Comments by "Catherine Birch" (@catherinebirch8263) on "Biden Weighs High-Stakes Response to Iran After Deadly Attack in Jordan | Pod Save the World" video.

Three. Soldiers. At a time where the US is arming, financing, and supplying political and military supported for the massacre of ten thousand times more civilians in Gaza. Ten THOUSAND times more. Here are some relevant questions that Tommy and Ben apparently didn't even think to ask. Why does the US have military deployments in Jordan in the first place? Or anywhere else in the Middle-East for that matter. What role does that establishment play in general US dealt death and destruction in the Middle East? The whole thing about attacking Iran ... the US crushed Iran's secular democracy way back in the 1950's. For cheaper oil access. Leading to the installation of an oppressive Caliphate there; after the mullahs played a major role in kicking out brutal dictator the Americans installed in its place. At what point is the US going to be content with the amount of damage it continues to cause there?
9
@user36112 Antisemitic used to mean anti-Jewish, which is something pretty awful. Then it meant anyone who wasn't a Zionist. Now it just means anyone who doesn't like what Israel continues to do to the Palestinians. It's trending towards becoming a badge of honour these days. I wonder what new word they'll come up with to mean anti-Jewish? I suggest "anti-Jewish".
4
And here I was thinking that the US had selected Australia to be one of the locations for its next war. Which frankly never bodes well for any country. And as for fighting with (as opposed to against) US forces - I've heard some veteran stories about how they dreaded having to fight anywhere near US forces in WWII and Vietnam. Not to mention how the US knowingly sank Japanese ships loaded with allied (but not American) prisoners in WWII. Fortunately I hedged my forecast with "...unless the US decides to attack some other country before it attacks China."
3
Wow! I just saw an MSNBC clip of Joe Biden saying he holds Iran responsible for the recent killing of the three American SOLDIERS at a US military base near the Iran border because Iran supplied the weapons to the people who did it. That must the the closest he's come to admitting responsibility for the 10 THOUSAND times more deaths of the CIVILIANS recently killed by Israel in Gaza.
2
At this point you really have to question Joe Biden's Muslim thing. Does he seriously intend to use the death of 3 American soldiers as an excuse to attack another country? Biden was in favour of the second American invasion of Iraq (by George Bush II, the first was by George Bush I). He continues to finance, arm, and provide political and military support for the massacre of tens of thousands of Palestinians. I've read that Biden believes the death of his son Beau might be attributable to toxic burn pits in Iraq. Could he blame Muslims for that? I mean, the burn pits were created by the US and presumably have killed far more Iraqis than US military. And the US invasions cause horrific damage in Iraq itself and the Middle East in general. However I doubt either of these things factor into Biden's world view.
1