Comments by "ScorpioBornIn69" (@ScorpioBornIn69) on "'Any Questions?': Trump Takes Question After Question From Peter Doocy | FULL" video.

  1. Canada? No. Greenland? Yes. Reason why I oppose Canada is because more than half of the voters there vote for socialists and if made a state with 40 million people, that'll be 55-60 Electoral Votes going to future socialist presidents. We cannot have that. Also, will have some impact on Congressional votes with two more senate seats and 50 - 60 more House seats. I see a split in the Senate but the majority of the House districts would be in liberal strong hold areas which will favor the socialists in the House. Therefore I say no for Canada. Greenland with a population of just 55,000 total, that would have little impact on Presidential Elections with 3 Electoral Votes. As for Congress with two more Senate and House seats, it will mostly lean toward being conservative.
    2
  2. Canada? No. Greenland? Yes. Reason why I oppose Canada is because more than half of the voters there vote for socialists and if made a state with 40 million people, that'll be 55-60 Electoral Votes going to future socialist presidents. We cannot have that. Also, will have some impact on Congressional votes with two more senate seats and 50 - 60 more House seats. I see a split in the Senate but the majority of the House districts would be in liberal strong hold areas which will favor the socialists in the House. Therefore I say no for Canada. Greenland with a population of just 55,000 total, that would have little impact on Presidential Elections with 3 Electoral Votes. As for Congress with two more Senate and House seats, it will mostly lean toward being conservative.
    1
  3. Canada? No. Greenland? Yes. Reason why I oppose Canada is because more than half of the voters there vote for socialists and if made a state with 40 million people, that'll be 55-60 Electoral Votes going to future socialist presidents. We cannot have that. Also, will have some impact on Congressional votes with two more senate seats and 50 - 60 more House seats. I see a split in the Senate but the majority of the House districts would be in liberal strong hold areas which will favor the socialists in the House. Therefore I say no for Canada. Greenland with a population of just 55,000 total, that would have little impact on Presidential Elections with 3 Electoral Votes. As for Congress with two more Senate and House seats, it will mostly lean toward being conservative.
    1
  4. @ I'm still iffy about it because of the effects of it on future elections seeing that majority of the people voted for radical progressives like Trudeau. This is a concern and that is why I oppose it. As for Greenland I say yes and take it.
    1
  5. Canada? No. Greenland? Yes. Reason why I oppose Canada is because more than half of the voters there vote for socialists and if made a state with 40 million people, that'll be 55-60 Electoral Votes going to future socialist presidents. We cannot have that. Also, will have some impact on Congressional votes with two more senate seats and 50 - 60 more House seats. I see a split in the Senate but the majority of the House districts would be in liberal strong hold areas which will favor the socialists in the House. Therefore I say no for Canada. Greenland with a population of just 55,000 total, that would have little impact on Presidential Elections with 3 Electoral Votes. As for Congress with two more Senate and House seats, it will mostly lean toward being conservative.
    1