the south and their awesome people :)
You guys and gals do truly rock!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I'm sorry if this isn't what you were expecting, but it is all credible truths that some individuals, (cough)(cough) the right, finds to be erroneous as it attacks their president. Well this is the United States of America, one of the greatest nations in the world Israel being number one, and your going to have to keep getting used to negative press coverage, because after all it is the President who ultimately makes the I'll advised decisions and CNN, NBC, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, ETC. they're a just reporting the truths, and from the looks of it there is more bad news coming on the horizon.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@FrankieJamesNews What if your mom decided to abort you?! EXACTLY! I bet your answer would be drastically different! You would want people to advocate on your behalf to make sure you weren't permanently terminated from ever-existing, right? For shame on you for not respecting the sacred process of life! Shame on you for defending the heinous murder of fetuses and shame on you for denying the world the joy of allowing babies to enter it! And I repeat the question again, what if your mom decided to abort you?!
Also, you do realize that most abortions are the result of one night stands, unprotected sex, and casual flings. "It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish." - Mother Theresa
So what right are you being granted here exactly?.....the right to sleep around with whoever you want and use abortion essentially as a birth control method? HOW DISGRACEFUL! Because thats what it looks like and sounds like from many women literally saying it who went through it. Honestly, disgusting how both men and womem cant control themselves and also just as revolting it that if they could control these actions they wouldn't be in this situation in the first place. I heard there is a little thing called Abstinence and that it is 100% guarenteed to not result in pregancy. Crazy idea...why not try it?
It's murder plain and simple of a life in development, and if you want to deny it that's fine but it doesn't change that basic fact.Taking a life in the throes of development, the most vulnerable victim imaginable among us (just because their unborn doesnt mean they're not alive) is evil and despicable, and those women who make that sickeningly evil decision took a life that will now never be and they will have to live with that decision. How would you feel if your parent decided that you weren't worth it and decided to forever terminate you and make sure you never existed? I honesl can't wait until the SC overthrows Roe v Wade and let me tell you with the current makeup of the court, especially with the addition of Brett Kavanaugh, it will be sooner than you think! Im excited just thinking about it! So sleep tight for now because sooner or later the time to snap the neck of Roe V Wade is coming and let me say when the time does come it will finally be thrown in the disgraceful trash bin where it belongs. Good night 😁😁.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Quikthumbs Here are my facts why there should not be a wall, and why a wall would be ineffective...
a) 57% of Americans dont support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls dont work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seered into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabiliazation throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenace, saving us a lot of money.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 20st century problem, especially when most Americans dont want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive then the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and lets use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.a) 57% of Americans dont support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls dont work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seered into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabiliazation throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenace, saving us a lot of money.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 20st century problem, especially when most Americans dont want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive then the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and lets use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Game Xiaoyao Yeah, I feel that people nowadays, in general not only younger S. Koreans, are starting to lose their moral compass, and that includes myself as a young adolescent. We are so engrossed in the idea of money and wealth and fortune we are losing our way across developed countries, not everyone but a lot of people, and Robert Francis Kennedy stated it well on talking about Gross Domestic Product, “measures neither our wit nor our courage, neither our wisdom nor our learning, neither our compassion nor our devotion to our country, it measures everything in short except that which makes life worthwhile.”
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Joseph Mingle The point being is that a Gallup poll, from March of 2018, revealed that 57%, a clear majority of Americans, do not want a wall along the Southern border. So any or every nation has the ability to construct a wall based on popularity or effectiveness, but when our own government is in deep disagreement and the people are obviously divided this wall will ultimately be a symbol of division and partisanship, something that we dont need. Also, people, in desperation, will eventually find a way to scale it, meaning that those hundreds of billions of dollars, even trillions according to some predictions in workers, materials and maintenance, would be in vain. What do you think about that? Answer in a civil manner, please as I just want to have a rationale, understanding conversation/communication.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
TapeDispense Hey, I'm not from Mississippi but can I just say...
I respect the state and its kind, hardworking people and your state does have so much to offer including delicious food, lovely sceneries, affordable living so people like I can fulfill their dreams of buying their own homes, great talent, beautiful architecture, vibrant optimism, a great music scene, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our Mississippian brothers and sisters, you guys and gals rock! 👍 😁.
Love from Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the great state of Mississippi and it's awesome people :)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Kaybrd 897
Hey, I'm not from Missouri but can I just say...
I respect the state and its kind, hardworking people and your state does have so much to offer including delicious foods, lovely sceneries, good people, vibrant optimism, spectacular charm, beautiful architecture, refined culture, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our Missourian brothers and sisters, you guys rock! 👍 😁 And never forget that!
Love from far away in Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the great state of Missouri and it's awesome people :)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Johnny0 0 I would be inclined to agree, but I myself am, perhaps naively, a devoted lover to the principle of democracy and respecting civil liberties and since the mainland government in Beijing is flagrantly neglecting and disrespecting both I believe that Hong Kongers should have the explicit right to seek shelter and citizenship abroad. And fine your right if the issues are to great to overcome than it doesn’t have to be the UK, but I do hope other countries step up and offer Hong Kongers the same option such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and maybe even my own country, the US. Those countries, especially Australia and Canada, would certainly have the space to accommodate them and they would definitely benefit from the high skilled labor force that it would bring. Wouldn’t you agree?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Eris Everblight Mississippi overall rocks! I'm not even from the state but can I just say that I have...
A deep respect for the state and its kind, hardworking people and your state does have so much to offer including delicious food, lovely sceneries, affordable living so people like I can fulfill their dreams of buying their own homes, great talent, vibrant optimism, refined culture, beautiful architecture, spectacular charm, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our Southern brothers and sisters, you guys rock! 👍 😁 Especially Mississippians!
Love from far away in Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the state of Mississippi and it's awesome people :)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@denniscurtis7275 Yeah, you keep thinking that, in other news congrats on the recent construction of the wall. Oh wait, I just remembered NOT GONNA HAPPEN. Anyway, have fun watching Fox News I'm assuming your a Fox News viewer correct me if I'm wrong. Many people, friends/schoolmates of mine who will also turn 18 in November of the next election year in fact across the country, have expressed dissatisfaction with the actions of this president. He is running on limited time with controversy after controversy like him saying he would be, "proud" to take responsibility for this government shutdown. Time will run out and the people will decide for themselves the obvious, is he helping us or hurting us? Oh, yeah dont forget the trade war with China hurting American workers/farmers, cant leave that out can you? This generation has to act and I am confident they will and they will rally making their voices heard to all elected officials, Dems or not, but especially to President Trump.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The Powercast Hey, I'm not from Texas but can I just say...
I respect the state and its kind, hardworking people and your state does have so much to offer including delicious food, lovely sceneries, terrific cities, great talent, beautiful architecture, vibrant optimism, amazing tight knit communities, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our Texan brothers and sisters, you guys and gals rock! 👍 😁.
Love from Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the great state of Texas and it's awesome people :)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Pete Jams I know sorry about that but if you would like to know the end of the story here it is.....
I'll try to sum it up where it kind of left off...
Finds out he robbed banks in Oregon
Tries to manipulate kids into taking more heat for him and to tell his story in an exaggerated way to get people to give him more sympathy to get a lighter sentence
He takes a plea detail avoiding a sentence of 99 years and gets 24
His son, Hayden takes a plea and gets 10
His daughter, Abby takes a plea and gets 5, which for the crime is good as Dan Abrams said
Sheriff is nice and let's her go to county jail and not a prison, gets paroled in two years and adopted by family into home
Doesn't listen to rules and gets home late
Gets job in Laredo, TX gets mixed into wrong crowd used drugs and meets a bad boy with a long rap sheet who when one day she was under influence in gas station sleeps in car when she wakes up finds out he robbed gas station at gun point
Doesn't go to jail for it, but does for parole violation by not informing her parole officer about her actions which is a deal about parole
Serves a year in county jail, gets out, finds job at fish processing plant, meets boyfriend, and is pregnant.
That's pretty much it!!!!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Tucker Carlson This president of yours has thus far, started a trade war hurting American farmers and workers, said he was "proud" to take responsibility for a government shutdown which seriously hurt 800,000 government workers and their families which is not a common occurrence in this country's history and is in fact a recklessly evident example of the administration's overall disregard of American citizens, made constantly misleading statements which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you dont believe me, made offensive statements towards others, frankly, unbefitting of the office, made ill advised geopolitical decisions, and alienated most of our key allies abroad.
SO, BASICALLY IF YOU WANT A DISCUSSION BRING IT!!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Nae55 _ I know, sorry... but here is the ending if you would like to here it....
I'll try to sum it up, watched it from HUlu right now,
Finds out he robbed banks in Oregon
Tries to manipulate kids into taking more heat for him and to tell his story in an exaggerated way to get people to give him more sympathy to get a lighter sentence
He takes a plea detail avoiding a sentence of 99 years and gets 24
His son, Hayden takes a plea and gets 10
His daughter, Abby takes a plea and gets 5, which for the crime is good as Dan Abrams said
Sheriff is nice and let's her go to county jail and not a prison, gets paroled in two years and adopted by family into home
Doesn't listen to rules and gets home late
Gets job in Laredo, TX gets mixed into wrong crowd used drugs and meets a bad boy with a long rap sheet who when one day she was under influence in gas station sleeps in car when she wakes up finds out he robbed gas station at gun point
Doesn't go to jail for it, but does for parole violation by not informing her parole officer about her actions which is a deal about parole
Serves a year in county jail, gets out, finds job at fish processing plant, meets boyfriend, and is pregnant.
That's pretty much it!!!!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
When an officer asks for your ID and registration you give it to him, their not required to tell you why and your legally required to give he documents to him/her. They don't have to tell you, but like I said earlier, you can find out through the ticket he/she will likely give you, through court proceedings, or common sense like driving with tinted windows and there is no mention in the constitution specifically or like you like to say "DIRECTLY" that says an officer that has pulled you over has to tell you why. All they need according to the fourth and fifth amendments respectively is probable cause so reason and reading of your Miranda rights, like I also said before it would be polite to tell you why you were pulled over but no one does it say you have to, go ask your teacher, an attorney, a judge, a senator, etc. because it doesn't say it in the constitution. If you don't want to believe me and don't want to ask someone go read all the amendments yourself like I did, kind of boring but important and you'll find out. If not and still think your right go get me so direct evidence dealing with specific officer actions that they are definitely supposed to do while their on the job and even more specific on traffic stops.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@yourfriendlyneighborhoodla2091 First of all, removing Obamacare not true as it is just extremely premature to say that at this juncture, and also, if it was to be removed the Republicans dont have a plan to substitute, properly, for the 20 million + Americans that are on it. And you just answered my question the ratio of bad things definitely outweighs that of the good. The trade war is hurting American workers, do you understand that?, assailing the intelligence communities, remember Putin and him meeting in Helsinki denying all the facts of our intelligence agencies right in front of Putin, constantly attacking people on Twitter, an action not befitting of a president, Insults many individuals and minorities, look at the videos if you dont believe me, dismisses global warming, and said he would take responsibility for the government shutdown. Shall I go on, or have I said enough. His approval ratings speak for themselves, as well as economists predicting more negative stock market news in 2019 and a recession in 2020. His only claim to success will seem to eventually erode. Plus, that wall, as far as the DEMS, are concerned will not come out of the taxpayers wallets. DEMS HOLD FIRM THAT MONEY CAN GO FOR AGING INFRASTRUCTURE.
2
-
@stormyweather9570 Look at what the economists are predicting for 2020, then you'll see. Also, the economy is just one thing what about all that he is doing trade war with China hurting American farmers and other workers, taking responsibility for the partial government shutdown, look at the meeting between Pence, Schumer, Pelosi, and the President himself, affecting 800,000 federal government workers, and the many misleading statements, or outright lies, on Fact Checker. It is their job to report about the president and believe me they have a lot to report about.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I respectfully disagree, they are out there trying to make the best possible car at a low price and sell it a high value but that is just capitalism and finance. A company tries to make money anyway it can and anywhere it can, Also American companies do the same thing like Google which also does the same thing in other countries- they are trying to make money because that is what all companies do whether they be British, American, Japanese, Chinese, German, Dominican, Peruvian, Costa Rican, South African, Somalian, etc try to make money thats their only thought. And that is not necessarily bad that companies do that because it means they create jobs and hire more people and those people go out and buy from other business, shops, malls, and grocery stores and then they use that money to pay their employees it is a cycle that is constant and its how people get paid and bring home groceries and pay for their bills. Its a major part of our economy in the US and how we get business done in America and in other capitalist countries. So Its not only the Japanese but highfive them because they are doing a good job at it and, in my opinion, making quality cars.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I agree that is why my car is a 2005 Honda Accord, my dad has a 2004 Prius, mom a 2013 Rav4, aunt has a Sienna and Rav4, and other aunt has a Camry. Built to last, and last they do. However, I would also like to interject that not all Americans are unreliable, their are some good ones that get hidden in that large stack. Dad bought a '97 Cavalier in 2007-2008 lasted till about '12. So, its not that long but its longer than most American cars that family has owned over the years and it got us from point a to b in a quick, efficient manner. So, however I prefer Japanese cars their are some good, worthwhile cars out there for American consumers from American automakers that is why if I ever buy American I am going with Chevy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
My first thought when I heard this, since he didnt do it the last two years, was as a political stunt designed to take attention away from the shutdown which he said he would be, "proud" to take responsibility for and to divert from the problems he is having with garnering enough support for the wall. Mr. President, if you haven't visited the troops during Christmas, since 2002 for presidents, for the last two years then why did you do it now, coincidentally during a government shutdown. Can some explain this to me? For me, in my opinion, the president is just using this as a way to distract and get support, void of any genuine care/sympathy for our brave men and women fighting on the ground.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Baxxz It's fine. The reason is- CT is high in taxes and in overall cost of living and that's precisely why thousands of people are leaving each and every year and I hope to be one of them by fall 2020. Nebraska is one of my favorite considerations because it is certainly much more affordable, relaxing and laid back, and has nice people with tranquil scenery. It's a good place to just settle down, without the burden of large taxes on your mind and just relax peacefully in a serene, tranquil setting. Other great states I'm also considering are Iowa, South Dakota, Idaho, West Virginia, and Minnesota (one of my favorite considerations but what's the point because it has such high taxes like CT too so it's not like I would be getting away from it.)
CT is just way to expensive and to prove that- CT has the highest economic inequality in the entire country. So you have some of the richest cities and towns in the entire country, but then miles away you have some of the absolute poorest and most destitute places in the entire country too so it basically represents the general trend of the nation in microcosm where the minority have the wealth, and the majority obviously don't.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@reversecourse First and foremost, give me the neutral website's or other sources that show those statistics you are talking about and also, like I said before many people, in desperation, will find ways to get up and over what are the safeguards against that. Plus, if they do get up and over and it eventually costs of hundreds of billions possibly even trillions, in some predictions, for absolutely nothing. Except wasting more money on an ineffective solution to stop illegal immigrants heading into the country. Our national debt, as of March, was 21 trillion, SURE LETS JUST ADD TO THAT NUMBER.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nocollusion5364 How so? Please explain because according to my own written things this tumultous presidential administration has done they come to...
Saying constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don’t believe me, directly to the American people, making disparaging comments, starting a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, starting a government shutdown hurting which he said he would be, “proud” to take responsibility for hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making ill advised political decisions, alienating some of our key allies, etc.
I’m sorry, should I go on? Or have I made my point in a rationale, comprehensive manner? This is concerning to me and to my fellow citizens as I firmly believe this president has a lack of political experience and thus, does not know how to properly run a large constitutionally based federal republic nation. So would you please explain to me and clear it up for me, how these actions represent him listening to the American people as you say.
1
-
@nocollusion5364 No I'm not, but actually there are others way to properly secure the border other an expensive, ill advised, ineffective wall...Here's my case for why not and what else could substitute for a wall...
a) 57% of Americans don't support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls don't work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seared into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabilization throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenance, saving us a lot of money. These can include aerial and underground sensors, high tech drones, AI powered facial recognition, and human presence detection, according to the Guardian.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 21st century problem, especially when most Americans don't want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive than the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and let's use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@commonsense2576 Could you please go into specifics, because according to my calculations all he has done is...
@pepe the baker How so? Please explain because according to my own written things this tumultous presidential administration has done they come to...
Saying constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don’t believe me, directly to the American people, making disparaging comments, starting a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, starting a government shutdown hurting which he said he would be, “proud” to take responsibility for hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making ill advised political decisions, alienating some of our key allies, etc.
I’m sorry, should I go on? Or have I made my point in a rationale, comprehensive manner? This is concerning to me and to my fellow citizens as I firmly believe this president has a lack of political experience and thus, does not know how to properly run a large constitutionally based federal republic nation. So would you please explain to me and clear it up for me, how these actions represent him being a great leader as you say. Please.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Also, some details/facts about the thing that has caused this government shutdown in the first place are...
a) 57% of Americans don't support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls don't work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seared into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabilization throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenance, saving us a lot of money. These can include aerial and underground sensors, high tech drones, AI powered facial recognition, and human presence detection, according to the Guardian.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 21st century problem, especially when most Americans don't want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive than the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and let's use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.
I rest my case.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This president has thus far, This president has had the most tumultuous administration in U.S. history with the largest firing/turnover rate, saying constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don’t believe me, directly to the American people, making disparaging comments, starting a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, starting a government shutdown hurting which he said he would be, “proud” to take responsibility for hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making ill advised political decisions, alienating some of our key allies, etc.
I’m sorry, should I go on? Or have I made my point in a rationale, comprehensive manner? This is concerning to me and to my fellow citizens as I firmly believe this president has a lack of political experience and thus, does not know how to properly run a large constitutionally based federal republic nation. Now with the new probability of these new possibly discoveries of wrongful actions of the president, they still are loyal to him. Its rather interesting and kind of sad.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How so? Techinically other networks, best example Fox, are much more biased and opinionated and boisterous in comparison to CNN. What CNN has talked about are.. This president has had the most tumultuous administration in U.S. history with the largest firing/turnover rate, saying constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don’t believe me, directly to the American people, making disparaging comments, starting a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, starting a government shutdown hurting which he said he would be, “proud” to take responsibility for hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making ill advised political decisions, alienating some of our key allies, etc.
Which have all been proven to be true, and they have all come from the president himself through his own actions or statements. And what they are reporting here is true also, because if you watched the hearing, which I watched not completely but a good chunk of, showed them really going after his credibility but never attacking the evidence itself, why did they do that? Because maybe the evidence really wasnt that reputable so if you cant go after the evidence go after the person.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jasonmalkin5004 This president has had the most tumultuous administration in U.S. history with the largest firing/turnover rate, saying constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don’t believe me, directly to the American people, making disparaging comments, starting a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, starting a government shutdown hurting which he said he would be, “proud” to take responsibility for hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making ill advised political decisions, alienating some of our key allies, etc.
I’m sorry, should I go on? Or have I made my point in a rationale, comprehensive manner? This is concerning to me and to my fellow citizens as I firmly believe this president has a lack of political experience and thus, does not know how to properly run a large constitutionally based federal republic nation.
However, one thing that I truly love that he did and truly respect him for it is when he voiced his support for Jerusalem as Israel’s rightful capital, which it is, and I applaud his effort in doing that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Really? Do you know the size, experience, weaponry, tactical expertise, and sheer overwhelming numbers of the American armed services in comparison to their UK counterparts. The US has 430 active ships with I believe 10 aircraft carriers, the US has 5,047 manned aircraft, 1.3 MILLION ACTIVE DUTY SOLDIERS WITH ANOTHER 865,000 IN RESERVE, AND (YOU COULD EXPECT) THIS NUMBER CAN ONLY INCREASE WITH MILITARY CONSCRIPTION OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE DRAFT WHICH CAN HE IMPLEMENTED AGAIN AT A TIME OF CRISIS, The US are constantly thinking about creating better, advanced weaponry such as hypersonic missiles, better drones, and a new stealth bomber, and the US has more tactical experience in dealing with warfare compared to the UK acquired from their involvement in many wars. In a war scenario at most I would give the UK only about a year in a war, which also includes guerilla warfare.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
APPLE Job Sorry about that but if you would like to know the ending of the story here it is....
I'll try to sum it up where it left off.....
Finds out he robbed banks in Oregon
Tries to manipulate kids into taking more heat for him and to tell his story in an exaggerated way to get people to give him more sympathy to get a lighter sentence
He takes a plea detail avoiding a sentence of 99 years and gets 24
His son, Hayden takes a plea and gets 10
His daughter, Abby takes a plea and gets 5, which for the crime is good as Dan Abrams said
Sheriff is nice and let's her go to county jail and not a prison, gets paroled in two years and adopted by family into home
Doesn't listen to rules and gets home late
Gets job in Laredo, TX gets mixed into wrong crowd used drugs and meets a bad boy with a long rap sheet who when one day she was under influence in gas station sleeps in car when she wakes up finds out he robbed gas station at gun point
Doesn't go to jail for it, but does for parole violation by not informing her parole officer about her actions which is a deal about parole
Serves a year in county jail, gets out, finds job at fish processing plant, meets boyfriend, and is pregnant.
That's pretty much it!!!! Essentially, the story goes from a WHAT???!!!! To an AWW!!! Fairly quickly
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Haylie Playz Hey, I'm not from Mississippi but can I just say...
I respect the state and its kind, hardworking people and your state does have so much to offer including delicious foods, lovely sceneries, affordable living so people like I can fulfill their dreams of buying their own homes, great talent, beautiful architecture, vibrant optimism, a splendid music scene, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our Mississippian brothers and sisters, you guys and gals rock! 👍 😁.
Love from Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the state of Mississippi and it's awesome people :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As he cared about others to such an extent and actively tried to help alleviate others sufferings through programs, policies, and shedding a light on at a time when many others did not seem to do the same. He is a great man, who morally fought for the poor, the weak, and people without voices to change someting in tnis country and bridge it together from the violence of Vietnam to the violence of the inner cities amd was loved by both African Americans and Whites as well as Latinos and Asians. He went to see Cesar Chavez and break bread with him when he didnt have to but he did it because he believed thr causs Cesar was fignting for was of a moral importance and even joined a picket line, he went to personally see the starving children of the Mississippi Delta when politically it wasn't necessary but he did it because he wanted to see for himself and see if he could do something about it, he visited Indian reservations when he didnt have to because again he didnt have to because he wanted to help, he cared about others and loved them like a lot of people didnt in that time, especially politicians. He was loved by both races just look at the videos of both African Americans and Whites clapping and grabbing at him and trying to get at him. McCarthy didnt attract such a massive following nor do I believe Nixon could have if there was a general election between the two. He is a great individual, and one that will always be remembered at least by me.
1
-
1
-
Times have changed, meaning that tactical planning and more advisable strategies are in place for these types of scenarios. Vietnam was a disgrace and what the Americans did to that poor country was horrid and catastrophic as we shouldn't have been there in the first place. However, the US has won most of its wars and I believe if one were to be fought against the UK things would be much, much different as we would crush its navy in no more than 3-5 days, crush its airforce, the RAF, by repeated and nonstop intense bombing and strafing in 1 week and 3 days with hundreds of American fighters and bombers, with its navy and airforce no longer a significant threat force it's way through an unexpected and lightly defended point on the coast, which will be detected through massive aerial surveillance, land there and drive directly towards London in search of a quick knockout blow scattering British armies along the way. At this time a group of American SEALS will parachute into Belfast and take control of the capital, effectively cutting off Northern Ireland from the UK. After the victorious American army drives into London they will then split up into two groups which 500,000 men each and they can fan out west towards Wales and north towards Scotland to cover more ground, as well as each group is equipped with hundreds of tanks and the newest of the line planes from American factories and manufacturers. The 500,000 Americans and their hundreds of tanks and planes will drive towards Aberhstwyth and city Wales into two parts then breaking up into two smaller groups 300,000 to attack southern Wales and drive towards Cardiff 200,000 to attack southern Wales and drive towards Caernarfon and Chester. The Americans would then send two parachute divisions to land and take Anglesey. With the campaign in Wales done the 480,000 Americans would then be transferred to help the 500,000 Americans approaching Edinburgh. They would give the Scots an ultimatum surrender your capital city or prepare for a hard fight. If the Scots surrender we march in peacefully they dont then the Americans would take it by force. After that the Americans would span out across the Scottish interior scattering armies and resistance fighters whilst taking concerning number of casualties. After several weeks of this the Americans will end up in Thurso and March in. At last they send four parachute divisions into Kirkwall. There would be a massive uptick in guerilla attacks so the Americans from from experiences would use the updated 2009 counterinsurgency manual to effectively quell it. To punish the English in their role in this war they would be forced to sign za humiliating treaty claiming full responsibility, having to pay 700 billion pound sterling, and would have to be forced to cede Northern Ireland to Ireland, lose Wales, and lose Scotland effectively losing its Europea empire, but it can still have its overseas empire. France would become America's friend and the Americans would have a massive military parade to celebrate their victory with dozens of tanks and planes and tens of thousands of troops. The campaign would have cost several four hundred billion dollars, lasted one year, lost 200 tanks, 75aircraft and about 32,000 casualties. The UK would have suffered 82,000 casualties, lost their entire navy, the RAF would have lost 95% of its aircraft, and a humiliating peace treaty.
I'm just saying what I would think would happn.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, as the video showed it has to deal with space, fuel efficiency, and notions of nonreliability among Japanese consumers. Plus, Japanese cars in general are more affordable, reliable, easy to keep healthy, and cool to drive! That is why they sell millions of cars here every year and why I have a Honda, dad has a Prius, mom a Rav4, aunt a Sienna and Rav4, and other aunt a Camry and in my home state of CT, almost everywhere you look you will see a Honda, Toyota, or Nissan.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lambertlum1087 Yes, your right about the economists talking about hypotheticals but if you look at it from a rationale point, you can see exactly what they are talking about giving them credibility all these factors of "higher borrowing costs, a strong dollar, a weakening global economy, an escalating trade war", doesn't look like its gonna end any time soon, "and fading fiscal stimulus from the tax cuts and extra government spending" I recently read this from an article in the Washington post, here is the source https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/business/economy/trumps-big-2020-problem-the-economy-could-be-in-recession/2018/11/13/a6a8946a-e695-11e8-b8dc-66cca409c180_story.html will all come together, at some point ( cough) (cough) 2020, and could be potentially catastrophic for the markets as a whole.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well, assuming your a supporter of the wall it wont come from the hard working taxpayer's money. DEMOCRATS HOLD FIRM that money could go for America's aging infrastructure and faculties that need urgent repairs. That money could go for bridges, tunnels, and highways that keep growing older and are a present danger to many traveling Americans, corrosive water systems that are making Americans sick, etc. things that face, impact many Americans are there isn't enough money that the state, or federal government, has to utilize. That money might not be enough for all of this aging infrastructure and faculties but it will be a good boost for it. Also, the wall probably wont help that much be cause people, in deep desperation, will find a way to circumvent its defenses, what then? We would just have put hundreds of billions, maybe even trillions, according to some predictions in workers, materiel, and maintenance, in something designed to protect us, which couldn't, for absolutely nothing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@marmadukescarlet7791 Forgive me if you saw my bluntness as rudeness. I’m not trying to be disrespectful here, I’m just here to have a civil, mind-mannered, and adult discussion. I brought my facts but if you would like me to keep going then I will:
Unsheltered Homeless (2009)
Women – 12,000 – 4%
Men – 240,000 – 96%
Suicides (2008)
Women – 7,585 - 19%
Men – 28,450 - 81%
Deaths by Homicide (2004)
Women – 3,856 – 20%
Men – 14,717 – 80%
Federal Funds for Sex Specific Cancer Research
Women – Breast Cancer – $631,000,000 - 40,000 Deaths
Men – Prostate Cancer – $300,000,000 - 33,000 Deaths
Deaths on the Job (2010)
Women – 355 - 7%
Men – 4,192 - 93%
Injuries on the Job (2007)
Women – 36%
Men – 64%
College Enrollment (2009)
Women – 58% - 11,658,000
Men – 42% - 8,770,000
Affirmative Action Education Programs (Gender Specific)
Women – Yes
Men – No
Unemployment Rates (2010)
Women – 8.6% – 6,199,000
Men – 10.5% - 8,626,000
Average Hours Worked Per Week (2010)
Women – 36.1
Men – 40.2
Incarceration Rates (2009)
Women – 114,979 - 7%
Men – 1,502,49 - 93%
US Military Deaths From 1950 – 2010
Women – 139 - 0.001%
Men – 100,063 - 99.99%
Federally Funded Battered Shelters
Women – 2,000+ $300,000,000 per year
Men – None – $0
Federally Funded Health Offices and Research 1970 – Present (not including cancer research)
Women Only – Office, Projects and Programs 70+ – Funds – $100,000,000,000
Men Only – None – $0
Forced Selective Service
Women – No
Men – Yes
Drug and Alcohol Addiction and Abuse Rates (2010)
Women – 5.8%
Men – 12.2%?
Deaths by Homicide (2004)
Women – 3,856 – 20%
Men – 14,717 – 80%
Deaths from Cancer (2004)
Women – 269,819
Men – 290,069
Deaths from HIV/AIDS (2004)
Women – 3,357
Men – 8,756
Federal Funds for Sex Specific Cancer Research
Women – Breast Cancer – $631,000,000 - 40,000 Deaths
Men – Prostate Cancer – $300,000,000 - 33,000 Deaths
Unemployment Rates (2010)
Women – 8.6% – 6,199,000
Men – 10.5% - 8,626,000
High School Graduation Rates (2005)
Women – 72%
Men – 65%
Child Custody Rates
Women – 11,268,000 custodial mothers
Men – 2,907,000 custodial fathers
1
-
@marmadukescarlet7791 First of all, I actually was curious - it wasn’t a “game” but the fact that you can’t respectfully send me a link and immediately insult my lack of feminist theory when I’m actually interested in the topic at hand is really telling. Remember when you assailed me for my, “bitterness”. Yes, I guess I’m the bitter one.
Second of all: If your talking about the patriarchy affecting the,” “entirety” of humanity why label it “feminism” and not humanism or egalitarianism - which is more wide range and inclusive while Feminism explicitly implies only female - and not the rest of our society. Feminists don’t even want boys to join your movement - that pretty much tells me everything I need to know. If the patriarchy affects everyone then why don’t you include everyone in your fight? Does that mean feminists are actually falling victim to the notion of false consciousness themselves by not recognizing or acknowledging the blatant injustice of excluding men in a group that claims to support equality of the sexes because they don’t believe men belong to a female centered movement that claims EQUALITY between the sexes, as the name not so subtlety suggests. It’s either false consciousness or complete hypocrisy - one or the other, and I’m thinking hypocrisy. The fact that western feminism has devolved to this low, while not even discussing the true oppression of women in the Middle East by men is absolutely confounding and concerning. Thank you but I’m done with this contempt-filled, hypocritical, and meaningless movement so have a lovely rest of your day and take care. 😊
And remember if you ever get in trouble with law enforcement for whatever reason, just remember you’ll be fine because women on average are likely to get 60% less criminal sentences than men for the same crime - which is yet another example of the vile and disgusting patriarchy that oppresses women at work! 😊
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@YasminMouse THERE ARE TENS OF THOUSANDS, TENS OF THOUSANDS, TENS OF THOUSANDS please, your doing this on purpose to intentionally provoke me I get it. Well, this is the last time I'm going to say it your wrong there are tens of thousands in the world that are good, honest people and you should be ashamed of yourself for attempting to disgrace and attack them and the Church, when thousands of them give food, donations, and a place to house people to keep them warm. It's wrong what your saying and I hope that one day you will change your mind, I'm not supposed to hate my enemies so I will not hate you and I'm going to leave on a good note, have a lovely rest of your day.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
TheIron Smith Also, you might think withdrawing from Syria and Afghanistan, is good which it might be, but from a military standpoint its definitely not. You give the Russian Federation and Iran the chance to exert more power and influence in the region, Bashar Assad could still commit violence against his own people, you leave the Kurds, which have been our allies against the world's most sickening terror group, wide open for an attack by Turkey, and if we leave without making absolutely 1000% sure IS hasn't been completely finished then their is the possibility that they could come back again, even if its years and years from now, like what happened when we left Iraq in 2011. Even General Mattis, a smart man with plenty of military experience, realized the massive negative implications of the president's actions and voiced his opposition in his resignation report. All of what I said has truth to it, however your entitled to your own opinion and I will respect that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hardkore360 No, I understand completely and I agree, the hardworking taxpayers money can go for more important/pressing issues to many Americans, such as aging bridges, tunnels, and highways, corrosive water systems etc. I'm just kind of weary of the Republicans and how they just naturally spin things in a shameful way to further their ridiculous political goals, so I'm just really tired of it. They're just using good people or honorable people and using them as ammunition to further whatever they want. But I just know when 2020 comes around their will definitely be a new president. For now, DEMS HOLD FIRM dont let the Republicans win this ridiculous shutdown for the taxpayers money at the border. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. ALSO, yeah I didnt like him equating Jesus to the immigration crisis, I felt that was inappropriate. Everything else, is agreeable with.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How are they "fake", please explain? Because according to my calculations, they have reported on the actions of this adminstration...
This president has had the most tumultuous administration in U.S. history with the largest firing/turnover rate, saying constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don’t believe me, directly to the American people, making disparaging comments, starting a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, starting a government shutdown hurting which he said he would be, “proud” to take responsibility for hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making ill advised political decisions, alienating some of our key allies, etc.
These are all true, and not just made up facts so how is this video any different? They are just doing their jobs and reporting to the world and the American people how their government is operating. If you think I'm wrong about all these facts, and they're are more, then go ahead explain each of them and tell me how they are, "fake" go ahead... clear the record... here's your opportunity....
1
-
@youknowwhat3747 Really, tell that to his approval ratings. How so? How has he kept his promises? I literally listed all the things he has done that have been wrong, and all you can come back to me is with a vague sentence of, "he kept this promises" that's it? I thought you were going to provide a comprehensive, rational analysis of all that he has done right to contradict me. Oh well, I also forgot the evidence that Cohen provided and by that I mean ACTUAL DOCUMENTS in case you were going to attack his credibility, but before I go I need to also say Hillary won the popular VOTE, so yeah he's not a very popular president and again I say all these things against him, which are true because he actually said them, and all you come back is with "he keeps his promises". doesnt sound like a very good defense to me, but alright you keep saying that BYE.
Lol, wheres the wall Mexico would pay for? Wheres the deal with North Korea he said would happen? Where's the Repeal and Replace ObamaCare that he so advocated for? Where is all the cancelling of all funding to Sanctuary cities that he so advocated for? Adminster Medicaid through block grants? Where are they? Etc. Etc. Where are they?
1
-
1
-
@youknowwhat3747 But actually there are others way to properly secure the border other an expensive, ill advised, and ineffective wall, here is my case below...
a) 57% of Americans don't support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls don't work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seared into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabilization throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenance, saving us a lot of money. These can include aerial and underground sensors, high tech drones, AI powered facial recognition, and human presence detection, according to the Guardian.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 21st century problem, especially when most Americans don't want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive than the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and let's use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.
And also, I realized that you didnt address something you said earlier, about him keeping promises that I disproved, and that I showed evidence of him promising something but not doing it but you didnt address it, how come? Where is your comprehensive, rational rebuttal to my statement, instead of calling me names and insinuating something that is absolutely false and intentionally provocative where is your counter argument?
1
-
1
-
1
-
@youknowwhat3747 And what did you mean you dont have to prove it, if you cant prove it where is your case? If all I have to do is look around, then show me some good things that are happening right now, if you cant even tell me/show me some examples, then you dont have a case based on factual evidence its just an opinion then there's nothing here. If all I have to do is look around, then I'm bound to see really good things but that's the thing I can't I see a government mired in absolute turmoil that attacks others routinely and has constant shakeups in the terms of firings and the controversial statements/language of an embattled president who has one of the lowest approval ratings in history.
Ok, let's say the economy is good, that is attributable to Pres. Obama setting it on the path where it is today, but then what? Huh... what really shows that he is the hardest working president ever... FDR, Lincoln, TR, JFK, Reagan they deserve that title not a man who is about to have his wall plan fail in the Senate and who is one of the most controversial figures in modern American history. Believe me, as both a history lover and an upcoming political scientist this is a very interesting, yet scary time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I am an American born and raised, in my family my mom has a Toyota Rav4 and dad has a Toyota Prius. My hand me down car is a Honda Accord. My aunt has a Toyota Camry. My other aunt has a Toyota Rav4 and a Toyota Sienna. In general, the reason people, and I am using my family as a smaller sample to represent people overall, is they are generally more reliable, they last a long time, and I mean a long time, I have seen videos of many Toyotas lasting hundreds of thousands of miles on Youtube with one pickup truck lasting 1 million, and their affordable, like someone said in this section, without taking to much away from comfort and technology. We had a Ford Eddie Bauer, and I know I should not judge based off of one experience but other people say this about Ford cars so I am going to assume its not only me, that lasted only several months before it completely broke down and it was done. In all the times I can remember, from having these Toyotas and now my hand me down Honda not once, and I mean no car isnt perfect nothing is except only God so, did it have a serious enough problem NOT ONCE IN OVER 7 YEARS, BUT A FORD BREAKS DOWN IN 2 MONTHS THAT PRETTY MUCH SUMS IT UP FOR ME. NOT THAT FORD IS BAD, I COULD BE WRONG AND PLEASE TELL ME THAT IN THE COMMENT SECTION IF YOU DISAGREE BUT I THINK TOYOTAS, HONDAS, AND IN GENERAL JAPANESE CARS ARE MORE QUALITY.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Ronniegosmi That is where we disagree.
1) Nothing is perfect, except God
2) The current Republican administration has not gotten that much done, well of you count a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, saying he would be "proud" to take responsibility for a shutdown hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making constant misleading statements which are on Fact Checker, if you dont believe me, ill advised geopolitical decisions, which James Mattis resigned over, and alienating many of our key allies abroad. But if you mean in general, yeah there have been really, really amazing Republican presidents.
Great examples include
- Abraham Lincoln
- Theodore Roosevelt
- Ronald Reagan
-And Dwight David Eisenhower
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
philippe dupont Still there are a lot of American inventions that we can take pride in among the biggest - planes, television, ARPANET, light bulb (wanna debate that one, because that's definitely historical and definitely American recognized and utilized the world over), photographic film, modern suspension bridge, and the mapping of the human genome which, as I recently learned, was finished in 1999/2000 a scientific milestone in all regards. I could go through many more, but those are most prominent within my mind and ones that I believe are most notable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
LAST CALL a) 57% of Americans dont support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls dont work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seered into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabiliazation throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenace, saving us a lot of money.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 20st century problem, especially when most Americans dont want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive then the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and lets use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.
1
-
1
-
1
-
No offense, but how so? This president has started a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, This president has said he was "proud" to start a government shutdown which hurt 800,000 federal employees, made many comstantly misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you dont believe me, to the American people and is still doing so, made many offensive comments on Twitter belittling others which degrades the office of the presidency, made many negative, offensive, and horrid statements against Hispanics, Muslims, and Women, made ill advised geopolitical decisions which are extremely bad if Jim Mattis with all of his experience resigns due to it, and alienated many of our key allies abroad. Do I need to go on? These actions and policies are immoral and wrong and only have one thing in common really- they create controversy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Guys and Gals, I dont know why there are people here comparing this to Hitler and his actions, just why?
I mean, I know this is raucous, inappropriate, divisive, etc but there is no comparison here between his actions and the actions of an authoritarian strongman who took people's rights away and had millions killed, God's people killed. Please don't compare, as their is, frankly, no comparison one does it intentionally to get support, the other actually believes in what he is saying and commited upon it with the worst crimes in humanity so just please stop.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@doomedt-62 You realize that war has changed since then. We don't even have to make an immediate landing we could just bombard you with precision guided bombs and missiles for months if may be to reduce your forces effectiveness and shatter your morale. We would first obliterate your navy, your airforce, military installations, airports, etc for months and months if we have to. We have a massive, massive arsenal and with America's massive weapons manufacturers it wouldn't be difficult to constantly make them and eliminate your war industry. We could place tariffs/embargoes on trading with you so other countries not wanting to mess with the US will not deal with you and thus shatter your economy. And after that with our massively numerical superiority, advanced weaponry in tanks and planes, and battle tactics we could them invade and destroy whatever is left. The war ends, America has a massive military parade with tens of thousands of troops and dozens of planes/tanks, and the UK, more like England, is forced to sign a humilitating peace treaty is forced to take full responsibility for the war, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland find their independence meaning its European empire is crumbled, and they have to pay 400 billion pounds in reparation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
LAST CALL a) 57% of Americans don't support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls don't work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seared into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabilization throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenance, saving us a lot of money. These can include aerial and underground sensors, high tech drones, AI powered facial recognition, and human presence detection, according to the Guardian.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 21st century problem, especially when most Americans don't want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive than the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and let's use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.
There is my case, along with a strong opinionated statement.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thepope2412 You do have a point there, I give you that, but in the case of the Great Wall of China the Mongols constantly found ways to get around/ through it and in the case of the Berlin Wall even if it's still keeping people in the central point is stopping people from going over or through it is still valid and it is what were talking about right now so it still does count and it is valid so it should be included. Also, I read a report in the NYT that said the wall would cost $70 alone to build and a further $150 million a year to maintain so overtime or in the long term like you said we really wont be saving that much money. Also, wasn't Mexico supposed to be paying for the wall? Because if it wasnt coming out of the hardworking American taxpayers dollars I guess it wouldn't matter what I think, but since it is coming from the hardworking taxpayer's dollars I am a vocal, advocate against it because we would be spending money on something I, and many others, see as impractical, ineffective, and extremely expensive - just my opinion.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Udar Pavarota EXACTLY! I’m Hispanic too and I agree. We need to get it through people’s heads and skulls whether their Cuban, Venezuelan, Mexican, Dominican, Puerto Rican, etc. that this is dangerous, that they need to follow proper procedures and protocols, and severely limit or outright terminate social interaction, unless necessary, to ensure the safety of themselves and their families. Until then, more of them will continue to get sick.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bill Nevins I wouldn't say such a bad thing like that, but I am not a fan of this administration also but let's try to be civil, and convey our opinions to respect with all. Anyway, you dont even need to say a bad word, the evidence kind of speaks for itself about this being the most tumultous adminstration in American modern history, maybe ever...
Saying constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don’t believe me, directly to the American people, making disparaging comments, starting a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, starting a government shutdown hurting which he said he would be, “proud” to take responsibility for hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making ill advised political decisions, alienating some of our key allies, etc.
I’m sorry, should I go on? Or have I made my point in a rationale, comprehensive manner? This is concerning to me and to my fellow citizens as I firmly believe this president has a lack of political experience and thus, does not know how to properly run a large constitutionally based federal republic nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@t.m9341 The President has thus far, started a trade war with China hurting American farmers and other workers, said he would be " proud " to take responsibility for the government shutdown affecting 800,000 federal government employees, and made constant misleading, or even outright, lies which you can check on Fact Checker. The wall has no guaranteed chance of success as many people in deep desperation will find a way to circumvent its defenses compared to the pressing and grave dangers of America's AGING INFRASTRUCTIRE/FACULTIES. Things like AGING BRIDGES, TUNNELS, AND HIGHWAYS, CORROSIVE WATER SYSTEMS, ETC. things that many Americans care about and impact their travel and safety where their isn't enough funding, not even close, where the hardworking taxpayers dollars can make a massive difference, or at least start to make a massive difference.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ashes2ashes863 Excuse me, but first can we be a little more bit more respectful in this discussion. Secondly, in general they are considering their sales, reliability, and affordability Americans realize this and this is why they sell so much and you only pointed to two examples, but it still does not impact the general quality that they have according to sales and satisfaction reports by consumers. And what about Nissan, Toyota, and Honda who have had many cars go into the hundreds of thousands of miles as well, while American cars are becoming less popular and less sold https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-01-16/why-the-american-sedan-is-marked-for-death.
Why do you think Detroit is shifting to large trucks and vehicles, in part because their cars are slow selling as less people are buying their smaller products and turning to their cheaper, more quality competition like the Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, which is my hand-me-down, and Nissan Altima. Guess what, the Toyota Camry was the best selling car in the United States of America in 2018, so even if you do not like it millions upon millions of Americans do, so sit tight and watch the ever changing landscape of cars: Maybe I will get a Camry in the future? For now, I'll drive my Honda. No offense, respectfully.
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/motoring/motoring-news/japanese-cars-take-seven-of-top-10-in-reliability-survey-2016048.html - 2010
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/autos/2015/10/20/consumer-reports-auto-reliability/74270438/ - 2015
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/03/general-motors-new-vehicle-sales-drop-2point7percent-in-the-fourth-quarter.html - 2019
See the pattern?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Russia's president wants to destabilize America, unfortunately that is what our president is doing. 😤😤😤.
This is purely my opinion, as well as from others, as his political stances, misleading statements, and previous actions have shown considering there is a trade war, government shutdown, and alienation of most of our closest allies around the world.
The only thing, in my opinion and others, that this administration has done that was good was supporting the fact that Jersualem is Israel's capital, as it should be, and going to move our embassy there within a few years.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
terry brown Hey, I'm not from Tennessee nor have I visited but can I just say...
I respect the state and its kind, hardworking people and your state does have so much to offer including delicious food, lovely sceneries, cheaper living so people like I can fulfill their dreams of buying their own homes someday, great talent, nice Southern hospitality, beautiful architecture, vibrant optimism, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our Tennessean brothers and sisters, you guys and gals rock! 👍 😁.
Love from Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the great state of Tennessee and it's awesome people :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@exxodas Really you would like a president who has...
Has had the most tumultuous administration in U.S. history with saying constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don’t believe me, directly to the American people, making disparaging comments, starting a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, starting a government shutdown hurting which he said he would be, “proud” to take responsibility for hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making ill advised political decisions, alienating some of our key allies, etc.
I’m sorry, should I go on? Or have I made my point in a rationale, comprehensive manner? This is concerning to me and to my fellow citizens as I firmly believe this president has a lack of political experience and thus, does not know how to properly run a large constitutionally based federal republic nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davesaldana7263 Excuse me who are you? And did I say that? All I'm saying is that money doesnt guarentee our safety as many people in deep desperation will find a way to circumvent its defenses. What that money could go for would be our AGING INFRASTRUCTURE/FACULTIES. Our aging bridges, tunnels, and highways, corrosive water systems, etc. things that aren't getting enough, not even nearly enough, funding but are extreme and pressing concerns for the lives of many of my fellow Americans. You Pres. Trump supporters need to go back to watching Fox News and let the rationale minded Americans, if you can even call yourself that 🤣🤣🤣 lol, try to decipher the current tragic state of the nation. 😤😤.
Edit: Sorry for some of my language and actions in addressing you, however, the facts are blatantly staring you in the face and all you have to do is open your mind to it, other than that I cant help you.
1
-
@diazarmy5278 Well, illegal immigration to our nation isn't right, others have waited their turn patiently and legally and they should do the same, but the wall has no guarentee of success, because even if it does hamper some people from getting into the country many people, in deep desperation, will find a way to circumvent its defenses. What then? What would all that money have gone for? Oh wait, it could have gone for AGING INFRASTRUCTURE/FACULTIES that pose pressing and grave dangers to many Americans. Things such as aging bridges, tunnels, highways, in the thousands, corrosive water systems, etc. things that Americans desperately need protection against and where there isn't enough funding, not even close, for. That wall is expected to, in the long run according to some estimates, hundreds of billions or even trillions in workers, materiel, and maintenace due to in part its grandeur and scale. I dont believe it is worth it and however I think something should be done about the illegal immigrants entering the country, this isn't it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Why? May I ask, why? They are really reliable, easy to maintain and fix just ask any mechanic, and last a long time with many videos showing them going to the hundreds of thousands to even over a million miles and still running. I can show you tons of videos if you like. They are also affordable without taking to much away from comfort and technology and fun to drive. That is why dad has a '04 Prius, mom a '13 Rav4, aunt a Sienna and Rav4, and other aunt a Camry. In general, reliable, affordable, easy to maintain, and fun to drive really help them considering almost everywhere you look, at least from my perspective, you see a Toyota.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Dylan Nguyen Please do not compare, of course Asian Americans have had discrimination but never, ever on par of lynchings, of dogs being sent on you, of hoses being sprayed on you, beating you calling you names, assaulting you. It’s not from the outside looking in, considering how these are problems Africans Americans are to an extent Latinos are facing today while comparable there not happening to Asians. And what I mean by this is yes it happens but more severely and more commonly to African Africans then Asians ten fold in fact a hundred fold. Asians by statistic have a higher chance of better living and being less discriminated upon in many, many many aspects of life in this country so of course you will never know the life a Latino or African American is going there, but you can bet that he/she knows the life an Asian Americans is living or has the proper chance to live. In fact, no offense, at times I also notice an arrogance of some Asians, not all, on their status and socio economic background and how they look down on others, it makes me sick and this goes back to 90s LA. Look up an incident in 1991-1992 Korean store in Koreatown and you’ll greet the picture of how they were treated upon and look at the interviews from African Americans in that area. Frankly, I am appalled and I’m not saying it’s all people but a good amount where it is certainly noticeable
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@spaceman5089 You want more? About the president's misleading statements, or even outright lies as shown by Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don't believe me, started a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, commencing a government shutdown in which he said, and I quote, he would be "proud" to take responsibility for impacting 800,000 federal government employees, ill advised geopolitical decisions with potentially massive negative fallout, and alienating most of our allies abroad.
But, I do love one thing that he did which is to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's rightful capital, as it is, and saying he will move our embassy there I do like that he did that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Zuha Sure, I’ll give you the truth but you might not like it.
Just because it’s in the womb doesn’t mean it’s not alive or a living organism who should be treated with respect! But yet again pro-choicers in general choose to blatantly deny facts and construct false realities in the justification of taking life. I brought a lot of evidence to my response in order to ensure that the Pro-Life position is well represented, so sorry in advance if it’s to lengthy or wordy.
And before you say oh it’s not a life, lets take a look at the scientific evidence shall we? :
https://www.justthefacts.org/get-the-facts/when-life-begins/ : A quote from this that I think you should pay specific interest to is, "In that fraction of a second when the chromosomes form pairs, the sex of the new child will be determined, hereditary characteristics received from each parent will be set, and a new life will have begun."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.desmoinesregister.com/amp/2286938002
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/549308/
In AP Psychology, we learned about coping mechanism and how the unconscious establishes such strategies as to cope with subjects that are more distressing in an intentional effort to lesson that trauma’s impact and thus makes it easier to be able to justify their actions, views, and or positions by being able to detach themselves from the realities they seek to oppose...so I’m going to respectfully go out on a limb here and say maybe the denial of plain facts and scientifically backed evidence is just your unconscious defense mechanism for something that you know in your heart is clearly immoral, ethically repulsive, simply inhumane, and barbarously sickening.
As shown in these truly saddening videos:
https://youtu.be/kAk0Ag-tfxE : This is from the baby’s perspective, the poor little sweet baby that is being murdered.
https://youtu.be/A16gzm9eaa8 : This one is from a doctor that acually performs abortions as he explains the violence of the procedure on tearing the child’s limbs apart piece by bloody piece. With all due respect, how does anybody have the right to do this? Women, men whoever. No one should be entitled to murder a living being and as well in such a violent and gruesome way.
But hey you be you for now, because with the way the Supreme Court is heading, especially with the addition of Brett Kavanugh to the court, it seems a very real possibility that Roe V. Wade can and will be overturned, so it’s only a matter of when and not if.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2018/7/10/17551644/brett-kavanaugh-roe-wade-abortion-trump
Also, the pro-choice position is funny. Supposing that you value your own life, don’t you realize that if your mother underwent this procedure you would have never seen the light of day? Never got the chance to enrich your mind through school? Make friends? Enjoy the beauty of life? Be married? Have children? Follow your dream? None of this would be a possibility. That beautiful life with so much potential will have been snuffed out forever. Be blessed that you even get the chance to be born. To breathe the fresh air and embark on the endless possibilities of how to move forward with your life considering so many other beautiful lives never even got the chance! So yeah be grateful, be blessed for the life you were able to live and so many thousands of others die everyday never even getting the possibility of having!
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bullet Anarchy I’m not the one that’s speaking drivel. Your the one that said it’s not violently ripped out. Proved you wrong on that one if you watched the link it seemed pretty violent to me. Ripping out a baby piece by piece and limb by limb. Also, I’m not the one that doesn’t respect the fundamental right to exist. Also I’m not the one only focusing on rape and medical reasons, when it’s common knowledge most are unwanted pregnancy. Wonder how you would feel if you were aborted, because it’s ridiculous how if your mother decided to do what your advocating for you would never have seen the light of day. Why deny the chance to get married? to follow their dreams? enrich their minds? etc. to a child with all these endless possibilities in our world? To be honest, I view the pro-choice movement as a bunch of people who throughly disrespectful life and again it is weird considering they wouldn’t be here right now if their mothers chose that path.
President Reagan was a very smart man when he said, “I’ve noticed how everyone who is for abortion has already been born.” The irony in that statement. Oh the irony.
Anyway, take care of yourself and just remember this happy thought, at least happy for us pro-lifers by the way, with the way the Supreme Court is heading, especially with the addition of Brett Kavanugh to the court, it seems a very real possibility that Roe V. Wade can and will be overturned, so it’s only a matter of when and not if.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2018/7/10/17551644/brett-kavanaugh-roe-wade-abortion-trump
Take care, and have a nice day!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It was actually Obama who brought back the economy from the wrenches of the devastating Recession, remember that? He left it in a strong position and now Trump is claiming credit for it and by pulled troops how is that going so far just interested in knowing?
Other "seemingly" great things this president has done are...
Saying constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don’t believe me, directly to the American people, making disparaging comments, starting a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, starting a government shutdown hurting which he said he would be, “proud” to take responsibility for hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making ill advised political decisions, alienating some of our key allies, etc.
I’m sorry, should I go on? Or have I made my point in a rationale, comprehensive manner? This is concerning to me and to my fellow citizens as I firmly believe this president has a lack of political experience and thus, does not know how to properly run a large constitutionally based federal republic nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
About the wall... The reason why the government is shutdown in the first place....
a) 57% of Americans don't support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls don't work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seared into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabilization throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenance, saving us a lot of money. These can include aerial and underground sensors, high tech drones, AI powered facial recognition, and human presence detection, according to the Guardian.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 21st century problem, especially when most Americans don't want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive than the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and let's use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.
So, its not biased just reporting the truth about how the president's lack of political experience and purely business mindset of no compromise is hurting our government over an ineffective wall.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Hippo.20 They actually are, and it’s been historically noted by past senior Palestinians figures themselves:
“The Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism.”
-Zuhair Mohsen PLO Executive Committee Member Chair of the PLO (in a 1977 interview).
Let me quote that again this time in bold just to emphasize it, “….no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese…for political and tactical reasons….we posit the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian people’ to oppose Zionism.”
There never was a Palestinian people and there never was a Palestinian state. From their own words, the notion of a Palestinian identity was artificially constructed as a means to solely undermine and attack Israel. It’s nothing more than a recent pseudo historical fabrication weaponized for political use.
Pro-Palestinians can plug in their ears and pretend they didn’t read what they just read, but even when your own side has literally acknowledged it - let’s just say it does not look good.
Maybe that explains why the Palestinians never had any problems (is. resistance efforts, independence movements, prolonged calls for the creation of their own state) with Jordanian and Egyptian occupation of the West Bank and Gaza from 1948-1967, but did so as soon as Israel began administering those territories post-1967? Because it’s always been about opposing Israel and not about any notion of “freedom” or “liberation”.
Anyway if there ever was such a thing as a Palestinian state it’d probably be Jordan - where up to 60% of the population identifies as Palestinian or of Palestinian origin. I’m surprised it isn’t classified as one already ngl.
1
-
@Hippo.20 They actually are, and it’s been historically noted by past senior Palestinians figures themselves:
“The Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism.”
-Zuhair Mohsen PLO Executive Committee Member Chair of the PLO (in a 1977 interview).
Let me quote that again this time in bold just to emphasize it, “….no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese…for political and tactical reasons….we posit the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian people’ to oppose Zionism.”
There never was a Palestinian people and there never was a Palestinian state. From their own words, the notion of a Palestinian identity was artificially constructed as a means to solely undermine and attack Israel. It’s nothing more than a recent pseudo historical fabrication weaponized for political use.
Pro-Palestinians can plug in their ears and pretend they didn’t read what they just read, but even when your own side has literally acknowledged it - let’s just say it does not look good.
Maybe that explains why the Palestinians never had any problems (is. resistance efforts, independence movements, prolonged calls for the creation of their own state) with Jordanian and Egyptian occupation of the West Bank and Gaza from 1948-1967, but did so as soon as Israel began administering those territories post-1967? Because it’s always been about opposing Israel and not about any notion of “freedom” or “liberation”.
Anyway if there ever was such a thing as a Palestinian state it’d probably be Jordan - where up to 60% of the population identifies as Palestinian or of Palestinian origin. I’m surprised it isn’t classified as one already ngl.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
jman baller Connecticut or as we like to call ourselves, "The Constitution State." We're the third smallest by size, but have 3.5 million people which is more than what Nebraska, Iowa, Montana, Wyoming, Nevada, Utah, Mississippi, Rhode Island, Delaware, and New Mexico can say they have. However, despite our population being larger than like 10 other states unfortunately for us, like I said in my previous comment, people forget about us existing all the time. I'm like WE EXIST, we're south of Massachusetts, east of New York and West of Rhode Island like how hard is it to find us on a map? 😩😩😤😤😤.
Edit: I also forgot to add Idaho, North Dakota, South Dakota, Alaska, Hawaii, West Virginia, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Maine.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wow, really? We have 430 powerful ships, including TEN OF THE MOST POWERFUL NUCLEAR POWERED CARRIER IN THE WORLD THE NIMITZ-CLASS CARRIERS, 1,356,929 active soldiers with 865,000 in reserve and THIS NUMBER COULD ONLY GO UP IF THEY REINSTITUTED THE DRAFT, and massive technological arsenals of the newest planes, upgraded tanks, and the new and more powerful Gerald R. FORD AIRCRAFT CARRIERS. Do you think you could honestly defeat us? Plus, we have more advanced tactics acquired from our involvement in so many recent wars.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
About the wall.... About the wall... The reason why the government is shutdown in the first place....
a) 57% of Americans don't support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls don't work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seared into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabilization throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenance, saving us a lot of money. These can include aerial and underground sensors, high tech drones, AI powered facial recognition, and human presence detection, according to the Guardian.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 21st century problem, especially when most Americans don't want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive than the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and let's use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.
So, its not "stupid" it is just reporting the truth about how the president's lack of political experience and purely business mindset of no compromise is hurting our government over an ineffective wall.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Stephen Shelley a) 57% of Americans don't support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls don't work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seared into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabilization throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenance, saving us a lot of money. These can include aerial and underground sensors, high tech drones, AI powered facial recognition, and human presence detection, according to the Guardian.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 21st century problem, especially when most Americans don't want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive than the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and let's use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just Random True, but at the same time I know economy matters, but what about the central moral endeavor of helping out those North Koreans who are starving and sick, the North Koreans who are in the horrific plight of prison camps, and the North Koreans being tortured. This is what should be discussed as a reason, not the selfish action of making ones nation richer but the honorable action of helping a people in dire need of assistance at this point in time from the horrible oppression they face by a totalarian dictatorship. So, don’t get me wrong it should happen but for the right reasons, not just thinking about money but thinking about lives. So, while I understand the intelligence of the kid and his concept of resources, which can be a valid argument, it shouldn’t only be about wealth but of ethical obligations to all people. And in a lot of these interviews, as people also explain in their comments, are about doing it for money being a primary motivator. We can’t as a society and a world only think of things in that sense, so while I understand it I don’t agree with its motivations and I believe people’s moral compasses, not only in South Korea but for younger generations everywhere, are skewed, and that includes myself as a 16 year old adolescent.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How? Please explain because this president according to my calculations has...
Saying constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don’t believe me, directly to the American people, making disparaging comments, starting a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, starting a government shutdown hurting which he said he would be, “proud” to take responsibility for hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making ill advised political decisions, alienating some of our key allies, etc.
I’m sorry, should I go on? Or have I made my point in a rationale, comprehensive manner? This is concerning to me and to my fellow citizens as I firmly believe this president has a lack of political experience and thus, does not know how to properly run a large constitutionally based federal republic nation. So please explain this to me, please.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kirkcrawford6513 Its weird, but then why didnt the Republicans do something about it when they controlled both houses in Congress and also, even if I dont agree with it and people still do it you realize I cant force it on anyone to stop because doing that would be being a tyranny, I cant force my will on another human being they have to find it out by themselves. So before you go trying to accuse a party of doing something hideous and blaming it for something,
A). Why didn't the Repubs do anything from the point when Trump won the Whit House in January 20, 2017 to the Midterms in November of 2018.
Ex. I just realized, sorry.
B). Even if I dont agree with it, I cant physically stop someone from doing it, just because I support the party doesn't mean I support everything the party does and I can be a firm advocate against this. Or maybe I should just be an Independent like many millions are, this is a controversial issue that I happen to firmly not believe in and will always take a stand against no matter what, understood?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We're not that word which I wont repeat. But if that were true why is his approval ratings so low? Why did Hillary win the popular VOTE? What about the ACTUAL DOCUMENTS that Cohen provided to Congress showing the incredible possibility of illegal conduct?
You are entitled to your opinion, but my opinion is
This president has had the most tumultuous administration in U.S. history with, saying constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don’t believe me, directly to the American people, making disparaging comments on Women, Muslisms, and Hispanics and I though everyone who works hard and believes in America's values are American?, starting a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, starting a government shutdown hurting which he said he would be, “proud” to take responsibility for hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making ill advised political decisions, alienating some of our key allies, etc.
I’m sorry, should I go on? Or have I made my point in a rationale, comprehensive manner? This is concerning to me and to my fellow citizens as I firmly believe this president has a lack of political experience and thus, does not know how to properly run a large constitutionally based federal republic nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Rpeffles 92 Hey, I'm not from Indiana but can I just say...
I respect the state and its kind, hardworking people and your state does have so much to offer including delicious food, lovely sceneries, affordable living, great talent, beautiful architecture, splendid entertainment options, vibrant optimism, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our Indianian brothers and sisters, you guys and gals rock! 👍 😁.
Love from Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the great state of Indiana and it's awesome people :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@R-8.0 Excuse me, but how are we that word which I will not repeat.
This president literally has had the most tumultous administration in history with..
Saying constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don’t believe me, directly to the American people, making disparaging comments toward Women, Muslims, and Hispanics, starting a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, starting a government shutdown hurting which he said he would be, “proud” to take responsibility for hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making ill advised political decisions, alienating some of our key allies, etc.
I’m sorry, should I go on? Or have I made my point in a rationale, comprehensive manner? This is concerning to me and to my fellow citizens as I firmly believe this president has a lack of political experience and thus, does not know how to properly run a large constitutionally based federal republic nation. Please tell me, that this isnt true because it is. How does this help us? How? How?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
a) 57% of Americans don't support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls don't work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seared into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabilization throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenance, saving us a lot of money. These can include aerial and underground sensors, high tech drones, AI powered facial recognition, and human presence detection, according to the Guardian.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 21st century problem, especially when most Americans don't want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive than the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and let's use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How so? Because according to my calculations this President has so far...
This president has had the most tumultuous administration in U.S. history with the largest firing/turnover rate, saying constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don’t believe me, directly to the American people, making disparaging comments, starting a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, starting a government shutdown hurting which he said he would be, “proud” to take responsibility for hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making ill advised political decisions, alienating some of our key allies, etc.
I’m sorry, should I go on? Or have I made my point in a rationale, comprehensive manner? CNN is just doing its obligation as journalists to point a light on it and show it to the world and to the American people, who has a right to know what is happening in their government.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Dan Glove Yes, but not in the near future. It could very well be possible but it is still unproven and there are many scenarios that could go wrong.
Here is a quote of why it could go wrong from an article that I am reading on this subject:
“For computer scientists who study election software, online-voting programs are a security nightmare. They invite bad actors to slip in undetected and compromise election systems, leaving those systems susceptible to denial-of-service attacks, ransomware, malware, and vote flipping. In 2014, a team of computer scientists at a company in Portland, Oregon, that builds secure systems for the National Security Agency and the Department of Defense showed, in real time, how easy it is to change the contents of a voter’s PDF file as it travels over the Internet. They sent a video of their attack to secretaries of state and other election officials, and posted an explanatory video on YouTube, showing all the weak links in the online transmission of ballots. “This is not just a theoretical danger,” one of the researchers, Joe Kiniry, said at the time. “Votes are silently changed after they leave your computer and before they reach election officials. What’s more, there’s no trace of foul play.”
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/why-you-cant-just-vote-on-your-phone-during-the-pandemic/amp
Now imagine a country like China or Iran or North Korea trying to take advantage of that because it could happen. It’s just to risky!
I personally think we’re at least 20 more years from this happening on a wide scale.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Scott Shaffer Hey, I'm not from WV but can I just say...
I respect the state and its kind, hardworking people and your state does have so much to offer including delicious food, lovely sceneries, affordable living so people like I can fulfill their dreams of buying their own homes, great talent, awesome tight knit communities where people value one another, beautiful architecture, vibrant optimism, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our West Virginian brothers and sisters, you guys and gals rock! 👍 😁.
Love from Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the great state of WV and it's awesome people :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ZeroMass Excuse me you are titled to your opinion but could you please explain all the winnings that are going on, because according to my calculations this president has...
Saying constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don’t believe me, directly to the American people, making disparaging comments toward Women, Muslims, and Hispanics, starting a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, starting a government shutdown hurting which he said he would be, “proud” to take responsibility for hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making ill advised political decisions, alienating some of our key allies, etc.
I’m sorry, should I go on? Or have I made my point in a rationale, comprehensive manner? This is concerning to me and to my fellow citizens as I firmly believe this president has a lack of political experience and thus, does not know how to properly run a large constitutionally based federal republic nation. So would you please explain it to me, please.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What patriarchy? The truth is there is no such thing as a patriarchy. The so called patriarchy is a manifestation of biological differences between men and women. I’ll explain myself with some examples. For example, our lovely feminist friends hate that women are objectified. Men are objectified too. I agree that women are objectified more in ad campaigns for example than men. But why is this? Very simple. Men love to see naked women more, than women like to see naked men. Thats why there are way more men who watch porn for example. This is a thing of supply and demand. I’ll give another example. Carreer women are often seen as arrogant, while men are praised for their success. Is this a product of our ‘sexist’ culture or the ‘patriarchy’ as you wish or is there a biological explanation. The thing is in general men dont find a women who is very carreer minded very attractive. While women find men who have a great carreer really attractive. Thats also why you see for example way more old ugly rich men with hot young women than old rich ladies with hot young guys. The biological reason is that in ancient times, the role of the woman was to give birth to children, and care for the children. The male role was to protect the women and the children and make sure there would be food. These days its money which is the protection and the food of the ancient times. When a man marries a woman who has a great carreer, he isn’t needed anymore. He is ‘disposable’. So this is the biological reason of my second example. I’ll give a third one. Why aren’t there more women in STEM fields. This also is most likely because of biological reasons. Research has shown that men and women have different preferences since birth. For example baby boys preferred cars over dolls in general. And girls preferred dolls over cars. The researchers concluded this had everything to do with hormonal levels. In very feminist countries like Sweden where people are very free to choose their field of study. You see that the gap between males and females in STEM widens instead of shrinks. When you see this there is a very good indicator that something is biological and not cultural. Last example, why are there not as much women in politics as men. A study with a size of 10 000 people showed women are less interested than men in politics. The gap was even bigger in modern societies than in developing countries. So could it be that women are less interested in politics and thats why they dont like to run for office as much as men? Men and women have different interests. For example men like football way more, and men like cars more than women. Why is this? Biology?
Also in the USA there are almost as much men raped as women. This is because of the insane prison population. Does anyone care? No, instead as a society we joke about it, dont drop the soap in the shower… While countless of males are completely ruined between the prison walls. But nobody cares. When a female is raped there is massive outrage. Why not when a man is raped? On average men commit more suicide, are 4 times as likely to be homeless, get longer prison time for the same crime, lose custody battles 8 times more often, a way bigger part of combat deaths are male. If there was something as a patriarchy, then why are these things the way they are?
If there are other things you think are sexist, please tell me, and I’ll see if I can debunk them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@joule7256 Yes, in that contentions meeting with the key Democratic leaders he did say that. Also, some facts about the wall which I believe would make it ineffective in the first place...
a) 57% of Americans don't support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls don't work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seared into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabilization throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenance, saving us a lot of money. These can include aerial and underground sensors, high tech drones, AI powered facial recognition, and human presence detection, according to the Guardian.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 21st century problem, especially when most Americans don't want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive than the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and let's use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@privatejr2702 Lincoln? (kept the Union together), Washington? (established many key precedents for future presidents, such as term limits and a peaceful transition of power) Carter? (ineffective, but extremely kind and compassionate just look at his humanitarian work), FDR? (Successfully guided the country through two immense crises unparalleled in American history - the Great Depression and WWII), even TR? (morally reprehensible at times, but still a work-alcoholic progressive president who got a lot done - Panama Canal, Trust Busting, and National Parks Preservation - he was also the first sitting president to leave the US during his presidency).
With all due respect their are plenty of great presidents, lately in the past 30 years however we really haven’t seen any. Obama was consequential, but certainly not great (at least in my eyes).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@*/ Were richer, extremely diverse, have a greater role in thgeopolitical, stage, have some great, great talent from artists to musicians, we have many famous scientists, we created many of the world's famous companies, we have larger space, a stronger military, more resources, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Mstislaw AA That was a different time and a different country. The Soviet Union doesn't exist anymore, it's the Russian Federation now and under Putin it is an autocratic state with little to few allies, an economy that hasn't reached its full potential, shameful human rights violations, crackdowns by the state on the free press, and is embroiled in a seemingly endless series of destabilizing conflict(s)and crises with the West brought about by Putin's own actions. The Russian Federation is a crumbling state and one that, if led properly and had the correct democratic ideals, principles, and institutions could rise to its greatest potential---but at the moment it's just sad what's happening to it because I truly believe Russia, if it was led properly by reformers, could be a grand powerhouse for peace and democracy----sadly this isn't likely to happen 😔😔.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
a) 57% of Americans don't support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls don't work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seared into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabilization throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenance, saving us a lot of money. These can include aerial and underground sensors, high tech drones, AI powered facial recognition, and human presence detection, according to the Guardian.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 21st century problem, especially when most Americans don't want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive than the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and let's use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How so, by doing their jobs? They have thus far, I believe, reported on many actions of this adminstration including...
This president has had the most tumultuous administration in U.S. history with the largest firing/turnover rate, saying constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don’t believe me, directly to the American people, making disparaging comments, starting a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, starting a government shutdown hurting which he said he would be, “proud” to take responsibility for hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making ill advised political decisions, alienating some of our key allies, etc.
I’m sorry, should I go on? Or have I made my point in a rationale, comprehensive manner? This is concerning to me and to my fellow citizens as I firmly believe this president has a lack of political experience and thus, does not know how to properly run a large constitutionally based federal republic nation. So please explain how by doing this, they are that? They are doing their jobs as journalists of reporting the news so the world, and the American people know how the US government is operating.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I wrote a Google Doc on my case against this wall, here I copied and pasted it below if you would like to read it.....
a) 57% of Americans don't support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls don't work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seared into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabilization throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenance, saving us a lot of money. These can include aerial and underground sensors, high tech drones, AI powered facial recognition, and human presence detection, according to the Guardian.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 21st century problem, especially when most Americans don't want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive than the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and let's use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.
a) 57% of Americans don't support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls don't work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seared into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabilization throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenance, saving us a lot of money.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 20st century problem, especially when most Americans dont want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive then the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and lets use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.
Sorry, accidentally copied and pasted it twice but here is my case. What do you guys and gals think? Anyway, have a lovely day and let's not let partisanship and strong political hatred/divide hurt us as a nation this is just my view. If you do respond or comment please try to be civil and respectful of others.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
a) 57% of Americans don't support a border wall along the Southern border, by a Gallup poll as of June 2018. In another poll CBS reports that 59% of Americans do not support a border wall along the Southern border as of Mid-November 2018. The president must adhere to the will of the people as his mandate requires.
b) Historically walls don't work, look at the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall, the latter which is seared into people's collective memory for what the pain it brought about and its ultimate downfall. Walls just usually bring about more violence and destabilization throughout history.
c) Increased technology, like I said before, is not that cheap however it is much, much more
cheaper than the tens of billions of dollars than what a wall would cost in workers, materials, and maintenance, saving us a lot of money. These can include aerial and underground sensors, high tech drones, AI powered facial recognition, and human presence detection, according to the Guardian.
In conclusion, why use a centuries old solution to solve a 21st century problem, especially when most Americans don't want it, they rarely succeed in their objectives, and it's extremely more expensive than the options I and many others are saying which is THE USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY. WE LIVE IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE UNRIVALED IN GLOBAL HISTORY SO WHY INSTEAD OF USING OLD AND EXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS WHY NOT USE MORE EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN HELP SECURE OUR NATION'S SOUTHERN BORDER(S).
BTW, I'm not yelling just empathizing strongly my position in my closing arguments.
Technology is upon us and let's use it the right way, the way to protect our citizens effectively.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Farming and Rails Of southwestern Iowa Hey, I'm not from Iowa but can I just say...
I respect the state and its kind, hardworking people and your state does have so much to offer including delicious food, tranquil sceneries, affordable living so people like I can fulfill their dreams of buying their own homes, great talent, beautiful architecture, vibrant optimism, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our Iowan brothers and sisters, you guys and gals rock! 👍 😁.
Love from Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the great state of Iowa and it's awesome people :)
So to answer your question no it doesn't sound right, because Iowa's awesome and it's on my top 3 finalist for states I'm seriously thinking about moving to!
1
-
1
-
@datdawg1751 How so? Have you seen the million mile Tundra, 1.2 million mile Tacoma, 500,000 mile Honda, million mile Honda, 805,000 mile Tacoma, and many, many other cars with hundreds of thousands of miles on them. I mean, they have to be doing something right to produce cars that are last with so much miles on them, right?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ashtyn Animations But his non-deleted account
Hey, I'm not from Indiana but can I just say...
I respect the state and its kind, hardworking people and your state does have so much to offer including delicious foods, lovely sceneries, affordable living so people like I can fulfill their dreams of buying their own homes, great talent, beautiful architecture, vibrant optimism, splendid sports, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our Indianian brothers and sisters, you guys and gals rock! 👍 😁.
Love from Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the state of Indiana and it's awesome people :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Skyris Hey, I'm not from New Mexico but can I just say...
I respect the state and its kind, hardworking people and your state does have so much to offer including delicious food, lovely sceneries, great talent, beautiful architecture, vibrant optimism, splendid cultural diversity, a rich history, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our New Mexican brothers and sisters, you guys and gals rock! 👍 😁.
Love from Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the state of New Mexico and it's awesome people :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Respectfully disagree, and many Americans would disagree with you too. They are reliable, quality, fuel efficient, helps environment by producing less emissions than gas guzzling trucks and big vehicles, affordable, easy to maintain, and exciting to drive. Did you know that the Toyota Camry was the best selling car in the US in 2018.
https://www.businessinsider.com/best-selling-sedans-in-america-in-2018-2018-8
So if the consumers dont agree with what your saying and the market is still there and people keep buying them as they do now what your saying it wont happen and they will still keep making them and selling them to an ethusiatic audience willing to buy them in large numbers. The power of an engine isn't important, what is is reliability, quality, fuel efficiency, and ease to maintain and that is what these cars, that is what reports have found, and thats what the American public likes and agrees about these cars because: Why would they consistently buy them in such large numbers?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JTeeBee55 No, just dont believe in a purely irrational, unsubstianted view point that believes that this man can do no wrong which he has done already. Started a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, saying he was "proud" to start a shutdown hurting 800,000 government workers, making constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don't believe me, making disparaging comments toward others whether on social media or on TV, making ill advised geopolitical decisions, which Jim Mattis resigned over because of his experience and knowledge he knew it was wrong, and alienating some of our most key allies abroad.
And if you say, oh the economy is great you do realize the president inherited the economy from President Obama who was the one that got us out of the recession and set up the economy on the path where it is now.
1
-
@JTeeBee55 Fine, even if there is no impeachable offenses how can you say there, with all the evidence that I have stated to the contrary, in a good conscience say that he is fixing our nation. You might say that they do lie to the American people but how, there is a trade war that he started no lie there, there is a government shutdown where he said he would be "proud" to take responsibility for the shutdown no lie there, do the demeaning tweets help our nation NO, do the misleading statements help our nation NO, do the alienating of some of our key allies help our nation NO. DO ALL OF THIS FIX THE PROBLEMS OF OUR COUNTRY, SHORT ANSWER NOPE. Also, people are allowed to change their minds without being judged as hypocritical, right. Even if they did that because of the President it is Washington after all partisanship is normal and even the Repubs do it too.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ozzy Osbourne Hey, I'm not from Texas but can I just say...
I respect the state and its kind, hardworking people and your state does have so much to offer including delicious food, lovely sceneries, terrific towns and cities, great talent, awesome tight knit communities, beautiful architecture, a fantastic art scene, vibrant optimism, and so much healthy recreational activity for the family :)
I want you to know we care about our Texas brothers and sisters, you guys and gals rock! 👍 😁.
Love from Connecticut which you can consider an ally to the great state of Texas and it's awesome people :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Excuse me, but have you taken a look at the actions of this presidential administration and the president himself? Have you? Because I have...
Saying constant misleading statements, which are on Fact Checker with actual evidence if you don’t believe me, directly to the American people, making disparaging comments about Women, Muslims, and Hispanics, starting a trade war hurting American farmers and other workers, starting a government shutdown hurting which he said he would be, “proud” to take responsibility hurting 800,000 federal government employees, making ill advised political decisions, alienating some of our key allies, etc.
I’m sorry, should I go on? Or have I made my point in a rationale, comprehensive manner? This is concerning to me and to my fellow citizens as I firmly believe this president has a lack of political experience and thus, does not know how to properly run a large constitutionally based federal republic nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1